Production, Distribution and Trade: Alternative Perspectives

Essays in honour of Sergio Parrinello

Adriano Birolo, Duncan Foley, Heinz D. Kurz, Bertram Schefold, Ian Steedman, Adriano Birolo, Duncan Foley, Heinz D. Kurz, Bertram Schefold, Ian Steedman

• Publisher: Routledge
• Year: 2010
• eBook ISBN: 9781136948466
• Topic: Business
• Subtopic: Business General
• Index: Business

This collection brings together significant new contributions to the Sraffa--based theories of production and distribution, from post-Keynesian arguments concerning monetary and macro economics to the history of thought and methodology. All of the authors are well established authorities in their field, and in this book they add stimulating and original pieces of analysis to the contemporary literature.

Production, Distribution and Trade is divided into three parts. The first explores analytical issues in production and exchange theory, the second examines Postkeynesian Macroeconomics and the final part includes essays on the history of economic thought and methodology. This collection has been written in honour of Sergio Parrinello and is a fitting tribute to his untiring efforts to stimulate discussion among Classicists, Marxists, Postkeynesians, and Evolutionists.

The book is a clear and convincing attempt to prove that an alternative paradigm to mainstream economics is alive and thriving and to argue that these perspectives shed better light on current economic problems, both as diagnosis and in terms of policy conclusions. The book will be of interest to Economics postgraduate students and researchers working in the Classical and Postkeynesian tradition.

Part I
Analytical issues in production and exchange theory

1
Bads as joint products in a linear production system

Eiji Hosoda*

1 Introduction

The classical economic theory rehabilitated by Sraffa (1960) has had a great impact on economists who work on the reproducibility of a capitalist economy and distribution of income. It is really amazing to see that not only nonmainstream economists but mainstream ones are deeply affected by the rehabilitation of classical economics. It is quite natural to develop further the idea of reproducibility of a pure capitalist economy in order to capture more complicated aspects of a modern capitalist economy where environmental issues among others are gaining more serious attention. Obviously, sustainable development has become an unavoidable concept for human beings, and sustainability is a natural extension of reproducibility of a capitalist economy.

To develop an economic theory in this direction, one important problem must be sorted out and answered; how one deals properly with residuals, which may be required neither for consumption nor for production, in an economic model. The purpose of this chapter is to consider this problem following the classical tradition, and demonstrate how a linear production model based upon the tradition can contribute to the understanding of sustainable development.

This problem has been ignored for such a long time, evidenced by the fact that the assumption of free disposal has been adopted. It is quite interesting to see that this assumption was adopted by both mainstream and non-mainstream economists. It was such a convenient assumption that it was hard for quite a few economists to dispense with it.

It must, however, be remembered that such a distinguished scholar as Debreu (1962) tackles the problem in a rather early stage of the history of the general equilibrium analysis. He proves the existence of an equilibrium solution without depending upon the free-disposal assumption in an abstract economic model. Quite a few researchers follow his research agenda, and develop an elegant model without the assumption (Hart and Kuhn 1975; Bergstrom 1976; and Gay 1979). One common feature of their highly sophisticated general equilibrium models is that prices of commodities which are disposed of must be negative.¹ Consequently, they have shown that commodities in a broad sense consist of not only goods but also bads.

A further important contribution to the problem comes from a different school, namely, a modern classical economist. Franke (1986) analyzes a Sraffian type of general joint production model, using the concept of a cost-minimizing system. He tries to show that a classical notion of equilibrium holds valid in a more general setting which reflects realities, getting rid of the assumption of free disposal. As in the cases above, it is shown that prices of some commodities may be negative, when an equality system is adopted for description of a quantity aspect of an economy.

He notices the significance of negatively priced commodities (discommodities) more than the mainstream economists we have mentioned above, and explains the meaning of negative prices. Since negatively priced commodities, namely bads, are given more concrete meaning as waste than the previous studies, costly disposal processes and demand for bads are naturally introduced and well explained in his model.

To the best of the author’s knowledge, Lager (2001) is one of the most comprehensive studies on reproducibility of a capitalist economy in this line.² Although he inherits the spirit of modern classical economists, he is more conscious of the problem of bads as an environmental issue, and deals with the longrun classical equilibrium with costly disposal processes more elegantly than previous researchers by means of a linear complementary theory.

One of the characteristics of his model is that restriction of free disposal is carefully introduced into his model, in the sense that a certain amount of disposal of residuals may be allowed instead of zero emission, although free disposal is restricted. Thus, whether some commodities may be goods or free goods is endogenously determined.

Yet, a more interesting feature of this chapter is that whether commodities in a broad sense may be goods or bads is shown to depend upon economic parameters as well as being endogenously determined. This means that residuals from production processes may possibly be resources which are positively priced, just like ordinary resources. Clearly, some residuals are bads or more simply waste which must be treated properly on a daily basis. In this way, the relativity of residuals’ nature is revealed in a very persuasive way.

Kurz (2006) surveys the goods/bads problem in the traditional theory of joint production, demonstrating that quite a few classical economists have noticed that some commodities may be negatively priced and they have tried to formulate the problem in one way or another. It is revealed that, although the existence of bads and activation of costly disposal processes have not been satisfactorily theorized, the problem itself has been debated among some classical economists.

By means of basic concepts and elementary diagrams, he also shows how one can deal with the costly disposal problem, following the classical tradition. From his argument, he concludes as follows:

One of the lessons the above example teaches us is that there is generally no a priori distinction possible between goods or commodities on the one hand and bads or disco...

Table of contents

• Routledge studies in the history of economics
• Contents
• Contributors
• Introduction
• Part I Analytical issues in production and exchange theory
• Part II Post-Keynesian macroeconomics
• Part III History of economic thought and methodology
• Index