- English
- PDF
- Available on iOS & Android
About This Book
This book develops a responsible and practical method for evaluating the success, failure, or "crisis" of American civil-military relations among its political and uniformed elite. The author's premise is that currently there is no objectively fair way for the public at large or the strategic-level elites to assess whether the critical and often obscured relationships between Generals, Admirals, and Statesmen function as they ought to under the US constitutional system. By treating these relationshipsâin form and practiceâas part of a wider principal (civilian)-agency (military) dynamic, the book tracks the "duties"âcare, competence, diligence, confidentiality, scope of responsibilityâand perceived shortcomings in the interactions between US civilian political authorities and their military advisors in both peacetime and in war.
Frequently asked questions
Information
Table of contents
- Crisis, Agency, and Law in US Civil-Military Relations
- 1 Introduction
- 2 The Opening Statement
- 3 The Case-In-Chief: What the Law Does (Not) Say
- 4 The Expert Witnesses: A Cross-Examination
- 5 The Expert Witnesses: The Fingerprints of Agency
- 6 The Rebuttal Witnesses: From Agency to Norms to Diagnosis
- 7 Exhibit A: Scope of Responsibility and Authority
- 8 Boundaries, or a âPoverty of Useful and Unambiguous Authorityâ?
- 9 Exhibit B: When Fidelity and Frankness Conflict
- 10 Exhibit C: Amending the Goldwater-Nichols Act
- 11 Exhibit D: The Future Fallacy: A Civ-Mil Dialogue
- 12 Closing Argument
- Index