Laughing Histories breaks new ground by exploring moments of laughter in early modern Europe, showing how laughter was inflected by gender and social power.
With its study of laughter in relation to power, aggression, gender, sex, class, and social bonding, Laughing Histories is perfect for readers interested in the history of emotions, cultural history, gender history, and literature.
Frequently asked questions
How do I cancel my subscription?
Simply head over to the account section in settings and click on âCancel Subscriptionâ - itâs as simple as that. After you cancel, your membership will stay active for the remainder of the time youâve paid for. Learn more here.
Can/how do I download books?
At the moment all of our mobile-responsive ePub books are available to download via the app. Most of our PDFs are also available to download and we're working on making the final remaining ones downloadable now. Learn more here.
What is the difference between the pricing plans?
Both plans give you full access to the library and all of Perlegoâs features. The only differences are the price and subscription period: With the annual plan youâll save around 30% compared to 12 months on the monthly plan.
What is Perlego?
We are an online textbook subscription service, where you can get access to an entire online library for less than the price of a single book per month. With over 1 million books across 1000+ topics, weâve got you covered! Learn more here.
Do you support text-to-speech?
Look out for the read-aloud symbol on your next book to see if you can listen to it. The read-aloud tool reads text aloud for you, highlighting the text as it is being read. You can pause it, speed it up and slow it down. Learn more here.
Is Laughing Histories an online PDF/ePUB?
Yes, you can access Laughing Histories by Joy Wiltenburg in PDF and/or ePUB format, as well as other popular books in Geschichte & Sozialgeschichte. We have over one million books available in our catalogue for you to explore.
This incident raises a host of questions about the role of laughter in relations of power. The scene gives us extremes of status from top to bottom, and of humor from the lower bodily function to linguistic wit. The appropriation of the hamperâclearly a valued item of the peasantâs propertyâfor such a defiling use underlined the extreme assumption of superiority by the king and his retinue. Clearly, Henry was in open view, the old womanâs presence troubling only because she wielded a weapon. Here, in the sixteenth century, we are in the âbeforeâ stage of Eliasâs civilizing process, when such bodily functions were not rigorously hidden. But covering someone or their goods with shit was still offensive, as the womanâs reaction shows. In practical terms, of course, it created a disgusting mess. The hamper was a storage vessel for food, adding the implication that she and her family should eat shit. The action effectively placed the woman and her possessions below the level of the kingâs excrement.
These themes provide the jumping-off point for exploring laughter and power. Is laughter subversive, overturning the status quo? Or does it serve the masters, reaffirming their authority? We can find laughter operating in both these modes, a slippery tool indeed. We look first at laughter from below, which has inspired pathbreaking work from cultural historians. Looking at a range of evidence, we consider some perennial questions: is the laughter an effective weapon, or is it a âsafety valveâ that disperses potential rebellion into frivolity? How can we tell when laughter is truly âpopularâ? Turning to laughter at the heights of official power, we consider the laughter of rulers and diplomats. Of course, on one level they laughed as everyone does; but they also mobilized laughter in distinctive ways for political purposesâleading to its appearance in political records. The theme of laughterâs power continues throughout this book, but the issues raised by laughter in the traditional realm of public powerâof rule, subordination, class, and political rivalryâinvite us to consider a central question: how powerful was laughter really?
Laughter from Below
The first work to draw wide attention to the historical power of laughter was written not by a historian but by the Russian literary critic Mikhail Bakhtin. In Rabelais and His World, Bakhtin argued that Gargantua and Pantagruel, masterwork of the Renaissance icon François Rabelais, was not just a literary classic but a window into the elusive world of popular culture and especially popular laughter. Two features of Bakhtinâs argument have broader importance for historical views of the power of laughter. The first has to do with the particular type of laughter. Bakhtin celebrated the laughter of popular festivity, especially carnival, the mad season of license that preceded the sobriety of Lent. The second has to do with who was laughing and at whose expense. For Bakhtin, the belly laugh of Rabelais was the laugh of the masses of ordinary people, and it symbolically dethroned the proud elites above them.2
The âcarnivalesqueâ laughter of popular celebration, in turn, had two main ways of subverting the orderly world of social hierarchy. One was the playful theme of inversion, turning the world upside down so that nothing is as it ought to be. The comic possibilities were vastâfish swimming in the air, husband and wife reversing their roles, a boy officiating as a mock bishop, a peasant honored as king. The masking and revelry of carnival offered many opportunities for changing identities and reversing high and low. Inversion appeared in many guises in public entertainment as well, from stage to song to popular print. Inversion was funny, overturning expectations with its absurd reversals of the norm. It also played fast and loose with the serious and the sacred.
A related and overlapping ground of popular laughter was what Bakhtin called the grotesque body. Rabelaisian laughter is full of untamed bodies and their orifices: gorging, swilling, vomiting, farting, pissing, shitting, coupling, even giving birth, all became part of the raucous comedy. The charactersâ monstrous excess, in gigantic size and in the scale of their disorderly behaviors, marked them as grotesque. Bakhtin saw a liberating symbolism in the shared bodily experience of humanityâbirth, death, digestion, excretion, sexâall in their way disgusting, all unavoidably human, all matter for carnivalesque laughter. The laughs at excrement and other fleshly functions, in Bakhtinâs analysis, marked the âuncrowningâ of social superiors by the reminder of their shared and absurd physicality. For Bakhtin, such popular humor marked a space of freedomâif only in the imaginationâthat he saw as suppressed and stunted in modern bourgeois society.
But was popular laughter really subversive, or was it merely a diversion that helped reconcile the lowly to their position in the status quo? The imagined inversions were fun, but their humor depended on recognition of the normal state of things: kings and nobles ruling over peasants, husbands ruling their wives, bishops processing with suitable pomp, fish swimming in the sea and not the sky. Carnival was temporary. On the other hand, the daring license of festivity was not always kept within bounds. When real rebellion did erupt, the laughter and irreverence could undermine the everyday awe that elites hoped to maintain. Another question: were the unruly laughers really the downtrodden masses? Rabelais had an elite university education, after all, and the wealthy claimed their own part in carnival festivities. It was they who could afford the best costumes for masquerades and fund the best revels. Carnival was imprinted with Christian meanings and could be orchestrated by authorities (though they could not always control it). Even when carnival play shifted into real unrest, it was not necessarily the lower classes who got out of control. Carnival laughter does not yield its meaning easily.3
Laughter and Subversion
Possibly the most famous subversive laughter in history was uncovered by the brilliant Robert Darnton in his book The Great Cat Massacre. It was late in the 1730s, in the Parisian print shop of a lazy bourgeois master and his cat-loving wife. Creeping capitalism had blocked advancement in the printing industry to a few fortunate owners. Employees still had the old guild titles of apprentice and journeyman, but in fact were largely treated as casual labor, without any prospect of eventually becoming master printers and opening their own workshops. They thought the master printer ought to be a coworker, but he had become part of a separate, leisured class that slept late, ate fancy dinners, and kept pampered pets. When told to get rid of the howling alley cats that kept the master and mistress awake at night (skipping a couple of steps in the story here), the workers staged a carnivalesque massacre. Starting with the mistressâs favorite, they slaughtered cats in an atmosphere of high revelry. According to the worker who retold the event in his life story, it roused irresistible laughter among the workers, not only at the time but in reminiscences. It was told and retold, raising hilarity every time.4
As Darnton has noted, the story may not have happened just as it was recounted. The semi-autobiographical account of the printer Nicolas Contat was full of embellishment, but it tells us a great deal about the workersâ outlook. Darnton found many layers of meaning in their laughter, which celebrated a moment of vicarious attack on the master and mistress themselves. The workers drew on the resources of popular culture, in which symbolic role reversals and innuendos from the sexual to the supernatural were in constant play. With inversion and symbolism, they could call the mistress a whore and witch, the master a cuckoldâall while pretending that they were merely following their instructions to get rid of those pesky cats. The workersâ derisive laughter was not revolutionary; it did not change their objective situation. Yet it made them happy in the hilarious moment. No longer victims, they could celebrate their own power. As Darnton points out, their rebellious outlook shows a kinship with the real revolutionary upheaval that was to come half a century later.
The cat massacre was the most dramatic moment in Contatâs account. It was far from the only laughter, though. Contat depicts a workersâ culture in which laughter was a constant and even required element of belonging and group identity. The cat episode is sandwiched between other occasions of laughterânot all of it rebellious, but all positioning laughter as a source of power. It was laughter that exerted the power of the group over individual members, as well as laughter that marked the community of its participants. In the first instance, the unhappy apprentice Jerome became the butt of his coworkers when they found and read aloud a letter from his uncle that repeated the words, âI told you so, Jerome!â The workers were amused by all the old uncleâs criticism and advice, but âI told you so, Jeromeâ caused explosions of laughter. The phrase became a catcall and nickname, loudly echoing through the shopâa hundred times a day, Contat tells us.5 (Even the cat massacre only got 20 repetitions.)
7 Laughter as Social Commodity: Hester Thrale and Friends
Coda: The Lessons of Laughter
Bibliography
Index
Citation styles for Laughing Histories
APA 6 Citation
Wiltenburg, J. (2022). Laughing Histories (1st ed.). Taylor and Francis. Retrieved from https://www.perlego.com/book/3463344/laughing-histories-from-the-renaissance-man-to-the-woman-of-wit-pdf (Original work published 2022)
Chicago Citation
Wiltenburg, Joy. (2022) 2022. Laughing Histories. 1st ed. Taylor and Francis. https://www.perlego.com/book/3463344/laughing-histories-from-the-renaissance-man-to-the-woman-of-wit-pdf.
Harvard Citation
Wiltenburg, J. (2022) Laughing Histories. 1st edn. Taylor and Francis. Available at: https://www.perlego.com/book/3463344/laughing-histories-from-the-renaissance-man-to-the-woman-of-wit-pdf (Accessed: 15 October 2022).
MLA 7 Citation
Wiltenburg, Joy. Laughing Histories. 1st ed. Taylor and Francis, 2022. Web. 15 Oct. 2022.