CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
Luca Zamparini and Ila Maltese
ABSTRACT
The relationship between transport and tourism is very complex to analyze due to mutual causality. Nonetheless, it is worthwhile investigating it, especially paying attention to sustainable mobility, due to the need to minimize the externalities of transport, which can otherwise reduce the attractiveness of a tourism destination. To this aim, after a brief overview of different analytical frameworks, this chapter focuses on transport at destination and sustainable mobility options, such as local public transport (PT) and active modes (walking and cycling). In particular, it provides some insights from the literature about both touristsâ mobility patterns â by taking into account both psychological aspects of tourism experience and the localization of the amenities â and specific modal choices, more focused on the impact of transport on the environment. It then concludes by presenting short summaries of each chapter of the book, in order to provide an overview of the investigated topics, which are dealing with both geographical (islands, coastal areas, natural areas) and management/administration (technical solutions, PT provision, transport demand) issues.
Keywords: active transport modes; mobility patterns; modal choice; public transport; sustainable mobility; transport for tourism
The relationship between transport and tourism is very complex to analyze (Page & Ge, 2009), due to reasons that are both theoretical, given the strong mutual causality between the two sectors, and empirical, as it is often difficult to distinguish whether the user of the transport service is a tourist or not. Consequently, although there are several studies dealing with this connection, they end up privileging one of the two perspectives (tourism or transport). An interesting exception was represented by the holistic and multidisciplinary approach of Page (2005), according to which the analysis of the relationship between transport and tourism should consider three main aspects: actually, not only transport clearly encourages and facilitates tourism (transport for tourism) but also tourism promotes the development of the transport sector (tourism for transport), in terms of new technologies, new forms of marketing, product development (e.g., as the complete package including accommodation and travel). Moreover, when carried out on specific means of transport, the trip itself becomes a tourism experience (transport is tourism).
Focusing on the first causal nexus, it is quite evident the importance of âtransportâ as a part of the âdestinationâ tourism product (together with accommodation, catering, and all collateral services). More specifically, it could be worthwhile to distinguish between the different types of transport services that can be used by tourists, as they deal not only with different mobility patterns and different transport modes, but also with different aspects of the destination itself. First of all, the definition itself of tourism, âtraveling to and staying in places outside oneâs own usual environmentâ for not more than one consecutive year (and not less than 24 hours) for leisure, business and other purposes (WTO, 1995) highlights the need to cover a certain distance that can be satisfied by the transport sector.
Transport from the origin to the tourist destination is thus the main theme, dealing with a multi-faceted concept of the tourist destination accessibility, which heavily depends on the presence of infrastructures and their intermodality level (physical dimension), on the tariffs system (economic dimension), and on the information level (communication dimension). More broadly speaking, the improvement in efficiency and the decrease of cost of the different modes of transport (Culpan, 1987; Duval, 2007) has allowed to reduce distances and times and to increase the service capacity, Jointly with some socio-economic (more leisure time and higher income) and regulatory (e.g., the liberalization of passenger movement) changes, such improvements in transport have allowed the development of mass tourism. Moreover, the increase in average income of individuals and the consequent possibility of having a car has led to the development of shorter and medium-range tourism.
Another topic that has attracted the attention of both scholars and practitioners is related to the transport activities between multiple tourist destinations. Once arrived at the main destination, tourists may want to visit other places not far from each other or they may have made prior arrangements in order to stay at a central location from which it is possible to make excursions to neighboring places (Plog, 1974). This implies to focus on the infrastructure for rail or bus services running from one location to another and strengthening the degree of connectivity among the different locations. In other cases, tourists choose a unique destination for their journey, arousing the interest on Transport within tourist destinations, which in most cases becomes part of the tourism product. The local public transport (PT) plays a crucial role, since it deals with several interesting aspects for tourism: (a) the management of feeder services for the major transport infrastructures (airports, railway, and maritime stations, etc.); (b) the capillarity of the service, with respect to the amenities of the tourist destination; (c) the tariff integration, together with special offer for tourists; (d) the multilingual and technological management of the information and communication service, both on-site (announcements and signs), and remotely (website) which allows displaying maps, pedestrian and cycle paths. Furthermore, due to the shorter distance to be covered, local PT can be easily replaced by walking or cycling. In any case, it is quite evident that the sustainable mobility choices at this stage are crucial also for residents and for the attractiveness of the destination itself. Within this context, sustainable mobility policy for tourism should be designed and implemented. In this context, the technology may be very important in several respects. First, the socio-economic trends, such as, for example, the aging of population, which leads to new challenges in terms of accessibility to tourist destinations. Then, the decrease in the motorization rate among the new generations, which will create ânew tourists,â more digitized and caring to sustainability issues, and therefore more likely to adopt âsharingâ and âgreenâ means of transport for traveling.
The topic of sustainable transport within tourist destinations will be the focus of the various contributions that constitute the book. It then appears useful to present a brief review of the main studies that have been proposed in the literature. While tourism is of paramount importance for many local economies, it could also be harmful in terms of natural resources over-consumption and environment degradation, reducing the destination attractiveness. Among the many different issues addressed by sustainable tourism, transport is probably the most relevant one (Gössling, 2002).
In this context, the mobility behavior of tourists once at destination has attracted the attention of scholars. The related studies can be distinguished between two main lines of research. The first one deals with mobility patterns and it is focused on the psychological aspects of the tourism experience and on the amenitiesâ management. The second one considers the modal choices with a particular emphasis on transport and its impact on the environment.
As it concerns the first line of research, several works can benefit from the new and widespread technologies such as GPS tracking devices or mobile phones for collecting data on tourist movement patterns within confined areas. Lau and McKercher (2006) analyzed the itinerary of tourists in Hong Kong by mapping their movements throughout a daily trip diary and GIS data. They also try to ascertain the factors that drive touristsâ decision-making and behavior and group them into three main categories: (a) trip factors (specific to the trip, such as type and duration); (b) human factors (related to demographic and psychological characteristics of the tourist); and (c) physical (related to the destination such as configuration, transport network, and attractions). More recently, using GPS tracking technology, Zheng, Huang, and Li (2017) collected movement information from tourists in the Summer Palace in Beijing, while De Cantis, Ferrante, Kahani, and Shoval (2016) focused on cruise passenger in the port of Palermo; Orellana, Bregt, Ligtenberg, and Wachowicz (2012) analyzes the movements in the 37 km2 Dwingelderveld National Park (the Netherlands) while Reif (2019) analyzes the spatiotemporal behavior of same-day visitors in Hamburg.
The second line of research appears to be more relevant with respect to sustainable mobility at destinations. Masiero and Zoltan (2013) discovered that the spatial extent of the visited destination, in terms of attractions and their localization, is linked to the modal choice of the tourist which is, in turn, explained by demographics. Several studies have dealt with the local PT used by tourists. Barr and Prillwitz (2012) segmented tourists in four market segments: (a) âReluctant PT usersâ (older and retired people, forced from their restricted accessibility to the car); (b) âCommitted green travelersâ (middle-aged people, managers or professionals who usually prefer active transport); (c) âAspiring green travelersâ; and (d) âaddicted car users,â who are less likely to use PT. Furthermore, an in-depth survey of the literature on the touristsâ use of PT at destinations allowed Le-KlĂ€hn and Hall (2015) to draw some conclusions. Heterogeneities in PT use (and provision) first depend on rural or urban destinations. In this context, both push (concerning touristâs motives and preferences) and pull (regarding PT characteristics and provision) factors (Dann, 1999) play a determinant role. At the urban scale, the users of PT are generally younger and concerned about the environment and sustainable mobility. They are also more confident about a reliable PT. In rural areas, elderly people may feel unsecure to drive and they may also have a higher willingness to enjoy the journey/trip/travel in terms of landscape and social engagement (Stradling, Carreno, Rye, & Noble, 2007). Moreover, it is worth to notice that the modal choice toward destination certainly affects the modal choice within destination (Hergesell & Dickinger, 2013): rail or road PT, replacing the private mode, can be helpful in achieving sustainable mobility, fostering local PT or slow modes at destination.
By focusing on the supply side, it emerges that services planning must be carefully considered (Gronau, 2017; Gross & Grimm, 2019). Not only in terms of sustainability but also because it may enhance the accessibility and promote a better environment within the tourist destination. This may increase the satisfaction of tourists, the attractiveness of the destination, and the number of repeated visits (Barros, 2012; Fu & Chen, 2019; Reyes VĂ©lez, PĂ©rez Naranjo, & RodrĂguez Zapatero, 2019). Lastly, other scholars (Dickinson, Calver, Watters, & Wilkes, 2004; Gronau, 2017) have analyzed the possibility to adopt a mix of reward for PT users and of penalties for private transport adopters to stimulate a more sustainable modal share.
STRUCTURE OF THE BOOK
The following chapters of the book will explore in depth many of the issues that have been considered in the first part of the Introduction by means of a large series of case studies. The chapters are grouped according to several interesting themes. In particular, Chapters 2 and 3 consider, respectively, the changes of transport in cross-border tourist regions in the Polish-Slovak borderland and the mobility choices of tourists in an important Polish seaside destination. Chapters 4 and 5 are related to the management of transport activities in urban tourism destinations. Chapters 6 and 7 discuss the transport activities and choices in the case of islandsâ tourism by taking into account Malta and the island of Ischia in the Italian gulf of Naples. Chapter 8 will consider the challenges for PT provision in a coastal mass destination. Chapter 9 will analyze the transportation demand management (TDM) in the case of important events. Chapters 10 and 11 will consider transport mobility in natural areas, by proposing two case studies in Italy and in Spain. The following are brief summaries of the contents and aims of the abovementioned chapters.
Chapter 2, âChanges of Transport in Cross-border Tourist Regions in the PolishâSlovak Borderland: An (un)Sustainable Development?â by Daniel Michniak and Marek WiÄckowski, aims at developing some concepts linking sustainable development with transport and tourism, by paying particular attention to the conflict between sustainability and transport development and to some elements of transport injustice. It analyzes the theoretical aspects of a relationship between transport and tourism and it assesses selected changes in cross-border transport that have influenced tourism in Polish-Slovak tourism regions. The chapter then considers the changes that have occurred both in terms of transport infrastructure and transport activities in the borderland between 1990 and 2020. It also enquires whether the development of transport is in accordance with the sustainable development goals. It consequently highlights the interactions between tourism, transport, borders, and sustainability in mountainous areas. The proposed case study is the P...