Living Class in Urban India
eBook - ePub

Living Class in Urban India

  1. 282 pages
  2. English
  3. ePUB (mobile friendly)
  4. Available on iOS & Android
eBook - ePub

Living Class in Urban India

Book details
Book preview
Table of contents
Citations

About This Book

Many Americans still envision India as rigidly caste-bound, locked in traditions that inhibit social mobility. In reality, class mobility has long been an ideal, and today globalization is radically transforming how India’s citizens perceive class. Living Class in Urban India examines a nation in flux, bombarded with media images of middle-class consumers, while navigating the currents of late capitalism and the surges of inequality they can produce.    Anthropologist Sara Dickey puts a human face on the issue of class in India, introducing four people who live in the “second-tier” city of Madurai: an auto-rickshaw driver, a graphic designer, a teacher of high-status English, and a domestic worker. Drawing from over thirty years of fieldwork, she considers how class is determined by both subjective perceptions and objective conditions, documenting Madurai residents’ palpable day-to-day experiences of class while also tracking their long-term impacts. By analyzing the intertwined symbolic and economic importance of phenomena like wedding ceremonies, religious practices, philanthropy, and loan arrangements, Dickey’s study reveals the material consequences of local class identities. Simultaneously, this gracefully written book highlights the poignant drive for dignity in the face of moralizing class stereotypes.     Through extensive interviews, Dickey scrutinizes the idioms and commonplaces used by residents to justify class inequality and, occasionally, to subvert it. Along the way, Living Class in Urban India reveals the myriad ways that class status is interpreted and performed, embedded in everything from cell phone usage to religious worship.    

Frequently asked questions

Simply head over to the account section in settings and click on “Cancel Subscription” - it’s as simple as that. After you cancel, your membership will stay active for the remainder of the time you’ve paid for. Learn more here.
At the moment all of our mobile-responsive ePub books are available to download via the app. Most of our PDFs are also available to download and we're working on making the final remaining ones downloadable now. Learn more here.
Both plans give you full access to the library and all of Perlego’s features. The only differences are the price and subscription period: With the annual plan you’ll save around 30% compared to 12 months on the monthly plan.
We are an online textbook subscription service, where you can get access to an entire online library for less than the price of a single book per month. With over 1 million books across 1000+ topics, we’ve got you covered! Learn more here.
Look out for the read-aloud symbol on your next book to see if you can listen to it. The read-aloud tool reads text aloud for you, highlighting the text as it is being read. You can pause it, speed it up and slow it down. Learn more here.
Yes, you can access Living Class in Urban India by Sara Dickey in PDF and/or ePUB format, as well as other popular books in Sozialwissenschaften & Kultur- & Sozialanthropologie. We have over one million books available in our catalogue for you to explore.

Information

1
Introduction
THE EVERYDAY LIFE OF CLASS
Our lives are shaped by class structures, but we live those classes as a daily process. How do these processes play out in urban India? What does it feel like to live in a class, to aspire to one, or to fear falling from one? And what immediate and long-term differences do these everyday experiences make? In this book I aim to make the lives and views of people in different class positions understandable, while exploring how class relations themselves produce inequality. To begin this exploration, I open with a conversation I had with a friend in 2011, a conversation that later drew me to reflect on my three decades of studying class in South India.
Early in 2011, I was visiting my friend Lakshmi in Hosur, a city hundreds of miles from where we had first met twenty-five years earlier. She had moved from her home in the South Indian city of Madurai when her husband found a job as a lathe operator in one of Hosur’s many factories. Later Lakshmi herself had become a forewoman in a tire factory. I hadn’t seen her for two years—before that, it had been over a decade—and this was my first chance ever to spend more than a single day in her small home.
We stayed up late that first evening, talking as we tried to keep ourselves awake for a 2:00 A.M. firewalking ritual at the nearby temple. The temple’s main deity, Karumariamman, is a fierce mother goddess. Decades earlier, Lakshmi and I had often visited the large temple to Meenakshi at the center of Madurai, but Meenakshi is a somewhat gentler goddess, and I had never attended a festival for a deity as ferocious as Karumariamman. Lakshmi’s sons were going to walk the fire that night. Lakshmi herself had walked it for the three previous years, always carrying out a month of austerities beforehand. These austerities allowed Lakshmi to become possessed by the powerful goddess and then cross the embers safely in a show of her devotion. But recently, the caretaker at the temple—a Brahman woman like Lakshmi, and a mentor of sorts—had cautioned her that possession was unsuitable for high-caste people, who typically value controlled and moderate behavior. To let a deity inhabit her body meant she was temporarily not in control of herself. So Lakshmi, chastened, reluctantly gave up the ritual, but she still permitted her two teenage sons to walk the fire. While she and I chatted in the bedroom that night, the boys rested on the floor next to their father in the front room. I lay on a cot on the household’s only mattress while Lakshmi lay next to it on the bare floor. Like her sons, Lakshmi had carried out the month’s austerities to demonstrate her continuing devotion, and mats and mattresses were two of the things that Karumariamman required her to avoid (other taboos included pillows, shoes, and heavy meals).
As we talked, Lakshmi began reminiscing about the first time we met. We both remembered it vividly—but from different angles. Lakshmi recalled that, when she was fifteen years old and I, then twenty-five, had just moved into her neighborhood, she began to see me walk down the street every day to buy a newspaper and carry it home. No one else on the crowded lane did that; the newspapers people read were the ones kept in tea stalls, so my newspaper purchases stood out. And then one day, after she and her neighbors had observed me making this daily roundtrip for some time, I stopped and asked if I could take a photo of the kōlam that decorated their threshold.
This is where my memory of that day kicks in. I had moved into the neighborhood two weeks earlier. New to Madurai, still tentative about my Tamil language skills, I was too shy to speak to the people who watched me as I walked down the crowded lane (apparently, though I don’t recall it this way, to buy a newspaper). Children would run up and ask my name, but the adults at most would smile briefly as they continued what they were doing—pumping water, heading out with a stainless steel container to buy fresh milk, squatting over a butane stove to prepare snacks for sale, or returning from the market with a cloth bag full of vegetables. I had finally worked up my nerve to broach this distance, deciding to ask to photograph the beautifully colored kōlams in front of people’s homes. Kōlams are the daily work of women, created morning and evening by sprinkling rice powder in geometric and figural designs on the threshold between house and street. It was then December, during the Tamil month of Margali, when kōlam patterns are especially elaborate. Some of the most complex designs on that street were put down in front of Lakshmi’s housing compound. That evening, Lakshmi was combing her hair outside the low thatched-roof entryway, standing with her neighbors Anjali and Kumar, two children who were still in their school uniform skirt and shorts. A couple of women clustered around the pump near the door, waiting for the evening flow of drinking water. Camera in hand, I approached the group and asked if I could take a picture of their kōlam. The younger children burst into grins, grabbed everyone within arm’s reach, and crowded behind the kōlam. “Yes!” they chorused. I took several photos, and then Anjali and Kumar’s mother—who had heard the commotion through her window—invited me into her home.
Photo 1. Walking down the lane, possibly holding a newspaper, 1986. Photo credit: Ted Adams.
At last I was in. The five one-room homes in that compound became the center of my gradually expanding social networks in Madurai, and they have provided some of the most abiding relationships of my life. This was my “arrival story,” that moment dear to the heart of many culture-crossing anthropologists. But though I had in a sense “arrived” on that day, my interpretations of what I saw there would take years to develop. And even as my knowledge grew, class identities and categories in Madurai would be in flux as well.
I had chosen to live in this neighborhood in 1985 because I thought its residents were poor and working class. I had come to Madurai to study what made Tamil movies so popular among the poorer residents of the city, and I “knew” that such people were the main audiences for commercial films because of what I had read in graduate school. After a month of staying in a guest room and exploring the city, I had selected this neighborhood to begin my research in. It was in the bustling center of the city, equally convenient to the large Meenakshi Temple and the City Bus Stand; and, crucially, the landlord of a three-story building on the street was willing to rent an apartment to a foreigner. And what made me think that most residents were poor or working class? I used signs from everyday life that seemed obvious to me: housing, clothing, and other material goods that are visible in public. These physical goods are only part of class, but they seemed sufficient indicators at the time. And to some extent they were, if only I had known how to read them properly.
What I saw when I entered those first homes on that day appeared to support my interpretation of these families’ class standings. Anjali and Kumar’s father was a bicycle rickshaw driver. He had already gone back to work that evening, but his wife was home and their seven children were all back from school. Inside, the narrow room was dark, with just one window overlooking the street. The family’s only solid furniture comprised a narrow metal bureau and one folding chair, and I was made to sit in the chair. Neighbors crowded in. Rapid-fire questions began in Tamil: “What’s your name?” “Do you have children?” “You eat only bread, right? No rice?” “How much is your rent?” Looking around, I could see how sparse this family’s belongings were. Clothes were strung over lines of rope, a few pots were stacked in the corner next to a wood-burning cooking pit, combs and talcum powder stood on a shelf with a tiny mirror, and lithographs of Hindu deities hung on the walls. I saw several upended reed mats that I knew would be unrolled at night when everyone slept side by side on the floor.
After I and a few of the adult neighbors—but no one in the family—drank coffee in Anjali and Kumar’s home, the children escorted me to the other houses in the compound. All were thatched one-room dwellings. The back wall of Anjali and Kumar’s home formed part of the next one-room house, where a temple priest and his wife and their two daughters lived. From there, the compound opened onto a blindingly bright courtyard. Arrayed around the courtyard were three more homes and a separate bathing area and latrine. Lakshmi’s was the third house on my introductory circuit. Lakshmi’s father, an accountant who had recently lost his job when the company failed, was at home, as were her mother and four younger siblings. Her father was courteous and reserved, pulling on a white shirt over his undershirt and veshti as I came in. (A veshti is a man’s unstitched lower garment that wraps around the waist and hangs to the ankles.) Her mother, whose bright nylon sari caught my eye, was warmly enthusiastic, inviting me to eat though it meant sending a child out to buy Britannia biscuits. Small images of their favorite deities were kept in a shrine area on the far wall, but otherwise the house was even more sparsely furnished than the others.
I thought these families were poor. They had homes just large enough to provide space for everyone to sleep on the floor, and they all shared a common latrine, used cheap cooking fuel, wore inexpensive clothing, and owned few other material goods. Although I already knew that these families were not by any means among the poorest residents of Madurai, my own understanding of material class markers—which were mostly shaped by my enculturation in the United States—suggested poverty, or nearly so. Later, though, when I learned more about these family members’ occupations and educations and tastes and attitudes, I came to think of them as working class (in Anjali and Kumar’s case) or even lower middle class (in Lakshmi’s)—still, however, in the terms I had grown up with.
And as my increasing understanding of Madurai’s class indicators led me to recognize that these families were not poor by their own standards, I also learned that the categories of “working class” and “middle class” were foreign to most people in Madurai at the time. Soon my assessments were also informed by a growing understanding of local ways of distinguishing class. The people in that compound, like almost everyone else in the neighborhood, called themselves illātavaṅka, “people who don’t have,” and in everyday conversation—whether talking about politics, movies, or vegetables—they frequently contrasted themselves with periyavaṅka and paṇakkāraṅka, “big people” and “moneyed people.” Such terms formed part of the idiom of daily talk, and they reflected the dichotomous class terms with which most people thought about their society as well as their everyday lives. There were people who have and people who don’t, with no middle ground.
Over time, these categories would change as the structure of the regional and national economies changed. In 1985, though I was only vaguely aware of it then, India’s economy was slowly becoming “liberalized,” moving from a planned economy to a more market-oriented one. That process—which eventually, among its many other impacts, opened the economy to imported goods and enabled local manufacturers to produce a wider variety of consumer goods as well—was formally instituted in 1991. The social and economic changes that liberalization has wrought have complicated Madurai residents’ ideas about class. Whereas, for example, almost no one on the lane thought in terms of a “middle class” in 1985, within a decade or so the middle class would become a widely recognized category in Madurai, and an increasingly important one for everyone from policy-makers, manufacturers, and retailers to filmmakers. This new middle class was defined in many ways, including by education, occupation, and increasingly English-language ability, but perhaps most visibly by the use of consumer goods. It was also defined behaviorally, using the language of moderation, control, and self-discipline that was once primarily associated with caste differences but now has become adopted for class markers.
When I visited Lakshmi in 2011, having watched and documented these changing class identities from 1985 on, I would certainly have identified Lakshmi and her husband as middle class by the local criteria of the time. They and their two children now lived in a three-room home furnished with a metal cot, television, gas stove, and a bureau filled with clothing. Their older son, a high school graduate, was working nearby in Bangalore’s Electronic City, and their younger son was studying for his electrical and electronic engineering degree. Thus I was mildly surprised to hear Lakshmi still refer to her contemporary family as “people who don’t have,” illātavaṅka, even as she was clearly proud of their movement into the middle class. There was no sense of contradiction for her in holding these two identities. It made me more conscious of something I had been sensing: that people could see themselves as “being without” (relative to people with more wealth, more goods, and more power) while also seeing themselves as “middle people,” naṭuttaramānavaṅka (because of certain objective indicators that they possessed).
I was also surprised to hear Lakshmi say, as we talked about the old days, that her family had been “poor” (ēḻai) back when I first met them. I had long ago moved from viewing her family of origin as poor to seeing them as lower middle class. What she told me now was that “in those days we were hungry.” What I had initially taken as signs of poverty were not so; but I had missed something that was a local sign of poverty. Even though Lakshmi did not remember the Britannia biscuits as I did, I had recognized the material cost of their hospitality in those days, yet still I hadn’t realized that her family had too little to eat. Class identities are performed, continually, by individuals, and despite their hunger, Lakshmi’s family was working hard to perform as not-poor people. In this they were aided by their high caste status, which provided them a familiarity with behaviors such as controlled comportment (like the type that would be enjoined on Lakshmi by the temple caretaker in Hosur years later) that had moved from being caste-related to class-related behaviors.
Lakshmi’s family did not stay poor. Those same signs that I eventually recognized as middle-class indicators (primarily education) enabled the family to prosper and move out of poverty. Here is part of that story. When I left Madurai in 1987 after my first fieldwork stay, I gave Lakshmi’s parents all the money I had remaining. It was a way of recognizing their expansive hospitality, and of marking our responsibility to each other. The sum, two thousand rupees, was roughly what her father’s annual income would have been when he was employed. Her parents invested the money—though, as I describe in chapter 7, in a different way than I might have anticipated—and their investment yielded a new job for Lakshmi’s father as the manager of a small bus company. His higher income eventually allowed them to move to a larger home in another neighborhood, buy consumer goods such as a bedframe and some chairs, and save up a bit of gold for their second daughter’s wedding. On the other hand, their neighbors, Anjali’s parents, stayed in their home until their deaths two decades later, with few more material goods than they had had in 1985. Anjali’s parents did, however, educate all seven children through high school, a rare accomplishment on a rickshaw driver’s income, and Anjali herself went to college, built a business around technologies and expertise that were enabled by a liberalized economy, and married into a solidly middle-class family.
In sum, Lakshmi’s and my stories of my arrival and of her life since that day illustrate both how my relationships to people and my understandings of meaning-making in their lives have changed, and how the changing economic environment they live and labor in has shifted the terms within which those meanings are made. These are stories of encounters, returns, reflection, and social change. João Biehl has written that long-term ethnography “open[s] a critical space for examining what happens in the meantime” (2009, 17–18; emphasis in original). I understand this idea in a number of ways. This ethnography engages what has happened in friends’ and informants’ lives over the past two to three decades. It tracks the changes and developments reflected in what I learned in each stay and have continued to learn after I leave, as well as in informants’ retrospective accounts over these years. Through such nodes over time I work to make everyday experience visible in a period in which extensive changes have occurred in the economy and in the lives of the people I write about. Marriage preferences, kinship obligations, consumption and debt practices, class and caste identities, and philanthropy are only some of the changing aspects of those lives that I discuss in the chapters that follow. This work reveals the interactions of material and ideational aspects of class relations in order to focus on the experiences of class in everyday life and their long-term impacts.
The research specifically for this book took place over a combined total of two years of fieldwork during seven stays between 1999 and 2015. That research was itself preceded by several earlier periods of fieldwork, including fifteen months in 1985–1987 (when I first met Lakshmi), two briefer visits in ...

Table of contents

  1. Cover
  2. Title Page
  3. Copyright
  4. Dedication
  5. Contents
  6. Acknowledgments
  7. Notes on Transliteration and Pronunciation
  8. 1. Introduction: The Everyday Life of Class
  9. 2. What Is Class in Madurai?
  10. 3. Four Residents, as I Know Them
  11. 4. Consumption and Apprehension: Class in the Everyday
  12. 5. Debt: The Material Consequences of Moral Constructs
  13. 6. Performing the Middle
  14. 7. Marriage: Drama, Display, and the Reproduction of Class
  15. 8. Food, Hunger, and the Binding of Class Relations
  16. 9. Conclusions: Nuancing Class Boundaries
  17. Notes
  18. References
  19. Index
  20. About the Author