IV. BROTHERS AND SISTERS
I first experienced the phenomenon of disciple-speak in late 2010, in a rented lecture hall in Birkbeck college, around the corner from Russell Square tube station. A few weeks before, Iâd read Dan and Kateâs email announcing their reasons for leaving SCOAN. It had left me determined to see the Synagogue Church for myself, and the London branch â which would soon be closed â was only a two-hour train journey away. I sat in the hall as a tag-team of young, white disciples took their turn to preach to the predominantly black congregation. Each one strode across the stage, leading the crowd in a call and response, channelling TB Joshua in every move and phrase.
On my way out of the meeting, I spoke briefly to Danâs mum Susan Winfield, who was sitting near the back. I told her that Iâd read Dan and Kateâs email. I asked her if she was worried about Kateâs accusations of sexual abuse, given that three of her children remained disciples. She told me that it was completely normal for every genuine move of God to face opposition. On the train home, I wrote about the service in my diary. Susanâs cold, strained smile and the briskness of her speech brought the word âbrainwashedâ to mind, but even then, I sensed the metaphor was wrong. Talking to Dan and Kate would confirm this. Nothing was scrubbed or removed. The blankness of disciple-speak did not reflect an absence. What was going on beneath its surface?
A few months after my visit, in the comments section of the TB Joshua Watch blog, disciple-speak was a common topic of conversation. What happened to people when they became disciples? The discussions on the blog shed some light on the question, but it wasnât until years later, through conversations with Dan and Kate, that I began to get my head around it.
We knew that TB Joshua Watch had reached the attention of the Synagogue Church when the copycat blogs started appearing. First it was watchtbjoshua.wordpress.com. Then came Watching TB Joshua, Watched TB Joshua, and other variations. Apparently written by disciples, most of these blogs pumped out large amounts of pro-SCOAN content, as if to bury any unflattering search results in an avalanche of puff.
Iâd started the blog in January 2011. I wrote a couple of posts that summarized the troubling side of SCOAN and linked to some existing critical accounts online. I sent an email to a number of old church friends with the link. Soon after, my brother Ian offered to help out. He was a practising Christian, so could address theological issues with more authority than me. He was also better with technology. He overhauled the website, set up social media accounts, wrote posts on idolatry and healing theology. The daily visits rose into the dozens, then hundreds, and eventually thousands. Lots of people were googling TB Joshua.
The blog was, according to the counter-blogs, founded by former disciples engaged in a bitter vendetta against the Man of God. It was a reasonable assumption, but besides not being an ex-disciple, my own interest in TB Joshua was limited at the time. I was repelled by him, and wanted more people to know he was a charlatan. This was an odd, accidental hobby rather than an all-consuming passion. The blog brought its own rewards. It was nice, for one thing, to have a shared project with Ian. He was one year older than me, but our lives had diverged: heâd got married young, had two kids and moved abroad for work. Weâd always got on well, but we rarely got around to talking without an excuse. We set up alerts to keep on top of SCOAN-related news. We sent ideas for articles to each other, and edited each otherâs drafts.
We learned that TB Joshuaâs notoriety extended beyond his claims of healing. His prophecies often made headlines. In 2012, he prophesied that an African head of state would die within sixty days. In a later video, he appeared to name a specific date. When the Malawian president, Bingu Wa Mutharika, died of a cardiac arrest on this day, he was succeeded by Joyce Banda, a devotee of TB Joshua whoâd visited the Synagogue Church several times. In the Malawian press, there was speculation as to whether Joshuaâs prediction was coincidence, divine anointing, or some kind of insider knowledge.
Many of the prophecy videos were easy to debunk. Whenever there was a major terrorist attack, plane crash or celebrity death in the news, Emmanuel TV would release a video â clearly heavily edited â in which Joshua appeared to predict the event during a church service. By watching the footage of the full service, often available online, we could find the bits that had been cut: the details that deviated from the event that TB Joshua claimed to foresee. These prophetic patchworks were created with such efficiency that on one occasion, a single prophecy was chopped up to make two different videos, each with its inconvenient bits removed: one claiming Joshua had predicted a flood in Indonesia, another a typhoon in the Philippines.
In the comments sections of the posts, a cast of regular characters emerged, often writing under pseudonyms. There were a number of ex-Immanuelites. There were wives worried by their husbandsâ obsession with TB Joshua, and concerned friends and relatives of disciples. There was Mr Terrific, a passionate and foul-mouthed critic of TB Joshua whoâd been involved with SCOAN in Ghana. There were a number of former disciples. Some, like Dan and Kate, were thoroughly disenchanted. A few were more ambivalent, their comments wrestling with contradictions. âDoesnât God move through imperfect vessels?â wrote one. Another regular ex-disciple, writing in a broken English that was hard to place, veered from acute insight to florid delusion, from scepticism to credulity, as if she was still only half-free from TB Joshuaâs spell.
Iâd go on the blog a dozen times each day, checking page views, moderating and responding to comments. Iâd sit in a cafĂ© and work on posts before work. What made it fun was the sense of amateur sleuthing, the attempt to figure out how SCOAN worked. With the help of regular commenters and contributors, we wrote about the deceptions of the healing ministry, about SCOANâs ways of making money from visitors, like the âfree giftâ of anointed water given only to those whoâd bought expensive merchandise or otherwise contributed money. The relative ease with which these mysteries were solved raised another, more profound question. What kept disciples faithful to a ministry that relied on such crude deceit?
Discussions in the comments section were joined by SCOAN supporters. Some were trolls, damning us to hellfire in all caps. Two regular names, writing in what seemed to be Nigerian-inflected English, defended SCOAN persistently but more or less respectfully. Another, a self-described disciple going by the name of Radicalised, was more elusive, writing a comment then disappearing, ignoring follow-up questions. I spoke to Ian about Radicalised. They had a Lagos IP address, and clearly had inner knowledge of SCOAN. They also seemed to know who we were. We were certain that he or she was an ex-Immanuelite, though had no way of knowing which one.
The presence of Radicalised was exciting. If disciples were commenting, this meant they were probably reading the posts. Perhaps the pressures of church life made it easy to turn a blind eye to troubling facts about SCOAN. On the blog, they were all collected in one place. There was proof of fraudulent prophecies. There was a clip from Emmanuel TV of children singing a song of praise to TB Joshua â âeverything about him is goodâ. There was another of a SCOAN attendee calling TB Joshua the âJesus of Todayâ. It was difficult to imagine how anyone raised as a Christian could see all this, and not have their faith in SCOAN shaken.
âThe first thing you do when you arrive as a disciple at SCOAN,â wrote Giles, âis get shown your bedspace. The males and females are accommodated in two huge separate rooms full of bunk beds. You could fit at least fifty beds in each room. Ablutions would be six toilets, six showers and a couple of sinks. Your luggage would have to fit in any way you could â under the beds, in between the beds or in my case, along the one side of the mattress while I slept on the other side.â
Giles appeared in the comments sections of the first few posts, a British ex-disciple with a good eye for the detail of disciple life. When we emailed him asking if he would write something longer, he obliged. He wrote about the correction meetings, in which disciples would report each other for missteps. He wrote about addaba â the state of ostracism imposed by TB Joshua if an accusation stuck. He wrote about his experience of being kicked out of SCOAN. In 2006, after being granted leave to attend a family reunion, he was denied an invitation to return. He called all the numbers he knew, wrote emails asking to be allowed back, but was met with silence. âI was living in the south of London in a flatshare where everyone seemed to get drunk and high all the time, working in a minimum wage job,â he wrote. âSo, I ended up doing what most guys would have done if they didnât know what to do with their lives. I joined the Army.â
Gilesâ rejection by TB Joshua didnât shake his belief that he was a great Man of God. When Giles was a disciple, his mum was diagnosed with cancer. Sheâd gone to SCOAN, where she was proclaimed healed. Sheâd refused chemotherapy but had kept getting sicker. When he visited her after leaving SCOAN, he sprayed her with TB Joshuaâs anointed water. It was only in Afghanistan that TB Joshuaâs hold on him began to slip.
After joining the Royal Engineers, Giles was sent to Helmand province, where a massive operation was underway to recapture Taliban-held territory. He was a sapper in the Counter-IED Task Force. His unitâs role was to move out ahead of the advancing troops, identifying and destroying IEDs. He brought a bottle of anointed water with him, and sprayed everyone in his unit at the beginning of the tour.
His mum died when he was in Helmand. Two close friends in his unit were killed by roadside bombs. âTurns out anointed water isnât IED-proof,â he wrote. During this time, Giles read the Bible every day. Heâd wake up reciting psalms out loud â though I walk through the valley of the shadow of death, I will fear no evil, for you are with me. He realized that the love and solace he felt from these words was unlike anything heâd known at SCOAN.
Gilesâ account initiated a new phase in the blog. Other ex-disciples came forward, and wrote testimonies of their own experience. The blog became more than just a catalogue of TB Joshuaâs dodginess. Some days it felt like a spontaneous community, a place in which people could talk about experiences that had been life-changing, sometimes traumatic, but too bizarre for most people to understand. In the comments section, a mixture of ex-disciples and outsiders attempted to make sense of things that seemed, to me and many others, incomprehensible. What was it that kept people in SCOAN for so many years, in spite of the privation, the absurdity and abuse?
Gilesâ story contained a fascinating specimen of disciple-speak. Towards the end of his tour of Afghanistan, he began to receive emails from a disciple called Angela. The Synagogue Church, after ignoring him for years, was suddenly keen to make contact again. In Angelaâs first email, she warned him to dismiss any accusations he might hear from Dan and Kate, whoâd recently left the church. âI just want to tell you that the allegations are all false â there is no truth in them. You should not allow it to disturb you but treat it as the rubbish it is and discard it.â
Giles waited until heâd left Afghanistan before replying. âI still donât know why my opinion is so important,â he wrote. âIâd been told to leave when I was a disciple, and ostracized until I did. No-one was interested in contacting me or my brother when my mum was dying and we were trying to get through. No-one seems to be interested in the fact that I have just spent the last six months fighting in Helmand, and am now trying to adjust to normal life. No-one is interested in Kate and Danâs welfare either. All the phone calls and emails Iâve been getting are to do with defending the ministryâs honour and winning people back to SCOAN.â
The discipleâs reply came a few days later:
What was puzzling about disciple-speak was how ineffective it was at persuading, or communicating anything of substance. The slightest display of empathy or acknowledgement â sincere or otherwise â would have surely done more to reassure Giles. But this jumble of pre-fabricated phrases, delivered with a vacant cheeriness, had a chilling effect: like being visited by something not-quite-human.
Disciples didnât pick up this way of talking overnight. In his early months at SCOAN, Gilesâ commitment to the ministry co-existed with a certain independence of mind. âIâve always been a bit gobby,â he told me, in a later conversation. He was often criticized by a number of zealous female disciples, Kate and Mary Winfield among them. It struck him as phoney to call them sister, he wrote, âunless I feel loved like my real sister loves meâ. He called them by their first names only, and for a while, he got away with it. Dan also described feeling uncomfortable about the way people called TB Joshua âdaddyâ. He resisted using the word himself at the beginning â though it was explained that this kind of thing was normal in Nigeria. Addaba changed everything. The unpredictability of the attacks in disciple meetings, and the pain of the public shaming that followed, meant that disciples looked for easy ways of staying relatively safe.
Gilesâ first stint in SCOAN came to an abrupt end because of a kitchen dispute. Unknown disciples had been drinking from his bottle of chilled water in the communal fridge and putting it back empty. He left a note on the bottle: Donât drink! Contains my yucky saliva! The bottle disappeared, then the note appeared in a disciple meeting, wielded by a disciple as evidence of Gilesâ bad behaviour. TB Joshua was outraged. The other disciples latched on to his disapproval, directing a litany of other complaints against Giles. Even the previously friendly ones added their own accusations. He was called to see TB Joshua after the meeting, who told him to pack his bags and leave.
When, after much pleading in the weeks that followed, he was given a second chance and invited back to Lagos, he decided to do it right. He called everyone sister and brother. He learned to deliver TB Joshua-approved teaching. He peppered his everyday conversation with Quotable Quotes, the words of TB Joshua that they were made to study and memorize. The change was dramatic. People used to leave the room when he entered. Now they welcomed him into conversations. He was given responsibilities: the youth work, the newcomersâ department.
Giles learned that speaking like a disciple was as much about what he didnât say. Disciples couldnât criticize the prophet or SCOAN in any way, but it was also taboo to speak of any other Christian leaders favourably. Conversations about seemingly innocuous topics were also out of bounds. He recalled how as a new disciple, heâd ask others about their family, their hobbies, their churches back home. He was met with stern responses: âThatâs not important.â âI do not discuss my past.â Later he understood. Life at SCOAN was about pressing forward. Such small talk was seen as unserious. They were there to serve God, to learn from their mentor TB Joshua.
Gilesâ discomfort at addressing fellow disciples as âbrotherâ and âsisterâ revealed a deeper truth about SCOAN. It was precisely those fraternal, horizontal bonds that disciple-speak denied them. People would spend years living together â sharing meals and dorm rooms, travelling the world â and yet barely know each other.
During Dan Winfieldâs first year as a disciple, his mum and aunt Madelaine came to SCOAN for a week, along with a group of British visitors. At the time, foreign groups would be given a short talk by TB Joshua early in their visit. This time it was different. TB Joshua had called Dan into his office with two other disciples, and told them to deliver a talk based on his teachings. Heâd given them precise instructions about how to introduce themselves.
Dan was first to address the group. âMy name is Dan,â he said. âBy the grace of God I am an evangelist-in-training under my Father in the Lord, Senior Prophet TB Joshua. Before I came to SCOAN, I was a sinner. I thank God for the life of my Father in the Lord, TB Joshua. Before coming to SCOAN, I didnât know Jesus, but now through my mentor I have come to know Him.â
Later that day, Danâs mum came to him in the computer room in a state of agitation. Her sister Madelaine had been concerned by what Dan had said. Dan had been raised as a Christian, and had chosen to be baptized as a young teenager. Heâd just denied his previous faith, giving TB Joshua all the credit for his salvation. Madelaine thought this was a sign that SCOAN was a cult. Danâs mum didnât know what to think.
Dan was taken aback. He listened to her, and gently tried to reassure her that it wasnât a cult. She calmed down. Several other disciples in the computer room witne...