C.P. Cavafy: Ithaka. Collected Poems 1992
J. Haydn, Piano Concerto no. 11 in D major Igor Levit and Deutsche Kammerphilarmonie Bremen: 17 May 2015
Vassily Kandinsky, Black and Violet (oil on canvas, 78 Ă 100 cm) 1923 Private collection
When a solid is subjected to external loading, mechanical, thermal, or other, it changes its shape and dimensions. These geometrical changes, described quantitatively by displacements and strains, are the subject of kinematics. External loads are transmitted within the material via forces acting between elements across imaginary sections and interfaces. These interactions are quantitatively described by stresses (components of force per unit area) and form the subject of the disciplines of statics or dynamics. The kinematical and dynamical descriptions of solid deformation are linked by the so-called constitutive law that establishes the relationship between stresses and strains (and/or their derivatives and integrals) and captures the peculiarity of a particular material's deformation behavior.
If a solid recovers its original shape and dimensions fully after the removal of the external load, then the deformation (and material) is called elastic; otherwise, inelastic. If the relationship between strains and stresses in an elastic material is described by a simple linear proportion, then the material is called linear elastic; otherwise, nonlinear elastic. If a material does not recover its original shape, then it is said to have undergone inelastic deformation. In specific cases, the terms plastic strain, creep strain, misfit strain, transformation strain, and eigenstrain are used to refer to the permanent inelastic strain.
As this is the first time we encounter the term eigenstrain, it is worth introducing the associated notation, Δâ, and recalling that the term was introduced by Toshio Mura (1987) in his book, together with âeigenstressâ that he defined as âa generic name given to self-equilibrated internal stresses caused by one or several of these eigenstrains in bodies which are free from any other external force and surface constraint.â He points out that âeigenstress fields are created by the incompatibility of the eigenstrains,â and adds that âengineers have used the term âresidual stressesâ for the self-equilibrated internal stresses when they remain in materials after fabrication or plastic deformation.â Below we flesh out the implications of the aforementioned definitions by discussing the relationships, form of equations, and problem formulations.
Total strain is additive: it is given by the sum of elastic and inelastic parts:
Total strain must satisfy the compatibility condition: it corresponds to a unique continuous deformation field.
After elastic loading and unloading of a stress-free body all strains return to zero, as do the stresses: no residual stress arises. Hence, inelastic deformation is a necessary (but not sufficient!) condition for the creation of residual stresses. Residual stresses arise as a body's response to permanent inelastic strains introduced during the loadingâunloading cycle. Therefore, stresses exist only in association with elastic strains: there is no such thing as plastic stress. Stresses must satisfy the condition of static equilibrium.
Permanent inelastic strains (eigenstrains) are the source of residual stresses, not the other way round. If eigenstrain is introduced into a body, it responds by developing accommodating elastic strains, which in turn give rise to stresses. The direct problem of eigenstrain residual stress analysis is the determination of elastic strains and residual stresses from a given distribution of eigenstrains. The inverse problem of eigenstrain residual stress analysis is the problem of finding the eigenstrain distribution that gives rise to the (measured or partially known) distributions of residual elastic strains and/or residual stresses.
Residual stresses cannot be measured directly, nor can, indeed, any stress: stress is an imaginary tool used for convenience of description. Instead, other quantities related to residual stresses are measured, usually some displacements or strains, strain increments, or some indirectly related physical quantities, e.g., magnetization. Experimental methods differ in the level of accuracy and detail with which the residual stresses can be assessed: some are only qualitative, whereas others provide highly detailed information that is resolved in terms of spatial location and orientation.
Diffraction provides a uniquely powerful method of evaluating lattice parameters, from which crystal strains can be readily deduced. Diffraction utilizes the simple relationship provided by Bragg's law between the interplanar lattice spacing parameter d, the wavelength λ (which can be expressed through photon energy E and universal constants h and c), and the scattering angle 2Ξ:
The lattice spacing d is found experimentally by fixing one of the two parameters E or Ξ, and varying the other one to find a peak. Consequently, two principal experimental diffraction methods are in use, the angle dispersive (monochromatic, λ = const) or energy dispersive (white beam, 2Ξ = const). Highly detailed information can be extracted by simultaneous interpretation of multiple diffraction peaks, e.g., the strain average across all peaks provides information about the equivalent macroscopic strain, whereas the differences reflect the inhomogeneity of deformation in terms of the interaction, and load and strain transfer between crystallites of different orientation.
Solid objects are very rarely (in fact, almost never) the idealized homogeneous and isotropic continua studied in the classical mechanics of deformable solids. Real materials consist of distinct grains and phases, e.g., polycrystals that are made up of constituent grains whose mechanical properties depend on orientation. Loading applied to such âcompositesâ induces inhomogeneous deformation: some regions experience greater strain or stress than others; some may yield, whereas others remain elastic. As a consequence of this inhomogeneity, after unloading, some microscopic intergranular residual stresses arise.
Within individual grains inelastic deformation is often mediated by crystallographic defects, such as dislocations. Dislocations appear and move under the applied shear stress; they exert forces upon each other and can organize themselves into more or less stable arrangements, such as persistent slip bands, pile-ups, ladders, and cell-wall structures. Dislocations can escape through the material free surface, leaving behind steps, and pairs of dislocations of opposite sign can annihilate. Defects such as dislocations give rise to residual stresses at the intragranular level.
This book contains an introductory course devoted to the analysis of residual stresses and their interpretation and understanding with the help of the concept and modeling framework of eigenstrain. The following order of presentation is adopted. After a brief introduction to the subject in this chapter, the continuum mechanics fundamentals for the description of deformation and stresses are given in Chapter 2. Some basic types of inelastic deformation and residual stress states are defined and analyzed: the consideration of constraint and stress balance conditions allows the introduction of the simple (i.e., 0-D, or âpointâ) residual stress states in Chapter 3. In Chapters 4 and 5, the important case of one-dimensional residual stress states is addressed, using the examples of inelastic beam bending and inelastic expansion of a hollow tube under internal pressure.
Chapter 6 is devoted to the eigenstrain theory of residual stress. First, the procedure for the solution of the direct problem of eigenstrain is illustrated using the examples of âshrink-fitâ eigenstrain cylinder and eigenstrain sphere. The important Eshelby solution for the eigenstrain ellipsoid is introduced next, followed by the concept of nuclei of strain as the sources of residual stress concentrated to a point.
Chapter 7 is devo...