This is a test
- English
- ePUB (mobile friendly)
- Available on iOS & Android
eBook - ePub
Book details
Book preview
Table of contents
Citations
About This Book
This cutting-edge title explores how narrating the past both conflicts and creates an interesting relationship with drama's 'continuing present' that arcs towards an unpredictable future. Theatre both brings the past alive and also fixes it, but through the performance process, allowing the past to be molded for future (not-yet-existent) audiences.
Frequently asked questions
At the moment all of our mobile-responsive ePub books are available to download via the app. Most of our PDFs are also available to download and we're working on making the final remaining ones downloadable now. Learn more here.
Both plans give you full access to the library and all of Perlegoās features. The only differences are the price and subscription period: With the annual plan youāll save around 30% compared to 12 months on the monthly plan.
We are an online textbook subscription service, where you can get access to an entire online library for less than the price of a single book per month. With over 1 million books across 1000+ topics, weāve got you covered! Learn more here.
Look out for the read-aloud symbol on your next book to see if you can listen to it. The read-aloud tool reads text aloud for you, highlighting the text as it is being read. You can pause it, speed it up and slow it down. Learn more here.
Yes, you can access Narrating the Past through Theatre by M. Bennett in PDF and/or ePUB format, as well as other popular books in Philosophy & Philosophical Metaphysics. We have over one million books available in our catalogue for you to explore.
Information
Topic
PhilosophySubtopic
Philosophical Metaphysics1
Dantonās Memory*: Structural Impossibilities in BĆ¼chnerās Dantonās Death
Abstract: Chapter 1 examines how Georg BĆ¼chnerās Dantonās Death invokes the workings of history and memory to create a narrative of suffocation, where the desires of narrating the past smash up against the ācontinuing present (that arcs toward an unpredictable future)ā of drama. In effect, Dantonās Death is a lamentation on unrealized possibilities and lost opportunities, and the very contradictory nature of dramatizing the past reinforces these almost oxymoronic abstractions. The effectual and ineffectual functions of memory (and it will become the dream for Strindberg many years later) that collapse the past and hopes for the future into a precarious present are exposed only to be forgotten and taken to the grave with the death of Danton. For BĆ¼chner, in Dantonās Death, the failure to rememberāthat is, the failure of memory and the failure of history to rememberābecomes the failure to seize an opportunity; or in another sense, past unrealized hopes for the future become the futureās desire for its present.
Bennett, Y. Michael. Narrating the Past through Theatre: Four Crucial Texts. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013.
DOI: 10.1057/9781137275424.
Nothing was fixed, nothing was settled, nothing was permanent; everything was, as they say in financial circles, to come due this month, or to come due next month. It was a time when kings lasted three months, books an hour, plays half an evening, and constitutions fifteen days. The scene shifted constantly, the nation lived in tents, and as we were part of the nation, we followed the trend.
āAbraham-Joseph BĆ©nard Fleury 1
Iāve heard of a sickness that makes one lose oneās memory. Death, they say, is like that. Then, I hope sometimes that death would be ever stronger and make one lose everything. If only that were so! Then Iād run like a Christian to save my enemyāthat is, my memory. This place is supposed to be safe. Maybe for my memory, but not for meāthe grave would be safer. At least it would make me forget. It would kill my memory here, but back there my memory lives on and kills me.
āDanton, in Dantonās Death 2
What Dubravka Knezevic has called āarguably the best historical play ever written,ā Dantonās Death, by Georg BĆ¼chner, dramatizes the downfall and subsequent execution of Georges Danton during the French Revolution and Terror.3 Danton was the real-life head of the Committee of Public Safety, and when he later became the president of the Convention, Robespierre took over his old position as the head of the Committee of Public Safety. Once the power over executions was granted to the Committee of Public Safety, Robespierre had Danton executed, effectively eliminating all of his major political rivals. Written in 1835 by the twenty-one-year-old Georg BĆ¼chner, the composition of the play situates itself in a precarious position in history and also in the history of drama. Many scholars, now, view BĆ¼chner as the first modern dramatist. Though his worked remained largely unknown, and was not produced for quite some time after his death (therefore, his influence was very limited), with Dantonās Death, BĆ¼chnerās first play, the first āmodernā play, was a historical drama. However specific the historicity of the play, in contrast to the clear framework and lines of conflict of melodrama, but more specifically, here, the anticipation of Romanticism by the Sturm und Drang writers, BĆ¼chnerās work signals the blurring of dramatic frame and conflict, creating liminal lines (something not really taken up again until Henrik Ibsen, a bit, but not really seen overtly until the work of August Strindberg and Oscar Wildeās Salome). Thus, in a sense, it took a historical work to change the way drama narrativized. Writing in 1835, and very politically active himself, BĆ¼chner and his work sat in anticipation of the Industrial Revolution and Marx, and looked back upon the French Revolution.
In this chapter, I examine how Georg BĆ¼chner, in Dantonās Death, narrative of suffocation through the invokcation of history and memory.4 The desires to narrate finds itself confronting the ācontinuing presentā of drama. Dantonās Death creates a synchronic and diachronic tense of always.5 Lamenting the unrealized possibilities and the lost opportunities, BĆ¼chner discusses the effectual and ineffectual functions of memory. Memories, BĆ¼chner suggests, collapse the past and the hopes for the future into a precarious present. However, memories are also exposed only to be forgotten and taken to Dantonās grave. The failure to remember in this play is equivalent to the failure to seize an opportunity.. Initially, Dantonās memory and remembrance of history allows him to seize all opportunities. Later, however, Danton still remembers, and his memories are killing him, not because he cannot act on them but because he can no longer convey (or translate, rather) those same messages as effectively as another: Robespierre. Danton and Robespierre remember history very differently. What happens to Danton, in effect, is that, for a short time, Robespierreās translation of history is more favorable to others than Dantonās translation of the same events. Danton becomes one of the first theorists of the linguistic turn. Danton realizes that the mistakes of the past cannot save the present, for we only know the past, and therefore the structure of the present, by way of a faulty translation. Action that is taken is based on misinterpretation and, therefore, nothing happens and nothing ever changes. In creating a historical drama that is structurally plagued by impossibility, BĆ¼chner sets up a cruel joke of contradictions and āempty noise,ā and created the ominous path where nobody can escape the terrors of a bad translation:
Actually, the whole affair makes me laugh. Thereās a feeling of permanence in me which says that tomorrow will be the same as today, and the day after and all the days to come will be alike. Itās all a lot of empty noise. They want to scare me. They wonāt dare.6
The fact that BĆ¼chner chose drama as the genre of the story is quite telling, as well.7 Only a few months after the composition of Dantonās Death, BĆ¼chner dabbled in prose fiction, writing the prose fragment, Lenz. His choice of genre, drama, reinforces the plague of memory. Intended to come to life and have a physical and material reality of its own on stage, the realities of the stage dictate that memories necessarily die, and that the actors suffer to repeat the same mistakes over and over again, so that every performance is (essentially) the same as the previous one. Danton is sentenced to eternal death by guillotine, and the knowledge gained by the actors must necessarily be forgotten once the play begins again the next night:
If there is a hero in this prose drama of the prosaic relations in the fourth year of the French Revolution, then it is the guillotine made sacred by the Jacobins. The guillotine functions simultaneously as metaphor and metonymy. It is a metaphor because in the moment of decapitation the sovereignty of the people is shown in action. It is metonymy because this moment cannot be maintained but constantly demands new moments, new beheadings.8
This embodied confusion of tropes plays into a genre that only reifies the ideas that BĆ¼chner explores and gives them a similar physical reality. In a play where history hinges on the constant juxtaposition of metonymy and metaphor, humans cannot neatly embody both the trope of metaphor and the trope of metonymy in the body of the actor. The character, then, becomes structurally and logically impossible and is in dire need of a topological translation.
The card game
The insufferable repetition of death and despair thematically opens the play with a game of cards. Flirting with a woman at the card table, by āplott[ing] an affair with the queen,ā HĆ©rault, a deputy of the National Convention, turns the physical action of a card game into a sexual advance: āThe kings and queens fall on top of each other so indecently and the jacks pop up right after.ā9 The stacking of the cards, however, not only mirror the physical nature of procreation and birth but also ominously point out the continual āfallā of kings and queens: the indecent, possibly early or treacherous fall of the kings and queens are followed by the rise of more than one jack, vying for power and the throne. This drama, played out with the flick of the cards, only lasts until the cards are reshuffled, and then the same drama can be played over again. The fall of kings and queens is left, somewhat, to chance. However, āit costs money.ā10 And to get into this drama, to participate in this rise and fall requires a price: some win and some lose. But there is always a winner, and always a loser. And the cards do not care that previous winners come out losers in the end. The cards have no memory.
Each card player, however, is very aware of the object of the game and remembers each win and loss. As Robespierre says about plotting the fall of Danton, a rival ājack,ā who in Robespierreās eyes is waiting to pop up and become the ākingā: āThe sin is in our thoughts. Whether thought becomes action, whether the body carries it outāthat is pure chance.ā11 But to Danton, there is even less agency than that, and there is very little that we can do about it: āTime loses us,ā Danton says. We are merely direct objects. We cannot act, but are acted upon, and therefore, n...
Table of contents
- Cover
- HalfTitle
- Title
- Copyright
- Dedication
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction: Modern Drama and the Translation of Historyās Narratives
- 1Ā Ā Dantonās Memory: Structural Impossibilities in BĆ¼chnerās Dantonās Death
- 2Ā Ā Salomeās TaleāIokanaanās Tellingā Wildeās Retelling: Historical Relativity and (Un)specificity in Wildeās Salome
- 3Ā Ā Galileoās Narrative: Translating Historyās āConditionsā in Brechtās Life of Galileo
- Conclusion: For All SeasonsāThe Particulars and the Universals of Man in Boltās A Man for All Seasons
- Bibliography
- Index