1
THE SOWER
MATTHEW 13:1â23
On the same day that the Pharisees accused Jesus of possessing demonic power and his family sought to carry out an intervention, Jesus went out of the house and âsat by the lakeâ (Matt. 13:1). A large crowd gathered around him and âhe told them many things in parablesâ (Matt. 13:3). In the midst of a cultural storm he sat down in a boat. There is a cove near Capernaum that provided a natural acoustical setting. His voice amplified off the surface of the water. His body language was a picture of composure and calm engagementâan example to believers today of how to engage the world in the midst of resistance and rejection. When speakers sit, they naturally limit their voice volume and animation. The focus narrows to what is being said rather than how it is being said. Jesusâs simple style corresponds to his simple parables. But the simple content of the story is a fiction, a calculated cover for profound truths and a not-so-subtle invitation to the listener to go deeper. The preacher of the Sermon on the Mount has shifted genres. The Sermon of Parables was designed to stymie the opposition, keep the crowd listening, and draw the disciples deeper into gospel truth. Jesus diverted an early end to his public ministry by his friendly, subversive speech.
âHOLY SEEDâ
Those with ears to hear will understand even before Jesus quotes from the prophet Isaiah that Jesusâs simple story of the sower invokes the deep meaning of salvation history. When he begins with âA farmer went out to sow his seedâ (Matt. 13:3), he telegraphs to his audience that this story should be understood on a deeper level than a carpenterâs sonâs commentary on farming. Isaiah spoke of âthe holy seedâ sprouting from the âstump in the land.â The seed signified the early growth of the kingdom of heaven (Isa. 6:13). The Isaiah reference linked the sowerâs seed to the word of God in Jesusâs audience. The promise of a fruitful harvest suggests the fruitful productivity of the word of the Lord: âIt will not return to me empty, but will accomplish what I desire and achieve the purpose for which I sent it. You will go out in joy and be led forth in peace; the mountains and the hills will burst into song before youâ (Isa. 55:11â12). If someone listened to Jesus closely, they would have anticipated the positive conclusion of the parable of the sower: âthe seed falling on good soil refers to someone who hears the word and understands itâ (Matt. 13:23).
There is little mystery as to who the sower is in Jesusâs parable. The word âsowerâ is unusual. The normal word to use back then was âfarmer.â But Jesus chose âsowerâ to give the hearer another clue. The parable wasnât about farming. It was about the proclamation of the word of the Lord. Jesus himself is the sower. The refrain âWhoever has ears, let them hearâ implies that there is something more to be understood than the surface meaning. The deep meaning of the parable of the sower is related to the prophecy of Isaiah.
The liberally sown seed fell in four places, on a hard-packed footpath, on rocky ground with a thin layer of soil, on a thorny patch of earth, and on fertile soil producing a fruitful crop. The sower scatters seed everywhere. He is unconcerned about wasting seed. Later, when the disciples get Jesus away from the crowd, they ask him, âWhy do you speak to the people in parables?â They are aware that Jesus changed his communication strategy, and they want to know why. In other words, they ask, âWhy do you teach them so cryptically? Why not spell things out for them?â The question implies a change in Jesusâs teaching method, a change that must have impressed them as unusual.
Jesus answered their question indirectly. His response did not focus on method (why are you choosing to speak in parables?), but on meaning (explaining what God was up to). His strategy is in response to what God was doing, rather than in how he could change his method to reach people. Reception, Jesus insists, is in the hands of God, not humans. Instead of changing methods because of consumer demand, Jesus insists on a deeper reason. Understanding, like grace, is a gift of God, lest anyone should boast. The disciples are privileged by God to be given âthe secrets of the kingdom of heavenââthe crowd is not; the religious leaders are not. The synergy between a human response (âWhoever has ears, listen!â) and Godâs sovereignty (âThe knowledge of the secrets of the kingdom of heaven has been given to you, not to them,â Matt. 13:11) cannot be explained in an equation or measured in percentages. Jesus lifts the preaching of the gospel above competing ideologies and the eloquence of human wisdom (see 1 Cor. 2:1â4).
ISAIAHâS OPEN SECRET
Jesus described the gospel as âthe knowledge of the secrets of the kingdom of heaven.â The Greek word for âsecretâ is âmystery,â a word we tend to associate with what we find vague, inscrutable, and puzzling. The apostles used the word âmysteryâ for the truth of God revealed. Truth is not unknowable and beyond our grasp, but neither does it originate with us. We are not the clever creators of truth. The source of universal truth is in God alone. Redemptive truth, absolute truth, is received, not achieved. This truth can only be known by the revelation of God (1 Cor. 4:1). The secret of the kingdom of heaven is that Jesus is Godâs revelation in person. This is the open secret that the disciples are privileged to hear and understand. This is the truth that the crowd fails to comprehend. Mystery is the revelation of God, previously hidden, now made known. The privilege of reception is not a problem but a blessing, and the gift received increases in abundance. Both reception and rejection of âthe secrets of the kingdom of heavenâ are orchestrated by the sovereign will of God. Theologian Carl Henry offers a line worth remembering: âHuman reason is a divinely fashioned instrument for recognizing truth; it is not a creative source of truth.â
Jesus attributes his reason for using parables to the hardness of peopleâs hearts. The crowdâs willful refusal to receive the truth undoubtedly has many reasons and excuses, but ultimately reception belongs to God. Jesus is neither surprised by the rejection nor filled with sorrow. His courage and conviction is reflected in the words of the prophet Isaiah. The prophet was called to preach the word of God to his own people who heard it clearly enough, but refused to accept it. They hardened their hearts, closed their ears, and shut their eyes.
Ironically, Isaiahâs calling reinforced the peopleâs failure to comprehend the truth. The better the prophet preached, the more resistant the people became. The Lord commissioned the prophet to make the truth plain and the peopleâs rejection complete: âBe ever hearing, but never understanding; be ever seeing, but never perceiving. Make the heart of this people calloused; make their ears dull and close their eyes. Otherwise they might see with their eyes, hear with their ears, understand with their hearts, and turn and be healedâ (Isa. 6:9â10).
How did the prophet do this? He did this by presenting the truth with such clarity, simplicity, and sincerity that each successive refusal to respond to the grace of God made it that much more difficult for the people to receive the message. Isaiah was a straight-talking prophet who did everything he could to convince the people of the truth of God, yet because of his effectiveness, he only drove them further from the truth. Isaiah âfaced the preacherâs dilemma: if hearers are resistant to the truth, the only recourse is to tell them the truth yet again, more clearly than before. But to do this is to expose them to the risk of rejecting the truth yet again and, therefore, of increased hardness of heart. It could even be that the next rejection will prove to be the point at which the heart is hardened beyond recovery.â
Isaiah was actually criticized for making the truth simple and straightforward. His critics asked, âWho is it he is trying to teach? To whom is he explaining his message? To children weaned from their milk, to those just taken from the breast?â In todayâs theological circles, Isaiah sounded like the simple believer who embraces the reality of the incarnation and the necessity of Christâs atoning sacrifice on the cross. Isaiah believed and proclaimed the word of God plainly, yet boldly, and critics mocked him for it. They ridiculed his message: âDo and do, do and do, rule on rule, rule on rule; a little here, a little thereâ (Isa. 28:10 NIV1984). Can you imagine dismissing the prophet Isaiah with âyada, yadaâ? Given such an unbelievably hard challenge, Isaiah naturally asked, âFor how long, O Lord?â The answer he received was not easy! âUntil the cities lie ruined and without inhabitant, until the houses are left deserted and the fields ruined and ravaged, until the LORD has sent everyone far away and the land is utterly forsakenâ (Isa. 6:11â12). Not only did Isaiah present the truth clearly and compellingly but he did it for more than fifty years with the same discouraging result. The substance and style of his ministry of the word was matched only by his endurance.
Understanding is a gift. God opens eyes and ears to the truth otherwise concealed by our depravity and hardness of heart. Jesus frames the rejection of the crowd and the understanding of the disciples in the big picture of salvation history. The disciples were privileged by Godâs amazing grace not only in their reception of the truth but in their timing. In Jesus, the revelation of God had reached its critical, redemptive climax (1 Peter 1:10â12; Heb. 11:13â16).
JESUSâS INTERPRETATION
We are used to expositions coming before illustrations. But here we have the reverse: an illustration first that anticipates exposition. The parable functions as a riddle, designed to provoke thought. For the crowd, the parable conceals; for the disciples, it clarifies. Jesus himself entitled the parable: âListen then to what the parable of the sower meansâ (Matt. 13:18, emphasis added). We may be inclined to change the title to the parable of the soils, because much of our preaching focuses on the various ways we reject the word of God. But it is best to follow Jesusâs lead. He keeps the focus on the sower and the sowerâs assessment of the four soil types.
The sowerâs analysis of rejection does not discourage as much as warn. The ratio of rejection to reception is three to one. The fate of the seed (the gospel) is negative 75 percent of the time. Although, as we will see, the abundant yield of the good soil makes up for the rejection (Isa. 55:11). But Jesusâs description of these three forms of rejection serves as a warning to his followers. Jesus doesnât want the disciples to be surprised by the rejection rate. One of the big secrets of the kingdom of heaven given to the disciples involves a radically new understanding of the Messiah. Instead of the political triumph of a popular messiah who defeats Rome and ushers in a new Davidic kingdom, Jesus calls for a righteousness that surpasses the righteousness of the scribes and Pharisees. The kingdom ethic outlined in the Sermon on the Mount promises persecution, not power.
The three forms of rejection all have to do with people who hear the good news of the kingdom. So even when the seed falls on the beaten path, the gospel has been heard. They may even be part of the church, but when it comes to the word of God, it goes in one ear and out the other. âThe first-soil hearer lets the devil steal the Word of God from his heart because he does not want to know or do the will of God.â Like seed on a hard-worn footpath, there is no soil in which the gospel can germinate. The secular and religious idols and ideologies of the world have hardened the soul and enthroned the self.
The people represented by this type move along the path of life with such speed and distraction that the loss of meaning and significance is not even noticed. They are sufficiently thoughtless that even nihilistic despair can be laughed off as a joke. Sex, fame, power, and adventure are sufficient goals in the secular age to inspire those who race along the well-worn path. The sexualized, secularized self does not realize that the good news of salvation has been snatched from their hearts by the evil one. They are oblivious to the power of evil and the seduction of the soul. The tragedy of the first-soil hearer is no respecter of persons. It is shared by the corner-office master of the universe and the home...