1.1 Introduction
Oxy-fuel combustion is currently considered to be one of the major technologies for carbon dioxide (CO2) capture. This book focuses on the development of oxy-fuel combustion technologies using coal as fuel.
1.1.1 Coal as an energy source
Coal plays a very important role in our day-to-day lives. In a comprehensive report published in 2008, the International Energy Agency (IEA) predicted that the demand for coal will surpass oil in absolute terms between 2030 and 2050, and will become the predominant fuel for the world (IEA, 2008ā1). Currently, about 40% of the worldās electricity is generated with coal (WCI, 2009) making it the largest fuel source for power generation (IEA, 2008ā1). In the two largest CO2 emitting countries, China and the United States of America, more than 77% and 50% of the electricity, respectively, is generated with coal (WCI, 2009). The improvement of global living standards and continuous economic growth will require increased use of energy. From 2000 to 2006, IEA reported that worldwide demand for electricity increased from 12,641 TWh to 15,665 TWh, a stunning rise in demand of nearly 24%. This growth is expected to continue at an average annual rate of 2.5%; coal generation is projected to produce 14,600 TWh of electricity by 2030 ā more than double its current contribution of approximately 6300 TWh (IEA, 2008ā2).
The attraction of coal as a fuel source is due to several factors. First, it is abundant: even under rapid growth scenarios, known coal reserves can continue to meet our energy needs for at least the next 100 years (Lackner and Sachs, 2005). Indeed, some studies have suggested that there is more than 190 yearsā worth of coal available, almost four times that of oil and gas combined (WCI, 2009). Unlike oil and gas, coal is well distributed in the world, making it easily accessible and very reliable. Coal is also one of the most affordable energy resources at one to two US dollars per MM Btu; by contrast, oil and gas costs are in the range of 6 to 12 US dollars per MM Btu (MIT, 2007). This combination of attributes makes it very likely that coal will continue to be a critical fuel source well into the future.
1.1.2 Developments in clean coal technology
Coal as an energy source has a number of negative environmental impacts, including (but not limited to) the release of particle matter (PM), oxides of sulphur and nitrogen (SOx and NOx), carbon monoxide (CO), and trace metals such as mercury. It is a long procedure from the point of realization of the need to control emissions, to pass appropriate emissions control regulations and standards, to develop control technologies, and to effect their implementation. With the gradual installation of each add-on unit for emissions reduction, the environmental impacts associated with coal combustion have been greatly reduced. Installation of electrostatic precipitators (ESP) and/or baghouses, initiated in the 1970s, allows for flue gas flyash reductions above 95%. Flue gas desulfurization (FGD) technologies, such as wet scrubbers introduced in the 1980s, are capable of 90% SOx removal. Since the 1990s, low NOx burners have been employed to reduce nitrogen oxide formation. Combined with selective catalytic reactors (SCRs), it is now possible to reduce NOx emissions by more than 90% (EPA, 2006). Rapid developments are currently taking place to address the issues of fine particulate matter less than 2.5 Ī¼m (PM2.5) and mercury emissions. Clean coal combustion technologies have become major business concerns in coal utilization. It has been reported that the capital and operating costs of emission control systems of a typical 500 MWe coal-fired power plant are roughly 47% and 57% of the total respective costs (Marin et al., 2003).
Of increasing concern, coal combustion is also one of the largest sources of anthropogenic CO2 emissions. In 2006, about 42% of the world energy-related CO2 emissions were attributable to coal use (IEA, 2008ā2). On an annual basis, a typical 500 MWe coal-fired power plant emits about three million tonnes of CO2 to the atmosphere (MIT, 2007), the equivalent of the total CO2 emissions from 374,000 passenger cars (EPA, 2000).
The concern about CO2 emissions from coal-fired units has prompted intensive research into its control technologies. Some reductions can be achieved by upgrading the coal by washing, drying and briquetting. Optimized operating conditions on excess air and stack temperature reductions lead to better efficiencies and, hence, lower emissions. Furthermore, up to 25% CO2 emission reduction can be obtained through the utilization of supercritical and ultra supercritical boiler technologies (BeƩr, 2007).
One of the most feasible options to stabilize CO2 levels in atmosphere is carbon (CO2) capture and storage (CCS). CCS is a process in which CO2 is removed from emission gases, transported, and stored (sequestered) in a location where it is isolated from the atmosphere. The United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has noted that āCCS has the potential to reduce overall mitigation costs and increase flexibility in achieving greenhouse gas emission reductionā (IPCC, 2005). Due to the large quantity and concentrated nature of CO2 emissions from coal-fired power generation stations, these emitters have become the focus of CCS development.
1.1.3 Carbon capture technologies
Currently, there are three major CO2 capture technologies that have reached the level of industrial-scale demonstration. These three technologies are:
ā¢ Post-combustion capture: a chemical solvent such as amine or ammonia is used to scrub CO2 out of the combustion flue gas.
ā¢ Pre-combustion capture: solid fuel is gasified with oxygen to produce a gaseous fuel consisting mainly of carbon monoxide (CO) and hydrogen (H2). A waterāgas shift reaction is employed to convert CO and water to H2 and CO2 and a physical sorbent is then used to capture CO2.
ā¢ Oxy-fuel combustion: pure oxygen is used for fuel combustion, thereby producing a CO2-enriched flue gas ready for sequestration once water is condensed from the flue gas and other impurities are removed.
The post-combustion capture approach is the same as the approaches for control of particulate matter, SOx, and NOx. This approach involves adding unit operations after combustion, making post-combustion capture an attractive option for retrofitting existing plants or building a CO2 capture-ready plant. For postcombustion technology, a liquid solvent such as monoethanolamine (MEA) or ammonia is used in an absorption tower to scrub CO2 from the flue gas. The CO2-rich solvent is then pumped to a stripper or regeneration tower where heat is used to separate CO2 from the solvent. The captured CO2 is then compressed and transported for storage. Chemical solvents are already widely used in refineries, natural gas processing, and petrochemical plants to capture CO2; demonstrations of solvent applicability for coal-fired power plants are currently underway. Because air is used for combustion, most (70%) of the flue gas is N2 with comparatively little (< 15%) CO2, hence large equipment is needed for post-combustion capture processes. Most post-combustion capture technologies are capable of capturing more than 90% of the CO2 at very high purity levels. A major challenge for post-combustion capture technologies is the intensive energy needed to regenerate solvent or to cool the flue gas when the chilled ammonia process is employed. Furthermore, stringent flue gas limits for SOx, NOx, and flyash are necessary to minimize solvent usage when amines are used.
Coal gasification is a central technology for pre-combustion CO2 capture. In gasification, coal is reacted with oxygen and steam at high temperature and pressure to produce a synthetic gas (syngas). Usually, less than 50% of the oxygen required for complete combustion is used in gasification; thus, the coal is only partially oxidized to CO and H2, the major syngas components. To capture CO2 from a gasification process, a waterāgas shift reactor is used to convert CO and water to H2 and CO2. The CO2 is then separated with physical sorbent. Gasification technology is widely employed in the chemical industry. However, its application in the power sector is very limited due to the high cost associated with it for electricity generation. At present, there are only four commercial-scale power generation plants in the world that gasify coal (Ratafia-Brown et al., 2002). The process that utilizes coal gasification for power g...