1 Introduction
The struggles and triumphs of staging gender and race in contemporary African American playrights
Philip C. Kolin
Black male playwrights historically have had a commanding voice in American theatre. In the 1930s, Langston Hughesâs Mulatto (1935) was the longest running play by an African American playwright on Broadway. In 1941, Richard Wright adapted his widely known novel Native Son (1941) for the stage. In the 1960s, the protest plays of Amiri Baraka and Ed Bullins received resounding critical attention and productions. In 1970, Charles Gordoneâs No Place to be Somebody was the first play by an African American dramatist to receive a Pulitzer, and in 1981 Charles Fullerâs Soldierâs Play also won this prestigious award. The plays of August Wilson (twice a Pulitzer winner), beginning with Ma Raineyâs Black Bottom (1984), earned him âthe stature of premier theatrical mythographer of the African American experienceâ (Marra 123).
But African American women playwrights are also taking their place as the leaders of the American theatre, creating their own theatrical space, history and mythos. While they are the heirs of Lorraine Hansberryâs legacy, perhaps the most widely taught and staged African American woman dramatist, most of the playwrights represented in this collection have radically departed from her realistic techniques and boldly interrogated and amplified her protests against racism and classism. The racial prejudices these playwrights have fought against as African Americans and as women have pyramided in the last third of the twentieth century. Gender politics and gaps have also intensified their searching for or proclaiming their identities. Each playwright in this volume has not been afraid to assert, assault, and to discover the complexities of survival of self in the process. Their politics are aesthetic; their aesthetics are political. As Anna Deavere Smith proclaims:
Yes, my entry into the theatre is political. Largely because of my race and gender. I am political without opening my mouth. My presence is political.
The way I negotiate my presence becomes political. If I tried to deny my politicalness, I would be even more political.
(âNot So Specialâ 80)
Their works challenge and attempt to change an oppressive ideology, whether it be a white patriarchy, an institutionalized theatre culture, or a dominating African American male surety. Glorifying the battle, Pearl Cleage calls herself one of âthe African American Urban Nationalist Feminist Warrior Womenâ (Alexis Smith 39).
Combating the snares of the status quo, these playwrights also are heavily invested in experimentation, oftentimes rooted in earlier cultural movements (e.g., Harlem Renaissance; Black Arts Movement) as well as dramatic and musical techniques (e.g., minstrelsy, spectacle). The name of playwright Ntozake Shange translates the creative selfhood of these playwrightsââShe who brings her own things.â Their plays explore the frontiers of signifying and often take audiences across horrifying dramatic terrains, physical, and psychic. It is hardly coincidental that so many of the playwrights whose work is studied in this collection are responsible for actually creating performanceâas dancers, actors, composers, scenographers, directors, producers. They preside over the age of performativity. Their canons range from realistic, well-made plays to daring experimental performance pieces to moving dance montages. The triumph of their creations are reflected in Alice Childressâs subversive well-made plays, Sonia Sanchezâs radical protest dramas, Adrienne Kennedyâs mind-chilling nightmares, Shangeâs choreopoems, Glenda Dickersonâs mythopoetic works, Suzan-Lori Parksâs decolonizing history plays, and Anna Deavere Smithâs documentary monologues. These original, revolutionary most times, scripts have taken American theatre into one of its most powerful eras.
The eleven original essays, and one interview, here attempt to chart the evolutionary history of these contemporary black women playwrights and to assess their contributions to American stages. These playwrights represent a widely diverse group of writers whose voices have and will continue to shape American drama. The essays are arranged in roughly chronological sequence, although in a few instances the order has leaped chronology to group or link complementary playwrights and scripts. Thematic continuity seems more crucial than strict chronological order which, because of the overlapping productivity of these dramatists, would have been less effective, e.g., separating Kennedyâs plays from Shangeâs which are so indebted to hers.
In the opening essay, David Krasner discusses three significant playwrights of the Harlem Renaissance, or earlier, and their impact on Lorraine Hansberry. The achievements and themes of these four black women writers serve as a bridge to the contemporary dramatists in this collection. The Harlem Renaissance, which trumpeted the cultural affirmation of the arts, emerged from the 1920s and empowered writers, according to Langston Hughes, âto express our individual dark-skinned selves without fear or shameâ (694). This is exactly what later generations of black women writers have done. For Krasner, Georgia Douglas Johnson, following the footsteps of Alain Locke, laid the groundwork for folk drama found in the plays of Dickerson, Cleage, or Lynn Nottage. Zora Neale Hurstonâs love of performance and theatre, for example, compelled her to write plays with vivid theatricality, thereby establishing a positive view of performance that later playwrights emulated. In Krasnerâs view, Marita Bonner, one of the most unappreciated playwrights, paved the way for a black avant-garde with her expressionistic dramas, precursors to the works of Adrienne Kennedy and Suzan-Lori Parks. Krasner also stresses how these three playwrights anticipated Lorraine Hansberry (1930â1965) whose landmark play Raisin in the Sun (1959) was a paradigm of social realism.
The plays of Alice Childress (1920â2004), the subject of the following essay by Soyica Diggs, also foreshadowed the themes, characters and culture clashes of more contemporary black women playwrights. Although vastly understudied, Childressâs canon spans over 40 years with more than a dozen plays, ranging from savage social criticism to a celebration of comic Jackie Mable in Moms (1987). Childress was the first African American woman to have her work performed Off BroadwayâGold Through the Trees (1952)âand won an Obie for her Trouble in Mind (1955). Praised for creating the âwell-made play,â as Hansberry was, Childress, according to Diggs, generated the tensions about gender and race that were to be highly productive in more contemporary drama. Beginning with Childressâs early play, Florence (1949), and analyzing her other work of the civil rights period (1949â1969), Diggs argues that Childress wrote dialectal dialogues that transformed what audiences had known about the performance of blackness, or the changing status of signifying blackness, one of the central debates of the Black Arts Movement (1965â1975). Childressâs most influential (and anthologized) plays are Wedding Band (1966) and Wine in the Wilderness (1969), which also focus on the performance, and acceptance, of blackness. The former play, about an interracial couple during World War I, was aptly subtitled, A Love/Hate Story in Black and White, thus looking forward to the identity struggles found in Kennedyâs A Movie Star Has to Star in Black and White (1976) as well as to numerous plays and films, including Lanford Wilsonâs Gingham Dog (1969), Spike Leeâs Jungle Fever (1991), and Mira Nairâs Mississippi Masala (1991) starring Denzel Washington, on miscegenation. Wine in the Wilderness continues Childressâs valorization of the strong black woman, in this case a ghettoized street person, Tommy Tomorrow, who is rejected by a smug black middle-class that finally learns to appreciate her honest earthiness and natural beauty.
Though more widely known as a highly prolific black revolutionary poet, Sonia Sanchez (1934â) as a resistance dramatist is the subject of Jacqueline Woodâs essay. Wood emphasizes Sanchezâs unique position as the only female dramatic voice within the cadre of black militant playwrights of the 1960s and 1970s, the period of the Black Arts Movement with which she was closely associated. Sanchez was also affiliated with the Nation of Islam, even writing a childrenâs play, Malcolm Man Donât Live Here No Mo (1972), on the death of Malcolm X. In acknowledging Sanchezâs understudied dramatic works, Wood examines her theory of poetic voice as it articulates her political vision of theatre, its value as weapon and revelation. Exploring four of Sanchezâs published plays as well as one of her unpublished scripts (Iâm Black When Iâm Singing, Iâm Blue When I Ainât 1982), Wood identifies the central themes of Sanchezâs plays, particularly her uniquely self reflexive interrogation of the black militant community and her efforts to privilege the issues and struggles of black women searching for their identity, most powerfully revealed in the monologue Sister Son/ji (1969) whose words and clothes symbolize her conflicts.
The next two essays concentrate on playwrights who have dominated the black avant-garde in the American theatreâAdrienne Kennedy (1931â) and Ntozake Shange (1948â). My study of Kennedy stresses that for over 40 years she has been writing shocking, surrealistic plays that have radically departed from realistic/naturalistic conventions. Her plays are nightmares about a chaotic world of shifting locations and selves. While not denying that Kennedy maps the landscape of the unconscious, I suggest a new way of reading her plays as cultural artifacts reflecting the tumultuous times during which they were writtenâespecially the 1960s. Contextually, through her black and mulatta characters we enter a world of civil rights atrocities and legislation that often failed to contain such horrors. In Funnyhouse of a Negro (1962), Sarah is haunted from the opening tableau until her tragic death by the spectre of the lynching rope that tropes many racial prejudices, historical and contemporary. In Ratâs Mass (1966), Kennedy analogizes white supremacists of the 1960s to Nazis, underscoring hate crimes against black children and the heinous process of racial flagging. The bombing of the Sixteenth Street Church in Birmingham in 1963 offers a further historical context in which to interpret the stage horrors and bloody imagery in Kennedyâs play. Seen in historical perspective, A Lesson in Dead Language (1964) also reflects the racist opposition to desegregation, by metamorphosing the schoolroom into a torture chamber of shame. But Kennedyâs political message is not limited to the 1960s; it can be traced across the trajectory of her canon to include racial profiling, or highway apartheid, as in Sleep Deprivation Chamber (1996).
In the following essay, James Fisher argues that among black women dramatists Shange holds a unique position as a creator of experimental works merging theatrical and poetic traditions with music and dance, an amalgam that played a major role in exploring black identity in the American theatre. Yet Fisher claims that Shangeâs signature âchoreopoem,â for colored girls who have considered suicide/when the rainbow is enuf (1976), was inspired by such diverse sources as the writers and performers of the Harlem Renaissance, Hansberryâs social dramas, and, of course, Kennedyâs surrealistic nightmares. As Fisher points out, Shange can boast of a career-long examination of the emotionally painful transition from adolescence to womanhood, a preoccupation which has also set her apart from her contemporaries. Acclaiming Shangeâs exploration of identity, Anna Deavere Smith begins Fires in the Mirror by interviewing Shange who proclaims: âI am part of my surroundings/ ⌠/ and whatâs inside our identity/ is everything thatâs ever happened to us.â Fisher concludes that Shange is wary of success in the mainstream commercial theatre and prefers to experiment with small ensemble casts in performances that reject the spectacle and linear dramatic structure of traditional theatre while emphasizing the emotional experiences of the young women whom she has typically depicted.
Like Sanchez, Atlanta-based Pearl Cleage is a poet and an activist, championing strong and creative black women. In fact, all except two of Cleageâs widely produced plays have been commissioned either by the Womenâs Project in conjunction with the Southeast Playwrights Project of Atlanta or by Atlantaâs Alliance Theatre. In studying Cleageâs plays beginning in 1983, Beth Turner sees Cleage as one of the foremost African American dramatic voices of contemporary American theatre in large part because of her portraits of valiant women put in a position of having to defend themselves. In Cleageâs articulation of feminist opposition to the interlocking oppressions of sexism, racism, and classism, Turner finds that her work also resonates with the spirit of both Alice Childress and Ntozake Shange. Focusing in detail on one of Cleageâs most well known plays, produced by both prominent Black and white theatres, Turner carefully explicates Flyinâ West (1992) with its four nineteenth-century African American women who settled in the all-black town of Nicodemus, Kansas. Turner also closely reads Cleageâs Bourbon at the Border (1997) and Blues for an Alabama Sky (1995), set in Harlem in the 1930s, which was selected as the official theatrical presentation of the USA at the 1996 Olympic Festival of the Arts in Atlanta.
Turning to Aishah Rahman (1936â), Brandi Wilkins Cantanese explores the ideas and dramatic techniques of a writer who has been an enduring and prolific presence in contemporary African American theatre as both an author and educator/mentor to younger generations. Rahmanâs work, according to Cantanese, has helped to shape the way we understand African American woman and culture in general. Her essay conducts an overview of Rahmanâs published, full length works, concentrating on such recurrent themes as the use of a jazz aesthetic, her recourse to intertextuality, her repeated staging of narratives that resurrect black cultural icons, her explorations of interracial and intraracial gender politics, and her interest in African-based spiritual practices. Exploring these themes, Cantanese insists that Rahman centers African American aesthetics and values rather than allowing them to remain on the cultural margins. Accordingly, Rahmanâs decision to work outside of the aesthetic tradition of dramatic realism allows her to depict aspects of African American life that defy reductive stereotypes found elsewhere in the American theatre. Rahman is an important link to other African American dramatists who engage the same issues and travel the same dramatic landscapes, such as August Wilson, Glenda Dickerson, Suzan-Lori Parks, George C. Wolfe, and Anna Deavere Smith.
Perhaps Rahmanâs closest contemporary spirit might be Glenda Dickerson who, like her, often uses a realistic situation as a springboard into a symbolic/mythic world. Freda Scott Giles points out in her essay on Dickerson that she has conceived, constructed, and mounted well over a dozen performance works. She has directed more than 50 plays as well. According to Giles, Dickersonâs works enter into a dialectic with contemporary history, politics, and feminist thought. Dickerson has placed these works into two general categoriesââmiracle playsâ and âperformance dialogs.â Dickersonâs âmiracle playsâ may be described as a mythopoetic theatre framed in the reality of black womenâs experiences while the âperformance dialogsâ are designed to bring underrepresented discourses involving women of color into the academy. Giles stresses that Dickerson has created a theatrical language that reflects her feminist, theatrical, and teaching philosophies. Influenced by poet and playwright Owen Dodson as well as by Georgia Douglas Johnson, Eleanor Traylor, and Ruby Dee, Dickerson continues the legacy of a highly poetic black theatre. Though she has often been compared with Shange and Anna Deavere Smith, Dickersonâs plays are uniquely hers, documentary testimonies by women combined with music, poetry, and movement. Giles shows how Dickerson has created a theatrical canon far less abstract and deconstructive than either Kennedyâs or Parksâs.
Anna Deavere Smith, whose plays Joan Wylie Hall assesses, occupies a crucial place as a contemporary performance artist. Like Shange or Cleage, she is an actressâplaywright but her trademark is the solo performance of her own work. Like fellow dramatists Adrienne Kennedy, August Wilson, Suzan-Lori Parks, or Dickerson, Smith examines African American identity in a national context, but her works are neither impressionistic nor do they adhere to the formula for the well-made realistic play. Instead, Smith writes raw documentary scripts about American cities in crisis. For her Obie award-winning Fires in the Mirror (1993) and Twilight in Los Angeles 1992 (1993) she created a montage of conflicting monologues from interviews with hundreds of individualsâgang members, rabbis, activists, police officers, truck drivers, teenage girls, etc. Playing more than 25 roles in Fires, for example, Smith (re)presented African American, Hasidic, Hispanic, and Anglo characters, male and female, young and old. Performing this widely diverse cast of...