Chapter 1
Defining Yoga
The term āyogaā has a wide range of meanings, due to its use in a variety of religious and secular contexts over the course of its over two-thousand-year history and its wide geographical representation across the globe. In the context of Indian religion and philosophy, especially within the traditions of Hinduism, Buddhism, and Jainism, the term āyogaā is used to signify both universal concepts and unique, contextual ones. Definitions of the term also vary within the range of modern nonsectarian and secular traditions of yoga that are distant from the cultural and religious moorings of the Indian traditions in which they originated. It might be suggested that beyond the simple fact that the term āyogaā is employed frequently by its various adherents, it is difficult to find a unitary thread that links the diversity of practices and ideas referred to as āyogaā together. In some cases, the religious roots of the traditions that gave rise to yogic practices have been left behind in a break from sectarian identity or have faded into the background in the process of modernization. In other cases, yoga is seen as a primarily, if not purely, spiritual or religious exercise that has been obscured, or even desacralized, by its adoption in modern secular contexts for the pursuit of physical fitness and beautification. Some scholars of religion have argued that yoga is the heart of the religions of India, while others have argued that yoga had been a relatively obscure, if not largely insignificant, facet of Indian religious life previous to the modern era.
In order to negotiate such various interpretations and evaluations, this chapter will begin with a brief examination of various contextual uses of the term āyogaā derived from different phases of its historical development. Having done this, a tentative definition for the term will be provided, focusing on its primary and secondary usages. The goal is to provide a heuristic, or constructive and pragmatic, definition of yoga applicable to its various contexts, thereby facilitating greater understanding, even if such a definition is incomplete or lacking in some respects. Much like in other fields of inquiry, it is helpful to think of defining yoga in terms of āfamily resemblance,ā or common features or elements, rather than in essentialist terms. This is sometimes referred to as a āpolytheticā or āprototypeā approach, one that recognizes common features while acknowledging the dynamic and variable nature of the object of study. Even within traditional sources, such as PataƱjaliās YogasÅ«tra, yoga has been defined or framed in multiple ways. In addition, practitioners and scholars of yoga often apply chronologically later, and more systematic, conceptions of yoga retroactivelyāfor example, applying systematic or āclassicalā definitions of yoga developed in the early centuries of the Common Era to practices found in earlier brÄhmaį¹a asceticism and Åramaį¹a traditions. The primary and generic sense of yoga that will be examined here, yoga as a ādiscipline,ā points to a common semantic and conceptual thread in how yoga is understood and practiced across various traditional boundaries. The broader focus, however, will be on examining the various historical and philosophical themes that demonstrate both continuity and discontinuity in yogaās theory and practice in its various contexts over time.
Yoga as āDisciplineā
Archeological evidence from the Indus Valley Civilization (2500ā1500 BCE), an ancient Indian civilization contemporaneous with Near Eastern civilization in Egypt and Mesopotamia, shows numerous figures in seated positions that appear similar to what would later be known as a form of seated yoga posture (Äsana). This has suggested to some scholars that the origins of yoga might be tied to the rise of this ancient urban Indian civilization in the Indus valley. Though such archeological relics are intriguing, they are nonetheless of questionable authority in establishing the history of yoga in comparison to later and more clearly verifiable textual representations. At this point in time, the writing system of the Indus Valley Civilization has not been deciphered to such an extent as to provide clarity on these issues, so it is difficult to evaluate these claims satisfactorily. However, the Sanskrit term yoga does appear in Hindu Vedic (vaidika) literature (1500ā500 BCE) frequently, providing a basis for understanding the semantic development of this concept in the early Vedic Sanskrit literature and later in the Classical Sanskrit literature. It also appears in PÄli Buddhist (Skt. bauddha) literature (500 BCEā100 CE) and in later Buddhist Hybrid Sanskrit literature in ways that anticipate, parallel, and expand upon its meaning and usage in the Hindu Vedic ritual compilation (saį¹hitÄ) texts and philosophical correspondence (upaniį¹£ad) literature. Likewise, early Jain (Skt. jaina) literature (500ā300 BCE), such as the ÄcÄrÄį¹
gasūtra, references ascetic principles and practices that parallel, if not anticipate, cognate developments in Hinduism and Buddhism.
In its early literary contexts, such as in the Hindu Upaniį¹£ads, including the Kaį¹ha Upaniį¹£ad and SvetÄÅvatara Upaniį¹£ad, and in the Buddhist NikÄya literature, notably in the Dhammapada, yoga is represented as a means of developing restraint of the body and senses and concentration of mind. Yoga is, in this respect, an aspect of asceticism, a discipline or method of cultivating self-control and enhancing the application of mind. The conception of yoga as an instrument of self-mastery expresses the literal meaning of yoga as a āyokingā or āharnessing,ā in this case of physical and mental faculties. This notion of yoga as a means of obtaining control over oneās embodiment through self-discipline is tied into conceptions of the physical and mental structure of the human organism as much as it is tied into a unique sectarian tradition, philosophical position, theology, or metaphysics. This conception of yoga as a mode of mind-body discipline is arguably at the root of yogaās adaptability to different Indian sectarian contexts and its success as a cosmopolitan practice in the modern era. As a set of techniques of physical and mental discipline, it is, in principle, not subservient to a particular philosophy or religious view beyond the understanding that mind and body can be fruitfully disciplined and brought under control. Where different traditions diverge, in part, is in their understanding of the fruits or benefits of such practiceāwhether they are understood in terms of worldly or otherworldly goals, for example. Traditions of yoga, from the most esoteric to the most mundane and secularized, place it within the domain of practice. Even traditions that view yoga as ultimately facilitating spiritual āunionā with an inner self (Ätman) or with a deity (devatÄ), for example, frame such union within the context of a spiritual discipline that prepares one for or precipitates the state. Though many modern traditions of yoga eschew formal sectarian religious identity, they implicitly, if not explicitly, value the disciplining of mind and body and contain an ethos regarding the benefits of performing yoga practice, even if they are simply mundane achievements such as relaxation, physical health, or beautification.
Though developing mastery of mind and body through practical discipline links the spectrum of yoga practices together, yoga traditions differ significantly with respect to relative emphasis on the mental and physical aspects of embodiment. This is particularly evident in the contrast between modern types of yoga that focus on meditation (dhyÄna) and those that focus on physical posture (Äsana). In the context of meditation-oriented conceptions of religious practice, such as the eight-limbed yoga (aį¹£į¹Äį¹
gayoga) of the Hindu Yoga Philosophy (yoga darÅana), the practice of yoga is viewed as a means of establishing mastery of mind, especially the development of deep concentration. In these contexts, yoga is equated with meditation (dhyÄna) or mental cultivation (bhÄvanÄ) and the practice of contemplation (samÄdhi). In the YogasÅ«tra, for example, PataƱjali refers to yoga as cittavį¹ttinirodha, āthe cessation of fluctuations of mind,ā a process of meditative isolation from the datum of ordinary experience through the achievement of mental stillness. The primary commentary on PataƱjaliās work, the YogabhÄį¹£ya, emphasizes this focus on mind by stating that yoga is, in essence, contemplation (samÄdhi). This is consistent with a technical and etymological definition of yoga as āconcentration,ā one that is advocat...