Chapter 1
Developing Personal Effectiveness
Taking Care of the Goose
One of the best definitions of effectiveness I have heard came from Stephen Covey, author of The Seven Habits of Effective People. He utilized the powerful example of Aesopâs fable of The Goose and the Golden Egg to illustrate his point. If you remember, the story is about a farmer who, having come upon a goose that lays golden eggs, becomes fabulously wealthy. With his increasing fortune, the farmer grows impatient and greedy and decides to kill the goose and get all the eggs out at once. When he opens the goose, he discovers the golden eggs are gone. In destroying the goose, the farmer also destroyed his stream of wealth.
The story of the goose and the farmer is a powerful allegory of the dangers of excess in our society today and what can happen when we donât take care of the producerâthat is, the one who responsible for generating the productivity. For the farmer, it was the goose. For a family, it is each other. For a business or organization, it is employees and team members. The stream of effectiveness, once achieved, needs to be nurtured and protected against excessive wear and tear. The âgooseâ needs to be well-fed, have plenty of exercise, and enjoy satisfying relationships with other âgeese.â Given the human fallibilities of âgeese,â this is much more difficult than it sounds. Suffice it to say, at this point in our book, it takes one heck of a skillful farmer to pull it off!
Do you really think humanity should be satisfied with its historical effectiveness?
At its core, effectiveness has a wide spectrum of reference today in our society. Of course, we know continued ineffectiveness breeds stagnation, retrogression, and sooner or later, failure and disappointment. Yet humanityâs quest for effectiveness, has often produced a less than stellar result.
Ponder, if you will, the following question: what if we accomplished all the significant advancements of the present day in mathematics, physics, and medicine, and even business, 500 years ago? What if automobiles, paved roads, commercial airliners, cures for polio, malaria, tuberculosis, bubonic plague, AIDS, and cancer existed before the middle ages? What if we placed a man on the moon in 1469 instead of 1969? Which planets do you think weâd be inhabiting today? What about Disney World on Jupiter? How long do you think it would take to visit your in-laws on Mars? Have you ever asked âwhy notâ?
Recent discoveries in Africa have proven that, anatomically, modern humansâHomo sapiensâhave existed for about 200,000 years. Since most industrial and medical advancement has transpired during the last 200 years, where have we been for the last 199,800 years? Terminal illnesses remain. The mosquito is still the mostly deadly animal in the world, killing 725,000 people every year. And what about the âhuman conditionâ? Are not our emotional fallibilities as pervasive as they were with our archaic ancestors? The consequences of jealousy, vanity, envy, greed, not to mention religious discord and violence, still confound our lives causing grief, unhappiness, and pain. Substance abuse is the coping mechanism of choice for many of our young people. War and crime still make daily headlines. While our political leaders squabble, time marches on and we fear future generations will suffer the consequences of their inaction. We pride ourselves on innovation but our historical record looks more like Johnny-come-lately than Johnny-on the-spot.
Did you ever wonder why a society so focused in the cerebral realm is so frail in the emotional one? In my mind, a definite fallacy exists when we believe intellect is the sole criterion for effectiveness. I believe our educational institutions need to step up and recognize the need to teach stronger coping skills. In addition to traditional courses like math, science, and the humanities, academia should also focus on courses that teach life management skills and emotional competencies. As students become adults and progress through the various stages of their lives, it wonât be their understanding of E=mc2 that will get them through the adversities of life. With an IQ of 160, even Einstein warned us of a disproportionate emphasis on intellect.
Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.
âAlbert Einstein
Psychologist Robert Sternberg has discussed the concept of âsuccessful intelligence.â Having a high IQ is not enough, he says. He believes successful people need to recognize and capitalize on their strengths, but also have to correct or compensate for their weaknesses. For example, he continues, brilliant leaders have failed because of their inability to admit to a mistake and change a course of action, or because they are unable to trust others and ask for help or delegate tasks to others. But there is something missing in the significance we attach to intelligence as being such an essential criterion for effective governance as well as success in business. If we believe effective leadership depends solely on high intellect, why have we seen so many seemingly smart politicians and business executives crash and burn?
Emotional CompetenceâTightening the Gap
We begin with emotional competence, because it is here that we find the greatest challenges, and it is here that we find the greatest opportunity for growth. The best preparation for becoming and remaining an effective person and leader is developing emotional competence, with emphasis on the word developing. Good leaders know that there is always work to do, especially in this area. Emotional Competence is always a journey and never a destination. A leaderâs own self-awareness, self-regulation, and self-evaluation are central components of his own bearing as a leader. He must be receptive to feedback, at times be totally vulnerable, and strive to achieve a steadfast composure during challenging moments. Even if he is doing these things well, there is always room for improvement. James MacGregor Burns of the Academy of Leadership at the University of Maryland and a well-known authority on leadership asserts that human need, moral purpose, empathy, and the desire to grow and get better are the most prominent manifestations of leadership.
Employers are beginning to value Emotional Competence (EQ) as more important than academic achievement. A recent study concluded that employers consider the following criteria as most important when filling leadership positions.
- Remaining calm under pressure
- Resolving conflict effectively
- Being empathic to employees
- Ability to lead by example
- Placing more consideration into business decisions
When LâOrĂ©al started hiring people based on emotional competency, the high EQ reps outsold the traditionally chosen ones by $90,000. Another company found their EQ reps outsold others by $45,000. Study after study has linked much higher success rates to emotional competence.
All leadership development should be based on this one important principle: A person can never lead others to a higher level of effectiveness than he is currently leading himself.
There is always a gap to close. Tightening that gapâmaking it narrowerâis the purpose of this book. Actually, we are all somewhat emotionally incompetent unless of course we happen to be Yogi Berra who said:
I believe people should admit their faults; Iâd admit mine if I had any.
Developing Your Emotional Competence
We have all seen it: the person who blows up their career, their marriage, their relationship with their kidsâsometimes all the above. We ask ourselves, âWhy did this happen? He had so much going for him. They seemed so happy.â The interesting thing is, many of us are not far from this same âblow up,â and we know it. We live in fear that the coping strategies we have built into our lives will not sustain us. The good news is that most of us wonât blow ourselves up. Yet we end up living our lives in a manner that is less than what we expected and far less than our true poten...