This book examines corporate financial
distress, as a negative corporate status. The importance of focusing on negative corporate situations, rather than only on successful ones, has been emphasized by authoritative literature in the field (Sitkin 1992; McGrath 1999; Thornhill and Amit 2003). Specifically, corporate
financial distress is still considered a vague term (Altman and Hotchkiss 2010) and related (in imprecise ways) to different terms such as failure and bankruptcy
. This book aims at shedding some light on this state of affairs and also on such terminological distinctions. In particular, this study aims to back up āthe view that there is value to be gained from the study of failed organizations. Just as medical science would be unlikely to progress by studying only healthy individuals, organization science may be limited in the knowledge attainable only from the study of successful firms. While these results shed new light on why firms fail at different ages, much remains to be learned about firm failureā (Thornhill and Amit 2003, p. 506). According to the concepts introduced and developed in the second chapter of this book, failure represents a specific type of corporate path in the experience of financial distress. A complete overview of this corporate path is relevant for both academic debate and the professional world. The classification and updating of the existing academic literature allow us to highlight recurring features, types, and signals of corporate financial
distress (Koh et al. 2015). It does not coincide with precisely timed legal events, such as bankruptcy
, because it represents a continuing corporate status. Its extension in time makes difficult its ex ante prediction through statistical methods because of difficulties in catching the complex dynamics of such processes in actual practice. After introducing the concept of corporate
financial distress, the book analyses its causes, consequences, and timing. More than one step is identified in the path of financial distress, and the distinction between temporary and severe financial distress is introduced. The symptoms of both these types may be either truly and fairly represented in financial
statements or fraudulently concealed. Such symptoms (or consequences) are financial ones (as highlighted by the term itselfāācorporate financial
distressā), but the causes and the corrective measures can be of different types, as pointed out in Chap. 2. Moreover, there is a relationship between corporate financial distress and managersā propensity to take on more risk (Edwards et al. 2013). Corporate financial
distress, therefore, represents a negative lasting corporate status that implies risks and uncertainties for all the parties, both internal and external, who have an interest in the distressed company. The time factor is crucial. Authoritative literature has emphasized the relation between the increase in the time of corporate paths of financial distress and the costs of the default
, the already noted managersā propensity to embark on risky reactive initiatives, and the difficulties of corporate
recovery. These difficulties also influence the end result of the corporate path of financial distress: recovery is possible after a temporary distress, while a case of severe financial distress entails a failing process leading to either bankruptcy
or another major mutation (e.g. merger, absorption, dissolution, liquidation, etc.). The analysis implemented in the following chapters also points to an order of preference for distressed entities regarding such final events. This observation is made possible by a full consideration of the time variable, entailing a change of focus beyond mere prediction towards an explanation of corporate
financial distress. The present book first analyses the progressive development of statistical prediction models, from univariate discriminant analysis to artificial intelligent systems and from bankruptcy
prediction to the assessment of corporate financial distress. These are all static modelling prediction tools. The next chapter highlights both their drawbacks and their possible uses. Such considerations go some way towards explaining the progressive shift of academic focus from mere prediction to fuller evaluations of corporate
financial distress
. Traditionally, prediction and explanation have been kept separate: this book proposes to apply both together. The evaluation of distressed companies and the respective roles of auditors
and managers are firstly explored in the US context (Chap. 3). Here, the going
concern assessment has for years been the auditorsā
responsibility, but investors have complained that by the time auditors
make their assessment, a deteriorating business is on the verge of bankruptcy
or a delisting from its stock exchange. The book aims to empirically verify this complaint in order to introduce recent developments in updating accounting and auditing standards in the US. These changes relate to the converging process being implemented by International Accounting Standards
Board (IASB) and Financial Accounting
Standards
Board (FASB) regarding going concern
assumptions with a view to overcoming substantial and potentially problematic differences between international standards and US principles. The present work (Chap. 4) considers this project of convergence and the applied statements in both (US and international) contexts.
Bibliography
Altman, E. I., & Hotchkiss, E. (2010). Corporate financial distress and bankruptcy: Predict and avoid bankruptcy, analyze and invest in distressed debt (Vol. 289). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
Edwards, A., Schwab, C., & Shevlin, T. (2013, February). Financial constraints and the incentive for tax planning. In 2013 American Taxation Association midyear meeting: New faculty/doctoral student session (Vol. 2216875). Retrieved October 6, 2017, from http://āpapers.āssrn.ācom/āabstract
Koh, S., Durand, R. B., Dai, L., & Chang, M. (2015). Financial distress: Lifecycle and corporate restructuring. Journal of Corporate Finance, 33, 19ā33.Crossref
McGrath, R. G. (1999). Falling forward: Real options reasoning and entrepreneurial failure. Academy of Management Review, 24(1), 13ā30.Crossref
Sitkin, S. B. (1992). Learning through failure: The strategy of small losses. Research in Organizational Behavior, 14, 231ā266.
Thornhill, S., & Amit, R. (2003). Learning about failure: Bankruptcy, firm age, and the resource-based view. Organization Science, 14(5), 497ā509.Crossref
2.1 Financial Distress: Definition and Main Features
Since first devoting its attention to the subject, academic literature has emphasized the difficulties in defining corporate financial distress because of the incomplete and arbitrary nature of any criteria by which to classify it (Keasey and Watson 1991). There is no consensus on how financial distress affects corporate performance, but it is costly (Opler and Titman 1994) and needs to be investigated. Altman (1993) relates corporate financial distress to unsuccessful business enterprise and defines four generic terms that are commonly used in the literature about it: failure, insolvency, bankruptcy , and default .1 Corporate financial distress remains, none the less, a vague term (Altman and Hotchkiss 2006) that does not correspond to an absolute condition such as bankruptcy or insolvency (Sun et al. 2016). This chapter aims at shedding some light on the matter.
Corporate financial distress ...