Abstract
In this book, multiscreen refers primarily to the four screens of smartphone, tablet, laptop or PC, and smart TV, but also considers the smartwatch as a fifth potentially relevant screen. Screen in this context is synonymous with a digital device. We present and describe various device classes as well as their specific features, opportunities, and differences and introduce five relevant device prototypes. We explain how different screens can be investigated, categorized, and how a mobile device is classified based on various levels of mobile quality. Other important factors for an appealing cross-device service experience are the user experience with the device itselfâthe device experienceâand the relationship between the various devices. There are various options for combining multiple screens and thus also interfaces, information offerings, and services with each other. This chapter introduces multiscreen ecosystems and experience categories that consist of certain requirements and environments or a combination of various devices.
1.1 Multiscreen
Two of the most important assets of the digital society are information and content. The easier they can be retrieved, the more successful the provider will be.
The term multiscreen or multi-screen is composed of the words âmultiâ (multiple) and âscreen.â I prefer the notation without the hyphen because of the hashtag capability and because typographically it looks better. In general, multiscreen means that (multiple) various screens and/or devices are used for or during one activity. In this case, âscreenâ serves representatively for a device with a firmly built-in screen. With regard to the devices, the term âmultideviceâ is popular.
Multiscreen is about developing a single application for multiple interfacesâone for each screen type: smartphone, tablet, desktop, and television.
Radley Marx (cofounder of cloud.tv)
Information in the (digital) information age
We live in a time in which there is a flood of information (Evsan, 2013c). Due to the Internet, today potentially all users are simultaneously senders and recipients of information that is available at all times. Thus, it has become even more important that information arrives to the recipient(s) as easily as possible. The higher the quality of information, the higher the probability that it is relevant for someone. Offering maximally user-centered, relevant, and exciting information is a challenge that is increasingly gaining in importance in conjunction with cloud-based multiscreen scenarios.
Online time is screen time.
Luke Wroblewski
In his article âThe UX of Data,â Scott Jenson (2011) explains why data must be processed in a user-friendly and sensible manner and, in this context, he uses the description â(user) experience of data.â
The relevant information should be provided at all times in a context-relevant manner. It is all about enabling people to have the easiest access possible to digital services via as many channels and devices as desired. Thus, think about how to enhance the information experience at all levels.
The next step in the digital information age in which everything and all information will be completely connected is the Internet of Things. Screens and nearly all imaginable other objects will be controlled remotely. They will also exchange data with other devices, objects, or data sources independently without any human or user involvement.
Challenges
Due to the increasing dissemination of mobile devices and increasing connectivity, the use of devices and services (e.g., websites, apps, and information) is becoming increasingly more fragmented. Thus, the user behavior and the attitude toward and access to information have changed.
Recommended Reading
Interesting articles that also discuss the theme in detail and describe current and future challenges are collected on the website and can be found at www.msxbook.com/en/mschllgs.
According to a Microsoft study, in 2010, there were approximately 20 million multiscreeners living in Europe (Microsoft Advertising, 2010b). Those are users who are constantly online with some type of device and alternate between multiple screens during the course of a day. The numbers have rapidly grown since then, and it is now quite common for a large number of people to behave like multiscreeners. In a Google study from 2012, approximately 90% of participants responded that they use more than one device for getting a task done (Google et al., 2012). This user group and similarly categorized users demand multiscreen-compatible offerings. Ultimately, it is a matter of offering a service that is more or less available without any restrictions on all screens and touchpoints.
When we talk about apps for devices these days, we are talking about a multitude of devices and device platforms.
Serge Jespers (Adobe Evangelist)
A multiscreen world
We live in a multiscreen world. People behave in a multidevice way. Thus, it is misleading if one measures the use of only single devices (which is still often the case). When people do anything with a device, they use the most convenient device available at that moment (which can potentially be more than one). Thus, it is not relevant what percentage of action is done on and with a specific device. Your service has to be available in the best possible way for all relevant screens. Thus, you should measure the number of users, not the number of devices (which is quite challenging or not accurate). Users behave increasingly more like multiscreeners.
If you do not have a multiscreen strategy and a multiscreen-ready service, people will not (want to) use your service on different screens. Therefore, a statistic that is used to decide whether a specific strategy is necessary or not will provide false information if it is based on misleading measurements. If you give people a bad experience on any screen, it reflects on all the other channels as well and thus impacts the experience with your service at large.
You canât choose not to support one device. They all have to be good because you donât control when, where or how people might need you. Itâs like having hot running water in both your kitchen and your bathroom. Sure, you probably use more hot water in your bathroom, but that doesnât mean that itâs any less important in your kitchen.
Thomas Baekdal (author and strategic consultant)
I agree with Thomas Baekdal that being multiscreen-ready is not a decision: It is the absence of a decision (Baekdal, 2014). Single-device design does not suffice anymore. Even if âmobileâ seems to be statistically not yet relevant for your projects, it is important, especially for this very reason, to âthink multiscreen.â
1.2 Important Terms
Here, we explain the most important terms and how we use them. More detailed definitions are provided in the credited sources.
Device and screen are used synonymously for an operatable, digital device with a screen. Such a device can output and display contents, it is in principle cloud compatible (i.e., cloud computing), and it is individualizable through the installation of software. With it, data and information can be depicted, retrieved, and processed (see Chapter 2). The terms screen and device are largely used in this book with the identical meaning.
Device Touchpoint describes the contact and/or touchpoint with a digital device. The following are decisive: Frequency, intensity, and the variance of the media and/or device usage (see Chapter 3, Section 3.2.1). In order to understand the multiscreen user, it is important (in addition to his daily routine) to know his potential device touchpoints, i.e., to know with which devices he comes into contact when, why, how and in what scope. For the service itself, naturally all other service touchpoints are relevant (e.g., contact with employees, the print communication, or analog letter post).
User Experience (abbreviated as UX) encompasses all aspects of the experiences (perception, reaction, behavior) of a user during the interaction with a product, system, service, environment or institution. This also includes the software and IT systems. The term encompasses the full spectrum of interactive possibilities (source: Wikipedia [de]: user experience, n.d.). The term experience or user experience is concerned less with technology, product design, or an interface and more with the aid of a digital device, creating a sensible and meaningful experience for the user. An experience is subjective, comprehensive, situation- and location-related, and thus context-related, dynamic, and valuable (Hassenzahl, 2010, 2011) (see Chapter 3, Section 3.3). âAn experience is a story, emerging from the dialogue of a person with her or his world through actionâ (Hassenzahl, 2010, p. 8). The field of user experience is very complex and comprises many intersecting topics and disciplines, such as user research, usability (engineering), information architecture, user interface design, visual design, interaction design, and content strategy. A more detailed definition of â(user) experience (design)â and additional sources can be found at http...