1.1
Introduction to the Handbook of Critical Literacies
The Current State of Critical Literacy Around the World
Jessica Zacher Pandya, Raúl Alberto Mora, Jennifer Helen Alford, Noah Asher Golden, and Roberto Santiago de Roock
DOI: 10.4324/9781003023425-2
This is an expansive handbook on the past, present, and future of critical literacies on a transnational scale. Critical literacies, as they are classically conceived, offer people ways of interrogating texts and contexts and of writing and rewriting texts and realities to address injustices. They are, or ought to be, a key skill in any literate individual’s repertoire of literacy practices (cf. Comber & Simpson, 2001; Janks, 2010; Luke, 2014; Vasquez, 2005). We define them in this Handbook as literate practices individuals need in order to survive and thrive in the world, foregrounding the concept that information and texts are never neutral; they afford the ability to produce powerful texts that address injustices in our lived worlds. This formulation is sometimes known by other names in the Global South, particularly in Latin America and Africa. As chapters in Area 2 of the Handbook will show, it can be seen in research on language acquisition, the teaching of literature and English language arts, Youth Participatory Action Research, environmental justice movements, and more. As the notion of “critical” has become increasingly commonplace, we as editors fear that, without reflexivity, the term has sometimes become too diluted or misconstrued to mean much at all, especially as terms like “critical thinking” become part of the neoliberal educational vocabulary. We are also concerned that the deeply contextualized meanings of critical literacy in different places and spaces around the globe may be lost even before coming to light. In the Handbook, we intentionally draw on multiple critical epistemologies, including European, Black, and Indigenous thinkers from the Global South and the Global North. At a time when post-truth paradigms influence the ways education is understood and enacted, and misinformation and disinformation increasingly shape unfolding events and evolving structures of power, critical literacies feel more relevant and crucial than ever.
Transnational issues of literacy are central to the resurgence of authoritarian forces and thus critical approaches have never been more important. As we write, we are experiencing the COVID-19 pandemic, whose ravages highlight the very inequalities and power arrangements that critical literacies research highlights. The pandemic’s death toll is exacerbated by years of intensifying ethno-racialized notions of citizenship and nationhood across the world, which some among us see as resurgent fascisms. This has included strong anti-science discourses and right-wing populist support, all based on broad-based consumption of misinformation and disinformation (often called “fake news”) spurred on by the architecture of and people’s use of social media. Additionally, existential threats due to climate genocide and nuclear proliferation are increasingly pressing, with significant repercussions for our biosocial and material worlds. Within education, we are also seeing increasingly narrow conceptualizations of literacy serving the interests of standardization, measurability, and accountability (Pandya, 2011) and a concomitant rise of edu-businesses that profit from literacy education. At the same time, the nature of texts and textual flows are rapidly transforming via media manipulation and the algorithms underlying digital platforms, altering the ways humans and nonhumans interact, produce, and consume knowledge, experience text(s), and experience racism (Benjamin, 2019; de Roock, 2021). If not for the everyday and collective resistance that is ongoing and necessary, such as the Black Lives Matter uprisings of 2020, or the recent protests taking place across Latin America or Asia, to name two regions, for the past two years, it would be easy to feel that critical literacies educators are losing the battle.
In response to this complex confluence of change driving humanity toward homogenization in the name of control and profit, this Handbook provides a heterogeneity of current interpretations and applications of critical literacy by scholars from across the globe. We seek to demonstrate the diversity of uptake within critical literacy research communities; to strengthen our critical literacies praxis and international collaborations; and to present a stronger collective and heteroglossic front. We see a strong need for collaborations across borders and foresee the generative possibilities of such collaborations. As oppressive discourses, institutions, and forces are increasingly transnational, and as socioeconomic injustices grow and inequities widen, research and organizing that responds to oppression must also grow and diversify. We purposefully use the term “transnational” to signal our own perspectives on our places in the world and our own lived realities. Transnationalism as a term “came into existence at that moment in time when successful nation-state building ‘contributed to the creation of large numbers of people’ out of place-—that is, crossing over the national boundaries erected in the last two centuries” (Roudometof, 2005, p. 119). Attention has shifted “from state and macro-actors to the micro-level of globalization and to civil society movements” (Duscha, Klein-Zimmer, Klemm, & Spiegel, 2018, p. 3) creating opportunities for refocusing the loci of voice and power. The Handbook is an attempt to capture disparate voices about critical literacy as a kind of collective civil movement.
This Handbook grew out of the Transnational Critical Literacies Network (TCLN), which was named to reflect our senses of being transnational academics and teachers, both in and out of place, and our awareness that our positionings allow us to decenter our own ways of knowing. As part of this commitment, we sought to highlight what counts as critical literacy work in diverse sociocultural contexts to counter the often-Eurocentric foundations of its academic lineage. In each of the chapters that follows, regardless of topic, area, or theme, we have asked authors to write about their social responsibilities as critical literacy researchers in this world. We decided early on that ideally no one person should write a chapter on their own, and that no one could write more than one. In the end, only three chapters are single-authored. Some authors knew each other before they began writing, while others were total strangers, connected through the TCLN and through their desire to write about this work. We took this approach to diversify the voices in these pages and to ensure that we had authors engaged in dialogue as they wrote. We have all reached far beyond our comfort zones to ask each other uncomfortable questions about whose voices should structure each section and how we should make decisions about inclusion and exclusion. One of our major preoccupations has been the languages we would use in this Handbook. We were not allowed to publish chapters in two languages—such as the authors’ preferred language and English—but as readers will see as they read the Handbook, we succeeded in arguing that many varieties of English were welcome. Readers will also encounter a wide variety within the structures we created; some authors chose to focus more on their home or adopted countries in a chapter on a geographic region, and some authors chose to focus on emerging instead of canonical work. Additionally, we have not required certain terms or acronyms (e.g., readers will see both “multilingual learner” and “emergent bilingual” in use in different places). The variation readers will encounter is intentional and reflects our vision for this Handbook as a space for diversity of experimentation, change, and intellectual rigor.
Form and Structure of the Handbook
As we hinted in the Preface, the Handbook is laid out in three Areas, allowing us to engage in three related projects mirrored in its areas: the antecedents and current state of critical literacies in Area 1; a global survey of critical literacy in praxis, examining work in 23 countries and geographical regions in Area 2; and finally, the chapters in Area 3 highlighting work that has pushed and continues to push the boundaries of critical literacies. We describe below some of the key concepts, theoretical frameworks, and areas of research in the three areas.
Area 1: Critical Lit...