Leaders in international development work on the cutting edge of the global order, striving to create a world where everyone can live a life of dignity with access to resources and services to meet their fundamental needs. Such leaders rarely have the chance to tell their stories. How they lead most effectively in various contexts and cultures has not often been told, nor have the qualities and approaches they employ to achieve success been systematically studied. The purpose of this volume, then, is to fill this gap by sharing these stories and proposing a tentative theory of leading in this context. In addition, the volume offers an innovative practitioner/scholar collaboration model for generating new knowledge directly from the stories and anecdotes of leaders.
We (the co-editors) decided to combine our practitioner and scholar skills and together developed a vision for this unique volume. Chapter 1, Toward a Theory of Leading in International Development, describes the specific steps undertaken to combine research and practice; our goal was to create a vehicle for stories from this leadership area and then analyze the stories to identify commonalities, differences, and critical leadership issues. From the analysis, our goal was to offer a tentative new theory of leading in this context that can be used to inform future research and leader development initiatives. As Chapter 1, Toward a Theory of Leading in International Development, makes clear, the leader stories provided a rich depth of leader experiences to draw from, and a new theory of leading in this context is offered.
The first section, entitled âOn International Development Leaders,â posits a preliminary definition of what leaders in international development do. The second section, entitled âThe Architecture within which International Development Leaders Leadâ describes the organizational context of their leadership. âApproaches to International Development,â the third section, summarizes different approaches to achieving development that leaders have implemented over the years. The fourth section, âHow do the Leaders in This Volume Practice Leadership?â highlights leadersâ conception of leadership as well as their reflections on the four factors we initially identified as possibly influencing leadership in this profession, namely gender, culture, context, and sustainability. Power emerged as a dominant factor in leadership in international development in virtually all the stories of the authors. In the Overview Part 2, Anne M. Spear presents an overview of the broader context of the issue of power in this domain and a commitment by the authors to a leadership practice that sincerely focuses on equalizing power relations and creating global harmony.
The introductions to each of the five parts of the volume also highlight some of the key findings regarding leadership in international development. Part 1, Challenges in International Development, of the volume includes stories that introduce the reader to some of the most common challenges faced by leaders in international development. Part 2, Leadership for Womenâs Empowerment and Equity, describes the leadership moments of leaders who have devoted their career to promoting womenâs empowerment and equity. Part 3, Spirit-filled Grassroots Leadership, describes leadership by faith-based leaders who work at the grassroots level. Part 4, Leading Major Donor Projects, contains stories by leaders who work for major donors or their projects. Finally, Part 5, Leadership Lessons to Reflect On, provides leadership lessons for the reader to reflect on.
THE ARCHITECTURE WITHIN WHICH INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT LEADERS LEAD
Leaders in international development lead within a complex global architecture of international and national organizations established shortly after World War II, which has evolved over the years through various phases driven by changing theories of how to catalyze international development and alter geo-political relationships as well as by vehement critiques of the sometimes negative impact of the practice of development on the lives of its beneficiaries. Although human, financial, and material resources and know-how have traversed global boundaries throughout history by migrations, cross-border trade, conquests, war, technical assistance, humanitarian aid, and religious zeal, the contemporary era of âinternational developmentâ and âforeign aidâ is generally considered to have begun with the words of US President Harry S. Truman delivered in his Inaugural Address on January 20, 1949:
More than half the people of the world are living in conditions approaching miseryâŚTheir poverty is a handicap and a threat both to them and to more prosperous areas. We must embark on a bold new program for making the benefits of our scientific advances and industrial progress available for the improvement and growth of underdeveloped areas⌠Greater production is the key to prosperity and peace. (Truman, 1949)
International development or global development historically has been closely linked to the concept of economic growth, although its definition has been broadened over the years to include human development and, more recently, sustainable development. Such development is directed by the policies, programs, knowledge, and resources within developing countries augmented by transfers of financial, technological, informational, and human resources from more developed ones. Leaders in international development are responsible for these transfers.
At the time of Trumanâs speech, the foundational architecture of international organizations that would play key roles in international development and foreign aid had already been built with the creation in 1944 of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (now part of the World Bank Group), and in 1945 the United Nations. Further, the Marshall Plan for the Reconstruction of Europe was initiated and the Organisation for European Economic Cooperation (OEEC) was created in 1948 to administer the Plan. The Marshall Plan served as a significant step forward in the advent of international development by focusing on the provision of technical and humanitarian assistance while at the same time creating a political and economic bloc opposed to the Soviet Union that would play an important role in international development henceforth. The conceptual foundation of development during this period and during the 1950s was the modernization theory posited by Walt Rostow and other American economists (Rostow, 1960, 1990).
Foreign Aid as an Essential Tool of International Development
The 1960s era of the independence of former colonies marked the advent of Western countries creating foreign aid organizations. Canada, France, and the United States led the way and other countries followed suit in subsequent years. In the United States of America, an advocate of foreign aid, President John F. Kennedy pushed for the enactment of the Foreign Assistance Act in 1961 that established the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). The establishment of USAID by Kennedy ushered in a new stage of development in the US. Kennedyâs 1961 Alliance for Progress focused on increasing gross national product (GNP), establishing democratic governments, ending adult illiteracy, land reform, and social planning guaranteed by US$20 billion.
Whereas predecessor US agencies such as the Technical Cooperation Agency, the Institute of Inter-American Affairs, and the US Department of Agriculture doled out highly technical programs, USAID required a new kind of development professional. No longer âwell drillersâ who worked at the community level, the new professionals were economists, loan officers, planners, senior technical advisors, private sector business executives, and professionals who could undertake policy discussions with ministers and heads of nations (Askin, 2012, p. 29). Development became the focus of âstudies, theories, and program approaches and helped usher in what many later characterized as the âGolden Age of Developmentââ (Askin, 2012, p. 30).
Given the advent of bilateral aid donors, the Development Assistance Group (DAG) of the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) was established on January 13, 1960, in order to track aid flows of its members to developing countries. The OEEC was reorganized in 1961 to become the OECD, whose 35 members from mostly high-income countries include some non-Western states. The Development Assistance Committee (DAC) was the renamed version of the DAG and focused on promoting development policies to improve economic and social well-being as well as to track resource flows, analyze data to predict future trends, and set international standards.
The United Nations agencies have also played a key role in international development. The United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA), the United Nations Childrenâs Fund (UNICEF), the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), the World Health Organization (WHO), and others have developed key international policies and negotiated with governments to make changes for the betterment of their people.
The architecture has evolved over the years as previously so-called developing countries have become middle-income countries and emerging powers and have become donors in their own right. Further, developing countries have increasingly formed a âSouthern blocâ to negotiate for more effective aid and a stronger role in managing it, through the Aid Effectiveness movement and resultant Paris Declaration, Accra Accord, Busan Partnership Agreement, and the Partnership for Effective Development Cooperation.
Multiple Identities of Donors
Within the international architecture of international development, donors are generally categorized into multilateral, bilateral, non-governmental, corporate, and individuals. Multilateral donors, whose funds come from many countries, include the UNDP, the World Bank, and international development banks, among many others. Bilateral donors represent individual countries. Currently, the DAC members are the largest donors. However, China is a growing donor as is India, Brazil, Mexico, and several of the Arab states.
International Non-government Organizations (INGOs) include Oxfam, Save the Children, World Vision, Catholic Relief Services, CARE, Mercy Corps, and hundreds of others, funded by a combination of donations and government funds. Missionary groups are also generally included in this category. Private foundations and philanthropic donors include, among many others, the foundations of ex-US presidents such as the Carter Center, the Clinton Foundation, and the Obama Foundation, and private philanthropic foundations such as the Soros, Rockefeller, and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundations. Many national non-government organizations (NGOs) also serve as donors.
In addition to the above donors, there are a myriad of private sector organizations that deliver aid provided by multilateral and bilateral donors and who work on the front lines of delivering aid directly to developing countries through a number of different funding mechanisms that will be discussed later. Corporations also have social responsibility strategies that are considered as aid. Further, private corporations provide the majority of resource transfers in recent years from developed to developing countries to stimulate international development, but those transfers are not considered as official aid.
Leaders work in all these various types of organizations and at all levels of this system, including political decision makers, policy makers, program designers, and project implementers in the field. The authors in this volume include leaders who work or have worked for developing country governments, for developing country development organizations, for major multilateral and bilateral donors, and for international and national non-governmenta...