When a rural hospital is closed (seemingly a national trend in the USA), what will be the impacts on its local residents as well as other hospitals in the region? Has a National Cancer Institute (NCI) Cancer Center been serving the population representative of various demographic groups in its projected catchment area, as required by the federal guidelines? How should Medicare/Medicaid adjust the reimbursement prices for procedures that pertain to local health care markets and over time? Answering all these questions relies on a data-driven, evidence-based, and timely delineation of hospital service areas (HSAs).
1.1 Hospital Service Area (HSA) as a Functional Region
Hospital service areas (HSAs) were pioneered by the Dartmouth Atlas of Health Care Project (http://www.dartmouthatlas.org/). An HSA is an area within which patients receive most of their hospital care and thus captures a local pattern of hospitalization. HSAs are more meaningful analysis units for studies of health care than geopolitical units (e.g., county, state), administrative units (e.g., township, city), or census units (e.g., metropolitan statistical area) because they represent health care markets.
Hospital referral regions (HRRs) are other units developed by the Dartmouth Atlas of Health Care Project and represent regional health care markets anchored by at least one hospital that provides more specialized care such as major cardiovascular surgery procedures and neurosurgery. An HRR is aggregated from HSAs and is thus a larger unit at a coarser geographic scale than HSA for studies of health care utilization, outcomes, and cost. Currently, there are 3,436 Dartmouth HSAs and only 306 Dartmouth HRRs in the USA. According to the central place theory (Christaller, 1966), an HRR is a higher-level tertiary hospital market area characterized by higher-order medical services that are available in their anchoring hospital(s) but absent in those anchoring HSAs.
The Dartmouth Atlas of Health Care Project has also developed other health care service areas such as pediatric surgical areas (PSAs) (Dartmouth Atlas of Health Care, 2013) and primary care service areas (PCSAs) (Goodman et al., 2003) for their respective medical services. Conceivably, for analysis of any health care service, one needs to define a service area pertaining to that type of service in order to capture its unique market structure. For example, cancer service areas (CSAs) are defined for cancer care (Wang et al., 2020). In this book, the term HSA, unless specified or implied otherwise in a context, refers to broadly defined hospital (or health care in general) service area regardless of the service types provided by hospitals or other medical facilities.
In geography, HSA is a type of functional region. A functional region is an area around a node, facility, or hub connected by a certain function (e.g., retail distribution, advertisement for a media company, and telecom coverage). Delineation of functional regions occurs by defining regions that are coherent in terms of connections between supply and demand for a service. By defining a functional region, a distinctive market area has a geographic boundary that encompasses many smaller areas more closely connected with the central node(s) than beyond.
The literature in various fields uses other terms that possess the same or similar properties as a functional region. For example, catchment area (CA) refers to an area around a facility where most of its clients, patients, or patrons reside. Similarly, trade area is âthe geographic area from which a store draws most of its customers and within which market penetration is highestâ (Ghosh and McLafferty, 1987, p.62). In urban and regional studies, hinterland (Wang, 2001) or urban sphere of influence (Berry and Lamb, 1974) includes the rural area that maintains the highest volume of commerce, service, and other connections with and around a city.
Defining functional regions is a classic task in geography. It can be as straightforward as assigning areas to their nearest facility to form a proximal region around it, or as complex as untangling a massive interconnected network of interactions. The development of geographic information systems (GIS) has helped advance related methodology, especially in automating the delineation process, spatializing network methods, and visualizing the results. The book focuses on the methods for defining HSAs. While the methods introduced in this book are illustrated in case studies of medical services, they can be applied to delineation of any functional regions.
1.2 Value of HSAs
The purpose of delineating HSAs is to define a reliable unit of analysis for examining the geographic variation of the health care system (Kilaru et al., 2015). Obviously, the definition and choice of an areal unit of analysis affects the validity of findings based on data aggregated in such a unit, commonly known as the modifiable areal unit problem (MAUP) (Fotheringham and Wong, 1991). If the unit does not capture the actual health care market structure, corresponding policy and planning strategy would be ill-informed. Here some exemplary studies are cited to illustrate the values of HSAs for designing research, informing health policy, and planning resources.
Glover (1938) is believed to be the first to study geographic variation in health care that helped explain the variation of tonsillectomy rates in Great Britain (Onega et al., 2014). In the USA, Wennberg and Gittelsohn (1973) were among the first to examine the study of geographic variations in health care resource, utilization, and expenditures across small areas in Vermont. However, researchers have long debated about the magnitude and underlying causes of variation. A report by Goodman et al. (2010) revealed that the quality of end-of-life cancer care for Medicare beneficiaries varied significantly across hospitals and the aforementioned Dartmouth HRRs. It helped identify hospitals and geographic regions that aggressively treated those patients with likely unwarranted curative attempts and incurred excessive costs without improving the quality of their last weeks and months. The report has been instrumental in guiding improvements in the development and delivery of symptom control and other palliative care for terminally ill cancer patients.
An influential study reported by the Institute of Medicine (IOM, 2013) also found substantial geographic variations in health care spending in the USA, and such variations were not necessarily associated with quality of care, by largely relying on the same analysis unit Dartmouth HRRs. While the subtitle of the report, âTarget Decision-makers, Not Geographyâ, might appear to cast doubt on the promise of geographic and regional efforts to improve US health care services, one major policy recommendation made by the report was to promote the transition to value-based payment models by providing financial incentives for health care providers to reduce costs and improve quality. However, the variability of cost efficiency in individual providers is embedded in the geographic variation across regions. Regional initiatives are just as important as providers-targeted incentives to improve both health and health care (Fisher and Skinner, 2013).
Health care markets also evolve over time as people move, some hospitals close and others open, and transportation networks connecting people and hospitals change. Units such as the Dartmouth HSAs and HRRs defined in the early 1990s have become outdated (Jia et al., 2015, 2020). Hospital closures have left some Dartmouth HSAs without any hospitals, and these units would no longer be suitable for analysis decades later. But many studies still used the same units âin order to preserve the continuity of the databaseâ (Dartmouth Atlas of Health Care, 2011, p.4)1. These units need to be updated with more recent data and defined with the methods that better reflect the scientific advancement in the field of deriving functional regions.
1.3 Study Area and Data
Unless specified otherwise, the same dataset for one study area is used throughout the book to illustrate various methods.
The study area is the state of Florida. Florida is only contiguously connected with two statesâAlabama and Georgiaâto the north, and bordered by Gulf of Mexico to the west, Atlantic Ocean to the east, and Straits of Florida to the south. This unique geography makes Florida an ideal study area as the edge effect is limited. Edge effect refers to cross-border interactions (e.g., residents in Florida seek health ca...