PART I
Thematic Essays
CHAPTER 1
God
Created in the Image of Diosito
The notion of God is a very broad metaphysical concept. To write a short chapter on this subject would not do justice to the variety of religious expressions and understandings behind this theological concept. Therefore, this chapter nuances this topic from the perspective of theological anthropology, in order to better understand notions of God from a Latino/a perspective. This chapter revisits a theological construct referred to in the dogmatic tradition as the imago Dei, a notion taken from the biblical reference to human beings as created in the image and likeness of God (Gen. 1:26â27). By examining the concept from the perspective of the dogmatic tradition in conversation with Hispanic popular religious expression, this chapter will elucidate how the community expresses and images its self-understanding in light of the experience of the sacred. An attempt will be made to show that God as experienced by the Hispanic/Latino/a community is not an exclusive metaphysical reality, but a personal and communal God who journeys with the people in daily life. To this end, this chapter will consult the diverse voices of both the Protestant and the Roman Catholic communities for a broader glimpse of the intimate and endearing God who is often referred to as Diosito.
To speak of God is to reflect on the nature or essence of God as experienced in community. When Protestant ethicist Ismael GarcĂa writes that âHispanics confess that our humanity is grounded in our being created in Godâs image,â he is speaking about the experience of a people who understand themselves as beloved of God who is amor, that is, love in relationship with others and specifically with a particular community that refers to itself as the Hispanic/Latino/a people of faith (1997:130). As a Protestant theologian who has reflected deeply on the meaning of God as amor, I have discovered from within my own community of faith and familial relationships that the character and nature of God is to be amoroso and cariñoso. This means God is a loving and affectionate friend who is often called Diosito, a term of endearment for One who is known intimately. This endearing friend creates, reveals, and manifests the essence of a caring love most acutely through others. As someone who loves us, Diosito is both a good friend, un Buen Amigo, and a Lover, un Amante, who initiates a loving relationship with the beloved community through the life and death of the beloved Son, Jesus of Nazareth. As Diosito, El Buen Amigo, and Amante, God loves the beloved community and creates us with this essence and capacity for reciprocal love even as our sinful nature often mars this image of perfect love. This amor del Amante and Buen Amigo is most clearly revealed in the incarnational love and ministry of Jesus of Nazareth. This is a view poignantly expressed by Roman Catholic theologian Virgilio Elizondo in his reflections and writings on the Galilean.1
To better understand the construct of the imago Dei and the notion that we as a people have been created âin the image and likeness of Diosito,â who is amor, let us briefly turn to the scriptural references. These texts are Genesis 1:26a: Then God said, âLet us make humankind in our image, according to our likenessâŠâ and Genesis 1:27: âSo God created humankind in his [sic] image, in the image of God he [sic] created them; male and female he [sic] created them.â Biblical scholars and theologians throughout the ages have reflected on the meaning of these texts as a way of understanding the nature and essence of the human, who is a reflection of the Creator.
Biblical scholar Claus Westermann points out that human dignity and responsibility for the creation are core values conferred by God in the creation of the human and that âimplicit in being created in the image of God is the capacity for languageâ (1987:11).2 Westermann also observes that the succession of human generations that the early biblical writer places after the creation story in Genesis (chapters 5 and 10) is a succession of names, and in the succession of names lies the beginning of history. History, he notes, grows out of the blessing conferred on the human family through fertility and procreation.
Westermannâs observations resonate with the Hispanic/Latino/a perspective on the imago Dei for several reasons. First, language or the ability to speak and name the world is derivative of the imago Dei as a gift of Diosito. The language of the family of origin is a gift of a historical and theological worldview. The gift of language also confers an identity that is nurtured and affirmed through the culture and history of the family and the community. It allows us to name the world and to cocreate with Diosito in the language of our culture. Historically, Hispanics/Latinos/as have been chastised for speaking the Spanish language because it represents the language of a conquered people. At the same time, Hispanics/Latinos/as who speak English as their primary language have at times experienced the lament of the loss of the native language of their parents and grandparents. While the English language has provided new opportunities, they are still treated as minorities within a much larger English-speaking dominant culture that often does not appreciate or value their contributions. Since the Spanish language is considered a foreign language throughout the United States, both the governmental and educational systems have attempted to eradicate it. The community resists these efforts because it recognizes that the Spanish language is the language of the heart. It is the language of prayer and of communion with Diosito.
Secondly, language is history. The gift of language allows the connection to the past. It gives the Hispanic/Latino/a community its sense of history and specificity within a culture that is not its own. It nurtures the cultural memory of faith and reminds the community that it has a place of belonging in the heart of God.3 It also provides the connection to the larger Hispanic/Latino/a community throughout the United States, so that a sense of solidarity and community arises wherever the Spanish language is heard and spoken. It helps to end the isolation that many immigrants feel when they enter this country and do not speak the English language. It reminds them that they have a common history and familiar roots. It confers dignity.
The apologists during the early church period emphasized the high value of the human being as a recurring theme in their works. This resonates with the Hispanic/Latino/a community. The early church writers appear to be in agreement with the psalmist in elevating the nature of humanity to a degree only slightly lower than the angels (Ps. 8). The noble characteristics they perceive in the humanâsuch as dignity, purity, and virtue; moral freedom and responsibility; reason in the service of morality; the ability to commune with God; as well as the bodily nature as a reflection of the divine and royal imageâare all evidence of an exalted view of humanity that was to characterize the early church movement and make it an appealing force for the community of the marginalized. These reflections were the basis for an early Christian theological anthropology that would leave its mark on the Roman Empire as the Christian church continued to grow as a subversive force within the empire. This elevated view of humanity would be a dynamic force in opposing the Roman notions of conquest and subjugation of foreign peoples.
Like the early church movement, the Hispanic/Latino/a community lives with a sense of estranged otherness due to a conquest of territories dating back to the nineteenth century. For Miguel De La Torre and Edwin Aponte, most Hispanics continue to be seen by the dominant culture as exiles, aliens, and outsiders, regardless of their historical connection to U.S. lands (2001:46â53). In light of this perception, the community strives to preserve its dignity based on its understanding of the human family. For Justo GonzĂĄlez, to be fully human is to be-for-others (1990:131). In this scenario no one exercises power over others, for that would lead to the dehumanization of everyone and the loss of our for-otherness. GonzĂĄlez and other Hispanic/Latino/a scholars such as Ada MarĂa Isasi-DĂaz (1993:34â54) and Ismael GarcĂa (1997:130â72) affirm the human being in other ways. They express and affirm the value of the human distinctively in community and in being-for-others. Sin is the violation of that for-otherness and the violation of Godâs image in us, which for GonzĂĄlez is precisely the image of Godâs for-otherness. The Hispanic/Latino/a affirmation of the oppressed minority differs from the way the early church theologians affirmed the human being. While early theologians affirmed the capacities of humans in their abilities to be like God, their interpretation tended to focus on the physical and psychical merits of the individual as a created being. They focused less on the human as a social and relational being who, as a communal person, reflects the image of Diosito who cares for others in community as exemplified in the life and praxis of Jesus of Nazareth.
From the perspective of the Hispanic/Latino/a community, the Genesis texts can only be understood and interpreted from within the context of a history of conquest, exile, and diaspora. This is also the experience of the more recent immigrant community and the U.S. native-born Hispanic/Latino/a community. Both share a history of marginalization, exclusion, and indignity due to cultural, linguistic, and religious roots and affiliations. Reflecting on this experience, Justo GonzĂĄlez and Ismael GarcĂa have interpreted the imago Dei construct with an understanding that to be created in the image and likeness of God affirms the human worth and dignity of all people and, in particular, those on the margins of society. For GonzĂĄlez, creation in the image and likeness of God means the exercise of the creative power and love of God after whom we have been created. As love, Godâs nature is being-for-others, and to be fully human is to be for others in a praxis of love and care.
The notion of the exiled community affirming its dignity in the face of oppressive conditions is not unlike the Hebrew writers who affirmed the dignity of their community when they constructed the Genesis texts of the imago Dei. They wrote those texts during or soon after the Babylonian exile and captivity as a way of affirming their God-given dignity and as a way of refuting the notion that only those in power were of divine origin. This experience closely parallels the Hispanic/Latino/a reality of exile and marginalization and the self-understanding that emerges from the encounter with the sacred. Whereas the exiled Hebrews sang the songs of Zion by the waters of Babylon, the Hispanic/Latino/a community sings songs or coritos (little choruses) that affirm the experience of a living and liberating God.4
The community interprets the biblical texts and their songs of praise in light of their experience of Diosito who, as being for-others, loves and cares for them. This understanding of Diosito is expressed most vividly through a popular corito known as âTu has venido a la orillaâ (âYou have come down to the lakeshoreâ). The lyrics express the understanding of Diosito as an intimate friend who calls us by name and invites us into the service of the reign of God:
You have come down to the lakeshore
Seeking neither the wise nor the wealthy,
but only asking for me to follow.
Refrain
Sweet Lord, you have looked into my eyes;
kindly smiling, youâve called out my name.
On the sand I have abandoned my small boat;
Now with you, I will seek other seas.
You know full well what I have, Lord:
neither treasure nor weapons for conquest;
just these my fish nets and will for working.
You need my hands, my exhaustion,
working love for the rest of the weary
a love thatâs willing to go on loving.
You who have fished other waters;
you, the longings of souls that are yearning:
O loving Friend, you have come to call me.5
According to Aponte, coritos are concrete vehicles that express a hope, faith, and empowerment rooted in both the Bible and lived experiences of the community. They give a voice to the hope of the people and their faith in God. They allow the community the freedom to give voice to their understanding of Diosito in their own language. They allow us to cross denominational barriers and racial and language boundaries as we recognize that we serve the same Lord and Diosito of all.
In summary, Hispanics/Latinos/as understand themselves to be created in the image and likeness of Diosito. This self-understanding is most clearly revealed through the gift of language by which they know and name themselves in light of their experience of a loving Diosito. The popular coritos capture this sense of the sacred Other who knows them intimately and calls them by name. The Hispanic/Latino/a people proclaim in many and diverse ways that in the community of the beloved all people are welcome and no one is a stranger before Diosito who is both Amigo and Amante. Their faith in Diosito expressed through their own cultural and religious symbols affirms and celebrates their understanding of God who calls all people into a loving relationship with others.
CHAPTER 2
Jesus
At 10:00 a.m., a loud trumpet signals the entrance of Pilate onto the stage to confront Jesus of Nazareth. From this point on, the words and actions follow the gospel passion narratives, with San Fernando parishioners playing the parts of the different characters in the passion story. Pilate sends Jesus to Herod, who in turn returns him to Pilate for judgment. After the crowd calls for the release of Barrabas, Jesus is flogged and crowned with thorns. Pilate presents the beaten and broken Nazarene to the peopleâthat is to the assembled crowd in San Fernando/ Jerusalemâwho cry out for his crucifixion. The scene can only be described as eerie: this is not an event that happened two thousand years ago, but an event taking place today and in which we are actively participating (Goizueta,1995:34).
With this haunting description of the Good Friday reenactment at San Fernando Cathedral in San Antonio, Texas, Cuban American theologian Roberto S. Goizueta enters into the popular rituals surrounding one of the most powerful images in Latino/a religiosity: the crucified Jesus. The Jesus of Good Friday is a central christological symbol within Latino/a theology. This stems from a theological worldview that strongly emphasizes Jesusâ humble origins, his prophetic message, and his active presence in the present-day lives of Christians, in particular his solidarity with the oppressed and marginalized. This strong emphasis on Jesusâ suffering and passion distinguishes Latinos/as fro...