Introduction: Cognitive Sciences and Medieval Studies
Notes
1 David Eagleman, Incognito: The Secret Lives of the Brain (Edinburgh: Canongate, 2011), idem, The Brain (Edinburgh: Canongate, 2015); Douglas Hofstadter, I Am a Strange Loop (New York: Basic Books, 2007); Gina Rippon, The Gendered Brain: The New Neuroscience that Shatters the Myth of the Female Brain (London: Vintage, 2019); Jonah Lehrer, Proust Was a Neuroscientist (Edinburgh: Canongate, 2012); Wendy S. Jones, Jane on the Brain: Exploring the Science of Social Intelligence with Jane Austen (New York: Pegasus Books, 2017).
2 The date of a landmark research presentation at MIT. See Howard Gardner, The Mindâs New Science (New York: Basic Books, 1987), p. 28.
3 On the major areas of study and debates in the field, see, for instance, William Bechtel and George Graham (eds), A Companion to Cognitive Science (Oxford: Blackwell, 1998), pp. 107â337.
4 See, for example, the Wellcome-funded Hearing the Voice project on hallucination at Durham University (http://hearingthevoice.org); a study of how people relate to and interpret unusual experiences conducted by the UNI QUE research group (Institute of Psychiatry, Kingâs College London: https://www.kcl.ac.uk/ioppn/depts/psychology/research/researchgroupings/the-uniqueresearch-group); the Religion, Experience, and Mind (REM) Lab Group (University of California: https://remlab.religion.ucsb.edu); The Eyeâs Mind project at the University of Exeter (http://sites.exeter.ac.uk/eyesmind/); and the AHRC History of Distributed Cognition Project (http://www.hdc.ed.ac.uk), to name a few.
5 Marilyn Strathern, âUseful Knowledgeâ, Proceedings of the British Academy, 139 (2006), 73â109 (p. 78).
6 For a detailed account of these debates, see Maxwell Bennett, Daniel Dennett, Peter Hacker, John Searle and Daniel Robinson, Neuroscience and Philosophy: Brain, Mind, and Language (New York: Columbia University Press, 2007). John Bickle argues that philosophers need to branch out even further from the relatively familiar theoretical level of cognitive neuroscience and look to the more challenging neuroscientific research in molecular biology and cellular physics. See Philosophy and Neuroscience: A Ruthlessly Reductive Account (Norwell, MA: Springer, 2003).
7 For a broad survey and overview of these developments, see Charissa N. Terranova and Meredith Tromble (eds), The Routledge Companion to Biology in Art and Architecture (New York: Routledge, 2017).
8 John Canaday, The Nuclear Muse: Literature, Physics, and the First Atomic Bombs (Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press, 2000), p. 3.
9 In addition to the works by medievalists below, recent examples in literary studies include Barri J. Gold, Thermopoetics: Energy in Victorian Literature and Science (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2010); Sarah C. Alexander, Victorian Literature and the Physics of the Imponderable (London: Taylor & Francis, 2015); Courtney Weiss Smith, Empiricist Devotions: Science, Religion, and Poetry in Early Eighteenth-Century England (Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia Press, 2016); Michael Tondre, The Physics of Possibility: Victorian Fiction, Science, and Gender (Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia Press, 2018); Karin Kukkonen, 4E Cognition and Eighteenth-Century Fiction: How the Novel Found its Feet (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019).
10 See Donna J. Haraway, âManifesto for Cyborgs: Science, Technology, and Socialist Feminism in the 1980sâ, Socialist Review, 80 (1985), 65â108; When Species Meet (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2007); Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2016).
11 Karen Barad, âNatureâs queer performativityâ, Kvinder, Køn & Forskning, 1â2 (2012), 25â53 (p. 29). See also Barad, âQueer causation and the ethics of matteringâ, in Noreen Giffney and Myra J. Hird (eds), Queering the non/human (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2008), pp. 311â38.
12 See, for example, Suparna Choudhury and Jan Slaby (eds), Critical Neuroscience: A Handbook of the Social and Cultural Contexts of Neuroscience (Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2012); Cristian TileagÄ and Jovan Byford (eds), Psychology and History: Interdisciplinary Explorations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014).
13 Mark Turner, Reading Minds: The Study of English in the Age of Cognitive Science (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1991); The Literary Mind: The Origins of Thought and Language (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996).
14 Lisa Zunshine, Why We Read Fiction: Theory of Mind and the Novel (Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press, 2006); Getting Inside Your Head: What Popular Science Can Tell Us about Popular Culture (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2012), p. xi. Zunshine has also edited the Introduction to Cognitive Cultural Studies (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2010) and the Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Literary Studies (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015).
15 Suzanne Nalbantian, Paul M. Matthews; James L. McClelland, The Memory Process: Neuroscientific and Humanistic Perspectives (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2010); Suzanne Nalbantian, Memory in Literature: From Rousseau to Neuroscience (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003); Paul M. Matthews and Jeff McQuain, The Bard on the Brain: Understanding the Mind Through the Art of Shakespeare and the Science of Brain Imaging (New York: Dana, 2003); Ann Taves, Religious Experience Reconsidered: A Building-Block Approach to the Study of Religion and Other Special Things (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2009); Patrick McNamara (ed.), Where God and Science Meet: How Brain and Evolutionary Studies Alter Our Understanding of Religion, 3 vols (Westport, CT: Praeger, 2006).
16 See Cognitive Science, Literature, and the Arts: A Guide for Humanists (New York: Routledge, 2003); Understanding Nationalism: On Narrative, Cognitive Science, and Identity (Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press, 2009); What Literature Teaches Us About Emotion (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011).
17 See especially âDistributing Cognition in the Globeâ, Shakespeare Quarterly, 56/2 (2005), 135â55; Cognition in the Globe: Attention and Memory in Shakespeareâs Theatre (New York and Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011); Early Modern Actors and Shakespeareâs Theatre: Thinking with the Body (London: Bloomsbury, 2017). In a similar vein, Mary Thomas Crane explored Shakespeareâs plays through the lens of embodied cognition and cognitive linguistics in Shakespeareâs Brain: Reading with Cognitive Theory (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2001).
18 Jane Chance and Anthony Passaro (eds), postmedieval: a journal of medieval cultural studies 3/3 (2012). See especially Jane Chanceâs introduction, âCognitive alterities: From cultural studies to neuroscience and back againâ, 247â61.
19 On cognition and emotions, see Sino Knuuttila, Emotions in Ancient and Medieval Philosophy (Oxford: Clarendon, 2004); Martin PickavĂŠ and Lisa Shapiro (eds), Emotion and Cognitive Life in Medieval and Early Modern Philosophy (Oxford: Clarendon, 2012); Frank Brandsma, Carolyne Larrington and Corinne Saunders (eds), Emotions in Medieval Arthurian Literature: Body, Mind, Voice (Cambridge: D. S. Brewer, 2015); Victoria Blud, âEmotional Bodies: Cognitive Neuroscience and Mediaeval Studiesâ, Literat...