Chapter 1
âA Beautiful Country Badly Disfiguredâ
Enframing and Reframing Eric Duttonâs The Basuto of Basutoland
Garth A. Myers
This chapter is an analysis of Eric Duttonâs 1925 book The Basuto of Basutoland.1 I use Timothy Mitchellâs concept in Colonising Egypt of an enframing colonial discourse, in combination with other theoretical insights, to analyze the book.2 Dutton, who later worked as an administrator in four British African colonies, orchestrated the construction of Lusaka as the capital of the future Zambia, and authored four other books, began his colonial career in todayâs Lesotho in 1918â19. He used the experience as the basis for writing this text, mostly while recovering from multiple surgeries that followed his severe injury during World War I. The Basuto is a curious and fairly thin human geography of the country. The book is at once a patronizing misreading of the history of the Basotho and a searching attempt not only to understand the people but also to come to grips with the landscape. The text attempts to transform that landscape from what was an âorder without framework,â in Mitchellâs terms, into colonialismâs segmented plan from the bedrock on up (55). Yet Dutton has more interest in Basotho senses of place and cultural practices than in the broader colonialist canvas with which the book begins; he struggles with what he thinks he ought to say and what he likes and longs for in the African world around him.
This struggle between repulsion and desire appears to have been lifelong. Duttonâs book suggests ways in which British colonialism in Africa contained within it both attraction and repulsion for colonialists. This work also suggests the influences that came from Duttonâs denial of his postwar disability. Even as he exemplifies tropes and tactics of colonialismâs environmental order, Dutton struggled against daunting personal and physical demons with a humor that betrays both the sentimentalist imperial geographer and the survivalist tactics of a disabled man.
Eric Dutton
During Duttonâs thirty-four-year colonial career, he engaged and corresponded intimately with the intellectual vanguard of British imperialism in Africa. He served in secretarial posts in five different British colonies in eastern and southern Africa between 1918 and 1952, and he published four geographically oriented books on Africa.3 Like the works of better-known British geographers in Africa, Duttonâs writings present him as âboth accomplice in, and critic of, the business of imperialism.â4 The representations of place, landscape, and environment in his writings manifest this ambivalence.
Dutton, the youngest of nine children in a middle-class parsonâs family, was born in Yorkshire in 1895. Like all four older brothers, he entered the army after studying at Hurstpierpoint and Oxford. His first and only battle experience came at age twenty-one in 1916 at Gallipoli, where he suffered severe injuries to his legs and spine. Although he was one of the few officers or enlisted men of the North Yorkshire regiment to survive, he never regained full use of his legs and never lived without severe pain.5 After Dutton experienced a half dozen surgeries, a long convalescence at home, and a brief attempt at a clerkship in Basutoland, Robert Coryndon, then the governor of Uganda, hired Dutton as his private secretary. Dutton served Coryndon in Uganda from 1920 to 1922 and then moved with him to his new post in Kenya. Dutton served in Kenya (1922â30) and moved on to serve in Northern Rhodesia (1930â37), Bermuda (1938â41), and Zanzibar (1942â52) before his retirement. It was during the early part of his service in Kenya that he finished writing his first book, The Basuto, and published it.
In this chapter, I give a close reading of this odd little book. From this book onward, Duttonâs spatial sense of colonialism suggests how frequently a âsense of landscapeâ and the power to produce it went hand in hand in masculinist ideological justifications of imperial rule (Kenya Mountain, xi). Yet Dutton had spent much of his time in Lesotho recovering from his horrific war wounds, which still affected his service in Kenya throughout his work on the book. As a consequence, the physical challenges of his experience make for a profound subtext to the book. Thus, throughout the book there is a bit of ambivalence about colonial power in Lesotho, as in much of Africa in the interwar years (1919â39). The context of its writing and the complexities of the author produce something quite other than a straightforwardly hegemonic masculinist imperial conquest narrative. Read broadly (meaning on a general level), The Basuto might seem to be a piece of âmale megalomania,â and we could stop there.6 However, read more closely (meaning within the historical-geographical context of its production and with appreciation for author positionality), the book also speaks to important nuances of analysis. This means producing what James Duncan and Derek Gregory term âa principled recovery of the complex subject positions of both men and womenâ who authored colonialist geographies such as this while recognizing the âphysical means through which they engaged themâ within a particular moment in time.7
In this case, the 1920s produced some grave uncertainties about the imperial endeavor at home and abroad for Britain. An ambivalent as well as âhybrid and syncretic . . . yet unequal exchangeâ took place in British colonial discourse between British authors and African peoples in writing about and articulating Africaâs geography in these decades, when colonial administrations were in place and apparently in charge.8 Moreover, Dutton was one of hundreds of male British war veterans in Africa suffering from war-related disabilities that both impaired their physical capacities and affected the ways in which they were seen and treated by other men. Duttonâs âphysical means through whichâ he âengagedâ the landscape of Lesotho (to appropriate Duncan and Gregoryâs phrase) become bodily manifestations of the character of colonial geographies in British Africa between the wars.
Colonial Enframing and Postexploration Landscape Geographies
The âsiting, surveying, mapping, naming, and ultimately possessingâ of colonial territory by Europeans in Africa as elsewhere depended upon geographical science.9 Literary studies have recognized that âimperialist structures of attitude and referenceâ depended on âthe way in which structures of location and geographical reference appear in the cultural languages of literature.â10 Much as Roderick Neumann does in chapter 2 in this book, I seek to extend the interplay between geographical and literary analyses of landscape in colonial African contexts.
Once the possessing, pacifying, and (re)naming of the landscape was done in the era of exploration geography, the spatial tactics of British colonialism in Africa broadened and deepened.11 After World War I closed the Scramble for Africa and up until at least the 1960s, British authors churned out books that sought a popular audience on African geographical topics. Many authors of such works were paid employees of colonial administrations and were writing about the people with whom and places in which they lived and worked. Some of this work followed in the wake of popular imperialist travel writing, such as Theodore Rooseveltâs African Game Trails (discussed in Neumann, chap. 2). Many but by no means all of these authors of this form of colonial geography were men for whom the âcolonial tourâ was a kind of rite of passage or assertion of belonging distinct from the agenda that Roosevelt brought to his writing.12
The postexploration colonial geographies of the interwar years in particular became part of a reorientation of ways of seeing the African political and ecological landscape in a more controlled frame, on a less fantastical map, beginning with books such as Duttonâs. Mitchell (45â62) identifies several conceptual themes for understanding the professional spatial strategies of British colonialismâs âenframingâ order that sought to develop that sense of landscape, and at least one of Mitchellâs themes is widely applicable to the colonial landscapes that these interwar works explored. This involved altering African âorders without frameworksâ into âsegmented plansâ (44). As colonial administrations asserted their power into wider corners of the colonies and established a coherent order, it became steadily apparent that race, class, and gender segmentation was intrinsic to the plan of that order. To Mitchell (44), this was an essential part of colonialismâs effort to separate the âcontainerâ (the colonizing power) and the âcontainedâ (the African community). In practice, these plans of a carefully segmented order almost never worked, and actually the containers often became confused by the interwar period.
Here I assess Duttonâs The Basuto as part of the enframing order in the British colonies of the interwar years. I attempt to show how he sought in the book to shape orders without frameworks into segmented plans and to differentiate container from contained. This emerges in repeated assertions of differentiation and British superiority. The mundane enframing and segmenting order has close links to the megalomaniacal masculinist geographies of the exploration era.
The Basuto points toward the cracks in this frame that appeared quite prominently by the interwar years. One uncertainty centers on the performance of masculinity. Militaristic ideas of manliness went hand in fist with the Scramble for Africa and British colonial enterprises there until World War I.13 J. Bristow and R. Dixon point to âthrustingly masculinist . . . ripping yarnsââBritish narratives of African adventure in the late nineteenth centuryâas guides to this male ideal.14 Christian ideology imparted to early twentieth-century British imperial masculine ideals, in equal parts, the muscularity that Berg, Bristow, and Dixon suggest and gentlemanliness: âthe ideal of Christian manliness imagined a âgentlemanâ equally at home in the public as well as the private sphere. A âmanly sensibilityââintegrating robust manliness with refinement and tempering moral authority with a solicitous regard for dependentsâwould guide his conduct.â15 There were even considerable efforts to develop this âmuscular Christianityâ in African men living under British rule.16
Yet even this ideal was in practice highly unstable and variable, and it became more so after World War I. Colonial rule in many areas, particularly in Africa, was âhaunted by a sense of insecurityâ by the time of the interwar period.17 This insecurity extended to the âpreferred forms of masculinity.â18 Richard Phillipsâs detailed reading of the ebb and flow of masculinities in British adventure stories shows that the manliness on display in these stories is ânot deterministic or staticâ but instead is decidedly plural.19 But Phillips (86â87) also notes that âthe geography of adventure spills over into . . . ârealâ gendered subjects and spaces inspiring merchants, investors, travelers, settlers, and others.â Connecting the analysis of discourse to its material implications for and context in the colonial enterprise is vital. One practical set of implications involved connections that texts by colonial officials had to âthe practical tasks of building in brick and mortarââthat is, building the colonial orderâand then to the growing sense that this order was not doing very well (Dutton, Hyena, 119). Another set of implications concerned the highly varied physical capacity to perform the hegemonic idea of colonial masculinity. In The Basuto, Dutton deployed a masculinist colonial discourse of spatial control and enframing alternated with the ambivalent, hybrid, and interdependent character of his encounter with colonized people.
Lesotho during 1918â19
At the time of Duttonâs hobbled arrival in 1918, Basutoland had already been under British control in one arrangement or another for some fifty years and was nearing the end of its first decade of being completely encircled by the independent white-ruled Union of South Africa. Since 1884, Basutoland had been a Crown colony with a resident commissioner answerable to the British high commissioner in southern Africa. In a rather short span of time, Basutoland had also become ânothing more than a labor reserve for its powerful white neighbor.â20 Geographically and economically, Basutoland conformed precisely to what Samir Amin meant by âAfrica of the labor reservesâ: a territory whose sole purpose in regard to the colonial system was to provide laborers for white settlers, in this case in South Africa.21 Coryndon, the man who would later become Duttonâs chief mentor in colonial administration, had just completed a contentious and rather unfulfilling two years as resident commissioner prior to Duttonâs arrival. Coryndon was indelibly linked to the institutionalization of varied forms of indirect rule in his service as governor or resident commissioner in Basutoland, Swaziland, Barotseland (northwestern Rhodesia, the former Lozi kingdom), Buganda, and Kenya. As Bill Freund points out, these first three were âmigrant labour reserve zones, a condition that went well with the depredations of âtraditionalâ authority reinforcing its own controls while acting in the colonial economic interests.â22
Coryndon, and the British more generally, struggled to gain authority over the indigenous leadership of Basutoland in political terms. Economically the territory became completely under the thumb of white mining capital via contracted labor migration. Yet the Sotho paramount chief and his association of chiefs, and for that matter the âSotho intelligentsiaâ of the Basutoland Progressive Association or th...