Why Americans Hate the Media and How It Matters
eBook - ePub

Why Americans Hate the Media and How It Matters

  1. 288 pages
  2. English
  3. ePUB (mobile friendly)
  4. Available on iOS & Android
eBook - ePub

Why Americans Hate the Media and How It Matters

Book details
Book preview
Table of contents
Citations

About This Book

As recently as the early 1970s, the news media was one of the most respected institutions in the United States. Yet by the 1990s, this trust had all but evaporated. Why has confidence in the press declined so dramatically over the past 40 years? And has this change shaped the public's political behavior? This book examines waning public trust in the institutional news media within the context of the American political system and looks at how this lack of confidence has altered the ways people acquire political information and form electoral preferences.
Jonathan Ladd argues that in the 1950s, '60s, and early '70s, competition in American party politics and the media industry reached historic lows. When competition later intensified in both of these realms, the public's distrust of the institutional media grew, leading the public to resist the mainstream press's information about policy outcomes and turn toward alternative partisan media outlets. As a result, public beliefs and voting behavior are now increasingly shaped by partisan predispositions. Ladd contends that it is not realistic or desirable to suppress party and media competition to the levels of the mid-twentieth century; rather, in the contemporary media environment, new ways to augment the public's knowledgeability and responsiveness must be explored.
Drawing on historical evidence, experiments, and public opinion surveys, this book shows that in a world of endless news sources, citizens' trust in institutional media is more important than ever before.

Frequently asked questions

Simply head over to the account section in settings and click on “Cancel Subscription” - it’s as simple as that. After you cancel, your membership will stay active for the remainder of the time you’ve paid for. Learn more here.
At the moment all of our mobile-responsive ePub books are available to download via the app. Most of our PDFs are also available to download and we're working on making the final remaining ones downloadable now. Learn more here.
Both plans give you full access to the library and all of Perlego’s features. The only differences are the price and subscription period: With the annual plan you’ll save around 30% compared to 12 months on the monthly plan.
We are an online textbook subscription service, where you can get access to an entire online library for less than the price of a single book per month. With over 1 million books across 1000+ topics, we’ve got you covered! Learn more here.
Look out for the read-aloud symbol on your next book to see if you can listen to it. The read-aloud tool reads text aloud for you, highlighting the text as it is being read. You can pause it, speed it up and slow it down. Learn more here.
Yes, you can access Why Americans Hate the Media and How It Matters by Jonathan M. Ladd in PDF and/or ePUB format, as well as other popular books in Politics & International Relations & Politics. We have over one million books available in our catalogue for you to explore.

References

Abramowitz, Alan I. 1978. “The Impact of a Presidential Debate on Voter Rationality.” American Journal of Political Science 22 (3): 680–90.
———. 1988. “An Improved Model for Predicting Presidential Election Outcomes.” PS: Political Science and Politics 21 (4): 843–46.
Abramowitz, Alan I., and Kyle L. Saunders. 1998. “Ideological Realignment in the U.S. Electorate.” Journal of Politics 60 (3): 634–52.
Abrams, Burton A., and Plamen Iossifov. 2006. “Does the Fed Contribute to a Political Business Cycle?” Public Choice 129 (3–4): 249–62.
Achen, Christopher H. 1992. “Social Psychology, Demographic Variables and Linear Regression: Breaking the Iron Triangle in Voting Research.” Political Behavior 14 (3): 195–211.
———. 2002. “Parental Socialization and Rational Party Identification.” Political Behavior 24 (2): 151–70.
———. 2005. “Bayesian Voters and Their Turnout Decisions: Unifying the Behavior Literature.” Department of Politics, Princeton University.
Achen, Christopher H., and Larry M. Bartels. 2004. “Musical Chairs: Pocket-book Voting and the Limits of Democratic Accountability.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago, IL.
———. 2006. “It Feels Like We’re Thinking: The Rationalizing Voter and Electoral Democracy.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia, PA.
Adams, Greg D. 1997. “Abortion: Evidence of an Issue Evolution.” American Journal of Political Science 41 (3): 718–37.
Agnew, Spiro. 1989. “Speeches on the Media.” In Killing the Messenger: 100 Years of Media Criticism, ed. Tom Goldstein. New York: Columbia University Press, 64–85.
Ai, Chunrong, and Edward Norton. 2003. “Interaction Terms in Logit and Probit Models.” Economics Letters 80 (1): 123–29.
Aldrich, John H. 1995. Why Parties? The Origin and Transformation of Political Parties. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Aldrich, John H., and Forrest D. Nelson. 1984. Linear Probability, Logit, and Probit Models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Alesina, Alberto. 2000. “The Political Business Cycle after 25 Years: Comment.” NBER Macroeconomics Annual 15: 117–24.
Alesina, Alberto, Nouriel Roubini, and Gerald D. Cohen. 1997. Political Cycles and the Macroeconomy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Allen, Eric W. 1927. “Journalism as Applied Social Science.” Journalism Bulletin 4 (March): 1–7.
Allen, Mike. 2009. “Fox ‘Not Really News,’ Says Axelrod.” Politico.com October 18. http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1009/28417.html (Accessed April 14, 2010).
Alterman, Eric. 1999. Sound and Fury: The Making of the Punditocracy. Rev. ed. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
———. 2003. What Liberal Media? The Truth about Bias and the News. New York: Basic Books.
———. 2008. “Out of Print: The Death and Life of American Newspapers.” New Yorker, March 31, 48–59.
Althaus, Scott L. 2003. Collective Preferences in Democratic Politics: Opinion Surveys and the Will of the People. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Althaus, Scott L., and Young Mie Kim. 2006. “Priming Effects in Complex Information Environments: Reassessing the Impact of News Discourse on Presidential Approval.” Journal of Politics 68 (4): 960–76.
Alvarez, R. Michael. 1997. Information and Elections. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Ames, William. 1972. A History of the National Intelligencer. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
Anand, Bharat, and Rafael Di Tella. 2008. “Perceived Media Bias: Some Evidence on the Impact of Prior Beliefs and Source Awareness.” Harvard Business School, Harvard University.
Anderson, Brian C. 2005. South Park Conservatives: The Revolt against Liberal Media Bias. Washington, DC: Regnery.
Angrist, Joshua D., Guido W. Imbens, and Donald B. Rubin. 1996. “Identification of Causal Effects Using Instrumental Variables.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 91 (434): 444–55.
Angrist, Joshua D., and Jorn-Steffen Pischke. 2009. Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist’s Companion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Ansolabehere, Stephen. 2006. “The Paradox of Minimal Effects.” In Capturing Campaign Effects, ed. Henry E. Brady and Richard Johnston. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 29–44.
Ansolabehere, Stephen, Shigeo Hirano, James M. Snyder Jr., and Michiko Ueda. 2006. “Party and Incumbency Cues in Voting: Are They Substitutes?” Quarterly Journal of Political Science 1 (2): 119–37.
Ansolabehere, Stephen, and Shanto Iyengar. 1995. Going Negative: How Attack Ads Shrink and Polarize the Electorate. New York: Free Press.
Ansolabehere, Stephen, Rebecca Lessem, and James M. Snyder Jr. 2006. “The Political Orientation of Newspaper Endorsements in U.S. Elections, 1940–2002.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science 1 (4): 393–404.
Ansolabehere, Stephen, and James M. Snyder Jr. 2002. “The Incumbency Advantage in U.S. Elections: An Analysis of State and Federal Offices, 1942–2000.” Election Law Journal: Rules, Politics, and Policy 1 (3): 315–38.
Ansolabehere, Stephen, James M. Snyder Jr., and Charles Stewart III. 2000. “Old Voters, New Voters, and the Personal Vote: Using Redistricting to Measure the Incumbency Advantage.” American Journal of Political Science 44 (1): 17–34.
Arceneaux, Kevin, and Martin Johnson. 2007. “Channel Surfing: Does Choice Reduce Videomalaise?” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, IL.
Armstrong, Jerome, and Markos Moulitsas. 2006. Crashing the Gate: Netroots, Grassroots, and the Rise of People-Powered Politics. White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green.
Arnold, R. Douglas. 1979. Congress and the Bureaucracy: A Theory of Influence. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
———. 1987. “Political Control of Administrative Officials.” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 3 (2): 279–86.
———. 2004. Congress, the Press, and Political Accountability. New York: Russell Sage Foundation and Princeton University Press.
Arrow, Kenneth J. 1963a. Social Choice and Individual Values. 2nd ed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
———. 1963b. “Uncertainty and the Welfare Economics of Medical Care.” American Economic Review 54 (4): 941–73
Austen-Smith, David. 1994. “Strategic Transmission of Costly Information.” Econometrica 62 (4): 955–63.
Austen-Smith, David, and Jeffrey S. Banks. 1989. “Electoral Accountability and Incumbency.” In Models of Strategic Choice in Politics, ed. Peter C. Ordeshook. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 121–48.
Bafumi, Joseph, Andrew Gelman, and David K. Park. 2004. “What Does ‘Do Campaigns Matter?’ Mean?” Department of Political Science, Columbia University.
Bafumi, Joseph, and Michael C. Herron. 2007. “Preference Aggregation, Representation, and Elected American Political Institutions.” Department of Political Science, Dartmouth College.
Bafumi, Joseph, and Robert Y. Shapiro. 2009. “A New Partisan Voter.” Journal of Politics 71 (1): 1–24.
Bai, Matt. 2007. The Argument: Billionaires, Bloggers, and the Battle to Remake Democratic Politics. New York: Penguin.
Baldasty, Gerald J. 1992. The Commercialization of News in the Nineteenth Century. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
Banks, Jeffrey S. 1991. Signaling Games in Political Science. Chur, Switzerland: Harwood.
Banks, Jeffrey S., and John Duggan. 2001. “A Multidimensional Model of Repeated Elections.” Department of Political Science, University of Rochester.
Banks, Jeffrey S., and Rangaragan K. Sundaram. 1993. “Moral Hazard and Adverse Selection in a Model of Repeated Elections.” In Political Economy: Institutions, Competition, and Representation, ed. William A. Barnett, Norman Schofield, and Melvin Hinich. New York: Cambridge University Press, 295–311.
Barker, David C. 1999. “Rushed Decisions: Political Talk Radio and Vote Choice.” Journal of Politics 61 (2): 527–39.
———. 2002. Rushed to Judgment: Talk Radio, Persuasion, and American Political Behavior. New York: Columbia University Press.
Barker, David C., and Kathleen Knight. 2000. “Political Talk Radio and Public Opinion.” Public Opinion Quarterly 64 (2): 149–70.
Barker, David C., and Adam B. Lawrence. 2006. “Media Favoritism and Presidential Nominations.” Political Communication 23 (1): 41–59.
Baron, David P. 2005. “Competing for the Public through the News Media.” Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 14 (2): 339–76.
———. 2006. “Persistent Media Bias.” Journal of Public Economics 90 (1–2): 1–36.
Barr, Andy. 2009. “Palin: Media Sought to Seek, Destroy.” Politico.com. February 23. http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0209/19178.html (Accessed February 24, 2009).
Bartels, Larry M. 1988. Presidential Primaries and the Dynamics of Public Choice. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
———. 1992. “The Impact of Electioneering in the United States.” In Electioneering: A Comparative Study of Continuity and Change, ed. David Butler and Austin Ranney. New York: Clarendon Press and Oxford University Press, 244–77.
———. 1993. “Messages Received: The Political Impact of Media Exposure.” American Political Science Review 87 (2): 267–85.
———. 1996a. “Politicians and the Press: Who Leads, Who Follows?” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Associa...

Table of contents

  1. Cover
  2. Title Page
  3. Copyright
  4. Dedication
  5. Contents
  6. List of Illustrations
  7. Acknowledgments
  8. Why Is Everyone Mad at the Mainstream Media?
  9. Political Conflict with the Press in the Pre-Polling Era
  10. The Emergence of the Institutional News Media in an Era of Decreasing Political Polarization
  11. The Institutional News Media in an Era of Political Polarization and Media Fragmentation
  12. Sources of Antipathy toward the News Media
  13. News Media Trust and Political Learning
  14. News Media Trust and Voting
  15. The News Media in a Democracy
  16. References
  17. Index