PART 1
Hebrews 1:1â4:13
Hearing Godâs Word with Faithful Endurance
With the inclusio that binds together the first major section of Hebrews, the author focuses the attention on Godâs word. âGod . . . has spoken in a Sonâ (1:2); Godâs word is âliving and active, sharper than any two edged swordâ (4:12). To say that God has spoken through a Son who is above the cosmos (1:3â4) is to recognize that this message is no ordinary word. It is the offer of a âgreat salvationâ (2:2â3) and the promise (4:1) that the people of God will reach the ultimate place of rest (4:9). The author maintains the theme of Godâs speech throughout the homily, finally reminding the community of the blood âthat speaks better than the blood of Abelâ (12:24).
As the author begins this âword of exhortationâ (13:22), the audience has not yet reached the promised land. Like their predecessors in ancient Israel they wander through the wilderness, and the promise appears more distant than ever. Consequently, their destiny rests on their willingness to âpay attentionâ (2:1), recognizing that they have reached the urgent moment when God speaks to them, âToday, if you hear his voice, do not harden your heartsâ (3:7â8a). As ancient Israel learned, Godâs promise of salvation is also the oath that declares, âThey shall never enter my restâ (3:11), to those who refuse to listen. Thus Godâs word is both the promise of salvation and the two-edged sword of judgment (MĂ€rz 1991, 263). Because âGod has spoken to us in a Sonâ (1:2), âwe must give an accountâ (literally âto whom is our word,â 4:13). Only those who listen and demonstrate faithful endurance through the unpleasant conditions of the wilderness will enter the promised land.
Part 1 of Hebrews sets the stage for the rest of the homily. The author maintains the wilderness setting, describing his listeners as the people on the move toward the promised land. He introduces the theme of Jesus as the pioneer (2:10) who leads the way and consistently invites readers to follow where Jesus has gone (4:14â16; 10:19â23; 12:1â2). He insists that readers endure faithfully, even when they have not received the promises (3:1â4:13; 10:32â12:13). Thus the urgent situation demands that the people hear the voice of the God who has spoken.
âș Hearing Godâs word with faithful endurance (1:1â4:13)
Exordium: Encountering Godâs ultimate word (1:1â4)
Narratio: Hearing Godâs word with faithful endurance (1:5â4:13)
Paying attention to Godâs word (1:5â2:4)
The communityâs present suffering (2:5â18)
Hearing Godâs voice today (3:1â4:13)
Probatio: Discovering certainty and confidence in the word for the mature (4:14â10:31)
Peroratio: On not refusing the one who is speaking (10:32â13:25)
Hebrews 1:1â4
Encountering Godâs Ultimate Word
Introductory Matters
Hebrews begins with an elegant style that is without parallel in the NT. Although it has an epistolary ending (cf. 13:18â25), it begins not with the traditional epistolary form but with a carefully structured combination of clauses in 1:1â4 (one sentence in Greek) that ancient writers called a period (periodos), literally a âway aroundâ (peri + hodos), that organizes several clauses into a well-rounded unity. This elegant style, which is rare in the NT but common in Hebrews (cf. 2:2â4; 4:12â13; 7:1â3, 26â28; 12:18â24), reflects the authorâs gift for language. The literary quality of the book is evident also in the use of alliteration, with five words in verse 1 beginning with the letter p (polymerĆs kai polytropĆs palai . . . patrasin . . . prophÄtais). Alliteration, especially using the letter p, was also a common device at the beginning of a speech or literary work (cf. Homer, Od. 1.1â4, polytropon . . . polla . . . pollĆn; Luke 1:1, polloi . . . peri . . . peplÄrophorÄmenĆn . . . pragmatĆn).
Figure 1. The Opening of Hebrews in an Ancient Manuscript.
Codex Alexandrinus is a fifth-century manuscript of the Greek Bible. The photograph shows the beginning of Hebrews at the top of the second column of folio 139 recto.
Like ancient orators, the author has artfully developed the opening words of his sermon, knowing that the beginning of the speech, known as the exordium, is the most critical part of the message (cf. Berger 1977, 19). Hebrews 1:1â4 conforms to the classical understanding of the exordium, establishing the expectations of the readers and preparing the way for the message that follows. The author crafts an artful periodic sentence in place of the customary epistolary introduction in order to prepare the audience for the distinctive form of address that will follow. The opening words in 1:1â2a introduce the theme of Godâs speech, which the author later develops (cf. 4:12â13; 5:11; 12:24â25). The âpurification for sinsâ in 1:3c anticipates the theme that the author develops in 9:1â10:18 (cf. 9:14, 22, 23; 10:2), indicating that the Levitical sacrifices provide the lens for the interpretation of the death of Christ. According to Exod 30:10, the Day of Atonement effected purification: âAaron shall make atonement once a year upon its horns (of the altar); from the blood of the purification for sins of atonement he shall purify it once a year.â According to Lev 16:30, the sacrifice of the Day of Atonement purifies the people from sins.
The claim that the Son has been exalted to Godâs right hand is a pervasive theme in Hebrews (cf. 1:13; 8:1; 10:12). The declaration that God has spoken in the past and âin these last daysâ anticipates the homilyâs consistent references to Godâs speech in the past and in the present (cf. 2:1â4; 4:12â13; 12:25â29). The note of continuity and discontinuity between Godâs speech to the fathers and in a Son (1:1â2a) anticipates the comparison between the institutions of the old and the new covenant throughout the homily. Thus the author follows common rhetorical practice by providing a table of contents in the opening words of the homily.
The rhythmic praise of the Son has suggested to numerous scholars that 1:1â4 contains a hymn, in whole or in part. Indeed, comparison with other NT passages that are widely recognized as hymns reveals numerous parallels with 1:1â4. Like Heb 1:1â4, NT hymns have a christological focus, commonly describing the Sonâs role in creating and sustaining the universe (cf. Col 1:16â17), descent to earth, ascent to heaven, and adoration by heavenly beings (cf. Phil 2:6â11; 1 Tim 3:16; also 1 Pet 3:22). The titles describing the Sonâs eternal nature (i.e., âradiance of his glory,â âexact representation of his beingâ) resemble early Christian hymns, which describe Christ as the âformâ (Phil 2:6) or âimageâ (Col 1:15) of God. The fact that these titles are used nowhere else in Hebrews has also suggested that the author is citing the words of a hymn. In addition, the parallelism and the relative clauses introduced by âwho(m)â are also common features of NT hymns that are found in Hebrews. Consequently, GĂŒnther Bornkamm (1963, 198) has suggested that the prologue of Hebrews is a hymn. His view is widely accepted among scholars (e.g., DeichgrĂ€ber 1967, 367; Hengel 1983, 84; Hofius 1991, 80).
These elements are not, however, sufficient evidence that the author is quoting a hymn. Indeed, most of the writers who identify the prologue of Hebrews as a hymn have difficulty demarcating the hymnic material from the surrounding prose. The introduction of major themes in 1:1â2a and 1:3bâ4 indicates that the exordium is deeply rooted in the authorâs own message. The authorâs use of the periodic sentence at critical transition points throughout the homily suggests that he is not quoting a hymn (cf. 2:1â4; 4:12â13; 7:26â28). Indeed, the correspondence between the periodic sentence here and the one in 12:18â24 suggests that he has crafted this introduction to move the audience toward his goal.
Only in the present participial phrases â[being] the radiance of his glory and exact representation of his beingâ and âbearing all things with his powerful wordâ (1:3aâb) is the language noticeably different from the authorâs description of the Son and reminiscent of NT hymns. Although these descriptions are parallel in content to the NT hymns, the authorâs terminology has no parallel in the NT, which nowhere else describes the Son as the âradiance of Godâs gloryâ or the âexact representation of his being.â The author of Hebrews could have appropriated these terms from wisdom literature and Philo, where they are widely used.
Whereas 1:1â2a and 1:3bâ4 summarize Godâs revelation of the Son within history (âin these last days,â âhaving made purification for sinsâ), 1:2bâ3a describes the Sonâs relationship to the cosmos in a series of relative clauses, all in the present tense, that echo Hellenistic reflection about Wisdom and the logos as mediators between God and the world. âAll thingsâ is a common designation for the totality of the universe (cf. John 1:3; Rom 11:36; 1 Cor 8:6; Heb 2:10) in Hellenistic philosophy that was adopted in the literature of Hellenistic Judaism (cf. Philo, Spec. Laws 1.208; Heir 36). God made his firstborn Son (cf. 1:6) âheirâ of all things, fulfilling the promise to David that he would receive the nations as an âinheritanceâ (Ps 2:8; Koester 2001, 178). âThrough whom he made the worldsâ echoes NT affirmations about the Sonâs role in creation (cf. John 1:1â3; 1 Cor 8:6) and is reminiscent of the claims in Hellenistic Judaism of the role of Wisdom and logos in the creation of the world (cf. Prov 8:22; Wis 7:22). âWorldsâ (aiĆnes), which is parallel to âall things,â can be used either temporally to mean âagesâ (cf. 1:8; 6:5, 20) or spatially to mean âworldsâ (cf. 11:3). The parallel to âall thingsâ suggests that the author is speaking in spatial terms to describe the cosmos, probably including both the heavenly and the earthly world that will be the subject of the later discussion in the homily. In subsequent comments about the creation, the author does not mention the Sonâs role, but describes God as the one who created all things (2:10) by his word (11:3).
In 1:3aâb, the author employs the present tense to describe the Sonâs relationship to God and to the creation in language that Hellenistic Jewish writers, especially Philo of Alexandria, employed to describe Wisdom (sophia) and the word (logos). The âreflection of his glory and exact representation of his beingâ are parallel phrases that employ separate metaphors to describe the relation of the Son to God. âReflectionâ (apaugasma) and âexact representationâ (charaktÄr) are parallel, just as âgloryâ (doxa) is parallel to âbeingâ (hypostasis). âGloryâ suggests the image of a shining light reminiscent of OT theophanies where the glory of God appeared (Weiss 1991, 145; Spicq 1994, 1:366; cf. Exod 16:10; 24:16; 33:18; 40:34â35; Lev 9:6, 23; Num 14:10; 16:19; 17:7 LXX [16:42 NRSV]; 20:6); thus it denotes the reality of God. Apaugasma, which c...