eBook - ePub
Book details
Book preview
Table of contents
Citations
About This Book
BarCharts, Inc was founded on our law guides created by the owner. They were designed to understand the significant details within the larger scheme of the law, as a daily refresher, and to review before the Bar Exam. Twenty five years later we keep those guides up to date for students of law and criminal justice, paralegals, and practicing lawyers to have the most handy legal reference to the most important points of the law possible in 6 laminated pages.
Suggested uses:
o Used by criminal justice majors and professionals
o Law students and legal professionals at any level
o To understand proportion and relevance regarding Evidence
o Quick and constant refreshers before classes and exams
o As the last review before taking the Bar Exam
Frequently asked questions
At the moment all of our mobile-responsive ePub books are available to download via the app. Most of our PDFs are also available to download and we're working on making the final remaining ones downloadable now. Learn more here.
Both plans give you full access to the library and all of Perlegoâs features. The only differences are the price and subscription period: With the annual plan youâll save around 30% compared to 12 months on the monthly plan.
We are an online textbook subscription service, where you can get access to an entire online library for less than the price of a single book per month. With over 1 million books across 1000+ topics, weâve got you covered! Learn more here.
Look out for the read-aloud symbol on your next book to see if you can listen to it. The read-aloud tool reads text aloud for you, highlighting the text as it is being read. You can pause it, speed it up and slow it down. Learn more here.
Yes, you can access Evidence by in PDF and/or ePUB format, as well as other popular books in Law & Law Theory & Practice. We have over one million books available in our catalogue for you to explore.
Information
TYPES OF EVIDENCE
CHARACTER IN CIVIL CASES [404] CHARACTER IN CRIMINAL CASES [404] VICTIMâS CHARACTER IN A CRIMINAL CASE [404(a)(2)] OTHER BAD ACTS [404(b)]
- Generally inadmissible to prove action in conformity therewith (e.g., plaintiff cannot introduce evidence that defendant is usually a reckless driver to prove he/she was negligent on day in question)
- Admissible when directly in issue
- Character is an ultimate fact in dispute and must be proved by competent evidence [405(b)]
- Defamation: Plaintiff sues defendant for calling plaintiff a thief, and defendant pleads truth as an affirmative defense
- Negligent entrustment: Plaintiff sues defendant for negligently permitting use of car by reckless driver; driverâs character for recklessness is in issue
- Evidence of either reputation in the community or specific acts to show this character
- Libel: Plaintiff is alleged to be a thief, so evidence that plaintiff has stolen things is admissible
- FRE allow any type of evidence (reputation, opinion, or specific acts) [404(b)]
- Methods of proving character:
- Specific acts
- Opinion testimony of witness who knows person
- Testimony of personâs reputation in the community
- Character is an ultimate fact in dispute and must be proved by competent evidence [405(b)]
- Generally, bad character inadmissible to prove defendant is more likely to have committed crime
- Rationale: Such evidence creates extreme prejudice (e.g., if the prosecution is permitted to show defendant is a bad person, jury may convict regardless of defendantâs guilt in crime charged)
- Accused may always introduce evidence of good character that tends to show he/ she did not commit crime whether or not he/she takes the stand
- Door is opened to attack character of defendant when defendant introduces evidence of good character, and door is opened to introduce character of victim if defendant introduces evidence of character of victim [402(a)(1)]
- Methods of proving character: Reputation and personal opinion testimony
- Traditional view: Witness limited to reputation only, not opinion or specific acts of defendant
- Modern view [405]: Witness for defendant may testify to defendantâs reputation and to his/her personal opinion
- Evidence of specific acts is not allowed unless character is an essential element of charge, claim, or defense
- Prosecution cannot initiate evidence of bad character of defendant, but if defendant puts character in issue by having a character witness testify as to his/her opinion of defendantâs reputation, prosecution may rebut by showing defendantâs bad character; defendant does not put his/her character in issue merely by taking the stand but rather credibility (not character) is in issue, and prosecution is limited to impeachment rather than substantive character evidence
- Methods of proving character: If defendant limited to reputation evidence to show good character, then prosecution generally can show same type of evidence to show bad character (e.g., witnessesâ testimonies show that defendantâs reputation in community is violent)
- Cross-examination of defendantâs character witnesses
- Majority view: Prosecution may test credibility of defendantâs witnesses by inquiring on cross-examination whether witness has heard of particular instances of defendantâs misconduct (i.e., reputation testimony)
- Prosecution may ask about arrests, as well as convictions
- Modern trend [405]
- On cross-examination, inquiry is allowed regarding specific instances of conduct (i.e., âDo you know thatâ?â is allowed)
- Majority view: If witness denies knowledge of specific instances of conduct, prosecution cannot prove by extrinsic evidence (e.g., arrest and conviction records)
- Majority view: Prosecution may test credibility of defendantâs witnesses by inquiring on cross-examination whether witness has heard of particular instances of defendantâs misconduct (i.e., reputation testimony)
- Defendant does not open the door by merely taking the stand
- Admissible in homicide cases
- Inadmissible in rape cases (e.g., rape shield: evidence of sexual behavior or sexual disposition of victim is generally inadmissible)
- Exceptions: Victimâs sexual behavior may be admissible to prove someone else is source of semen, injury, or physical evidence
- Specific instances of sexual behavior between victim and accused may be admissible by prosecution for any reason and by defense to prove consent:
- When defendant claims self-defense, he/she may introduce evidence of victimâs violent nature to show victim was the aggressor
- The prosecution may then introduce evidence of victimâs good character
- Majority of courts do not allow prosecution to introduce rebuttal evidence of defendantâs reputation for violence to show defendant was the aggressor
- Methods of proving character: Reputation and opinion evidence is admissible to show character of defendant or victim (majority view)
- On cross-examination, inquiry is permitted into specific instances of past conduct of victim
- Admissible to prove another element of present crime and not to show defendant had criminal propensity
- In a criminal case, defendant may request reasonable notice of prosecutionâs intent to use bad acts as evidence to prove another purpose; MIMIC rule: Motive, Intent, Mistake (absence of), Identity (e.g., if modus operandi is a crime signature), Common plan or scheme (e.g., evidence that defendant recently stole burglary tool is probative of burglary)
- Similar crimes in sexual assault cases [413]: In a criminal case in which a defendant is accused of a sexual assault, the court may admit evidence that the defendant committed any other sexual assault; the evidence may...
Table of contents
- JUDICIAL NOTICE [201]
- JUDICIAL RULINGS
- BURDENS OF PROOF [301]
- KINDS OF PROOF
- RELEVANCE
- TYPES OF EVIDENCE
- WITNESSES
- HEARSAY
- HEARSAY EXCEPTIONS
- CONSTITUTIONAL ISSUES IN CRIMINAL LAW: CONFRONTATION CLAUSE