MAIN REFERENCE LISTING
Main Reference Listing
1. Abelson, R., “Cause and Reason in History”, in Hook, S., (ed.), Philosophy and History, New York, New York University Press, 1963, pp. 167–173, (D).
2. Abrahams, P., “A Review of Sociology and History: Methods”, Past and Present, [United Kingdom], Vol. 52, Aug. 1971, pp. 118–125, (H).
3. Abrams, P., “History, Sociology, Historical Sociology”, Past and Present, 1980, pp. 3–16, (H).
4. Abu Al-Haj, Rif'at, “Muntalaqat Nathariyah Fi Manhajiyat Al-Tarikh Al-Libi”, [Theoretical Points in the Methodology of Libyan History], Majallat al-Buhuth al-Tarikhiya, [Libya], Vol. 1, No. 2, 1979, pp. 65–83, (J).
5. Acton, H.B., “The Philosophy of History”, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 1939–40, (B).
6. Adamus, J., “Nowe Drogi Historii Spolecznej”, [New Roads of Social History], Kwartalnik Historyczny, Vol. 67, No. 3, 1960, pp. 699–711, (H).
7. Adelman, H., “Rational Explanation Reconsidered: Case Studies and the Hempel-Dray Model”, History and Theory, Vol. XIII, 1974, (A).
8. Agassi, J., “Towards an Historiography of Science”, History and Theory, Vol. 2 (suppl. 2), 1962, pp. 1–117, (A).
9. Aitken, H.G.J., (ed.), Explorations in Enterprise, Cambridge, Mass., Harvard Univ. Press, 1965, (E).
10. Aitken, H.G.J., (ed.), The Social Sciences in Historical Study, Social Science Research Bulletin, No. 64, New York, 1954., (H).
11. Aitken, H.G.J., “On the Present State of Economic History”, Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science, Vol. 26, Feb. 1960, pp. 87–95, (E).
12. Aitken, H.G.J., “The Future of Entrepreneurial Research”, Explorations in Entrepreneurial History, 2nd ser., Vol. I, 1963, pp. 3–9, (E).
13. Aitken, H.G.J., “Entrepreneurial Research: The History of an Intellectual Innovation”, in Explorations in Enterprise, Cambridge, Mass., Harvard Univ. Press, 1965, pp. 3–19, (E).
14. Aitken, H.G.J., “The Entrepreneurial Approach to Economic History”, in Taylor, G.R. and Ellsworth, L.F., (eds.), Approaches to American Economic History, Charlottesville, Univ. Press of Virginia, 1971, pp. 1–16, (E).
15. Aitken, H.G.J., “Myth and Measurement: The Innis Tradition in Economic History”, J. of Can. Studies, Vol. 12, No. 5, 1977, pp. 96–105, (EFI).
16. Akamatsu, P., “Furansu Ni Okeru Saikin No Shigakukenkyu No Dōkō To Nihonshi Kenkyu”, [Recent Trend of Historical Studies of Japan in France], Shakoikeizaishigaku, [Socio-Economic History], [Japan], Vol. 42, No. 1, 1976, pp. 83–97, (AKL).
17. Alatoseva, A.I. and Kirieva, R.A., “Viec Nghien Cuu Lich Su Khoa Hoc Lich Su O Lien Xo Trong Giai Doan Hien Nay”, [Current Studies in Historiography in the U.S.S.R.], Nghien Cuu Lich Su, [Vietnam], No. 6, 1981, pp. 49–57, 64, (AJK).
18. Albert, E.M., “Causality in the Social Sciences”, Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 51, 1954, pp. 695–706, (DH).
19. Albrecht, G., “Zur Stellung historischer Forschungsmethoden und nicht-reaktiver Methoden im System der empirischen Sozialforschung”, [On the Position of Historical Research Methods and Non-Reactive Methods Within the System of Empirical Social Research], Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, [West Germany], Vol. 16, 1972, pp. 242–293, (J).
20. Albrow, M., “Legal Positivism and Bourgeois Materialism: Max Weber's View of the Sociology of Law”, British Journal of Law and Society, Vol. 2, No. 1, 1975, pp. 14–31, (GHI).
21. Alchian, A.A., “Uncertainty, Evolution and Economic Theory”, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 58, June 1950, pp. 211–221, (E).
22. Alexander, M., “Zur Verwendung von Lochkarten, elektronischer Datenverarbeitung und statistischen Methoden in der sowjetischen Historiographie”, [On the use of punch-cards, electronic data processing and statistical methods in Soviet historiography], Jahrbücher für Geschichte Osteuropas, [West Germany], Vol. 22, No. 1, 1974, pp. 88–124, (J).
23. Allen, F.L., The Big Change, 1900–1950, New York, Harper and Row; Bantam paper edition, 1961, ( H).
24. Allswang, J.M. and Floud, R., An Introduction to Quantitative Methods for Historians, Princeton, Princeton U. Pr., 1973, (F).
25. Almas, D., “Conceptul De Sinteza A Istoriei Universale La N. lorga”, [N. lorga's Conception of the Synthesis of World History], Analele University Bucuresti: Istorie, [Rumania], Vol. 22, No. 1, 1973, pp. 123–133, (AJ).
26. Altamira, R., “Posibilidades de Escribir la Historia Contemporanea”, [Possibilites of Writing Contemporary History], Boletin del Archivio General de laNaeión, [Venezuela], Vol. 59, No. 216, 1969, pp. 99–104, (AJ).
27. Alter, G., “History and Quantitative Data: A Review”, Historical Methods, Vol. 14, No. 3, 1981, pp. 145–148, (EF).
28. Altmann, E., “On the Logical and Historical Method”, Deut. Z. Phil., [Germany], Vol. 28, 1980, pp. 1197–1206, (J).
29. Alvord, C.W., “The New History”, Nation, Vol. 94, May 9, 1912, pp. 457–459, (F).
30. Anderk, O.F., “Panoramic Approach”, Wissenschaft und Weltbild, Vol. 8, No. 1, 1955, pp. 49–56, (AJ).
31. Anderk, O.F., “Das Integrationsproblem in der Geschichtswissenschaft”, [The Problem of Integration in Historical Science], Schweizer Beiträge zur Allgemeinen Geschichte, Vol. 15, 1957, pp. 209–248, (AJ).
32. Anderk, O.F., “A Plea for Theoretical History”, History and Theory, Vol. 4, No. 1, 1964, pp. 27–56, (M).
33. Anderk, O.F., “Arnold J. Toynbee und die Problematik der geschichtlichen Sinndeutung”, [Arnold J. Toynbee and the Problem of the Interpretation of Historical Meaning], Welt als Geschichte, Vol. 20, No. 3, 1960, pp. 143–156, (BJ).
34. Anderson, W. C., “Dispensing with the Fixed Point: Scientific Law as Historical Event”, Hist Theor., Vol. 22, 1983, pp. 264–277, (G).
35. Andrea, C.G., “Historia På ; Nya Vägar”, [New Ways in History], History Tidskrift, [Sweden], No. 2, 1967, pp. 247–254, (AJ).
36. Andreano, R., “Four Recent Studies in Economic History: Some Conceptual Implications”, in Andreano, R., (ed.), New Views on American Economic Development, Cambridge, 1965, pp. 13–26, (E).
37. Andreano, R.L., (ed.), The New Economic History: Recent Papers on Methodology, New York, Wiley, 1970, (E).
38. Angermeier, H., “Historisches Denken in der Geschichtsphilosophie und in der Geschichtswissenschaft”, [Historical Thought in the Philosophy of History and in Historical Science], Historische Zeitschrift, [West Germany], Vol. 190, No. 3, 1960, pp. 497–516, (B).
39. Apter, D.E., “Radicalisation and Embourgeoisement: Some Hypotheses for a Comparative Study of History”, Journal of Interdisciplinary History, Vol. 1, No. 3, 1971, pp. 511–526, (B).
40. Arab-Ogly, E.A., “Filosofiya Istoriya Arnol'da Toinbi”, [Arnold Toynbee's Philosophy of History], Voprosy Filosofii, No. 4, 1955, pp. 113–121, (BJ).
41. Arcila Fariás, E., “La Historia Cuantitativa Y Sus Problemas”, [Quantitative History and its Problems], Histórica, [Peru], Vol. 5, No. 2, 1981, pp. 141–147, (FJ).
42. Arendt, H., “The Modern Concept of History”, Review Politics, Vol. 20, No. 4, 1958, pp. 570–590, (A).
43. Arkel, D. van, “Clio and Minerva; Social History and Social Science”, Acta Historiae Neerlandica, [Netherlands], No. 4, 1970, pp. 1–19, (H).
44. Arnold, K., “Geschichtswissenschaft und elektronische Date...