This is a test
- 216 pages
- English
- ePUB (mobile friendly)
- Available on iOS & Android
eBook - ePub
Twentieth-Century Irish Literature
Book details
Book preview
Table of contents
Citations
About This Book
This Guide surveys existing criticism and theory, making clear the key critical debates, themes and issues surrounding a wide variety of Irish poets, playwrights and novelists. It relates Irish literature to debates surrounding issues such as national identity, modernity and the Revival period, armed struggle, gender, sexuality and post colonialism.
Frequently asked questions
At the moment all of our mobile-responsive ePub books are available to download via the app. Most of our PDFs are also available to download and we're working on making the final remaining ones downloadable now. Learn more here.
Both plans give you full access to the library and all of Perlegoâs features. The only differences are the price and subscription period: With the annual plan youâll save around 30% compared to 12 months on the monthly plan.
We are an online textbook subscription service, where you can get access to an entire online library for less than the price of a single book per month. With over 1 million books across 1000+ topics, weâve got you covered! Learn more here.
Look out for the read-aloud symbol on your next book to see if you can listen to it. The read-aloud tool reads text aloud for you, highlighting the text as it is being read. You can pause it, speed it up and slow it down. Learn more here.
Yes, you can access Twentieth-Century Irish Literature by Aaron Kelly in PDF and/or ePUB format, as well as other popular books in Literature & English Literary Criticism. We have over one million books available in our catalogue for you to explore.
Information
CHAPTER ONE
Irish Literature and Criticism in the Revival
Anglo-Irish Irelands: Yeats and his inheritances
Given the political impetus behind Arnoldâs Celticism, its desire to endorse and galvanize a settled and homogeneous British nation, it may seem odd that the Irish nationalist Yeats should take up Arnoldâs template in his own essay âThe Celtic Element in Literatureâ. But it does need to be acknowledged that where Arnold saw the different races as complementing one another in a unified British State, Yeats seeks to turn Arnoldâs model against its own putative logic. Yeats argues that if Saxon and Celt are so racially, historically and culturally distinct in their identities and values, then this necessitates political separatism and an Ireland unfettered by British domination and materialism. Nonetheless â as will be discussed in due course with regard to those critical paradigms opposed to Yeatsâs project â while his political intentions are radically different from Arnoldâs, Yeats does broadly accept the racial designations and assumptions of Arnoldâs lectures. Yeats is eager, however, to stress his deeper and more profound attachment to Celtic culture than Arnold, in a manner that helps explain the reasons for his own and Lady Gregoryâs systematic effort to collect, recuperate and rewrite a disparate array of Irish folk cultural sources into a literary tradition, such as in Representative Irish Tales (1891). Yeats claims:
Yeats is here trying to establish an organic connection with that folk culture, which, in turn, itself provides a direct bond with nature. Yeats contrasts this Celtic union with the natural world with the alienation from, and indeed loss of, nature in even the very best of Western European literature and its pastoral modes, so that he writes of the ancient Roman poet Virgil (70â19 BC), William Shakespeare (1564â1616) and the Romantic poet John Keats (1795â1821):
Thus, for Yeats, âall folk literature, and all literature that keeps the folk tradition, delights in unbounded and immortal thingsâ.3 So where Arnold sought to petrify Celtic culture, Yeats endeavours to claim it as a timeless resource which is able to offer him access to a people, a collective tradition, untrammelled by the limitations of his contemporary society. To that end, he rewords Arnoldâs theories about the Celtsâ reaction against the âdespotism of factâ and thorough melancholy, which, he argues, stem from
We can discern here the implacable anti-modernity that is given directly political shape in a play such as Yeatsâs Cathleen ni Houlihan (1902), wherein Michael Gillane is required to renounce the material world of money, possessions and marriage in order to answer the lament of his nation personified as Mother Ireland or Cathleen. What is truly Irish, it is implied, is either that which has been uncontaminated by the material world, or that which is once more prepared to renounce the petty concerns of that world. Hence, what Ireland needs to restore to itself is not to be found in Dublin or Belfast for example, but in a realm where the artist may commune with a rural, peasant people themselves at one with nature.
It can be pointed out that the melancholy attributed to the Celtic peasant not only by Yeats but also by Arnold and Renan before him is particularly disingenuous, to put it mildly, in an Irish context, given the Famine (which directly impinges on Arnoldâs lectures) and a broader history of dispossession, poverty and suffering. The social and historical conditions producing a vast Irish folk and ballad tradition of loss and lament are thus recoded and decontextualized as an immemorial metaphysical disposition. Yeatsâs sense, in the above passage, that it is he and the urban intelligentsia who suffer âpenuryâ, inverts the reality of social inequality in assembling a model of spiritual debasement designed to transfigure the rural poor into keepers of cultural riches. A Yeats poem such as âThe Fishermanâ is creatively charged by its attempt to construct an ideal rural peasant to whom Yeatsâs work may be dedicated in the face of an acknowledgement that such a figure does not exist, that realities may be very different. It is Yeatsâs intention, however, that art is to have a transformative role, that it may redeem a society lost to materialism and philistinism. His use of the peasantry as a point of access to an âancientâ world also discloses that part of Yeatsâs revival mission was to repair a rupture in Irish history and tradition caused by Irelandâs subjugation and the imposition of the British culture that he sees as the vehicle of modern, materialist corruption. While the marginalization of the Irish language and the fragmentation of Irish culture prevent any sense of cultural continuity, Yeats endeavours to restore and recuperate out of that discontinuity, if not a unitary tradition, then a unity of purpose that may finally make Irish culture whole again in the present. So the lessons and achievements of antiquity that have been preserved in however disparate and fragmentary a form, the remaining repositories of Irish culture, may speak once more and assume their full meaning in the present and in the transformation of Irish national life.
Equally, Yeatsâs effort to reassert a sense of Irish cultural tradition entails a rejection of the contemporary British supplanting and inferiorization of it. Part of the point of Yeatsâs association of his own project and the folk culture which supports it with the ancient past is to proclaim that Ireland does have a worthy and noble culture with a history and an authority of its own. It is not merely a regional or provincial variant of British culture, nor indeed a cultural dead-end that has served its limited aims and been eclipsed by the achievements and advancements of England. The linking of the present to the ancient past seeks to circumvent the Anglicization and disruption of Irish cultural tradition, and it jointly serves to aggrandize Irish literature as being one of the formative sources of the great literary traditions of the Western world (before its contamination by Britishness). Yeats also approvingly reiterates Renanâs claim that the Lough Derg purgatory had a key influence on The Divine Comedy of Dante (1265â1321). Yeats goes on to link âThe Celtic Movementâ with a pan-European Symbolist which includes the German composer Richard Wagner (1813â83), the English Pre-Raphaelite painters and poets such as Dante Gabriel Rossetti (1828â82), the French poets Villiers de lâIsle Adam (1840â89) and StĂ©phane MallarmĂ© (1842â98), the Belgian poet and playwright Maurice Maeterlinck (1862â1949), the Norwegian dramatist Henrik Ibsen (1828â1906) and the Italian poet, playwright and novelist Gabriele DâAnnunzio (1863â1938). For Yeats, all great literatures must create âa sacred bookâ.5 Yeatsâs own art similarly strives to produce such a âsacred bookâ, an epic Irish text to inspire and redeem the nation. His reclamation of the heroic myth of Cuchulainn in a play like On Baileâs Strand (1904), or of the many heroes of both ancient legend and more recent Irish literature and politics who people his poetry, are all enlisted to shake the foundations of a complacent, materialist society through an eruption of the sacral, restorative intoxication and power of art. Such art, Yeats intended, would reconstitute the Irish nation according to its own heroic ideals, and behind such epic idealism stands Yeats himself as the supreme artistic hero. Indeed, Yeats carefully dates the prefatory note to his Autobiographies as 25 December 1914 so that the book of his life is brought into being on Christmas Day and thereby (somewhat mischievously, perhaps) positions Yeats as the new Messiah. Though adept at self-promotion, Yeats did also more selflessly commit himself to collective projects like the Irish Literary Theatre and its commitment to advancing the work of a whole gamut of writers.
In another essay, âThe Theatreâ (1900), Yeats outlined the goals of that national drama:
In this excerpt there is the familiar effort to connect Yeatsâs own intellectual ambitions and reading of Irish culture with a (somewhat condescendingly defined) âsimpleâ popular audience in an authentic bond that once more resists the depredations of commerce and modern life. But it is in this endeavour that Yeats builds upon the work of a number of figures in the second half of the nineteenth century who similarly sought to reconcile the intellectual and the people in the reclamation of heroic forms. The historiography of Standish OâGrady had sought to retrieve the âheroic periodâ of Irish history, which encapsulated âthe spirit of a whole nationâ, since âthose heroes and heroines were the ideals of our ancestors, their conduct and character were to them a religion, the bardic literature was their Bible [âŠ] The same human heart beat in their breasts as beats amongst us today. All the great permanent relations of life are the sameâ.7 And, in terms that are echoed in Yeats, this timeless transmission of these essential Irish heroic virtues is made more exigent by the sprawling corruption of the modern world, of what OâGrady terms âthe vastness and populousness of this ageâ.8 So, as with Yeats, there is in such sentiment a deeply ingrained fear of modern society and the modern masses and a hope that the return of heroic forms will give shape and meaning to what is perceived as chaos.
The essay âThe Necessity for De-Anglicizing Irelandâ (1892) by Douglas Hyde comparably wills the salvation of a shapeless Irish society. Hyde felt that the British occupation of Ireland had disrupted the continuity of Irish history and that the Anglicization of Ireland had ruined the autonomy and integrity of Irishness as an identity of its own. Consequently, Hyde argued, Ireland was in a âhalf-way houseâ, neither one thing nor the other, since people had turned their backs on the language and culture of their true Irish heritage and had instead sought to copy and emulate English culture. For Hyde, this was a doomed servility since the Irish were not English and their second-order approximation of Anglicized culture left Ireland in its present âanomalous positionâ. The political and social upheavals and failures of nineteenth-century Ireland, Hyde averred, were directly attributable to âthe race diverging during this century from the right path, and ceasing to be Irish without becoming Englishâ.9 In particular, it was the revival of the Irish language, and more generally Irish culture itself, which were vital weapons in defeating the âWest Britonismâ â the mimicking of British culture â that had contaminated Ireland. So, in Hydeâs model, both Irish culture and nationality are ideal...
Table of contents
- Cover
- Title Page
- Copyright
- Dedication
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- Chapter One: Irish Literature and Criticism in the Revival
- Chapter Two: Irish Literature and Criticism after Partition
- Chapter Three: The Development of Irish Studies: Contesting the Revival
- Chapter Four: Irish Studies Paradigms and Literature after Partition
- Chapter Five: Gender, Sexuality and Feminism in Irish Literature
- Chapter Six: Contemporary Literature in the Irish Republic and Northern Ireland
- Conclusion: Irish Studies Today
- Notes
- Select Bibliography
- Suggested Primary Reading
- Index