Part
The Collaboration Imperative
Chapter
1
The Evolution of Collaboration
âThe future is already hereâitâs just not evenly distributed.â
âWILLIAM GIBSON
Long before we stood upright, collaboration was essential to our speciesâ survival. Since the dawn of our existence, we have worked together in some capacity.
How do I know?
Simple. Because I wouldnât be here without collaboration. Neither would you or anyone else for that matter. But donât take my word for it.
Cavemen and Collaboration
Archaeologists know that, two million years ago, members of Homo erectus needed to work together in order to survive. Put differently, collaboration wasnât optional. Hunter-gatherersâ challenges included foraging for food and water, finding shelter, keeping warm, and staving off wild animals. Hunters gotta hunt, right?
Around 10,000 years ago, our ancestors developed a new and better means of providing subsistence: farming. At a high level, the Agricultural Revolution required Homo sapiens to work together. As Yuval Noah Harari writes in his bestselling book Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind:
Wheat didnât like rocks and pebbles, so Sapiens broke their backs clearing fields. Wheat didnât like sharing its space, water, and nutrients with other plants, so men and women labored long days weeding under the scorching sun.
Of course, today relatively few of us call ourselves farmers. As of this writing, they represent a mere 1.3 percent of the U.S. workforce.1 No matter. As Harari describes, collaboration wasnât easy millions of years ago, but we did it because it was essential. Notably, we also worked together in person because, again, what other option was there? Cavemen didnât whip out their smartphones, fire up Google Docs, or text each other.
Early Office-Based Collaboration
Fast-forward 10 millennia or so to about 1950. People were much more likely to work in offices than in the fields. Picture Mad Men. Like agrarians, though, most professionals worked in close physical proximity to their colleagues.
During this quaint era, people could certainly exchange information and ideas. That is, they could collaborate synchronously. Doing so, however, meant that they needed to meet in an office, board trains or planes, or pick up the phone.
As for asynchronous work, typewriters and intra- and inter-office memos ruled the day. Friction abounded. Executives typically employed secretaries to make appointments, coordinate schedules, and handle other administrative work. Mainframe computers existed, but they were enormously expensive, rare, bulky, and limited by 1990s standards, let alone those of today.
New Technologies and Tools Change the Game
This model of decidedly low-tech collaboration began to shift around 1995. Although early incarnations of the Internet had existed since the mid-1960s, it was largely the purview of academics and government types.
A few things happened that brought the Internet and high-speed communications to the consumer and business worlds. Most notably Sir Tim Berners-Lee invented the World Wide Web in 1989. Marc Andreessen and Eric Bina launched Mosaic, the insanely popular and user-friendly web browser, in February of 1993.
To be sure, the Internet and the Web changed many things. Photo-development services, travel agents, fax machines, most bank tellers, executive secretaries, and Blockbuster Videos largely went the way of the Dodo. Within a relatively short period of time, laptops, e-commerce sites, sophisticated productivity software, nascent videoconferencing tools, search engines, social networks, blogs, smartphones, tablets, email, websites, and file-sharing services arrived.
For the purposes of this book, these powerful new tools meant that synchronous workplace collaboration no longer needed to occur in person. For its part, asynchronous collaboration became quicker and easier. In a word, collaboration was becoming more virtual.
The Turn of the Century Births Purely Distributed Companies
Plenty of companies and individuals resisted these fundamental changes in how they workedâby themselves and with others. No shocker here.
For example, in 1998, I worked at Merck & Co., one of the largest pharmaceutical companies in the world. I vividly remember Jonas (a pseudonym), a less-than-tech-savvy vice president of human resources. He effectively used his laptop as a paperweight. Jonas told his secretary to print out his emails. He handwrote his responses for her to type.
Back then, such behavior was not exactly the paragon of efficiency. Still, it was understandable and not uncommon.
At the other end of the technology-adoption spectrum, some prescient individuals immediately recognized the vast possibilities that these new tools presented. As a result, they went all-in on tech. These distributed companies built collaboration and tech-savviness into their DNA from day one. Here are two of them.
Basecamp
In 1999, Jason Fried, Carlos Segura, and Ernest Kim started 37signalsâa web-design firm. Over the years, the company has released a number of different software applications. In February of 2014, it shifted its focus to its project-management tool, Basecamp, and rebranded under that name.
Today, Fried and David Heinemeier Hansson (aka, DHH) run the company. DHH currently lives in BenahavĂs, Spain, while Fried calls Chicago, Illinois, his home. Its other fifty-some employees live wherever they want and rely extensively on collaboration tools.
DHH and Fried have codified their philosophy into a number of bestselling manifestos, most notably Rework and Remote: Office Not Required. In short, they find the notion that all work needs to take place in the same physical space at the same time absurd.
Automattic
You may not have heard of Matt Mullenweg, but youâve doubtless used his companyâs software. Automattic maintains WordPressâthe open-source content-management system that runs a full 39 percent of the worldâs websites, more than 60 million in total.2 WordPress provides the plumbing behind The New York Times, BBC America, the Rolling Stones, and oodles more household names. On a personal level, Iâve been using WordPress for a decade. Itâs awesome.
If you think that Automattic is no five-person startup, trust your instincts. As of May 2020, it employed 1,184 people. One thing, however, hasnât changed: Since its founding in August 2005, Mullenweg has proselytized remote work. Automattic has operated as a purely distributed company from day one.
So, employees never meet each other, right?
Nope.
Each year, everyone descends upon an exotic locale for the companyâs annual gala. My friend Scott Berkun spent a year working at Automattic on a participative-journalism project. As he writes in his 2013 book The Year Without Pants: WordPress.com and the Future of Work:
The rest of the year we work online from wherever in the world each of us happened to be.
By definition, Automattic employees must colla...