Chapter 1
The Urgent Need for a Strengths-Based Approach
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
It is an absolute human certainty that no one can know his own beauty or perceive a sense of his own worth until it has been reflected back to him in the mirror of another loving, caring human being.
âJohn Joseph Powell
Think back to when you formally trained to become an educator. How much time and how many course texts, readings, and activities were devoted to formally studying the complexities of working with students living with trauma, violence, and chronic stress? We often ask teachers this question when we provide professional development on the topic. Almost universally, across the United States, the common response we receive is that very little time or resources were devoted to studying this critical topicâespecially as it applies to teaching students and working with their families. Rather, teachers tell us that they learn about what to do in four general ways: (1) by doing their best to teach students using trial-and-error strategies, (2) by learning from support staff, such as school counselors and others who engage in the psychosocial well-being of students, (3) by listening carefully at a school's child study team meetings when a variety of interpretations about students' and families' circumstances are discussed, and/or (4) by seeking advice from colleagues who have taught children with similar situations.
What exacerbates this situation even further is the reality that most educators have little to no formal education working with students and families who represent cultural, linguistic, racial, and economic experiences that are distinct from their own (Bransford, Darling-Hammond, & LePage, 2005; Darling-Hammond & Rothman, 2015). Whether it is working with high or low incidences of people who represent the rapidly growing diversity among U.S. students and their families, most educators tell us what the professional literature has confirmed for years: Very few in our profession have had any formal training or depth of experience working with the large, growing, and changing population of diverse learnersâlet alone those living with trauma, violence, and chronic stress.
The absence of any formal training in this area, understandably, has led many teachers to feel quite unprepared to teach and work with this population. Further, many teachers believe that some students' experiences are so extreme that there is little hope for them, despite all of the educators' efforts and good intentions. This perception often puts limits and restrictions on teachers in terms of how they teach and interact with students, as well as how they work with families. In a real sense, it has almost forced many teachers to look at students and their families as "broken" instead of as individuals who already possess inherent strengths and who can make great contributions to their classrooms, their communities, and the world. Indeed, for too long, teachers have found themselves using language to name their perceptions in terms of what they believe are impossible situations for students living with trauma, violence, and chronic stress. Here is an example.
While we were writing this chapter, one of us conducted a schoolwide training in an impoverished industrial city in the Northeast. She asked pairs of teachers to describe strategies that they found to be the most successful in their work with students living with trauma, violence, and chronic stress. While there were many different responses from each pair, one in particular resonated with the group. It went something like this: "I know that I am working hard, but it is impossible when I know that I have students who don't know whether they have a bed to sleep on at night, who worry about one of their parents who is incarcerated, or who come to school hungry." As you read this, you might find that you feel or have felt like this teacher. We acknowledge this reality, as well as the fact that many caring educators spend great amounts of their time and energy trying to minimize the effects of adversity on their students while simultaneously supporting them to succeed in school. Having said this, we also want to share our excitement about more recent evidence-based research that shows promising practices for teaching students living with trauma, violence, and chronic stress and working with their families. The foundation of this book is based on these findings.
What we propose is to take it a step further and look beyond "what is lacking" to find "what is already there" to effect change and sustain progress. Renowned pediatrician, professor of pediatrics at Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, and director of youth services at Covenant House Pennsylvania, Kenneth Ginsberg (2015) tells us that our students are "not broken" despite the many odds that they face. He urges us to look at our students in a different way so that we can see their many strengths and assets and tap into their natural resilience to improve their outcomes in school and beyond. An example that Ginsberg uses to illustrate this important point is his work with children who are chronically ill and their families. While he acknowledges the effect that chronic illness has on children's lives, he also points to the many strengths that the same children possess. Pushing his thoughts further, he discusses the importance of using these strengths to support students to become more confident, more competent, more connected and contributory to others, more committed to integrity, more able to cope, and able to have more control over their lives to make healthy choices.
In this spirit, we created the following question to embark on this transformational journey of teaching students living with trauma, violence, and chronic stress:
How can we move from feeling defeated, helpless, and hopeless in our beliefs about students experiencing trauma, violence, and chronic stress to being lighthouses of hope, high expectations, and appreciation of our students' and their families' inherent strengths?
Weaving Three Elements to Form a Braid of Understanding
In this chapter, we explore three critical and foundational elements for working effectively with students living with trauma, violence, and chronic stress. We use the illustration of three strands to show how interweaving these elements together forms a tight braid or bond. We have separated this chapter into the following three sections to reflect our braid framework.
- The first section includes key evidence-based tenets of strengths-based teaching that we use to identify and acknowledge the inherent assets and capacities of students and their families to help us in creating and/or strengthening our teaching practices.
- The second section is devoted to exploring some key principles for working with dynamically changing student and family populations. We examine some of the key concepts for understanding culture as a way of being and acting as it relates to child development.
- The third section focuses on the importance of supporting student learning and thinking through interactions. We do so by drawing from the seminal contributions of developmental psychologist Lev Vygotsky (1978), who posited that student learning occurs through two interdependent systems: cognition and social interaction.
The intent of this chapter is to explore the possibilities that can occur when we use this braided framework. We draw from it to build on students' inherent strengths, connect with their cultural ways of being, and create opportunities for students to learn through interactions to expand their ability to cope and help them become confident learners and active members of their classrooms, school communities, and beyond.
Let's begin by engaging in a reflection activity intended to help us explore some key principles about students living with trauma, violence, and chronic stress. As we stated in the Introduction, all of the reflection activities found in the book are intended for applying and extending the key ideas to our personal and professional lives. They are also intended for two types of audiences: individual readers and groups of readers, such as those in a college course, professional learning community, or book study group.
Using a Strengths-Based Instructional and Interactional Approach
Research points to the urgent need to approach the topic of students living with trauma, violence, and chronic stress from a more positive stance, as opposed to looking at it through a deficit-based lens. The field of psychotherapy suggests that focusing on people's inherent strengths (what they bring) has been proven to lead to better outcomes than focusing on what we perceive as their weaknesses (Seligman, Rashid, & Parks, 2006). In educational settings, additional research shows that we can help students be more successful and engaged when we draw from their internal strengths and capacities (Biswas-Dienera, Kashdan, & Gurpal, 2011). Part of our thinking needs to shift from what we believe is not happening and impossible to what is happening and possible. To do this we must take time to
- Identify students' existing strengths.
- Honor, value, and acknowledge these strengths.
- Help students become aware of their strengths.
- Build instructional programming that boosts social ties and networks by drawing from students' strengths.
These four elements are essential to teaching students living with trauma, violence, and chronic stress. And they bring us back around to the first reflection task.
How easy was it to identify the various strengths of the students? Many educators tell us that it is challenging for them to find any strengths for the last student, Jasmine. They have shared with us that they just don't see how her circumstances and what she does in school reflect any assets. So let's go back to Jasmine for a few moments before we enter into a discussion about the principles of positive psychology. In the description, we share that Jasmine comes to school every day. If we think about this, despite whatever we perceive about her home life (and we have not furnished much about it in terms of the relationships that she has with her mother, neighbors, family's community, and more), she is coming to school regularly, consistently, and routinely. This is certainly a strength that she possesses. It shows responsibility, value for education, value for interactions, hope, appreciation, gratitude, determination, connection, and courage, to name a few of her values and qualities. What this points us toward is the research encouraging us to look for specific student strengths so that we may draw from these in our work.
Psychologist Abraham Maslow's (1999) contributions help us understand the possibilities of what can occur when we look through our strengths-based lens.
Principles of positive psychology. Maslow (1999) pioneered the idea of looking at human behavior through the lens of the assets, capacities, and qualities that empower people and their communities to flourish. He coined the term positive psychology to reflect this idea. Positive psychology is a belief that, as humans, we all want to be the best that we can be and that it is in our nature to strive toward what Maslow refers to as our self-actualized potential. It positions human behavior as being driven by the desire to lead richly meaningful and fulfilling lives. Further, it does not ignore or dismiss the need to take time to understand the difference between what helps us achieve our potential and what doesn't. While not abandoning their roles as scientists of healing, experts in positive psychology (also referred to positivists) argue that we have to give as much attention to acknowledging and building positive qualities as we have given to repairing damage (Morris & Maisto, 2002). In addition, positive psychology expands beyond the self. It looks closely at the human potential for working and collaborating together. Interpersonal relationships, according to Maslow, are made more possible when we believe in each other's worth or value and when we mutually support each other to see our collective human potential.
Earlier, we acknowledged that many caring educators spend great amounts of their time and energy trying to minimize the effects of adversity on their students while simultaneously supporting them to succeed in school. Part of this is our capacity to be empathetic educators; that is, educators who understand our students' circumstances and seek ways to make education meaningful for those students. The tenets of positive psychology require that we be empathetic and asset-based teachers. First, we must have an understanding of our students, and second, we must work from their strengths.
Here is a small example that will be expanded on later in the book. Let's say that we are David, Brianna, and Jasmine's U.S. history teacher. In our course text, students are reading about the U.S. Civil War. The text talks about fathers and sons leaving their families to fight in the war. One of the activities created by the school district's history department asks students to interview their parents about what it would be like to leave a family member behind to fight in a war. As empathetic teachers, we likely would know that some students don't live with their parents. Indeed, Brianna lives with her grandmother. With this knowledge, we would modify the question to be more inclusive of all of our students, including Brianna and others. The same would hold true for making modifications for students who are homeless or living in shelters, or whose parent or guardian is deployed to an area of conflict, so that what we do is inclusive, respectful, validating, and honoring. In addition, if we changed the earlier examples to include a student who is an unaccompanied minor from a war-torn country and learning English, we would make second language learning modifications (such as asking a question that matches the student's level of English proficiency or asking it in the student's native language). We would also modify the question to be relevant and sensitive to the student's background. Furthermore, we would anchor all of these modifications on the students' previously identified assets. While later chapters explore these ideas in much more detail, the point here is that the foundational princip...