Risk in The New York Times (1987–2014)
eBook - ePub

Risk in The New York Times (1987–2014)

A corpus-based exploration of sociological theories

  1. English
  2. ePUB (mobile friendly)
  3. Available on iOS & Android
eBook - ePub

Risk in The New York Times (1987–2014)

A corpus-based exploration of sociological theories

Book details
Book preview
Table of contents
Citations

About This Book

This book investigates to what extent claims of common social science risk theories such as risk society, governmentality, risk and culture, risk colonisation and culture of fear are reflected in linguistic changes in print news media. The authors provide a corpus-based investigation of risk words in The New York Times (1987-2014) and a case study of the health domain.

The book presents results from an interdisciplinary enterprise which combines sociological risk theories with a systematic functional theory of language to conduct an empirical analysis of linguistic patterns and social change. It will be of interest to students and scholars interested in corpus linguistics and digital humanities, and social scientists looking for new research strategies to examine long term social change.

Frequently asked questions

Simply head over to the account section in settings and click on “Cancel Subscription” - it’s as simple as that. After you cancel, your membership will stay active for the remainder of the time you’ve paid for. Learn more here.
At the moment all of our mobile-responsive ePub books are available to download via the app. Most of our PDFs are also available to download and we're working on making the final remaining ones downloadable now. Learn more here.
Both plans give you full access to the library and all of Perlego’s features. The only differences are the price and subscription period: With the annual plan you’ll save around 30% compared to 12 months on the monthly plan.
We are an online textbook subscription service, where you can get access to an entire online library for less than the price of a single book per month. With over 1 million books across 1000+ topics, we’ve got you covered! Learn more here.
Look out for the read-aloud symbol on your next book to see if you can listen to it. The read-aloud tool reads text aloud for you, highlighting the text as it is being read. You can pause it, speed it up and slow it down. Learn more here.
Yes, you can access Risk in The New York Times (1987–2014) by Jens O. Zinn,Daniel McDonald in PDF and/or ePUB format, as well as other popular books in Sciences sociales & Étude des média. We have over one million books available in our catalogue for you to explore.

Information

Year
2017
ISBN
9783319641584
© The Author(s) 2018
J. O. Zinn, D. McDonaldRisk in The New York Times (1987–2014)Critical Studies in Risk and Uncertaintyhttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64158-4_1
Begin Abstract

1. Introduction

Jens O. Zinn1, 2, 3 and Daniel McDonald4
(1)
Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK
(2)
University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
(3)
Mid Sweden University, Östersund, Sweden
(4)
Eberhard Karls University, Tübingen, Germany

Abstract

There is little doubt that risk has become a common experience of our times. Organisations and people in everyday life are increasingly concerned with all kinds of risk and also actively take risks. However, it remains an open question to what degree life has become riskier compared to earlier times. While a number of social theories compete in explaining the shift towards risk, there remains little research that examines the relative explanatory power of different approaches. This book details an investigation of risk language in The New York Times between 1987 and 2014, carried out using corpus/computational linguistic methods and informed by functional linguistic theory.
Keywords
Social theoryLanguageSocial worldSocial changeDiscourseThe news media
End Abstract
There is little doubt that risk is a common experience of our times. Since Ulrich Beck (1986, 1992) in the mid-1980s suggested characterising advanced Western industrialised societies as Risk Societies, the world witnessed technical catastrophes from the explosion of the Piper Alpha oil production platform to the nuclear disasters in Chernobyl and Fukushima. Environmental issues entered front-stage with the debates and negotiations of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change . Al-Qaida and later the Islamic State spread war in the Middle East and broad international terrorism to North America and Europe. National and international financial crises challenged the world economy. Large streams of migrants increased concerns about national security. Infectious diseases such as AIDS , SARS and the swine flu (H1N1) heightened the awareness of the threats of global pandemics.
All kinds of organisations have developed strategies to deal with the risks of uncertain futures, whether they are risks for society or risks for the organisation itself. Private companies and public administration assess, audit and manage the efficiency of their processes. Formalised procedures of managing risk have become key elements in public administration and private companies alike to optimise processes and legitimise performance.
Also in everyday life , the management of risk is a common experience: who to marry, what to study, which career to pursue, how to deal with chronic illness, how to overcome poverty and unemployment, how to invest income and prepare for retirement, whether to come out or to move country, where and how to give birth, whether to vaccinate the children and what school to choose or even what to eat or drink.
Often, global, national, organisational and individual risk management aims simply to identify and minimise risk . At the same time, however, risks are actively taken to change the world, increase profit, gain a valued identity or overcome an undesired situation (Zinn 2015). Sometimes, people take risks just for the joy of the risk-taking experience itself, as in extreme sports such as skydiving, BASE jumping and free climbing.
But has life really become riskier in recent centuries? Haven’t looming disaster and catastrophe always accompanied human existence (Mohun 2016)? Why is it that societies seem to experience more risk communication at times when people live in average longer, healthier and wealthier as ever before? The diversity of risk issues makes it difficult to understand what drives current debates about risk (Garland 2003). It seems too complex a task to find a shared core of meaning for all these different kinds and notions of risk referring to issues from possible harm to the mathematical calculation of and voluntary risk-taking .
However , there is a growing body of sociological theorising and research which make different claims about a shift towards risk and the reasons for and the forces behind it. This book empirically examines to what extent assumptions of different theories contribute to explain the social shift towards risk.
But how can we examine a general social shift which might take place everywhere in society or only in particular social domains? Since it is difficult to examine society as a whole, a decent starting point for the analysis of a social zeitgeist and changing discursive practices is needed. We turned to language , since language is a constitutive part of the social world (e.g. Berger and Luckmann 1967) and an important medium involved in the exchange, reproduction and shift of (social) meaning. In language, the past leaves traces, as does the imagined future. Language combines long-term social changes as well as short-term variations. In language, social structures are reproduced as much as social changes are anticipated. In short, language is an ideal source to examine how the past and the anticipation of the future are interwoven and change over time.
While language is a rich resource for research, it also comes with difficulties. It seems impossible to create a sample of language that is representative of an entire culture or point in time (Biber 1993). How much written and spoken language, from what regions, should be included? Which genres of written text have to be included? There is no uncontested answer to these questions. Therefore, corpora are often built for a particular research purpose, and their composition is justified based on the specific needs of a given project.
We have turned to the print news media , since they play a key role in people’s knowledge and awareness of risk. Many risks are intangible, or difficult to identify, requiring scientific research to make them socially accessible. They are only known because they are communicated and socially represented. This is similar to many everyday life issues, of which we are only made aware through media reports. Even though the media follow their own rationale when producing news, they do not only influence or set the agenda of public discourses,1 but also reflect what is going on in a society and are influenced by social players as important information sources such as politicians and researchers.2 Even though the news is shaped by a wide range of factors, such as the genre and editorial stance of a newspaper, news plays a key role in public debates about risk. Thus, digitised media archives provide an excellent source for analysing social change as it is reflected in discursive changes in the news media.
We have chosen The New York Times (NYT) for our analysis, since it is a leading global news source, influencing US and international debates. The NYT provides high-quality journalism, spanning economic, social and political issues, from a more or less balanced/centrist perspective.3 The NYT has been in consistent operation for over a century, with relatively little disruption in style and political stance. We, therefore, assume that general social changes, rather than short-term changes in internal policies, dominate observable linguistic shifts in the news coverage of the NYT (Zinn and McDonald 2016).
In the following chapte...

Table of contents

  1. Cover
  2. Front Matter
  3. 1. Introduction
  4. 2. Conceptual Foundations
  5. 3. Research Design and Methods
  6. 4. Risk in The New York Times
  7. 5. Risk, Health and Medicine in The New York Times
  8. 6. Summary and Conclusions
  9. Back Matter