1
RUMBLINGS OF DISSENSION
The revolution that began in Dublin at Easter 1916, culminated in the signing of the Anglo-Irish Treaty on 6 December 1921, but within a month that Treaty had led to a split in the Irish Republican movement. The vote on acceptance of the Treaty in the DĂĄil took place on 7 January 1922 and seven days later the sixty-four members of the second DĂĄil who supported the Anglo-Irish Treaty assembled at the Mansion House, formed the Provisional Government of the Irish Free State and elected an Executive Council. Those elected to the council were Michael Collins, William T. Cosgrave, Ăamonn Duggan, Kevin OâHiggins, Patrick Hogan, Patrick McGrath, Eoin MacNeill and FionĂĄn Lynch. Michael Collins was elected as chairman. A general election was due to be held later in 1922 and both sides began a scramble to put their respective points of view before the electorate.
On 17 January 1922, the Ard Chomhairle (National Executive) of Sinn FĂ©in was convened to elect a new standing committee. The Ard Chomhairle had a membership of nearly seventy, drawn from the partyâs officer board, its executive and the representatives of all ComhairlĂ Ceantair (districts). The election yielded a standing committee that was predominantly pro-Treaty, and by late January 1922 âthe party was overwhelmingly pro-Treatyâ.1 At a meeting on 31 January, Michael Collins proposed that the standing committee should ârecommend to the Ard-Fheis [annual conference], that the vote on acceptance or non-acceptance of the Treaty should be by ballotâ.2 Kevin OâSheil seconded this. Austin Stack proposed an amendment to the resolution, that the voting should be public, and Ăine Ceannt seconded it. This modification received the support of Kathleen Lynn and Hanna Sheehy Skeffington, but the Collins motion was passed without amendment.
As a reaction to the pro-Treaty stance of the majority of Sinn FĂ©in, some time between 3 February and 22 February the anti-Treaty side of the IRA met and a new political party, Cumann na Poblachta (The Association of the Republic), was formed. Cumann na Poblachta affirmed its allegiance to the Proclamation of 1916 and to the Declaration of Independence of 21 January 1919, and three trustees were appointed: J. J. OâKelly (also known as Sceilg, from his surname in Irish â Ă Ceallaigh), Cathal Brugha and Austin Stack. The trustees went to America on a fund-raising mission, accompanied by Countess de Markievicz and Kathleen Barry, and arrived in New York on St Patrickâs Day 1922. They operated under the auspices of the American Association for the Recognition of the Irish Republic (AARIR), launched by Ăamon de Valera and Harry Boland in 1920.3 Sceilg said, âwith the support of Clan na Gael, Cumann na Poblachta raised a substantial amount of moneyâ and this gave them a significant war chest.4
The anti-Treaty IRA was not the only group taking a negative stance against the Treaty. On 11 January 1922, twenty-six members of the Cumann na mBan (Irishwomenâs Council) executive had met to discuss the Treaty and voted twenty-four to two against acceptance. The two women who supported it were Jennie Wyse-Power and âa Miss Mullan from Monaghanâ.5 Following the vote, Wyse-Power resigned from the executive. The executive then set a date for a special convention, which was dominated by anti-Treaty delegates, and re-formed as the third incarnation of Cumann na mBan. Unlike Sinn FĂ©in, the Cumann na mBan executive did not allow any discussion, and Mary MacSwiney and Countess de Markievicz were determined that the organisation would be the first Republican organisation to vote against the Treaty, thereby leading the vanguard for the anti-Treaty side.
Mary MacSwiney wrote to the branches in Cork and instructed them to:
Call a special meeting of their branches to discuss the executive resolution. Because the majority of the Deputies of DĂĄil Ăireann have declared for the Free State and this may lead to decrees subversive of the constitution of Cumann na mBan.6
She also told them that, âin view of the grave importance of the decisions involved, the executive earnestly hope that each branch will make a special effort to send a delegateâ.7
At the rank and file level, Cumann na mBan was riven by arguments about the Treaty. The Cumann na mBan Cork District Council held a meeting to discuss their differences. Twenty-three delegates attended the meeting, representing branches from Bishopstown, Blackpool, Blackrock, Clogheen, Dublin Pike, Cork city (Poblacht na hĂireann), Pouladuff, Shandon, St Finbarrâs, St Patrickâs and Cork University. A motion was put forward by the Poblacht na hĂireann (Republic of Ireland) branch that:
The Cork District Council re-affirms its allegiance to the Irish Republic and condemns without qualification the betrayal of the Republic by the signing of the Treaty in London on December 6 1921 ⊠furthermore it repudiates the action of the sixty-four men who were elected to represent the Republic of Ireland and have foresworn their allegiance to the Republic in voting for this settlement.8
A report on the outcome of the meeting in The Cork Examiner said âthe motion was defeated by sixteen to sevenâ. The following day, a complaint from May Conlon claimed that âthe report was incorrect and the vote was in fact defeated by ten to sevenâ.9 Regardless of the confusion, it is clear that the majority of the Cork District Council was pro-Treaty.
A special convention of Cumann na mBan was held on 5 February 1922. The Irish Times and the Irish Independent published detailed reports of the convention, with the latter paper reporting that:
At the special convention of Cumann na mBan in Dublin yesterday, a resolution of adherence to the Republican policy was carried by 419 to 63 for an amendment advocating working for the Republic through the Free State.10
Based on the publication of the above figures, Florence OâDonoghue interpreted it as Cumann na mBan âregistering a practically unanimous vote against the Treaty at their conventionâ.11 This perspective has endured to the present day. The figures have been accepted without question or careful scrutiny, and have become the accepted story of the voting pattern at the convention. The acceptance of these figures from that time is one of the most successful pieces of propaganda to emerge from this period.
There were 600 delegates present at the convention, with 200 missing because of a rail strike affecting the Cork and Kerry areas. Consequently, the convention did not reflect the opinions of the total membership, and by insisting on going ahead with the convention the leaders actually breached the organisationâs constitution.12 During the debate a question was posed from the floor about Cumann na mBan remaining neutral, but Mary MacSwiney replied that âasking Cumann na mBan to remain neutral was akin to asking her to stand neutral while a murderer stabbed her mother to deathâ. Her motion that âCumann na mBan reaffirm its allegiance to the Republic of Ireland, and therefore cannot support the Articles of Agreement signed in London, 6 December 1921â was âput forward as a substantive motion and was carried by a show of handsâ.13 This was the actual vote that determined the organisationâs position on the Republic versus the Treaty. According to Jennie Wyse-Power, as she left the convention with others who voted against MacSwineyâs motion they were taunted with âshouts of traitorâ.14 In the wake of this convention the anti-Treaty group formed the third Cumann na mBan.
When Cork District Council decided to hold a meeting to discuss the future of the organisation in the city, Mary MacSwiney informed them that she was coming to address them, but the women refused to admit her and said âthey were not willing to allow themselves be subjected to a two and a half hour harangue of invective, similar to that delivered to the DĂĄilâ.15 The rank and file members simply walked away from the organisation.
After the split, pro-Treaty members of Cumann na mBan were faced with a dilemma, as they did not have a forum to express their point of view. In early March 1922 a small group of women met at 70 St Stephenâs Green in Dublin and formed an âalternative organisationâ â Cumann na Saoirse (Irish Freedom Committee) â with Jennie Wyse-Power and Louise Gavan Duffy as the main movers behind it, thus giving a platform to women who wanted to support the Treaty.16
Back in Cork, a row erupted over the name of the new organisation. The pro-Treaty members in Cork refused to use the name Cumann na Saoirse and insisted they were entitled to keep the original name of Cumann na mBan. The row was bitter, but the pro-Treaty members of Cumann na mBan in Cork were determined they were not going to be bullied and they retained the name Cumann na mBan in Cork and operated as a pro-Treaty organisation.
Within months of this split, Cumann na mBan and the political women in Sinn FĂ©in who took the anti-Treaty side found themselves making up part of a Republican triad comprising Cumann na mBan, the IRA and Cumann na Poblachta.
2
THE REPUBLICAN TRIAD, 1922â23
The IRA also fragmented over the issue of the Treaty, with the neutral membership being known as âthe neutral IRAâ, while the anti-Treaty group re-formed as the Republican IRA and became known as anti-Treatyites or âIrregularsâ.1 The Free State side used the term âIrregularâ as a pejorative expression for Republicans who fought against them during the Civil War. It was also used in government documents, particularly in intelligence reports, and by the media and Cumann na Poblachta.
In March 1922, as the anti-Treatyites regrouped, Ăamon de Valera went on a tour of the south of Ireland, where he made a series of inflammatory speeches that fuelled the fast-growing discontent among those who opposed the Treaty. F. S. L. Lyons notes that the tone of these speeches could be summarised by one quote from de Valera:
If they accepted the Treaty, and if the Volunteers of the future tried to complete the work the Volunteers of the last four years had been attempting, they would have to complete it, not over the bodies of foreign soldiers, but over the dead bodies of their own countrymen. They would have to wade through Irish blood, through the blood of the soldiers of the Irish Government, and through, perhaps, the blood of some of the members of the Government in order to get Irish freedom âŠ2
On 9 April 1922, the anti-Treaty IRA assembled at the Mansion House in Dublin, adopted a new constitution and elected a new executive as their governing body in direct opposition to the Provisional Government. The new executive of the Republican IRA comprised Liam Lynch, Liam Mellows, Rory OâConnor, Joe McKelvey, Florence OâDonoghue, SeĂĄn Moylan, SeĂĄn Hegarty, Liam Deasy, Seamus Robinson, Ernie OâMalley, Peadar OâDonnell, Joe OâConnor, Frank Barrett, Tom Maguire, P. J. Ruttledge and Tom Hales.3 At the end of the convention an army council was also formed, comprising Liam Lynch as chief of staff, Joe McKelvey as deputy chief of staff, Florence OâDonoghue as adjutant general, Ernie OâMalley as director of organisation, Joseph Griffin as director of intelligence and Liam Mellows as quartermaster general. Rory OâConnor, Seamus OâDonoghue and SeĂĄn Russell were appointed directors of engineering, chemicals and ammunition, respectively.4 They claimed that their legitimacy as defenders of the Republic emanated from the proclamation of 1916, the declaration of the Irish Republic in 1919 and the second DĂĄil Ăireann of 1921.
On Holy Thursday, 13 April 1922, four days after the formation of the anti-Treaty IRA, Rory OâConnor, in a challenge to the authority of t...