- English
- PDF
- Available on iOS & Android
Contested Commodities
About This Book
Not only are there willing buyers for body parts or babies, Radin observes, but some desperately poor people would be willing sellers, while better-off people find such trades abhorrent. Radin observes that many such areas of contested commodification reflect a persistent dilemma in liberal society: we value freedom of choice and simultaneously believe that choices ought to be restricted to protect the integrity of what it means to be a person. She views this tension as primarily the result of underlying social and economic inequality, which need not reflect an irreconcilable conflict in the premises of liberal democracy.As a philosophical pragmatist, the author therefore argues for a conception of incomplete commodification, in which some contested things can be bought and sold, but only under carefully regulated circumstances. Such a regulatory regime both symbolizes the importance of nonmarket value to personhood and aspires to ameliorate the underlying conditions of inequality.
Frequently asked questions
Information
Table of contents
- Cover
- Title Page
- Copyright
- Dedication
- Acknowledgments
- Contents
- Preface
- Chapter 1. Commodification as a Worldview
- Chapter 2. Market-Inalienability
- Chapter 3. Problems for the Idea of a Market Domain
- Chapter 4. Compartmentalization: Attempting to Delineate a Market Domain
- Chapter 5. Personhood and the Dialectic of Contextuality
- Chapter 6. Human Flourishing and Market Rhetoric
- Chapter 7. Incomplete Commodification
- Chapter 8. Conceptual Recapitulation
- Chapter 9. The Double Bind
- Chapter 10. Prostitution and Baby-Selling: Contested Commodification and Womenâs Capacities
- Chapter 11. Commodification, Objectification, and Subordination
- Chapter 12. Free Expression
- Chapter 13. Compensation
- Chapter 14. Democracy
- Notes
- Index