1
Introduction
Denise Cooper-Clarke and Jill Firth
âThere Are No Women in My Bibliographies!â
In 2015, music student Jessy McCabe observed that there were no women among the sixty-three composers featured on her UK school music syllabus. Five years later, another syllabus showed only 4 percent women composers. Similarly, womenâs voices are underrepresented in the Australian media, as documented by Jenna Price and Anne Marie Price in their report, 2019 Women for Media: âYou Canât Be What You Canât See.â Theological college students can resonate with the experience of Marion Taylor, who asked her university professor if he could recommend a woman biblical interpreter as a topic for an upcoming essay. He replied succinctly that there were none. Marionâs subsequent research identified many nineteenth-century women biblical interpreters, and later broadened out to her Handbook of Women Biblical Interpreters (2012), which introduces 180 women interpreters from Paula, associate of Jerome, and Macrina, sister of the Cappadocian fathers Basil and Gregory, in the fourth and fifth centuries, to Katharina SchĂźtz Zell and Mary Sidney Herbert in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, to Florence Nightingale and Christina Rosetti (who wrote a commentary on the book of Revelation) in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries.
Publishing, rather than public speaking, marks the âentry of women preachers into male dominated discourse,â as early Methodist women observed. Recent Australian research into women in theological education identified female representation in bibliographies and female role models as among key factors for encouraging women students. In past decades, there were few or no women authors in many academic theology reading lists, and today there is still a dearth of womenâs writing, Australian womenâs writing, or evangelical womenâs writing in theology and biblical studies.
This book grew from a desire to offer accessible readings by Australian women scholars in the evangelical tradition, for students and lecturers in biblical studies, theology, and applied subjects. We invited chapters from established and emerging scholars from around Australia, and from a variety of theological colleges. Many of the chapters were first presented at the Evangelical Women in Academia conference, which took place at Ridley College in Melbourne on August 3, 2019. This conference was the third in a series of annual conferences, from 2017â2019. The inaugural Evangelical Women in Academia conference in 2017 featured speakers Lynn Cohick and Delle Matthews. The 2018 conference, Finding Her Voice, explored womenâs writing and public speaking with publisher Katya Covrett, Old Testament scholar Katy Smith, and missiologist Moyra Dale. At the 2019 conference, the theme Grounded: in the Body, in Time and Place, in Scripture was explored by featured speakers Paula Gooder and Jude Long and in around twenty academic papers that were presented by Australian evangelical women scholars. Alongside the conferences, Ridley has also developed womenâs writing groups and a womenâs preaching network.
In this introduction, we consider what women, and Australian women in particular, bring to theological and biblical scholarship, then provide an overview of the chapters.
Women and Australian Women in Theological Scholarship
In considering the rationale for publishing a book by Australian women scholars in the fields of theology and biblical studies, it is reasonable to ask whether women have a particular contribution to make in these fields. We believe that they do. In 1889, over a century ago, Frances Willard, president of the Womanâs Christian Temperance Union, issued this call: âWe need women commentators to bring out the womenâs side of the book; we need the stereoscopic view of truth in general, which can only be had when womanâs eye and manâs eye together shall discern the perspective of the Bibleâs full-orbed revelation.â
Womenâs perspectives include the distinctive questions and concerns we bring to the text, arising from our distinctive experiences âof self and family, our relationship to institutions, the nature of our work and daily lives, and our spirituality.â As Amanda Benckhuysen notes, we need to acknowledge and consider the way gender affects the interpretation of texts.
In 2016, an anonymous voluntary survey of women students and lecturers in the Australian College of Theology was undertaken to answer the question, âWhat do women bring to theological education as learners and teachers?â Some of the students who responded said they valued a female perspective. These respondents named dimensions frequently contributed by women to be âempathy, pastoral care, pragmatism, complex view of relationships, compassion, counselling, emotional engagement with Scripture, pastoral implications of biblical exegesis, experiential approach to spiritual formation, humor . . . serving God in the messiness of everyday life, and a holistic view.â Of course, none of these dimensions or qualities are exclusive to women, but some respondents drew attention to âthe unique life experiences of women as daughters, sisters, mothers, wives, widows, and women in unpaid ministryâ that informed their understanding of discrimination and injustice, especially in relation to issues such as domestic violence and body image.
Even in this age of equality, women do experience the world differently to men in a number of ways, and so contribute a particular perspective. One aspect of this perspective is perhaps surprisingly captured in the teaching of 1 Peter: âHusbands, in the same way, show consideration for your wives in your life together, paying honor to the woman as the weaker sex, since they too are also heirs of the gracious gift of lifeâso that nothing may hinder your prayersâ (1 Peter 3:7).
As women who take the authority of Scripture seriously, what are we to make of this text? Lucy Peppiatt has a helpful approach. She believes that few today would consider that women are weaker than men âintellectually, emotionally, spirituallyâ or in terms of physical stamina or ability to withstand pain. It is true that that women are generally physically weaker than men, but Peppiatt points to another, albeit related, aspect of the weakness of women: their disempowerment in patriarchal societies. In the ancient world, the context in which Peter wrote, âon the whole women were socially, economically, politically, and educationally disadvantaged in comparison to men.â So we might paraphrase âweaker sexâ as âdisempowered or disadvantaged sex.â
Whether to a greater or lesser extent, this is still the experience of women. There is a growing awareness, even among feminists who are wont to emphasize womenâs strength, of their vulnerability: âWomen are almost universally at the mercy of a manâs physical strength and in most cultures of the world at the mercy of menâs economic and political strength.â On average, one woman a week is killed in Australia by her male partner or former partner. The #MeToo and #ChurchToo movements have made us more aware of the sexual harassment and assault experienced by so many women, including in Christian communities. Such violence is part of the reality for women and informs their perspective.
On the other hand, we should not speak of a âwomanâs perspectiveâ as if this were distinct from an âobjectiveâ perspective (hitherto mostly understood as a male perspective, by default). What Lucy Peppiatt says of herself is true of every theologian and biblical scholar, male or female: âThere cannot be any real objectivity in the task. I can only write as an insider of a particular world.â Or, as ...