A transborder project of modernity in Batavia, c. 1900s
Didi Kwartanada
Education would be dynamite for the rigid caste systems of colonies.
(Kennedy 1945: 311)
It is to be remembered that the members of the Tiong Hoa Hwe Koan are among the most intelligent and progressive of the Chinese people.
(Denyes 1911: 30)
This chapter focuses on the kaoem moeda or the âenlightened Chineseâ in Java at the turn of the twentieth century. For hundreds of years, the Chinese prospered economically in the colonial Dutch East Indies, since they successfully served as mediators between the Dutch colonizers and the local native population. However, in their daily lives they experienced discrimination in legal matters and it was not easy for their children to receive a European education. Toward the end of the nineteenth century, reacting against their legal marginalization, several elites within the Chinese community led the way to urging the Dutch and the other communities in the Indies to consider the Chinese as âmodern subjectsâ of the Dutch Crown. These efforts at updating their status were accompanied by parallel efforts in modernizing or reforming the community. One of the most important modernizing endeavors was the establishment of a âmodern Chineseâ school, complete with a âmodernâ curriculum, teaching methods and, of course, teachers. What remains remarkable was that they achieved their goal without the help of the colonial government, but by cleverly developing their transborder trade network into one that purveyed new knowledge and cultural products.
The kaoem moeda or âkaoem moeda bangsa Tjina,â which can be rendered literally in English as the âyouth of the Chinese nation,â was a term used by a group of Chinese to describe themselves at the turn of the twentieth century in Java.1 I have translated this term as âenlightened Chineseâ because members of this group often described themselves as the carrier of âthe lightâ (Ml.: terang) of progress, in contrast to those whom they described as living in conservatism or an âage of darknessâ (Ml.: djaman kegelapan).2 The kaoem moeda consisted predominantly of men and women who saw themselves as progressive in their outlook. Many of them had been successful in business and were journalists, writers or community leaders who had some form of education, often in a private home environment or some exposure to âWesternâ or âEuropeanâ education, for instance in schools established by Christian missionaries. While many of the kaoem moeda were born in the Indies and came from families that were long settled there, there were kaoem moeda who were newly arrived immigrants from China. In general, the kaoem moeda can be defined not so much by education, family background or immigrant history as by a common purpose. They were not satisfied with their position as second-class citizens in the new world of the twentieth century and believed that only by embracing modernity could they reach a âcivilizedâ status in colonial Indonesia.
This chapter features what was probably the most remarkable yet controversial achievement of the kaoem moeda: the establishment of the Tiong Hoa Hwee Koan (literally, the Chinese Association, henceforth THHK) school which was founded in Batavia on 17 March 1901. Although there have been several studies of THHK, much remains to be clarified.3 The existing literature on the THHK movement tends to overlook the importance of the kaoem moeda's transborder connections in the establishment of the THHK school in Batavia.4 For example, Mona Lohanda provided interesting analyses of the THHK officers' occupations, dialect backgrounds and their importance for the organization, but she did not comment on how these drew on a wider transborder network (Lohanda 1996: 110â26). This chapter maps the transborder connections of the kaoem moeda that provided inspiration and enabled them to establish the school.
âModernityâ in the Dutch East Indies context has often been seen as mainly âDutchâ in origin. In this chapter, I argue that the kaoem moeda were not just inspired by Dutch modernity but drew inspiration from a range of non-Dutch sources. Drawing on their global trade networks, they were able to obtain resources, especially teachers and teaching materials for the THHK school. Thus, the kaoem moeda succeeded in this initial attempt at circumventing Dutch authority to build their own schools, prompting the Dutch to reconsider the wisdom of not providing any education for their Chinese subjects in the Indies.
The existing literature also regards the THHK school as the first attempt to build a modern school for the Chinese in Java. Recent writings indicate, however, that there were earlier schools built by the Chinese in Java that experimented with a modern curriculum. A recent essay by Claudine Salmon reveals the existence of a âmodernâ Chinese school named Nanyang Xunmeng Guan (literally, the âSouth Seas Training Schoolâ). This Confucian school was established by Tjioe Ping Wie, who came from a prominent local Chinese family in Surabaya and who studied in China, where he obtained a licentiate degree. Tjioe then returned to his hometown and established this new school (Salmon 2009: 48â49). Another example is the establishment of a Singapore-oriented school in Batavia in 1892. The origin of this school lies in the visit in 1887 of a Manchu envoy who was actually an overseas Chinese from Penang. While this school turned out to be unsuccessful, it showcased the transborder networks of Chinese communities in Java which connected them to Singapore, Penang and China, underscoring how Java's Chinese utilized these ties for the betterment of their children's education. Nine years later, the same story was repeated as the THHK appeared in Batavia. The main difference was that the network supporting the THHK school was much more global in scope (Nio 1940).
On the kaoem moeda and being âmodernâ in colonial Java
The new age of the twentieth century offered many novelties to Asians living in colonial Java. The main inspiration, especially for educated people, regardless of their ethnicity, was the advent of a Europe-centered modernity. Takashi Shiraishi, for example, uses the term kaoem moeda in a non-racialized way to describe the generation of Dutch-educated youth at the turn of the twentieth century. In the Dutch East Indies, according to Shiraishi, Dutch modernity was all the rage and it was exemplified by the popularity of Dutch words used by Dutch-educated youth, such as vooruitgang (progress), opheffing (uplifting), ontwikkeling (development) and opvoeding (upbringing).These words signified forms of progress (Shiraishi 1990: 27). There was also a strong association of modernity with being âcivilized,â which was also understood in Dutch terms. In the eyes of the Dutch colonizers, a perfect Chinese was âa highly civilized, Dutch-speaking and Christian Chineseâ (Anon. 1909: 5).
It was not surprising that Western knowledge found admirers among the Chinese, such as one Peranakan Chinese from Makassar who sent a letter to the Governor General. He had exclaimed that âthe science of the Dutch nation, who rule over us here in the Indies, is the perfect learning, as it is used around the world by various nations.â5 As Shiraishi argues, mastery of the Dutch language was âthe key to open the modern world and ageâ (Shiraishi 1990: 90). The language provided âaccess to the Dutch world in the Indiesâ and the Dutch âexemplified modernityâ (Shiraishi 1990: 90). Therefore, anyone educated in the Dutch system would strive to master Westersche beschaving (Western civilization) because being considered a beschaafd (civilized) person was one of the ultimate goals in life. The struggle to be âcivilizedâ and, thus, equal to the Dutch and other Europeans was a common phenomenon in Asia at the turn of the twentieth century (cf. Winichakul 2000 and Hirano 1993). Because of their pariah status, the Chinese of Java were even more exposed to this pressure to strive for a civilized status than the Javanese. In the late nineteenth century, due to criticisms from Dutch politicians and journalists who witnessed extreme poverty among the Javanese, the Dutch government adopted an âethical policyâ to improve the lives of the Javanese. These critics put a large share of the blame for the poverty and misery of Javanese on the Chinese, calling them âthe bloodsuckers of the Javaneseâ (bloedzuigers der Javanen) (see also Lohanda 2003: 22â30).
Another significant factor contributing to the striving to be âmodernâ among the kaoem moeda was the widespread âevilâ image of the Chinese in the nineteenth- century Indies. In the mid-nineteenth century, during the pacification of West Borneo, the Dutch military commander called the Chinese âthe most immoral of all immoral nations,â who would âonly listen to forceâ to mend their ways (Moor 1989: 59). Another officer admitted the importance of the Chinese, but at the same time was derogatory toward them: âIf it weren't for the Chinese, we would have missed out on a lot of things, but still we despised those dog eatersâ (Dharmowijono 2001: 226). Dutch authors enhanced this negative image through their novels about life in the Indies. The âmiscreantâ (aterling) and âcunningâ (sluw) Chinese were among the common stereotypes of the Chinese in Dutch Indies novels from the late colonial period (Dharmowijono 2004). It is not surprising that the ethical policy supporters deliberately painted a ânegative picture about the Chinese involvement in a wide range of economic activitiesâ (Dharmowijono 2004: 171). It is related to their role as middlemen in economic life, in which the Chinese were active in trade, money lending, opium and tax farming, and other âpariahâ activities, considered âdirty jobsâ by the Javanese and Europeans (see Carey 1984).
Therefore, the late nineteenth century was not a good time for the Chinese. The Dutch put severe restrictions on Chinese children entering European schools; they had to live in ghettos and apply for travel passes if they wanted to go anywhere. The long-time source of colonial government income, the revenue farm, was abolished and changed into a government monopoly. The rising Japanese, fellow Asians, were given European legal status in 1899, leaving the Chinese to experience themselves as second-class âforeign orientals.â How could they then achieve âcivilizedâ status and, at the same time, be âmodernâ?
The kaoem moeda and the establishment ...