The earliest experiments with wild pedagogies were, at their core, about reimagining and enacting alternative relationships. By alternative, we mean relationships that fall outside of mainstream business, politics, and education. Given the sense of ecological urgency that increasingly defines our times, it seems important to look beyond present norms and worldviews for our responses. With this thinking in mind, our first aim was to re-examine relationships with places, landscapes, nature, more-than-human beings , and the wild. This required rethinking notions of wilderness, wildness , and freedom . The second aim was to challenge recent trends towards increased control over pedagogy and education, and how this control has been constraining and domesticating . The third aim was to offer something to educatorsâsomething that would propose a possible path forward. This book thus builds on past work with the aim of more thoroughly articulating the theoretical roots and offering practical strategies for enacting wild pedagogies.
It is tempting to say that Earth is in terminal decline. Climate change appears to have reached, or perhaps even crossed, the threshold of irreversibility. Many scientists and environmental historians are carefully arguing that Earth is about to, or is already, transitioning into a new geological epoch: the Anthropocene , or the âage of human impact.â If we are indeed at the threshold of a new epoch, we are equally at the threshold of an emerging geological conversation. A new geo-story is transpiring on the ground beneath our feet, in the atmosphere around us, and in increasingly warm oceans. It is being communicated through climate change , increasingly fierce storms, and mass species extinctions . The first to suffer, as always, are the marginalized and disenfranchised. This includes many from our human speciesâespecially within oppressed communitiesâbut also the staggering loss and suffering of other species. This suffering of more-than-human beings seldom registers in public discourse and is often downplayed. However, the situation appears to be worsening. Science is inherently sceptical, cautious, you could even say conservative. Yet, with each passing year we hear news reporting that the situation is even worse than previously predictedâmore species annihilated, more glacial ice melted, and more topsoil lost to the sea.
As frightening as this is, Earth has seen large-scale extinction events before. In fact, there appears to have been five of them. If another drastic change is imminentâin geological timeâEarth will survive. It has before. Many existing species will not; others will be diminishedâand this includes humans. Yet, it is not humans as a whole that are the source of this problem. So what is the trouble? We argue, what is really at issue is a troubling kind of relationship with Earth. This relationship is reflected in the ways that many of the most affluent and âdevelopedâ nations have lost the knowledge of and, subverted the social structures for, living well with placeâto live within their means, to live with care and compassion for other being s, and to live with wonder in Earth itself. Unfortunately, this relationship appears to be spreading across the globe.
We wonder what the world could look like if humans, afflicted with such relationships within their place on Earth, enacted different ways of being in the world. What is not clear is how, exactly, it would mean to âbe differentlyâ within the world. It seems that the most common suggestions, which range across various new attitudes, prescriptions, warnings, restrictions, summons, sermons, and threats, seem to be out of sync with the magnitude of changes required. Changing relationships within our place on Earth or being in the world differently entails far more than using a different kind of light bulb. Something more fundamental must be disrupted1 and something significantly different must be offered. Such a disruption will not be achieved through appeals to rationality, duties, or facts alone, nor will it be achieved by humans on their own. It is more likely that changing relationships with Earth and its other beings will require learning through active engagement with the natural world. The return could be richâfor example, in increased sense of well-being, decreased sense of alienation, and an expanded range of what it means to be human. Thus, this conversation about change is about doing, not just thinking. And, doing things differently will mean being different in our orientations towards nature, our language about nature, and our responsibilities with nature. This suggests that we must practice a kind of environmental etiquette. Here etiquette is not reserved for elites, but it is rather a kind of everyday manners amongst beings and places. This move to being differently in world also suggests that we are tasked to engage in face-to-face âre-negotiating â of what it means to be human and to be a citizen in a more-than-human world. All of this is, at least in part, an educational project. Big changes are needed and with big changes bold educational approaches are required. In this book we propose some boldâand wildâideas.
Before launching into wild pedagogies, we need to acknowledge the way in which education has typically been conceived is in trouble. Kris
Gutiérrez,
2 former President of the American
Educational Research Association, provided a good summary of this problem when she described her most persistent concern:
Our inability to intervene productively, at least in any sustained and transformative way, in the academic lives of so many youth todayâto imagine new trajectories and future forms of agencyâŠ. we simply cannot rely on efficiency and market-driven models of education that are certain to bankrupt the future of our nationâs youth. We need models for educational intervention that are consequentialânew systems that demand radical shifts in our views of learningâŠ.
For Gutiérrez
, current
models of education are part of the problem. Her vision of education demands that she enact pedagogies that challenge dominant models. In doing so, she is simultaneously being
the change in the very process of enabling change to occur.
GutiĂ©rrezâs own pedagogy reflects a view that learning and developing agency requires doing, engaging, being the changeâand, indeed, being in the world differently. Her own educational experiments point to wonderful pedagogical possibilities when university students and school children work together. In her words, âThey were brought together through an intervention that privileged joint activity, playful imagination , and a vision of teaching in which an imagined or projected future could influence...