Community Power Structure

A Study of Decision Makers

Floyd Hunter

• Publisher: The University of North Carolina Press
• Year: 2017
• ISBN:
  9781469616940
• Topic: Social Sciences
• Subtopic: Sociology
• Index: Social Sciences

In this study of busy, complex Regional City -- and it is a real city -- the author has analyzed the power structure from top to bottom. He has searched out the men of power and, under fictitious names, has described them as they initiate policies in their offices, their homes, their clubs. They form a small, stable group at the top of the social structure. Their decision-making activities are not known to the public, but they are responsible for whatever is done, or not done, in their community. Beneath this top policy group is a clearly marked social stratification, through which decisions sift down to the substructures chosen to put them into effect. The dynamic relations within the power structure are made clear in charts, but the real interest lies in the author's report of what people themselves say. The African American community is also studied, with its own power structure and its own complicated relations with the large community. The method of study is fully described in an Appendix. The book should be of particular value to sociologists, political scientists, city-planning executives, Community Council members, social workers, teachers, and research workers in related fields. As a vigorous and readable presentation of facts, it should appeal to the reader who would like to know how his/her own community is run. Community Power Structure is not an expose. It is a description and discussion of a social phenomenon as it occured. It is based on sound field research, including personal observation and interviews by the author.

1   INTRODUCTION

It has been evident to the writer for some years that policies on vital matters affecting community life seem to appear suddenly. They are acted upon, but with no precise knowledge on the part of the majority of citizens as to how these policies originated or by whom they are really sponsored. Much is done, but much is left undone. Some of the things done appear to be manipulated to the advantage of relatively few.

There appears to be a tenuous line of communication between the governors of our society and the governed. This situation does not square with the concepts of democracy we have been taught to revere. The line of communication between the leaders and the people needs to be broadened and strengthened—and by more than a series of public-relations and propaganda campaigns—else our concept of democracy is in danger of losing vitality in dealing with problems that affect all in common.

With these thoughts in mind, I have studied power leadership patterns in a city of half a million population, which I choose to call Regional City. If this study of leadership and power relations can help to clarify the fact that one may find out who our real leaders are and something of how they operate in relation to each other, the present task will have been accomplished. Only by such understanding can we hope to solve the many and complex problems that confront every American community today.

Power will be defined, as the study proceeds, in relatively simple terms. Moralizing on the subject of power will be avoided. The primary interest here is in discussing the nature of the exercise of power in a selected community and as this community relates to the larger society. One hypothesis taken is that power is a necessary function in a society. Power is also a necessary function in the community, for it involves decision-making and it also involves the function of executing determined policies—or seeing to it that things get done which have been deemed necessary to be done. The social rights and prerogatives implied in power functions must be delegated to specific men to achieve social goals in any society.

In our society, men of authority are called power and influence leaders. Such leaders will be discussed here, with full recognition that they are men and women very like other men and women in many respects. The difference between the leaders and other men lies in the fact that social groupings have apparently given definite social functions over to certain persons and not to others. The functions suggested are those related to power.

Throughout this discussion I shall be using the concept of community as a frame of reference for an analysis of power relations. This is done because of a strong conviction that the community is a primary power center and because it is a place in which power relations can be most easily observed. Within the community frame of reference, an attempt will be made to keep the definition of power “operational,” that is, power will be defined in terms of men and their actions in relation to one another.

The term “power” is no reified concept, but an abstract term denoting a structural description of social processes. Or, in simpler terms, Power is a word that will be used to describe the acts of men going about the business of moving other men to act in relation to themselves or in relation to organic or inorganic things. This concept can be talked about with some sureness, but there are elements of power about which one cannot speak so surely. These latter elements will be called, after the manner of the social scientist, “residual categories,” by which is meant those ideas and conceptualizations which are related to power but fall outside the scope of the present study.

Three residual categories of power may be cited of which one should be aware in the discussion of community power structure. The first might be called historical reference; the second, motivation and other psychological concepts; and the third, values, moral and ethical considerations. Each of these categories may perhaps appear in later analyses, but they will be incidental to the problem under consideration, namely, that of analyzing the structure of power. Each will here be briefly summarized.

As to historical reference, it would be possible to become bogged down in a survey of theories of power relations, if one attempted to consider everything that has ever been said about it. The history of philosophy and of social thought is full of power topics. They may be found in the writings of Plato, Aristotle, Cicero, Machiavelli, Hobbes, Locke, Mill, Marx, Laski, and a host of others. There has also been much discussion of the “contractual” relations of men and power, and of “constitutional” types of power formulation and delegation, with which political scientists are often concerned, and which seem to stem from a preoccupation with contractual ideas having their roots in the thinking and writing of the past. Quite possibly any of these sources might have some bearing on community power relations, as might also the generalizations of many writers on the historical aspects of power—shifting power relations in social organization under autocracies, feudal systems, democracies, and socialist states of various sorts. Any such materials will be used most sparingly, for although they might clarify some points in the present study, the main emphasis here is on current history, rather than on the past. Thus, for all practical purposes, historical reference becomes a residual category.

Psychological motivation in power relations is another residual category—an area of thought which is intriguing in its possibilities, but one in which the materials of the study are inadequate for more than a superficial analysis. Economic “interests” will be discussed. Aggression on the part of individuals and groups toward one another will come in for consideration. Curiosity will be expressed as to what holds the power structure together and an assumption will be made that an explanation of the “cement” of the relations described must lie in the realm of social psychology. Other related topics will be touched upon as the discussion of power proceeds, but no attempt will be made to interpret the psychological motives behind individual or group behavior. There is an open field for study in this area, but materials have not been exploited fully enough in power-relations studies to make them more than illustratively useful. The concepts of fear, pessimism, and silence will be used at a later stage, but suggestively, not analytically.

In the third residual category mentioned, that of values, morals, and ethical considerations, the literature on power relations is shot through with these concepts. Once power is defined as the ability of men to command the services of other men, it is tempting to speculate on what commands should be, or should not be, given at any particular time. Sages abound who know the answers to “proper” statecraft which power implies. I have my own ideas, too, of what ought to be done in many social situations, but such values might stand in the way of an adequate description of the power structure in Regional City. Newspapers, radio, and other channels of communication in American society are constantly telling the citizenry what is right, just, and good. I propose not to follow their example at this time. Power, as it is presently discussed, will have a neutral content in an ideological sense, in so far as this feat can be achieved in a description of its structure in Regional City.

The men in this city who influence others in power relationships are cognizant of values. They, as well as the men of lesser power, recognize that power-wielding is functional in the society of which they are a part. Most men in Regional City apparently believe that goods and services must be moved toward definite objectives. The observable “busy-ness” of the city would indicate that this activity is deemed valuable. The real question of conflicting values in the situation arises over who is to derive the most benefit from the composite of activity.

In passing, it might be said that this study assumes the existence of two great ideological considerations which help men to shape policy in industrial communities in the world today, namely, capitalism and socialism. The author is not unaware of these forces. Both ideologies are packaged for local consumption in various ways in different nations. In discussing power, one might take either of these major ideological clusterings as a frame of reference. Both have many moral and ethical aspects, according to their adherents. No conscious choice of either is made in this writing, which will be concerned with power structure operating in a capitalistic community. The descriptions of the workings of the power structure may not always look “good,” but suggesting alternatives is not a primary concern here, and ideological considerations are, thus, a residual category.

One other set of abstractions must be given before arriving at more concrete descriptions of Regional City and its system of power relations. These abstractions relate to the postulates and hypotheses of the study, and they are comprehensive of the several aspects of power already suggested. Drawn from readings relating to power relationships and from observations of power personnel extending over several years, the postulates and hypotheses to follow are put forward to guide the study of community power structure. The postulates are these:

POSTULATES ON POWER STRUCTURE

1. Power involves relationships between individuals and groups, both controlled and controlling.

Corollary 1. Because power involves such relationships, it can be described structurally.

2. Power is structured socially, in the United States, into a dual relationship between governmental and economic authorities on national, state, and local levels.

Corollary 1. Both types of authorities may have functional, social, and institutional power units subsidiary to them.

3. Power is a relatively constant factor in social relationships with policies as variables.

Corollary 1. Wealth, social status, and prestige are factors in the “power constant.”

Corollary 2. Variation in the strength between power units, or a shift in policy within one of these units, affects the whole power structure.

4. Power of the individual must be structured into associational, clique, or institutional patterns to be effective.

Corollary 1. The community provides a microcosm of organized power relations in which individuals exercise the maximum effective influence.

Corollary 2. Representative democracy offers the greatest possibility of assuring the individual a voice in policy determination and extension.

The postulates seem to the author to be self-evident propositions. During the field investigation they formed a mental backdrop, an abstract frame of reference. The second portion of this frame of reference is contained in the following hypotheses:

HYPOTHESES ON POWER STRUCTURE

1. Power is exercised as a necessary function in social relationships.

2. The exercise of power is limited and directed by the formulation and extension of social policy within a framework of socially sanctioned authority.

3. In a given power unit (organization) a smaller number of individuals will be found formulating and extending policy than those exercising power.

Corollary 1. All policy makers are “men of power.”

Corollary 2. All “men of power” are not, per se, policy makers.

If these abstract hypotheses seem obscure at this point, they may become less so as the discussion proceeds. The postulates and hypotheses will be referred to in concrete illustrations in subsequent portions of the book.

As stated earlier, the community is the easiest place to locate and study the relations between men of power. I believe this statement is true. It is now possible to be specific and to analyze the relations of power as existent in Regional City.

2 LOCATION OF POWER IN REGIONAL CITY

In order to keep the discussion of power in operational terms, it is necessary to locate power as resident in a community, and—more important still-as resident in the men who wield power in the community. Thus, in describing the physical setting in which Regional City leaders operate, it should be stressed that the physical community is dominated by the men in it, rather than that the men are dominated by topography, climate, or any other physical element.

Regional City’s geographical location makes it a focal point for transportation operations and financial transactions both within and beyond its region. Commercial transactions supply goods to an extensive hinterland through storage, assembly, and distribution activities. Raw materials supplied by the hinterland make possible many branches of both light and heavy industry. The position of Regional City makes it a center devoted to finance, commerce, and industry, in about that order of importance. The activities centered in these areas of activity engross most men of Regional City from Monday through Saturday of each week. To paraphrase a president of the United States, “The business of Regional City is business,” and if the word business is put in its original form, “busy-ness,” the community is well described.

By day there is a constant roar of traffic over the congested streets carrying goods and people to their destinations. By night the great diesel trucks and busses blast the air with their exhausts, telling those who may hear that Regional City never sleeps. The all-night restaurants thrive in the commercial and warehouse areas, catering to men and women who ply their trades through the night shift. The whistles of trains and the “revving up” of airline motors add to the sounds made when men move goods and people. Regional City is always moving. It never stops. And it is filled with activity, more, perhaps, than many other cities, because of its strategic geographical location.

Twelve major highway trunks converge on the city. Ten air routes and eight major rail lines radiate from it. The volume of traffic over these routes is heavy. More than 500 passenger cars a day go over the rail lines. Nearly 400 busses run daily along the highways leading to and from the city. More than 150 scheduled planes operate daily from the municipal airport. The motor truck lines and private passenger cars traveling the highways and streets add an unestimated volume of traffic to the city’s transportation load.

Because of all this physical activity involved in moving goods and services in the complex system designated as Regional City, it is obvious that a social order, or system, must be maintained there. Broadly speaking, the maintenance of this order falls to the lot of almost every man in the community, but the establishment of changes in the old order falls to the lot of relatively few. In a city as old and as large as Regional City, the existing order has been a cumulative process. It has been handed down to the present generation by the past. Consequently, the men in power in Regional City may be said to have inherited its present order. But new times bring new problems, and decisions have to be made concerning changed conditions. Policies have to be formulated and made effective.

The physical community plays a vital part in maintaining the existing order by helping to differentiate men from one another. The men of power and policy decision in Regional City have definite places in which they are active. There are certain places in which they make decisions and formulate policies to meet the many changing conditions that confront them. In locating these men of power in a community one finds them, when not at home or at work, dividing their time between their clubs, the hotel luncheon and committee rooms, and other public and semi-public meeting places. And the appearance of a man’s surroundings is very considerably determined by the kind of work he does, the money he is paid for it, and the status his occupation has in the community.

A description, therefore, of the physical features which surround the men of power, such as their offices, industrial plants, or commercial establishments, as well as their clubs, homes, and other personal living quarters, seems more pertinent to the present discussion than do facts about most other parts of the physical community. Men are ranked and classified by other men, in some degree, by the physical elements around them. An office with soft carpeting, wood-panelled walls, and rich draperies immediately suggests that the man occupying it is more influential than the man who walks on composition concrete floors and looks at plaster-board walls each day, and whose only window decoration is a fifty-cent pull-down shade. Such physical characteristics may not give a completely accurate picture of power and influence, but they are indicative of power, position, and status in our culture. They are a part of the power structure in any community, in its physical aspects. As will be developed later, where men locate their homes is another measure of status on a class basis.¹

Within the physical setting of the community, power itself is resident in the men who inhabit it. To locate power in Regional City, it is therefore necessary to identify some of the men who wield power, as well as to describe the physical setting in which they operate. In Regional City the men of power were located by finding persons in prominent positions in four groups that may be assumed to have power connections.² These groups were identified with business, government, civic associations, and “society” activities. From the recognized, or nominal, leaders of the groups mentioned, lists of persons presumed to have power in community affairs were obtained. Through a process of selection, utilizing a cross section of “judges” in determining leadership rank, and finally by a further process of self-selection, a rather long list of possible power leadership candidates was cut down to manageable size for the specific purpose of this study. Forty persons in the top levels of power in Regional City were selected from more than 175 names. Many more persons were interviewed than the basic forty, but they were interviewed in relation to the forty. The whole method will unfold as the analysis proceeds. All individuals and all organizations dealt with in this study are given fictitious names.

The forty persons with whom this study is chiefly concerned are the following:

Percy Latham, Adam Graves, Fargo Dunham, Elsworth Mines, Grover Smith, Hetty Farley, John Webster, Truman Worth, Gary Stokes, Gary Stone, Epworth Simpson, Harvey Aiken, Brenda Ho...

Table of contents

• Cover Page
• Title Page
• Copyright Page
• Dedication
• Preface
• Contents
• Tables
• Figures
• 1 Introduction
• 2 Location of Power in Regional City
• 3 What Some Leaders Are Like
• 4 The Structure of Power in Regional City
• 5 Power Structure of a Sub-Community
• 6 Regional City in Political Perspective
• 7 The More Private Aspects of Power
• 8 Projects, Issues, and Policy
• 9 The Organized Community and the Individual
• Appendix Methods of Study
• Bibliography
• Index