1.1 Definition of Forensic Engineering/Sciences
A detailed discussion of the definition of forensic engineering follows:
“Forensic engineering is the application of engineering principals and methodologies to answer questions of fact. These questions of fact are usually associated with accidents, crimes, catastrophic events, degradation of property, and various types of failures,”1 and further, “Forensic engineering is the application of engineering principles, knowledge, skills, and methodologies to answer questions of fact that may have legal ramifications.”1
While this definition is applied to forensic engineering, it should be acknowledged that this field is practiced by not only engineers, but also other specialists involved with areas such as roofing system sciences, building envelope sciences, accident reconstruction, industrial hygiene (e.g., mold, bacteria, asbestos, and indoor air quality), and meteorology (rain, wind, snow, ice, hail, tornados, and hurricanes). Thus, the term forensic engineering in this book has been expanded to forensic engineering/sciences. The fundamental questions of fact to be addressed are:
What are the failure(s) or condition(s) of concern?
What are the magnitude and extent of the failure(s)?
When did it occur (if this determination is needed and desired)?
Why did it occur?
As noted in the preface, this last question, “Why did the failure(s) or concern(s) occur?” is complex, and this causation question must often be answered at multiple levels. For example, if a high wind caused failure of the roof, the failure may be due to high winds, but may have occurred at lower-than-design wind speeds due to improper design and/or installation. This example touches on the issue of the ultimate “root cause” of the failure, which requires analysis based on detailed site inspection information and subsequent analysis and review of the literature, pertinent codes and standards, and other information such as that obtained from interviews. It is common to arrive at a topical conclusion regarding the cause of a failure (e.g., wind) that is not the root cause of failure (e.g., faulty installation). Often, whether in claims resolution discussions or in litigation, this differentiation between a topical cause and a root cause of failure is the core of the arguments between opposing parties involved in a dispute.
What makes forensic engineering/sciences different from other fields of science is that it couples the academic fields of engineering and science with the practical fields, such as building/construction sciences and the trades such as those associated with carpentry, masonry, and plumbing. Building and construction sciences consist of knowing terminology, practices, and methodologies of trades such as carpentry, heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC), plumbing, and electrical. Knowledge of residential and commercial codes and standards is also a must and bridges across all these areas. New engineers and other science professionals are rarely adequately trained in the trades or codes and standards; disciplines, which must be learned by trained forensic investigation professionals through experience. The training of engineers and scientists in this field requires considerable training beyond academics since much of the information needed to make forensics causation opinions lies in the practical fields, areas typically not covered in colleges and universities. Interestingly, often those growing up in rural environments have better entry-level skills in this field than those being raised in urban environments; most likely this is because they must be creative problem-solvers (i.e., cause versus effect) with limited resources given the environment in which they live.
Regardless of experience, the forensic investigator must be able to recognize when they may not have the skill sets to solve a given situation and must feel comfortable to rely on other, m...