Chapter 1
The Marriage at Cana (John 2:1â11)
Jesusâs first miracle was water into wine
It occurred just in time
A step of faith in a marriage act
gave so much more joy to the pact
Celebration and joy came with the wine
Which Jesus can give at any time
He can make up for any lack
So go to him and donât be slack
Seek his face and obey
It is the joyful way.
According to John, the turning of water into wine at Cana is the first of all Jesusâs miracles, but there are those who would dispute this based on the apocryphal writings and stories from pseudo-scripture that are not part of the canon. These are the books that were rejected by the early church as not meeting the criteria for Scripture and are not to be totally believed. It is recognized that there is some historic value to these books, but they were not considered to be Scripture by the Jews or the early church. Since the end of the apostolic age, the Canon has been closed, which means there are no new scriptures being written.
Every once in a while, there will be a book published and/or advertised with a title such as the lost books of the Bible. They are not lost books of the Bible. What they are are books that were rejected from being part of the Bible because they did not meet the criteria set forth to make them acceptable as Scripture. There are over fifty apocryphal Gospels known for the New Testament and at least thirteen apocryphal books that the Roman Church has in their Bible. Therefore, a more accurate title for these works would be the âRejected Books of the Bible.â
There are no new or lost books to be found. The traditional church believes that the Canon was closed with the apostles and that the Bible we have is the inspired, inerrant, and infallible Word of God. Therefore, for the believer, any miracle claimed to be done by Jesus before the marriage in Cana is to be rejected as unnecessary and frivolous.
Another group that opposes this being the first miracle of Jesus are those oppose the supernatural. They say the stories of the Bible are myth and not based in historic reality. They believe the Scriptures are all allegory and picture stories to portray the intended truth.
One of the most noted scholars that believed this was Rudolph Bultmann, who set out to peel away all the miraculous and come up with what he called the cornel of truth. He believed the miracle was factitious and should be regarded as such. He believed the story had a truth to tell like a fable.
What he was concerned with was the truth that was hidden in or illustrated in the miracle myth that was written. Bultmann said this about this miracle at Cana:
There can be no doubt that the story has been taken over from heathen legend and ascribed to Jesus. In fact the motif of the story, the changing of water into wine, is a typical motif of the Dionysus legend. In the legend this miracle is the miracle of the epiphany of the God, and was therefore dated on the day of the Dionysus feast that is on the night of the 5th to the 6th of January.
Bultmann is saying that the early Christians borrowed this story from the pagan god, Bacchus or Dionysus, and applied it to Jesus. Bacchus or Dionysus was the god of wine (considered beneficial by the Romans), and he was thought to be the great promoter of civilization, a lawgiver, and a lover of peace. We know, of course, that alcohol is not the great promoter of civilization; it is rather a great hindrance to civilization, creating incivility, injustice, and discord when it is abused. Alcohol has been responsible for more crime, hurt, pain, and death than any other drug in the history of mankind.
Now as far as Jesusâs story being a myth, there is ample evidence that it could not be a myth. First of all, James Garrett asks this pertinent question:
Is there an exact parallel? Are the early Christians likely to have done such borrowing? The vile character of Greek and Roman mythology and the non-historical nature of the myths work against this theory.
It is not likely that the early Christians would have desired to borrow from a pagan god who had drunken orgies as part of the festivals in and to his honor.
Secondly, the Gospels were written within a generation of Christ. This means there would have been eyewitnesses still alive to support or contradict the apostlesâ writings. Some New Testament critics and others had assumed that synoptic studies (which is the study of the parallels in Matthew, Luke, and Mark) would lead to the conclusion that the earliest view of Jesus and his ministry were without miracles. These persons assumed that they could eradicate miracles from the Synoptic Gospels. This study is called source criticism and did not yield to their expected conclusions.
The Gospel of Mark (which most scholars consider to be the earliest Gospel) has some eighteen miracles in it, and that is not counting the transfiguration and resurrection of Christ. There was then an effort to give Mark a late date, but this did not work because of the discovery of what is known as the John Ryland papyrus, a small manuscript of John that was dated between 120â130 A.D. It is the oldest existing fragment of the New Testament.
This archeological find forced the scholars to redate the book of John (which is believed to be the last of the Gospels) from between 170 to 200 A.D. all the way back to about 90 A.D. In turn, this forced the scholars to redate Mark between 33 and 68 A.D. This places the writing of the Gospels within a generation of Christ, making it very difficult to have the mythologizing that some claim happened. This would be equivalent to trying to convince people today that Ronald Reagan performed miracles in the White House during his presidency. It just wouldnât happen because there are people alive who would remember it. The combination of the character of pagan myths and the fact that the Gospels are dated within a generation of Christ make the mythologizing claim unlikely and highly improbable. Once again in light of honest history and archeology, the Bible proves to be the most truthful.
What are the details of the miracle that illustrate that Jesus is God? (John 2:1â11). Jesus has just started his ministry. He has just been announced by John the Baptist as the Lamb of God that takes away the sins of the world. He has just chosen his twelve disciples, and here they are at the wedding.
Many scholars think this wedding was for a close relation of Jesus, possibly one of his younger one-half brothers or maybe a cousin, we donât know for sure, but we do know they were invited. Letâs look at the details from John 2:1â11.
On the third day there was a wedding in Cana of Galilee, and the mother of Jesus was there and both Jesus and His disciples were invited to the wedding. When the wine ran out, the mother of Jesus said to Him, âThey have no wine.â And Jesus said to her, âWoman, what does that have to do with us? My hour has not yet come.â His mother said to the servants, âWhatever He says to you, do it.â Now...