1
The 1960s and the Appearance of âA New Creedâ
Introduction
Renowned United Church historian Phyllis D. Airhart once said that âA New Creedâ âsounds sort of â60s-ish to me.â Her comment was remarkably intuitive, but in what sense? Given that this distinctive confession is so unlike anything that preceded it, in The United Church or elsewhere, questions surrounding the occasion of its appearance are important to consider. As is widely known, the sixties was a period of significant social upheaval that marked a cultural turning point in the twentieth century. This was true not only for mainstream Christian denominations like The United Church of Canada but for Western societies at large. Though North Americans had sought a return to normalcy following the Second World Warâcertainly a better and more affluent normalcyâany sense of contentment or consensus that had been achieved in the aftermath of V-E Day or V-J Day was fragmented by the 1960s. Worldviews and assumptions having evolved or taken great leaps, some individuals became impatient for society to change as rapidly and as thoroughly as they had done personally. Some of the enduring images of the decadeâfrom the civil rights struggle of the United States and mass protests against the Vietnam War to the sexual revolution and the emergence of a rock-and-roll drug cultureârepresented social developments that would have been unthinkable just a generation earlier. It will be the purpose of the following few pages to demonstrate briefly in what ways this dramatically changing cultural context suggested to many the need for commensurate adaptation on the part of the church. Some in The United Church felt the times specifically necessitated a change in the form and content of their denominationâs creed. The confessional transformation embodied by âA New Creedâ was precipitated by such feelings and made more viable in the midst of a radically unsettled community.
Defining the Sixties
When we speak of the historical significance of the 1960s, we are not just talking about ten years as counted according to the Gregorian calendar. Rather, the sixties refers to a period of cultural revolution throughout the West. The era not only seemed full of significant events for those who experienced them but has since been acknowledged as such by historians. One of the challenges of assessing this period is the utterly massive body of evidence at hand. Arthur Marwickâs influential book The Sixties: Cultural Revolution in Britain, France, Italy, and the United States stretches to over fifteen hundred pages. In some ways, it is a very detailed work. In other ways it is, by necessity, highly selective and superficial. The 1960s occurred at a period in human history when burgeoning technologies allowed for unprecedented levels of human communication, as well as the preservation of vast amounts of information across several media, both new and old. In practical terms, there is an overwhelming amount of data that needs to be considered.
Another challenge in assessing the events of the sixties is the task of choosing appropriate start and end dates for this cultural revolution, which did not begin precisely on 1 January 1960 or end on 31 December 1969. The aforementioned Arthur Marwick made his most notable contribution in suggesting the idea of a long sixties from 1958 to 1974. He argues the sixties really began culturally with a new affluence that empowered teenagers economically and drove corporate interests to pursue teens with the development of an adolescent rock-and-roll culture. This accumulation of financial and social currency greatly emboldened the baby boom generation and increased the significance of their responses to events in the world around them. The end of the era came with the winding down of the Vietnam War and the resignation of Richard M. Nixon from the American presidency. While the long sixties concept has been well received, the selection of different dates by other historians symbolizes the challenge of assigning precise beginnings and endings.
Arthur Marwick took his inspiration for the idea of the long sixties from fellow British scholar Eric Hobsbawm and his influential work The Age of Extremes: The Short Twentieth Century 1914â1991. I find Hobsbawmâs delineation of this era more convincing, from the triggering of the First World War in 1914 to the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991. There seems to me a thematic continuity within the geopolitics of this short twentieth century and a clear way to distinguish that period from events both before and after. While I agree that there was also an era we can call the sixties, and that the idea of a long sixties is helpful, I am not sure it is quite as easy to demarcate a cultural revolution in that era as it is with the international political turmoil of the short twentieth century. One could conceivably suggest the beginning of a very long 1960s at 1914. This is not to deny the significant impacts of the sixties but to name a particular challenge in assessing them.
Secularization
Of particular interest to the history of The United Church in general and its writing of âA New Creedâ in particular is the difficult issue of secularization. It is widely agreed that over the last hundred or more years, the West has secularized. During this period, religious institutions have been disengaged publically and private faith has waned. It is also acknowledged that the cultural developments of the sixties played an important role in this still ongoing story of secularization in Western societies. Precise understandings of the causes, nature, and timing of the long-term secularizing trend, however, remain remarkably mysterious.
Prominent Canadian philosopher Charles Taylor did a helpful job of framing the challenge. While we might sense that religion has waned in both the public and private spheres in the West, he argues, closer examination reveals many exceptions that call into question this general assumption. In Britain, private piety is not prevalent but there remains a prominent role for religious institutions in public life. In the United States, by contrast, there is no state church, but religious belief among individuals remains fairly common. Rather than considering secularization as a linear trend, in isolation, Taylor prefers to suggest that what has been happening in the West is rather a process of pluralization. âThe shift to secularity,â he writes, is âa move from a society where belief in God is unchallenged and indeed, unproblematic, to one in which it is understood to be one option among others, and frequently not the easiest to embrace.â
The emphasis on pluralism within the discussion of secularization is a helpful one. It offers a more rounded consideration of the issue whi...