eBook - ePub
Refugees, Prisoners and Camps
A Functional Analysis of the Phenomenon of Encampment
This is a test
- English
- ePUB (mobile friendly)
- Available on iOS & Android
eBook - ePub
Book details
Book preview
Table of contents
Citations
About This Book
What do refugee and concentration camps, prisons, terrorist and guerrilla training camps and prisoner of war camps have in common? Arguably they have all followed an 'outsides inside' model, enforcing a dichotomy between perceived 'desirable' and 'undesirable' characteristics. This separation is the subject of Møller's multidisciplinary study.
Frequently asked questions
At the moment all of our mobile-responsive ePub books are available to download via the app. Most of our PDFs are also available to download and we're working on making the final remaining ones downloadable now. Learn more here.
Both plans give you full access to the library and all of Perlego’s features. The only differences are the price and subscription period: With the annual plan you’ll save around 30% compared to 12 months on the monthly plan.
We are an online textbook subscription service, where you can get access to an entire online library for less than the price of a single book per month. With over 1 million books across 1000+ topics, we’ve got you covered! Learn more here.
Look out for the read-aloud symbol on your next book to see if you can listen to it. The read-aloud tool reads text aloud for you, highlighting the text as it is being read. You can pause it, speed it up and slow it down. Learn more here.
Yes, you can access Refugees, Prisoners and Camps by B. Møller in PDF and/or ePUB format, as well as other popular books in Politics & International Relations & Peace & Global Development. We have over one million books available in our catalogue for you to explore.
Information
1
Introduction: Methods, Concepts and Theories
Abstract: The introduction provides an overview of the subsequent analysis and a tentative classification of different types of camps, and an identification of the contributions of various academic disciplines to an understanding of camps. It also offers an explanation of the methodology, which is primarily functionalist, focusing on the functions of encampment, but also historical and dialectical in the sense of looking throughout at functional equivalents of encampment. It also introduces the theoretical concept of heteronomy, drawn from Michel Foucault.
Keywords: asylum; camps; concentration camps; Foucault; ghettos; Gulag; heteronomy; prisoners-of-war camps; prisons; refugee camps; refugees; training camps
Møller, Bjørn. Refugees, Prisoners and Camps: A Functional Analysis of the Phenomenon of Encampment. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2015. DOI: 10.1057/9781137502797.0005.
In the following chapters ‘camps’ will be used in a rather broad sense as places of separation, segregation or confinement of people which are usually, but not necessarily, marked off with a fence or an equivalent thereof. They are treated as what Michel Foucault called ‘heterotopias,’ that is, ‘places outside of all places’ or ‘outsides inside’ and thus as exceptions.
1.1History, functionalism and dialectics
The primary aim of this short monograph is to provide a functional analysis of camps, wherefore it distinguishes between various categories of camps according to the functions they are supposed to perform. In most cases the origins and historical development of each category are briefly outlined.
The analysis is also partly ‘dialectical,’ albeit admittedly in a rather loose sense, perhaps more akin to Immanuel Kant’s ‘antinomies’ than to G.W.F. Hegel’s ‘thesis-antithesis-synthesis’ mode of thinking.1 Having identified camps as performing a (set of) function(s), it then proceeds to ‘represent, contest, and invert’ (in the words of Foucault, vide infra) these functions by identifying functional equivalents of camps, some of which may also be ‘places’ or ‘spaces,’ whereas others are not. A good example, to which we shall return in Chapter 2, is Jeremy Bentham’s famous blueprint of a prison known as the ‘Panopticon’ intended for correctional (as opposed to punitive) purposes. This has given rise to various other forms of surveillance, often lumped together as forms of ‘panopticism,’ which may take material form, for example, in the form of wiretapping and closed-circuit-TV surveillance, but the supposedly positive consequences of which may also be achieved by, for instance, certain religious belief sets. Whereas camps are thus spaces, their functional equivalents need not be.
However much we may like to extend the definition of camps, it would be unwise to go too far. For the concept to retain its analytical utility, camps must remain exceptions. We may well understand what Bob Dylan meant when he sang that ‘Sometimes I think this whole world is one big prison yard/Some of us are prisoners, some of us are guards,’2 just as we probably understand what is meant by allegations along the lines of ‘North Korea is one large prison camp.’ The gist of, and the intention behind, such formulations is surely laudable, but they erode the significant differences between those unfortunate North Koreans who are in fact incarcerated and the majority who are not. Even somewhat more accurate comparisons of territories such as the Gaza Strip with prisons are only really useful if used for a comparison of the residents of Gaza with the rest of the Palestinian nation, on the West Bank or in a diaspora situation (vide infra).3
As ‘exceptional spaces’ or, as Giorgio Agamben puts it, ‘spaces (or states) of exception,’4 camps are almost emblematic, no matter what kind of camp we are talking about: Prison camps, concentration camps, labour and death camps, prisoners-of-war camps, guerrilla or terrorist training camps, strategic hamlets or refugee or IDP (internally displaced person) camps, to all of which some space is devoted in the following.
1.2Camps and academic discipline(s)
Just as camps and similar types of confinement, according to Foucault and others, play quite a central role in disciplining societies, discipline(s) also play a role in understanding the phenomenon/a of the camp, as a camp may look quite differently from the academic vantage points of, for instance, architecture, law, political science or anthropology. The study of camps thus almost cries out for multidisciplinary studies, even when approached from the present article’s historical-functional-line up dialectical angle, which simply opens up for a wealth of interesting research avenues.
Table of contents
- Cover
- Title
- 1 Introduction: Methods, Concepts and Theories
- 2 Punitive and/or Preventative Confinement
- 3 Concentration Camps and Ghettos
- 4 Camps for/in War
- 5 Camps for People in Flight
- 6 Conclusion
- Selective Bibliography
- Index