Hybrid Ship Hulls

Engineering Design Rationales

Vladimir M. Shkolnikov

• Publisher: Butterworth-Heinemann
• Year: 2014
• ISBN:
  9780128010921
• Topic: Technology & Engineering
• Subtopic: Materials Science
• Index: Technology & Engineering

Hybrid Ship Hulls provides an overview of cutting-edge developments in hybrid composite-metal marine ship hulls, covering the critical differences in material processing and structural behavior that must be taken into account to maximise benefits and performance.Supporting the design of effective hybrid hulls through proper consideration of the benefits and challenges inherent to heterogenic structures, the book covers specific details of quality control, manufacturing, mechanical and thermal stress, and other behavioral aspects that need to be treated differently when engineering hybrid ship hulls. With a particular focus on heavy-duty naval applications, the book includes guidance on the selection of composite part configurations, innovative design solutions, novel hybrid joining techniques, and serviceability characterization.

• Addresses the engineering requirements specific to hybrid structure engineering that are essential for optimization of hybrid hull design and maximization of material benefits.
• Covers methodology, techniques and data currently unavailable from other sources, providing the essential base knowledge to support robust design, reliable manufacturing, and proper serviceability evaluation.
• Includes MATLAB codes, enabling engineers to easily apply the methods covered to their own engineering design challenges.

Chapter 1

Premises of Hybrid Hull Implementation

Abstract

Chapter 1 introduces the main premises of the hybrid (metal-composite) hull concept and principal challenges inherent to engineering of hybrid structures pertinent to their naval application. Utilization of polymer matrix structural composites is potentially beneficial for several key performance parameters of a primarily metal naval vessel. However, the heterogeneity of hybrids notably affects both primary characteristics of hull structure—manufacturability and service behavior—which need to be taken into account in order to provide the requisite integrity, robustness, and weight efficiency of the structure. In this chapter, the relevant peculiarities are outlined. Also, the history of composite shipbuilding is reviewed with respect to the lessons learned from preceding design, construction, and operational experience and application of this knowledge to the encountered engineering challenges.

Keywords

Polymer matrix composite (PMC)

Hybrid hull

Service behavior

Mine countermeasures vessel (MCMV)

Design trends in composite shipbuilding

1.1 Trends in Demand for Composite and Hybrid Structures

Development of novel structural systems is inconceivable without advanced materials capable of facilitating service performance related to a new demand. As with everything in nature composed of a mixture of materials that work well together, two or more dissimilar material systems may be employed in concert to form a heterogeneous, hybrid structure that enables a rational balance of enhanced performance with feasibility and cost efficiency of the new structure. One of the most common structural hybrids being exploited combines metals with polymer matrix composites (PMCs).

Structural utilization of PMCs is extensive and rapidly expanding today. This is due to a combination of the structural and physical properties of PMCs that enables substantial advancement of assorted structural systems. A structure’s weight reduction allied with the high specific strength of structural PMCs; an opportunity to provide a complex streamlined shape, considerably simplifying employed manufacturing processes; and great corrosion/fouling resistance in a harsh operation environment, allowing for practically effortless maintenance—these and other advantages are driving the exceptional popularity of PMCs for a diversity of structural applications.

Among the major beneficiaries are watercraft, aircraft, and spacecraft; automobiles and other ground vehicles; bridges, causeway floating platforms, and offshore oil/gas rigs; pipelines and pressure tanks; wind turbine blades; and so on. Warships and other naval platforms represent a worthwhile example of the structural hybrids operated on, under, and above the sea surface.

Despite the multiple gains, lack of magnetism was in fact a prime inspiration for the naval application of PMCs, particularly for mine countermeasures vessels (MCMVs). Enhanced stealth performance is another advantage calling for expanded use of PMCs for warships. Not only relatively small and midsize warships, such as MCMVs and corvettes, which typify full-composite naval vessels, benefit greatly from PMC utilization. Large, primarily metal-hull ships such as destroyers and missile submarines, for which a full-composite hull is impractical, may also be beneficiaries. For instance, a destroyer’s superstructure made of a PMC is capable of absorbing electromagnetic emanations from radar and transforming the signature of the vessel, simultaneously significantly reducing her top weight (Arkhipov et al., 2006; Hackett, 2011; Lackey et al., 2006).

In general, such key advantages as weight saving, augmented deadweight-to-displacement ratio, increased speed and/or cruising range, improved stability, corrosion prevention, enhanced propulsion characteristics, and improved signature control may all ensue from implementation of a hybrid hull combatant ship.

Weight saving, augmented deadweight-to-displacement ratio, increased speed and/or cruising range, improved stability, corrosion prevention, enhanced propulsion characteristics, and improved signature control; all could be facilitated by implementation of the hybrid hull concept for a combatant ship.

Essentially, any structural component of a hybrid hull might be made of structural PMCs, including but not limited to hull shell panels, bulkheads, platforms, the deckhouse, the superstructure, and foundations for machinery and equipment, as well as other heavily loaded ship structures, including rudders and structural components of water jet propulsion systems, such as the outlet, pump housing, housing inlet, and inlet tunnel.

It should be noted that along with the primary structural material, metals and PMCs, an assortment of ancillary materials may be used within a hybrid structure. These include a variety of light-weight core materials pertinent to sandwich panels, rubbers (for acoustical enhancement of structural panels), and ceramics (useful for enhancement of ballistic protection of a structure’s panel).

A series of recent patents and technical papers enlighten the hybrid hull notion with regard to the major structural components of a primarily metal naval surface vessel—bow, stern, and midship side panels, as well as topside structures. The following represent an array of related recent patents (Aleshin et al., 2011; Barsoum, 2002, 2005; Critchfield et al., 2003; Kacznelson et al., 2009; Maslich et al., 2009; Shkolnikov, 2011, 2013) and technical papers (Barsoum, 2003, 2009; Bulkin et al., 2011; Critchfield et al., 1991; Horsmon, 2001; Kudrin et al., 2011; Mouritz et al., 2001; Potter, 2003; Shkolnikov et al., 2009).

As for rewarding applications for surface vessels, hybrid structures are also favorable for submarines, particularly in terms of their outboard structural components. The benefits pertaining to PMCs’ submarine application include increased sonar efficiency, avoidance of intricate demagnetization procedures relevant to complex-shape structures, and simplified trimming and ballasting operations. For these reasons, a sonar dome, ballast cisterns, superstructures, sail (fairing), fins, propulsors, launch tubes, and hatches are all good candidates for replacement of metal with PMC to enable significant enhancement of a sub’s structural and combat efficiency.

Figure 1.1 depicts a generalized hybrid hull architecture applicable to both major categories of naval ships, surface vessels and submarines, for which the hybrid hull option might be superior.

Figure 1.1 Generalized hybrid hull architecture.

The white areas indicate locations of composite structural components potentially beneficial to the service performance of these metal naval vessels.

Besides technical advantages, a PMC application for a primarily metal vessel may facilitate considerable cost savings. Although a hybrid hull construction itself is typically somewhat more expensive than a conventional monotonous metal hull, the ensuing significant weight savings ultimately provides a noticeable reduction of the ship’s construction cost. Resistance to both corrosion and fouling in turn dramatically lowers maintenance expenses, greatly contributing to overall ownership cost savings.

1.2 Hybrid Hull Peculiarities

Evidently, a hybrid structure comprises merely metal and composite mono-material components along with a distinctive heterogeneous material-transition structure. For some structural units, such as a hull shell, mono-material components represent the prevailing part of the hybrid structure, while the material transition typically embodies just a hybrid (composite-to-metal) joint. For other parts, such as a ballistic-protection panel or a composite pipeline with a metallic load-sharing liner, the material transition essentially represents the entire hybrid structure. For both these major alternatives, the pursued heterogeneity, while capable of upgrading functional and operational performance, considerably affects both manufacturing technology and structural behavior of a hybrid ship hull, requiring a certain revision of conventional engineering routines, including a structural design optimization, structure analysis and strength reconciliation, and material processing.

First of all, a trade-off study, looking at the fea...

Table of contents

• Cover image
• Title page
• Table of Contents
• Copyright
• Preface
• Acknowledgments
• Chapter 1: Premises of Hybrid Hull Implementation
• Chapter 2: Existing and Prospective Hybrid Hulls
• Chapter 3: Material-Transition Structures
• Chapter 4: Comeld-2 Development and Performance Evaluation
• Chapter 5: Serviceability Characterization
• Chapter 6: Prospective Investigations
• Appendix: MatLab Codes on Serviceability Characterization
• Glossary/Abbreviations
• Index