![Baby Boomers and Generational Conflict](https://img.perlego.com/book-covers/3489233/9781137454737_300_450.webp)
eBook - ePub
Baby Boomers and Generational Conflict
Jennie Bristow
This is a test
- English
- ePUB (mobile friendly)
- Available on iOS & Android
eBook - ePub
Baby Boomers and Generational Conflict
Jennie Bristow
Book details
Book preview
Table of contents
Citations
About This Book
The dominant cultural script is that the Baby Boomers have 'had it all', thereby depriving younger generations of the opportunity to create a life for themselves. Bristow provides a critical account of this discourse by locating the problematisation of the Baby Boomers within a wider ambivalence about the legacy of the Sixties.
Frequently asked questions
At the moment all of our mobile-responsive ePub books are available to download via the app. Most of our PDFs are also available to download and we're working on making the final remaining ones downloadable now. Learn more here.
Both plans give you full access to the library and all of Perlegoâs features. The only differences are the price and subscription period: With the annual plan youâll save around 30% compared to 12 months on the monthly plan.
We are an online textbook subscription service, where you can get access to an entire online library for less than the price of a single book per month. With over 1 million books across 1000+ topics, weâve got you covered! Learn more here.
Look out for the read-aloud symbol on your next book to see if you can listen to it. The read-aloud tool reads text aloud for you, highlighting the text as it is being read. You can pause it, speed it up and slow it down. Learn more here.
Yes, you can access Baby Boomers and Generational Conflict by Jennie Bristow in PDF and/or ePUB format, as well as other popular books in Social Sciences & Children's Studies in Sociology. We have over one million books available in our catalogue for you to explore.
Information
Part I
The Sociology of Generations
1
Introduction
In recent years, the Baby Boomer generation has become the subject of numerous articles, books and policy debates. The Boomers of our present-day imagination are personified, not by the earnest players of Trivial Pursuit, who âgrew up with the Beatles and televisionâ and âcould tell you how many series of Monty Python were made, which British folk singer had a guitar labelled âThis machine killsâ, and Kookie Byrnesâs trademark act of vanity on 77 Sunset Stripâ (Turner, 1986a, Times). They are personified by the degenerate hedonists Patsy and Edina in the cult BBC sitcom Absolutely Fabulous [Ab Fab]; the âstroppy, cocky, randy epitome of rebellious Sixties youthâ Mick Jagger who, at 65, was still staging sell-out tours (Morrison, 2008, Times); Tony Blair, the prime minister who, when he was popular, brought us âCool Britanniaâ and when he wasnât, the Iraq war; and Bill Clinton, the US President sandwiched between two generations of George Bushes, who charmed and scandalised in equal measure.
On an everyday level, the Boomers appear to be embodied in a âsilver tsunamiâ (Bone, 2007, Times; Goldenberg, 2007, Guardian) of âyoung oldsâ who have just started retiring and threaten to live forever, allegedly sending the country into never-ending debt as it struggles to pay for spiralling costs of pensions, health and social care, and using their considerable voting and purchasing power to skew markets and public policy around their own interests. They are the âSixties generationâ (Edmunds and Turner, 2002a, p. vii) who promised personal liberation, cultural transformation, and eternal youth â until they hit retirement, when everybody realised what a mess they had made of everything, and what an enormous cohort they actually were.
So the story goes. But this story is a one-sided one, at best.
The upsurge of interest in the Baby Boomers in recent years relies on a narrative that holds this generation responsible for an extraordinary range of social problems. The Conservative politician David Willetts, then Minister of State for Universities and Science, in 2010 accused the Baby Boomers of throwing a 50-year-long party for which âthe bills are coming in; and it is the younger generation who will pay themâ (Willetts, 2010a, p. xv). These âfuture costsâ include âthe cost of climate change, the cost of investing in the infrastructure our economy will need if we are to prosper, and the cost of paying pensions when the big boomer cohort retires, on top of the cost of servicing the debt the government has built upâ. But for Willetts, the Boomersâ failure goes way beyond poor financial management: âThe charge is that the boomers have been guilty of a monumental failure to protect the interests of future generationsâ.
At the other end of the political spectrum, the left-leaning writer Francis Beckett, editor of the University of the Third Ageâs (U3A) magazine Third Age Matters, accuses the Sixties generation of selling out on the radicalism of that era. âWhat began as the most radical-sounding generation for half a century turned into a random collection of youthful style gurus who thought the revolution was about fashion; sharp-toothed entrepreneurs and management consultants who believed revolution meant new ways of selling things; and Thatcherites, who thought freedom meant free markets, not free peopleâ, he declares bitterly. âAt last it decayed into New Labour, which had no idea what either revolution or freedom meant, but rather liked the sound of the wordsâ (Beckett, 2010a, p. ix). While Beckettâs appreciation of Sixties radicalism is clearly very different from that of Willetts, the central charge he levels against the Baby Boomers is the same:
The baby boomers saw themselves as pioneers of a new world â freer, fresher, fairer and infinitely more fun. But they were wrong. The world they made for their children to live in is a far harsher one than the world they inherited. (Beckett, 2010a, p. ix)
I began researching on the question of how the Baby Boomers became constructed as a social problem in Britain in the autumn of 2010. In this year, three high-profile British books were published that, as Machell and Lewy (2010) report in the Times (London), showed that publishers have âcashed inâ on the current âwar between the generationsâ (Kaletsky, 2010, Times). These were, listed here in order of their significance to the debate:
- The Pinch: How the baby boomers took their childrenâs future â and why they should give it back, by David Willetts.
- Jilted Generation: How Britain has bankrupted its youth, by Ed Howker and Shiv Malik.
- What Did the Baby Boomers Ever Do For Us? Why the children of the sixties lived the dream and failed the future, by Francis Beckett.
A further pamphlet â Itâs All Their Fault, by Neil Boorman, described by Machell and Lewy as â[a]s much a screed as analysisâ â gained some attention by virtue of being published at the same time. All four books âseek to explain the political, social and economic factors that have combined to create the unusual (and for many, difficult) situation where parents seem to have had it better than their children. Some try to apportion blameâ (Machell and Lewy, 2010, Times).
At this time, I was struck by a number of elements in the âBaby Boomer problemâ as it immediately appeared. First was the range of social problems for which the Boomers were held responsible: from environmental destruction to the financial crisis to sexual licence and rampant materialism, as indicated in the quotes by Willetts (2010a) and Beckett (2010a) above.
Second was the consensus about the extent to which the Boomers were to blame â a consensus stretching across the political spectrum, and also across the generations writing about the Boomers. Thus Willetts and Beckett both situate themselves clearly within the Baby Boomer generation, and offer their critiques as a form of generational mea culpa, while Howker and Malik, who are journalists for national newspapers and periodicals, situate themselves as members of the âjilted generationâ whose plight they attempt to articulate: âThey are both 29 and live in Londonâ (Howker and Malik, 2010a, front matter). For these authors too, the âsheer sizeâ of the Baby Boomer generation âhas some wide-ranging implications for our societyâ: as resource pressures intensify, â[t]he generation who will bail Britain out canât quite get startedâ in the labour market or on the property ladder, which in turn indicates a fundamental problem with âthe mechanism by which our society considers the past and the future â our relationship with timeâ (Howker and Malik, 2010a, pp. 6, 15, 14). In the present discourse, the notion that the Boomers somehow âtook their childrenâs futureâ (Willetts, 2010a) seems to be shared across the generations.
The third element that struck me was the potential consequence of what appeared to be a deliberate strategy to articulate (and indeed, foment) a conflict between generations who are still very much living, related to one another both through kinship relations and wider social ties. âIf circumstances get worse, people will begin looking for simple shapesâ, Howker and Malik (2010a, p. 15) warn. âThey will start to seek out a narrative, any narrative. And then people will find someone to blame.â
This book attempts to engage with âgenerationalismâ, a term used to describe âthe systematic appeal to the concept of generation in narrating the social and politicalâ (White, 2013, p. 216), as a way of explaining political and cultural shifts. White draws out some of the tensions within the development of generation as âan emergent master-narrative on which actors of quite different persuasions converge as they seek to reshape prevalent conceptions of obligation, collective action and communityâ (p. 217).
Through an analysis of how the cultural script of the Baby Boomer problem has developed over the post-war period, and particularly from the mid-1980s to the present day, this book reveals how âBoomer blamingâ has been mobilised within the political and cultural elite to explain problems that have their origin, not in generational or demographic shifts, but in wider social and historical factors. The primary impact of âgenerationalismâ is to mystify the causes of social problems, and to set in motion the very thing that Howker and Malik warn against: a simplistic narrative that relies on blaming older people for the myriad problems of the present day.
When a narrative of âBoomer blamingâ takes hold within the elite, practical consequences are likely to follow. These include policies designed to penalise the older generations for the alleged benefit of the younger generations, and, more insidiously, encourage people to think at a âcommon senseâ level that their Baby Boomer parents, colleagues, or acquaintances are the cause of their own economic or existential difficulties. The Baby Boomers, after all, are not embodied only in political leaders or cultural caricatures, but in real people with whom we share our everyday lives.
The fourth element of the Baby Boomer problem is the contradictory character of claimsmaking with regard to why the Boomers allegedly constitute a social problem in the present day. By analysing how the cultural script of this problem has developed, we can see that, despite the extraordinary level of consensus that the Boomers constitute a social problem, explanations about who, exactly, the Boomers are, and why, exactly, they are a problem, vary widely and change over time. This indicates that the social problem of the Baby Boomer is not an objective fact that has only recently been discovered and articulated, but rather that generational explanations have come to be mapped onto pre-existing social problems, which have their origins somewhere other than within the generations.
Defining the Baby Boomers
Perhaps the starkest illustration of the contradictions within the cultural script is the extent to which claimsmakers â those who make claims about how and why the Baby Boomers are a problem â differ in their definitions of what the Baby Boomer generation actually is.
The very label âBaby Boomersâ carries with it a wealth of meaning. At its most basic demographic level, it relates to a phenomenon that took place after the Second World War, where many countries in the Western world experienced a surge in the birth rate. The Oxford English Dictionary defines âbaby boomerâ as âa person born during the baby boom following the Second World Warâ, and dates the use of this term to 1970, with a reference by the Washington Post to â[t]he baby boomers of the Eisenhower decadeâ (OED Online, 2014). In historical terms, the concept of the âbaby boomerâ also relates to a time of economic âboomâ in the USA and, to a more limited extent, in the UK (Marwick, 2003; Sandbrook, 2005). When members of the Baby Boomer cohort were in their infancy, they were also discussed as âthe post-second world war âbaby bulgeââ (Toynbee, 1998, 2014, Guardian); that âBaby Boomâ became the accepted definition reflects the twin historical and demographic characteristic ascribed to this cohort.
Interest in the Baby Boomers is an international phenomenon, reflected in the academic and grey literature of North America, Europe and Australia. This reflects a combination of demographic, social, cultural and political trends. But there is a big gap between the demographic existence of the Baby Boomer cohort, and the way the Baby Boomer generation is described and discussed in Britain through the contemporary cultural script. Thus, in the polemical grey literature recently published on the Baby Boomer problem in the UK, the precise dates ascribed to the Baby Boomer cohort vary according to the date periods preferred by those who are writing about them.
Willetts (2010a, p. xv) defines the âboomersâ as âroughly those born between 1945 and 1965â. This definition is broadly shared by Boorman (2010, pp. 11â13), who sees his book in even broader terms, as âa chance for those born in the Seventies and Eighties to respond to the chaos caused by those born in the Forties and Fiftiesâ. A project launched by the Social Research Institute of the UK polling company Ipsos MORI following the publication of Willettsâs The Pinch defines the Baby Boomers in 2010 as âall adults aged 45â65â (Ipsos MORI, n.d.).
However, this âwideâ definition of the Baby Boomers, encompassing a cohort born over a period of 20 years, is challenged by other writers on the Baby Boomer problem. Beckett (2010a, p. vii) argues that there were in fact two baby booms in the post-war period, and that â[t]he classic baby boomers, born between 1945 and 1955, were a completely different sort of generation from those born at the start of the sixties.â Howker and Malik (2010a) distinguish between the ââfirst-waveâ baby boomâ, which âoccurred in all Western countries following the end of the Second World Warâ, and the âsecond-wave baby boomâ in Britain:
In America, that [post-war baby] boom carried on for the next twenty years, but in Britain it slowed down, rising again only between the years 1956 and 1965 in the âsecond-wave baby boomâ. Since then some have died and others have migrated, but today in total there are 16.7 million baby boomers in Britain. (Howker and Malik, 2010a, pp. 4â5)
Ian Jack (2011, Guardian) notes that the âbaby boomer generationâ is âa term borrowed from America and quite wrongly applied to the post-war pattern of British birth rates. (Not until 1975 were as few babies born as in 1945; more British babies were born between 1956 and 1966 than in the so-called boomer decade of 1945 to 1955.)â The US Census Bureau in fact defines the American post-war âbaby boomâ as including âpeople born from mid-1946 to 1964â (Werner, 2011).
The historian Jean-François Sirinelli (2003, title page, p. 9), meanwhile, defines the French Baby Boomers in both historical and demographic terms as encompassing 24 years (âUne gĂ©nĂ©ration, 1945â1969â), and suggests that an important factor in their significance was the âcoup de jeuneâ effected by the existence of a relatively large proportion of young people at a particular historical moment.
Figure 1.1 illustrates the character of the two British âBaby Boomsâ, where a distinction is made between the âPost World War Two baby boomâ and the more sustained â1960s baby boomâ. Here, the fall in the fertility rate between 1950 and 1955 is very apparent, confirming the arguments put forward by Howker and Malik (2010a) and Jack (2011).
Figure 1.2 illustrates the effect of these peaks and troughs in the birth rate on the demographic situation in England and Wales today, where the Baby Boomers now form a âspikeâ in the proportion of people aged around 65, and a âbulgeâ in the proportion of people between the ages of about 40 and 50. It is this age distribution, between the proportion of the population of working age and those of retirement age, which forms the basis of current anxieties about âageing societiesâ, discussed in Part II of this book. However, for the purpose of defining the Baby Boomer cohort, it is worth indicating that â[t]he classic baby boomers, born between 1945 and 1955â (Beckett, 2010a, p. vii) form a relatively small proportion of the retired population overall.
![Image](https://book-extracts.perlego.com/3489233/images/9-plgo-compressed.webp)
Figure 1.1 Total fertility rate, 1938â2004
Source: Office for National Statistics, General Register Office for Scotland, Northern Ireland Statistics and Research Agency, in Chamberlain and Gill, 2005, p. 76. Licensed under the Open Government Licence v.2.0.
![Image](https://book-extracts.perlego.com/3489233/images/9-1-plgo-compressed.webp)
Figure 1.2 Population pyramid for England and Wales, mid-2011
Note: Census-based estimates (bars) and mid-2011 rolled-forward estimates (line).
Source: Office for National Statistics, 2013. Licensed under the Open Government Licence v.2.0.
The disagreements over defining the British Baby Boomers as a demographic cohort, and the disparities between the demographic situation in Britain and that in North America, reflect a wider conversation about the significance of this cohort, and the way ideas about its significance have changed over time. A useful discussion of this point is provided by Falkingham (1997), who notes that there were two âbaby boomsâ in Britain, in comparison to the more âpronouncedâ rises in the crude birth rate that took place in the Australia, Canada, France and USA. Furthermore, Falkingham explains that the actual numbers of babies born in these peaks in the birth rate were relatively smaller:
For example, for the first 50 years of this century Canada averaged around 250,000 births per annum, with only slight variation from year to year. However, from 1952 to 1965 between 400,000 and 500,000 children were born every year â nearly twice the previous rate. For every two children born previously there were now at least three. According to the 1966 Census, one-third of the entire population of Canada had been born in the preceding 15 years.
In contrast, whilst the number of babies born in the UK in the years 1947 and 1964 excee...
Table of contents
- Cover
- Title
- Copyright
- Contents
- List of Figures and Tables
- Acknowledgements
- Part I The Sociology of Generations
- Part II The Construction of the Baby Boomers as a Social Problem in Britain
- Appendix: Study Design
- Notes
- Bibliography
- Index