CHAPTER ONE
A history of work
The concept of work, or its modern version ācareerā, has become such an essential aspect of our modern lives that itās hard to imagine a time when people didnāt even have a word for work in their vocabulary. I find this particularly mind-blowing, because my personal relationship with work is a very close one ā work, for me, is linked to my identity. Even if you are strongly in the workālife balance camp, chances are your work has a big impact on your sense of identity, too.
In this first chapter, we will look at a history of work: a whistle-stop tour of human beings and their ājobsā, ācareersā and attitudes towards work. For me, learning about the history of work is like a lightbulb moment; finally, everything makes sense, as you learn why we work and how it all began. Once we grasp where it came from, we can understand the most important thing for you and me: where is it going?
First, though, letās address the elephant in the room.
The question of workālife balance
There is a lot of discussion these days about āworkālife balanceā. As I mentioned, work for me is closely tied to who I am ā so much so, that for a long time, I didnāt get why people insisted so much on separating āworkā and ālifeā. Surely, work was life?! At least it seemed that way to me: some people canāt wait for the weekend so that they can have a break, whereas Iām the kind of person who canāt wait for the weekend so I can do my most creative work without interruption.
If you are a fan of books like The 4-Hour Work Week by Tim Ferris, you may be in the āworkālife balanceā camp. This is the mindset that views work as mainly a source of income. Ferris ā and many others like him ā suggest that you should strive to minimize your work hours and maximize your income, preferably making it as passive as possible.1
What Iām about to say in this chapter may appear to be the exact opposite of this point of view. However, donāt be too quick to judge. Iād argue that what Iām going to say isnāt actually that far from Ferrisā viewpoint at all. For example, some people may be inclined to say that Iām a workaholic. Thatās not how I see myself at all ā but hereās the point: what other people define as work, to me, is just being. I enjoy what I do so much that I donāt separate work from leisure.
As I write these words, Iām on a short holiday in Portugal. I know that if Iām found typing on my computer for too long, my boyfriend will remind me to rest and enjoy my break. For me, a break is not separate from work, and work is not different from the pursuit of knowledge and growth. Iām the kind of person who would sit in a bubble bath and listen to an audiobook or an article from The Economist ā grateful that they now make them available in audio format. Could you say that Iām having a break or working at that moment as I bathe? I consider my work as a calling: itās not a job to me, or even a career.
Workālife blend
And Iām not the only one. When you look at social media today, you will see that Iām not an anomaly. This attitude to work seems to be the standard way of life for many entrepreneurs, authors, scientists, content creators and artists. It has always been that way throughout history. Do you think, for example, that Mozart, Einstein, Nietzsche and Aristotle were concerned about workālife balance? I very much doubt it. But, of course, they didnāt have the internet so they were unable to share their progress and excitement on Instagram and LinkedIn. I can imagine Einstein tweeting his thoughts as he developed his theory of relativity! Newton famously worked such long hours and immersed himself in his work so much that he once boiled his watch instead of an egg.
Hereās what I believe, and what weāll look at more closely later on in this book: if you view work as a calling rather than merely a job, your attitude will change. You will be much more flexible and ready to learn and adapt to new technologies. You will naturally be inclined to find areas where you can contribute to society, have an impact and feel fulfilled. Most importantly, you will never compare yourself to others. It wonāt matter how successful other people may appear on social media. You will know who you are and what you can do.
All of this will become a lot easier and more interesting when you find your place in the world and get passionate about having a calling. To have a calling is to live life as a game. It is to enjoy the pain and the frustration of learning, growing, creating, failing, and starting all over again. It is not just a job, or just an income, or just a means to an end.
All of which raises the question: how did the value of work diminish to ājust a jobā in the first place?
From early humans to the first disruptors
When I look at the history of work, what strikes me is a sense that humans have had a loveāhate relationship with it. At least, this is the case in so far as we think of work as a means to feed and shelter ourselves.
In his excellent book The History of Work, Richard Donkin notes that, historically, the term work meant something to be avoided. It referred to what we might now describe as chores. In other words, from early history, work was viewed as a kind of burden. Ancient Greeks didnāt even have a word for this action, Donkin says. They had words for leisure and learning, but nothing that directly defined the activity we now know as work.2
Perhaps one of the reasons for this is that most of the early history of work was based on slavery. Sadly, the further back we go into the depths of human history, the less information we have about how our ancestors lived: in his book Sapiens, Yuval Noah Harari explains that early humansā position in the food chain was in the middle. He describes a scenario where a lion would kill another animal: the lion and her family would eat the flesh; hyenas and other animals ate the remainder; and finally, humans were able to get to the middle of the carcass (the bone marrow). Humans did this using sharp tools that they created from stones and wood. This enabled them to access nutrients that were untouched by other animals, avoiding contamination.3 We can think of this process as an early form of work. You can imagine why it wasnāt exactly pleasant: youād have to have a lot of patience hanging around until it was your turn to get to the food.
But of course, things moved on. As humans got more sophisticated at creating sharp tools, they were also able to kill smaller animals. Discovery of fire enabled them to cook previously indigestible foods. Access to these new kinds of nutrients was crucial in the growth and development of the human brain. As our brains developed, we also became more adept at using our hands to create tools and make fire and shelter. At the same time, humans started to stand upright and walk on two feet.
According to Harari, the combination of standing upright and the growth of the human brain came at a high cost, especially to women. Standing upright meant that womenās hips got narrower over time, making childbirth much more difficult. This was just at a time when our brains were getting bigger. The combination of bigger brains and narrower hips in women has meant that children are born while most of their vital systems are still underdeveloped. In most other animals, their babies can stand on their feet and live independently much more quickly than humans. But human babies need the protection of their parents for many years before they can be independent.4
This evolutionary fact has had both positive and negative impacts on human evolution. Perhaps most relevant for this book was the need to create social bonds and contracts to be able to survive. From there, itās not hard to imagine how the concept of work was born: imagine a group of hunter-gatherers. While men were out in the wild in pursuit of meat, women looked for fruit, nuts and grains that could be cooked and prepared.
If a woman with a toddler needed to leave her child to go into the woods to gather fruit and nuts, she could ask a teenage member of the group, or an older adult, to look after her child. The development of language helped humans negotiate and come to an agreement on these social roles. To leave your child with another human also meant that you would have to have similar values and be able to trust one another. The person looking after the child would ensure that the baby was safe until the mother returned. In return, the woman would share her food with the ānannyā.
This scenario is a very early form of āpaidā work, but it is far from organized. Itās not clear exactly when organized work began to take shape in human society.
Organized work and slavery
The concept of organized and supervised work is intertwined with a history of slavery. For most of our history as a species...