Introduction
Many psychopathologies result in the significant manifestation of antisocial behaviors. Some of these are antisocial in the context of the sufferer withdrawing from social interaction and isolating himself or herself as a defensive mechanism to help avoid the unpleasant thoughts, feelings, behaviors, and physiological reactions that are a feature of the disorder. Anxiety disorders, depression, trauma, and conditions that affect communication and/or socialization, such as autism, are examples of conditions that fit this description. The use of immersive technologies, nonsuicidal self-injury, and alcohol may also be seen in this light as they are often used as means of avoiding, attenuating, treating, or self-medicating these symptoms. Generally speaking, avoidant behavior of this nature is unlikely to result in criminal behavior. The exception is when self-medicating with alcohol is undertaken by a minor or if an adult exchanges alcohol for illicit substances. At other times, psychopathology influences the manifestation of behaviors that are more expressive in nature. That is to say, these behaviors are focused outward at other people, animals, or objects. When this occurs, the behavior necessarily impinges on others, whether directly, such as in the case of an assault, or indirectly, such as when the behavior involves property theft or damage. It is in this context that psychopathology is likely to result in criminal behaviors. Expressive behaviors can be volitional, nonvolitional, or incidental.
⢠Volitional: A volitional behavior is a deliberate act that is committed to achieve a specific end. The end may or may not be a legitimate endeavor. A legitimate endeavor can include acts such as sexual or physical assault, theft, or other behavior that is undertaken as a direct means to achieve a desired outcome. An illegitimate endeavor may include speeding, illicit drug use, or other high-risk behavior undertaken while in a manic or psychotic episode, or other state that distorts the offenderâs capacity for insight or judgment.
⢠Nonvolitional: A nonvolitional behavior is an act committed as a result of delusional or hallucinogenic cognitions that establish a false presumption on the part of the offender. Command hallucinations (e.g., âthe Seagull told me that man was evil, and it was my duty to stab him before he hurt anyone elseâ) and delusional thoughts of cause and effect (e.g., âif I kill his wife then he will love me, and we can be together foreverâ) are examples of this form of criminal act.
⢠Incidental: Incidental behaviors are illegal acts that occur incidentally to another objective. An example of this may be someone who has a pathology that presents as generally avoidant but finds himself in a highly anxiety-provoking situation that triggers a panic attack. As a result, the individual may âlash outâ to try and escape (avoid) the fear-provoking stimuli. He may assault someone, destroy property, or steal a bike, car, or other means of transportation to flee.
Although mental illness may contribute to antisocial and criminal behaviors, it is imperative that we appreciate that psychopathology and criminal behavior are not ubiquitous. The reality is that individuals with a mental illness are at an exponentially greater risk of being a victim of crime than they are of becoming an offender. This being said, there are certain psychopathologies, as well as cognitive, affective, motivational, and behavioral manifestations, that, when present, may collude with environmental circumstances to increase the risk that an individual will engage in antisocial and/or deviant behaviors. It is also true that many of these antisocial or deviant acts may well cross the line and also be criminal. However, to reiterate, it is far more common that these emotional, cognitive, and psychobehavioral manifestations collude with environmental circumstances to increase the risk of a mentally ill person becoming a victim of crime. For the mentally ill, as with all individuals; the socioenvironmental circumstances are of paramount importance in mediating the ultimate outcome. It is perhaps the first rule to keep in the forefront of your mind when immersing yourself in the world of crime and the individualâno one lives in a vacuum, and it is the interaction between the individual and the external mechanics of his ecology (family, peers, education, socioeconomic status, society and culture, etc.) that ultimately determines the outcome (Bronfenbrenner & Ceci, 1994). Indeed, the corporate world is full of psychopathic personalities who have never committed a murder but have ruthlessly used their psychological make-up to allow them to pursue financial goals and objectives despite the potential impact on others. In fact, the study of what has become known as corporate psychopathy is a burgeoning field within the arena of organizational psychology (Babiak, Neumann, & Hare, 2010; Mathieu, Neumann, Babiak, & Hare, 2015; Yamagishi, Li, Takagishi, Matsumoto, & Kiyonari, 2014).
In this chapter, we will explore how psychopathology can mediate antisocial and criminal behaviors. We will explore some of the mainstream diagnosed psychopathologies that are associated with crime and criminal behaviors, and we will explore the expression of our constituent thoughts, emotions, motivations, and other psychological compone...