Comparative Perspectives from Senegal and Cambodia
Sara Vigil
This is a test
This is a test
198 pages
English
ePUB (mobile friendly)
Available on iOS & Android
eBook - ePub
Land Grabbing and Migration in a Changing Climate
Comparative Perspectives from Senegal and Cambodia
Sara Vigil
Book details
Book preview
Table of contents
Citations
About This Book
This book provides a theoretical and empirical examination of the links between environmental change, land grabbing, and migration, drawing on research conducted in Senegal and Cambodia.
While the impacts of environmental change on migration and of environmental discourses on land grabs have received increased attention, the role of both environmental and migration narratives in shaping migration by modifying access to natural resources has remained under-explored. Using a variegated geopolitical ecology framework and a comparative global ethnographic approach, this book analyses the power of mainstream adaptation and security frameworks and how they impact the lives of marginalised and vulnerable communities in Senegal and Cambodia. Findings across the cases show how environmental and migration narratives, linked to adaptation and security discourses, have been deployed advertently or inadvertently to justify land capture, leading to interventions that often increase, rather than alleviate, the very pressures that they intend to address. The interrelations between these issues are inherent to the tensions that exist, in different contexts and at different times, between capital accumulation and political legitimation. The findings of the book point to the urgency for researchers and policymakers to address the structural causes, and not the symptoms, of both environmental destruction and forced migration. It shows how acting upon environmental change, land grabs, and migration in isolated or binary manners can increase, rather than alleviate, pressures on those most socio-environmentally vulnerable.
This book will be of interest to students, scholars, and practitioners working on the topics of land and resource grabbing and environmental change and migration. The book will also be of interest to those analysing political ecology transitions in Africa and Asia, as well as to those interested in novel theoretical and methodological frameworks.
Frequently asked questions
How do I cancel my subscription?
Simply head over to the account section in settings and click on âCancel Subscriptionâ - itâs as simple as that. After you cancel, your membership will stay active for the remainder of the time youâve paid for. Learn more here.
Can/how do I download books?
At the moment all of our mobile-responsive ePub books are available to download via the app. Most of our PDFs are also available to download and we're working on making the final remaining ones downloadable now. Learn more here.
What is the difference between the pricing plans?
Both plans give you full access to the library and all of Perlegoâs features. The only differences are the price and subscription period: With the annual plan youâll save around 30% compared to 12 months on the monthly plan.
What is Perlego?
We are an online textbook subscription service, where you can get access to an entire online library for less than the price of a single book per month. With over 1 million books across 1000+ topics, weâve got you covered! Learn more here.
Do you support text-to-speech?
Look out for the read-aloud symbol on your next book to see if you can listen to it. The read-aloud tool reads text aloud for you, highlighting the text as it is being read. You can pause it, speed it up and slow it down. Learn more here.
Is Land Grabbing and Migration in a Changing Climate an online PDF/ePUB?
Yes, you can access Land Grabbing and Migration in a Changing Climate by Sara Vigil in PDF and/or ePUB format, as well as other popular books in Biological Sciences & Ecology. We have over one million books available in our catalogue for you to explore.
Although environmental change, migration, and land grabs represent some of the most pressing and challenging socio-political issues of our time, the interlinkages between these issues have tended to be problematised, analysed, and acted upon â at best â in pairs. On the one hand, while research on climate change and migration has greatly advanced our understanding of the complex relationships between biophysical environmental changes and human (im)mobility, much less is known about how discourses, narratives and frames around environmental, climate change and migration modulate these impacts by modifying access to natural resources. On the other hand, while research on global land grabs has advanced our understanding of many of its drivers and impacts, and in doing so, has illuminated the increasing role of environmental and climate policies, the role of migration narratives in legitimising land grabs, as well as the impact of these land grabs on migration remains underexplored. In order to fill these gaps and to bridge the disciplines that deal with these phenomena, this book asks: Why and how do environmental change, land grabs and migration shape each other, both materially and discursively, and with what consequences?
The challenge is to build theoretical and methodological bridges that can allow us to make sense of the complex material and discursive interrelations that are at the basis of this puzzle. While different frames could be used to understand how these issues are interconnected, both security and adaptation frames have become pervasive in climate change and migration policy processes. On the one hand, migration is often conceptualised as either a driver and/or consequence of conflict and national insecurity or as an essential adaptation measure capable of promoting human security and to contributing to triple win solutions for migrants, origin, and host societies. On the other hand, arguments to legitimise the need for land intensive investments often use environmental security/adaptation narratives as well as narratives around employment creation to halt migration as key justifications. But what are the theoretical antecedents of these powerful ideas, where do they come from, and where do they fall short? In order to address this question, the chapter first conceptually analyses the interconnections between environmental change, land grabs, and migration as they relate to diverging security and/or adaptation frames. To achieve this, this chapter reviews these interconnections from the vantage point of neo-Malthusian security and of neoclassical adaptation frames juxtaposing them to a framework denominated variegated geopolitical ecology, which draws on political economy, political ecology, critical geopolitics, and political geography to historically embed and analyse the multi-scalar, discursive and material interactions at play. In order to empirically investigate the material and discursive interrelations between environmental and climate change,1 migration, and land grabs, the chapter discusses the methodological approach and comparative perspective between Senegal and Cambodia that underpinned the research, as well as the data collection tools which made the findings possible.
Figure 1.1Exploring interrelations.
Environmental security and population bombs
Bulging populations and land stress may produce waves of environmental refugees that spill across borders with destabilizing effects on the recipientâs domestic order and on international stability.
(Homer-Dixon 1991, 77)
While the idea that environmental and national security are connected has a long history, the concept of âenvironmental securityâ became increasingly popular after the Cold War when demographic and environmental factors entered national security agendas (Barnett 2001; Urdal 2005). The earliest frames of environmental security can be found in Thucydidesâ The Peloponnesian War and Platoâs Republic. Both authors compared the security of societies that lived within their ânaturalâ limits, like Sparta, to those like Athens that relied heavily on imports (Floyd and Matthew 2013, 3). These ideas survived the passage of time and received a powerful translation in the famous Essay on the Principle of Population by the demographer Thomas Malthus. Malthusâ well-known thesis is that the power of population is indefinitely greater than the power of the earth to engender subsistence for man (Malthus 1872). Given that the population would theoretically grow at a geometric rate while that same populationâs ability to produce resources would increase only at an arithmetic rate, the population will inevitably surpass the needs of their subsistence. Although migration could serve as a temporary fix to relieve pressure on the labour market, in the long run, the âprinciple of populationâ would come into effect with higher wages and greater fertility, thereby filling the gap that had been created by the departing emigrants (OâRourke 2015, 96). In terms of scarcity, this means that there is an absolute scarcity of natural resources that is âphysical, real and inescapableâ (Scoones et al. 2019, 234). Following this thesis, neo-Malthusians argue that the finitude of natural resources places strict limits on population growth and on consumption. If these limits are exceeded, poverty, social breakdown, migration, and conflict are inevitable (Homer-Dixon 1995).
However, and despite Malthusian predictions, colonial administrators were primarily concerned about under-population, attributing it as the cause of stagnant economic growth (Collins 2002). It was not until the post-war period that the Malthusian fear of overpopulation gained traction and that national security concerns became fused with environmental ones (Baldwin 1997; Barnett 2001; McBrien 2016). These ideas were championed by authors such as the biologist Paul Ehrlich in his book The Population Bomb (1968) and by the ecologist Garrett Hardin in his widely influential essay The Tragedy of the Commons (1968). Hardin deployed the Malthusian argument of geometric population growth to argue that âa finite world can only support a finite populationâ (Hardin 1968, 1243). Under the assumption that human beings act like selfish individual maximising agents, he used the metaphor of a selfish herder to underline that people would continue to over-exploit natural resources for their own self-interest. The result leads to a vicious circle of environmental degradation that Hardin labelled the âtragedy of the commonsâ. Ehrlich also incited the fear of overpopulation by stating that âThe battle to feed all of humanity is overâ, that âhundreds of millions of people are going to starve to deathâ, and that âoverpopulation is now the dominant problem in all our personal, national, and international planning problemsâ (Ehrlich 1968). These arguments around resource scarcity and the supposed dangers of population growth gained traction in the midst of the 1970s oil crisis when the concept of energy security, as it relates to the stable supply of oil, also entered the stage (Cherp and Jewell 2014; Scoones et al. 2019). It was also at this time that ideas about planetary limits, closely linked to population growth arguments, emerged in ecology and conservation, championed by Richard Falkâs This Endangered Planet (1972). These ideas entered the political scene through the Club of Romeâs 1972 Limits to growth report (Meadows et al. 1972) and were later reinforced in a Brundtland Commission Report titled Our Common Future, which stated that âThe very possibility of development can be threatened by population growthâ (Brundtland et al. 1987, 2).
Migration as a security threat
First introduced in the 1970s by the founder of the Worldwatch Institute, Lester Brown, the term âenvironmental refugeesâ became popular through a report authored by Essam El-Hinnawi for the United Nations Development Program in 1985, who defined them as âthose people who have been forced to leave their traditional habitat, temporarily or permanently, because of marked environmental disruption (natural and/or triggered by people) that jeopardized their existence and/or seriously affected the quality of their lifeâ (El-Hinnawi 1985, 4). Despite early critiques to the concept (Kibreab 1997) and its lack of legal recognition, the term gained traction amongst those drawing linkages between environmental and national security. In an essay entitled Environment and Security, the famous British ecologist Norman Myers deployed both population growth and refugee flows as a central component linking environmental destruction and national (in)security:
These two later problems (tropical deforestation and the spread of deserts), like certain others are closely connected to rapid population growth in the Third World, a problem related in turn to pervasive poverty and to associated issues of massive unemployment, overburdened cities, and refugees from environmental degradation.
(Myers 1989, 23)
These arguments were mirrored in an influential article by the security specialist Robert Kaplan, entitled The Coming Anarchy, where he argued that foreign policy would be shaped by: âsurging populations, spreading disease, deforestation and soil erosion, water depletion, air pollution, and possibly rising sea levels â developments that will prompt mass migrations and in turn incite group conflictsâ (Kaplan 1994, 58). According to these views, it is an imbalance between the supply and demand of natural resources â often driven by escalating population growth and migration â that creates scarcity and exacerbates socio-economic problems that can, in turn, escalate into conflicts, and hence, political insecurity.
Discourses drawing links between population growth, security, and migration, have continued to gain prominent political attention as concerns over both climate change and migration have skyrocketed. One dominant narrative exhibited in international politics and media portrays close connections between climate change and conflict, especially in the African Sahel, which is often presented as âground zeroâ for climate change. The Sahel has been globally described as a âperfect stormâ case, wherein the combination of climate change impacts and population growth is predicted to lead to land degradation, famine, and terrorism insurgencies if urgent action is not taken. In a neo-Malthusian fashion, these narratives start by introducing demographic realities and projections, directly followed by climate projections:
In 1950, the region contained 31 million people; today there are more than 100 million, and in 2050, there could be more than 300 million. New projections of climate change ⌠foresee a rise of 3 to 5 degrees Celsius above todayâs already high temperatures by 2050 ⌠The projections for 2100 are startling, with a population of 600 million in the Sahel and temperatures up to 8 degrees above todayâs norms. It would be totally implausible to sustainably accommodate this scale of growth. Without immediate large-scale action, death rates from food shortages will rise as crops wither and livestock die and the largest involuntary migration in history could occur.
(Potts et al. 2013, 3)
Based on methodologically biased projections that couple demographic and climate scenarios, figures ranging from 150 million to 300 million people displaced by environmental factors by 2050 are often cited (see Gemenne 2011 for a critique).
When linked to violence, climate change is also believed to fuel extremism because people who are unable to provide for their families in contexts of extreme weather events and environmental degradation may become easy targets of extremist recruits who offer them employment and food. An example that is often offered is how the drying up of Lake Chad contributed to the growth of Boko Haram. As a climate and security specialist explained it: âClimate shocks and stresses are pushing many into extreme poverty. Joining an armed group is sometimes the only option availableâ (Gerretsen 2019). The conflict in Dar...
Table of contents
Cover
Endorsements Page
Half-Title Page
Series Page
Title Page
Copyright Page
Dedication
Contents
List of figures
Foreword
Preface: from co-development to land grabs
Acknowledgements
List of abbreviations
Introduction
1 Exploring variegated geopolitical ecologies
2 From colonialism to neoliberalism
3 Green and migration grabs
4 Expulsions and destruction
5 Self-fulfilling risks
Conclusion
Index
Citation styles for Land Grabbing and Migration in a Changing Climate
APA 6 Citation
Vigil, S. (2022). Land Grabbing and Migration in a Changing Climate (1st ed.). Taylor and Francis. Retrieved from https://www.perlego.com/book/3189277/land-grabbing-and-migration-in-a-changing-climate-comparative-perspectives-from-senegal-and-cambodia-pdf (Original work published 2022)
Chicago Citation
Vigil, Sara. (2022) 2022. Land Grabbing and Migration in a Changing Climate. 1st ed. Taylor and Francis. https://www.perlego.com/book/3189277/land-grabbing-and-migration-in-a-changing-climate-comparative-perspectives-from-senegal-and-cambodia-pdf.
Harvard Citation
Vigil, S. (2022) Land Grabbing and Migration in a Changing Climate. 1st edn. Taylor and Francis. Available at: https://www.perlego.com/book/3189277/land-grabbing-and-migration-in-a-changing-climate-comparative-perspectives-from-senegal-and-cambodia-pdf (Accessed: 15 October 2022).
MLA 7 Citation
Vigil, Sara. Land Grabbing and Migration in a Changing Climate. 1st ed. Taylor and Francis, 2022. Web. 15 Oct. 2022.