Romantic Poetry and the Fragmentary Imperative
Schlegel, Byron, Joyce, Blanchot
- 216 pages
- English
- PDF
- Available on iOS & Android
Romantic Poetry and the Fragmentary Imperative
Schlegel, Byron, Joyce, Blanchot
About This Book
Romantic Poetry and the Fragmentary Imperative locates Byron (and, to a lesser extent, Joyce) within a genealogy of romantic poetry understood not so much as imaginative self-expression or ideological case study but rather as what the German romantics call "romantische poesie"âan experimental form of poetry loosely based on the fragmentary flexibility and acute critical self-consciousness of Socratic dialogue. The book is therefore less an attempt to present yet another theory of romanticism than it is an effort to recover a more precise sense of the relationship between Byron's fragmentary or "workless" poetic and romantic poetry generally, and to articulate connections between romantic poetry and modern literature and literary theory. The book also argues that the "exigency" or "imperative" of the fragmentary works of Schlegel, Byron, Joyce, and Blanchot is not so much the expression of a style as it is an acknowledgment of what remains unthought in thinking.
Frequently asked questions
Information
Table of contents
- Romantic Poetryand theFragmentary Imperative: Schlegel, Byron, Joyce, Blanchot
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- 1. Setting Out: Toward Irony, the Fragment, and the Fragmentary Work
- 2. Rethinking Romantic Poetry: Schlegel, the Genre of Dialogue, and the Poetics of the Fragment
- 3. Nothing so Difficult as a Beginning: Byronâs Pilgrimage to the Origin of the Work of Art and the Inspiration of Exile
- 4. Narrative and Its Discontents; or,TheNovel as Fragmentary Work: Joyce at the Limits of Romantic Poetry
- 5. From the Fragmentary Work to the Fragmentary Imperative: Blanchot and the Quest for Passage to the Outside
- Notes
- Index