A âTHEOLOGYâ OF THEÂ SPIRIT?
THE SPIRIT IN PAULINE THEOLOGY
Our theology and experience of the Spirit must
be more interwoven if our experienced life
of the Spirit is to be more effective.
I well remember my graduate theology professor declaring emphatically: âEveryone has a theology [that is, some rudimentary view of God and the world on the basis of which they live]; the question is not whether you have a theologyâyou doâbut whether you have a good one.â
Without apology, therefore, this is primarily a book on Paulâs theology, that is, how Paul understood God and his ways, and the role of the Spirit in that theology. For some, of course, a âtheologyâ book on the Spirit is the kiss of death; and in many ways I am in that camp. But we lack a better word; and in the final analysis, the health of the contemporary church necessitates that its theology of the Spirit and its experience of the Spirit correspond much more closely than they have in much of the past.
Ordinarily theology has to do with a studied, reflective understanding of things divine, dealing with how the various matters we believe about God and Godâs ways can be put into a coherent whole. But we do not find Paul reflecting on the Holy Spirit, any more than we find him reflecting on the significance of the Lordâs Table or on the relationships within the Godhead, which he presupposes and which tantalizingly pop out here and there. As often happens with such foundational matters, we rarely look at them reflectively. They are simply part of the stuff of ongoing life; and what we say about them is often offhanded, matter-of-fact, and without argument or explanation.
Yet theology is what Paul is doing all the time. Rather than the reflective theology of the scholar or classroom, his is a âtask theology,â the theologizing that takes place in the marketplace, where belief and the experience of God run head-on into the thought systems, religions, and everyday life of people in the Greco-Roman world at the beginning of the second half of the first century. Paulâs task theology is the more complex because it takes place in a racially and socially diverse environment. In part, therefore, the issues raised for Paul have to do with what the God of the Jews (the one and only God) was doing in history through Christ and the Spirit, which for Paul transpired within a primarily Gentile context.
Into this kind of setting Paul came preaching, experiencing, rethinking, and restating old and new truths, as he wrestled with what it meant for Jew and Gentile together to be the one people of God. In the process he was constantly âdoingâ theology, grappling with how the gospel worksâand works outâin this new context that was so radically different from the more insular Jewish world in which the gospel first appeared in history.
Our present concern in this reading of Paul is with what he says about the Spirit, since his words are our primary window into his understanding. But we need to do more than just gather all the passages and test them against some set of doctrinal assumptions, for in the case of the Spirit we are dealing with the essential matter of early Christian experience. The only worthwhile theology, after all, is one that is translated into life; and Paulâs understanding of the Spirit is ultimately a matter of lived-out faith. The experience of the Spirit was how the early believers came to receive the salvation that Christ had brought, and how they came to understand themselves as living at the beginning of the end times. For them, the Spirit was both the evidence that Godâs great future for his people had already made its way into the present and the guarantee that God would conclude what he had begun in Christ (= Paulâs eschatological framework). Thus the Spirit is foundational to their entire experience and understanding of their present life in Christ.
My concern is that we come to terms both with the experienced realities and with Paulâs understanding of them, as much as we can do that fairly and with integrity.
CONTINUITY AND DISCONTINUITYÂ WITH THE PAST
One of the primary issues in Pauline theology is that of continuity and discontinuity between the old covenant and the newâthat is, between Godâs word to Israel, communicated by prophet and poet, and Godâs new word to his people through Christ Jesus, communicated by apostles and teachers. We read the letters of Paul as part of the New Testament, the record of Godâs new covenant with his people, effected through Christ and the Spirit. But in fact Paul did not know he was contributing to such a ânew testament.â For him the ânew covenantâ was not a written record at all but a historical reality, experienced anew at the Table of the Lord and realized on an everyday basis through the presence of the Spirit. The question then is, How is the new related to the old? Does it supersede, as a truly new covenant? Or does it fulfill, and in so doing carry with it much of what was there before? In order to understand Paul properly we must grasp how his perspective both continues and modifies the religious tradition in which he was reared, especially his understanding of his Old Testament roots.
First, we must recognize his own sense of continuity with his heritage. Paul sees himself and his churches as being in a direct line with the people of God in the Old Testament; and despite his deep convictions about the radical implications of the coming of Christ and the Spirit, he regularly reaffirms that continuity. He includes a primarily Gentile church in the events of the exodus: âall our forefathers were baptized into Moses in the cloud and in the seaâ (1 Cor 10:1â2). To Gentiles who were in danger of submitting to circumcision he not only appeals to Abraham and the promises of the old covenant, but also asks frankly, âTell me, you who wish to be under the law, do you not hear the law?â and then expounds the âtrue meaningâ of Sarah and Hagar, Isaac and Ishmael, in light of Christ and the Spirit (Gal 4:21â31). Paul never speaks of a ânew Israelâ or ânew people of Godâ; his language is âGodâs Israelâ (Gal 6:16), an Israel in continuation with the past but now composed of Jew and Gentile alike as the one people of God.
But just as clearly, there is significant discontinuity. The people of God have now been newly formed. Christ is the âgoal of the lawâ (Rom 10:4), and the Spirit is âthe promised Holy Spiritâ (Gal 3:14; Eph 1:13). Christâs death and resurrection have brought an end to Torah observance (living on the basis of the Old Testament law, Rom 7:4â6; 8:2â3); being led by the Spirit has replaced observance as Godâs way of fulfilling Torah (Gal 5:18); indeed, the righteous requirement of Torah is now fulfilled in those who walk in/by the Spirit (Rom 8:4).
The Holy Spirit was an essential part of Israelâs promised future. For Paul the gift of âthe Holy Spirit of promiseâ (Eph 1:13) is the certain evidence that the future has already been set in motion. To see how the promise has been fulfilled by the Spirit, and how that affected the early churchâs self-understanding, is part of the invitation to this fresh reading of Paul.
Since the Spirit plays this integral role in fulfilling the promised new covenant, it would be fitting to include a chapter in this book on the Pauline antecedents,[1] that is, on the role of the Spirit in the Old Testament and intertestamental Judaism. Rather than do that, I have chosen to show throughout the book what their expectations looked like and how Paul understands the Spirit as fulfilling them.
FINDING THE ELUSIVE CENTER
A final introductory word concerns the long debate in scholarship as to what constitutes the âheartâ of Paulâs theology.[2] The traditional view, fostered by the Reformers and perpetuated by generations of Protestants, is that âjustification by faithâ is the key to that theology. This view emphasizes Christâs historical saving act on our behalf and our realization of it through faith. The inadequacy of this view is that it focuses on one metaphor of salvation, justification, to the exclusion of others.[3] Such a focus fails to throw the net broadly enough to capture all of Paulâs theological concerns.
In response to this, others found as the center Paulâs âmystical experience of being in Christ.â[4] This view shifted the focus from Christâs historical work and its appropriation by the believer to the believerâs (especially Paulâs) ongoing experience of Christ. While in some ways this view served as a corrective to the traditional one, most contemporary Pauline scholars have recognized that both these approaches are somewhat limiting. The frequent result, however, has been to emphasize the diversity and âcontingencyâ[5] of Paulâs letters to such an extent that many scholars, reflecting contemporary postmodernism, despair of ever finding a genuine center to Pauline theologyâor even of finding coherence in his theology at all.
I bring two convictions to these matters regarding Pauline theology. First, I am convinced that there is a stable core to Paulâs understanding of Christ and the Spirit, much of which he presupposes, based on his sense of continuity with the old, and all of which can be found in what he simply calls âthe gospel.â For him there was a fundamental core content to the gospelâa content held in common with all other early Christians (see, e.g., 1 Cor 15:1â3, 11). The seeming variations in Paulâs theology, as I understand them, have to do with his working through the implications of that common content for the Gentile mission, to which he devoted the last two decades of his life.
Second, and in keeping with some of the present mood, I am convinced that the center is so elusive because the basic core of Paulâs theology covers too much ground for one to simplify it into a single phrase. It would seem far better for us to isolate the essential elements of his theology that lie at the heart of matters for Paul and around which all other concerns cluster. In my view, at least four elements are essential:
- The church as an eschatological community (that is, a community living in the "beginning of the end times") made up of the new covenant people of God.
- The eschatological framework of this new people's existence and thinking.
- The formation of God's new people by the eschatological salvation accomplished through the death and resurrection of Christ.
- The focus of this people on Jesus as Messiah, Lord, and Son of God.
To put this another way:
- The foundation: A gracious and merciful God, who is full of love toward all.
- The framework: The fulfillment of God's promises as already begun but not yet completed.
- The focus: Jesus, the Son of God, who as God's suffering servant Messiah accomplished eschatological salvation for humanity through his death and resurrection, and who is now the exalted Lord and coming King.
- The fruit: The church as an eschatological community, who, formed as a people by Christ's death and the gift of the Spirit, and thus restored into God's likeness, becomes God's new covenant people.
If this is a correct assessment of Paulâs perspective (and indeed that of the rest of the New Testament), then we might further distill all of this. On the one hand, as will be pointed out in chapter 5, it seems impossible to understand Paul without recognizing eschatology as the essential framework of all his theological thinking; on the other hand, salvation in Christ is the essential concern within that framework. Salvation is âeschatologicalâ in the sense that final salvation, which still awaits the believer, is already a present reality through Christ and the Spirit. It is âin Christâ in the sense that what originated in God was effected historically by the death and resurrection of Christ, and is received and experienced by Godâs people through the work of the Holy Spiritâwho is also the key to Christian life âbetween the times,â until the final consummation at Christâs parousia (âcomingâ).
It does not take much reflection to recognize that apart from the actual focus on Jesus Christ as Messiah, Lord, and Savior, the Spirit is a crucial ingredient to each of these aspects of the Pauline center. Thus my conviction that the Spirit stands near the center of things for Paul, as part of the fundamental core of his understanding of the gospel. The experience of the Spirit is the key to his already/not yet eschatological framework; the Spirit is the essential player in the believersâ experiencing and living out the salvation that God has brought about in Christ; the Spirit both forms the church into Godâs new (eschatological) people and conforms them into Christâs image through his fruit in their lives; and the Spirit gifts them in worship to edify and encourage one another in their ongoing life in the world. It is fair to say that âPaulâs entire theology without the supporting pinion of the Spirit would crumble into ruins.â[6]
Finally, I must note that the aim of all this is not simply informational. I would be less than honest if I did not admit to trying to persuade. But persuasion in this case is not a matter of being right or wrong. My ultimate concern, for myself and for the contemporary church, is that we return to our biblical roots on this matter if the church is going to count for anything in the new millennium that lies just around the corner.
GOD REVISITS HIS PEOPLE
THE SPIRIT AS THE RENEWED PRESENCE OF GOD
The outpouring of the Spirit meant for Paul
that God had fulfilled his promise to dwell
once again in and among his people.
Presence is a delicious wordâbecause it points to one of our truly great gifts. Nothing else can take the place of presence, not gifts, not telephone calls, not pictures, not mementos, nothing. Ask the person who has lost a lifelong mate what they miss the most; the answer is invariably âpresence.â When we are i...