PART ONE
UNDERSTANDING THE REALITIES OF CHILDREN IN ARMED CONFLICT
Theoretical and Conceptual Considerations
This first section of the book aims both to capture the multifaceted realities of children affected by armed conflict and contribute to conceptual and theoretical considerations. The chapters in this section critically interrogate the concepts of resilience, social exclusion, connectedness and belonging, agency, and social construction and their implications for war-affected children in Burma, Colombia, Pakistan and Sri Lanka.
In chapter 1, ā āRaising the Deadā and Cultivating Resilience: Postcolonial Theory and Childrenās Narratives from Swat, Pakistan,ā Lubna Chaudhry explores the realities of childrenās experiences by reflecting on their constructions of trauma, violence, and resilience in the context of the armed conflict in Swat Valley, Pakistan. In her analysis, Chaudhry engages with postcolonial theories of trauma and mourning to argue that children are social actors whose narratives of traumaāby their very articulationābecome assertions of agency and even manifestations of resilience. These narratives demonstrate how children negotiate the violence around them, as well as the ways in which gender, class, ethnicity, and geographical positioning influence individual and collective identities.
In chapter 2, āYoung Childrenās Experiences of Connectedness and Belonging in Postconflict Sri Lanka: A Socioecological Approach,ā Nanditha Hettitantri and Fay Hadley consider young childrenās experiences of connectedness to their social ecology in a postconflict Sri Lankan village. Through an analysis of the accounts of two young children, Hettitantri and Hadley demonstrate the ways in which these children experience connectedness to their social ecology and develop a sense of personal and community belonging. These factors, the authors argue, contribute to young childrenās resilience in a post-conflict setting and hence should be further developed and supported through service provision. Hettitantri and Hadley illustrate that listening to the voices of very young children (3- and 4-year-old children) can be fruitful in understanding their lives and that agency does not discriminate according to age.
In chapter 3, āContending with Violence and Discrimination: Using a Social Exclusion Lens to Understand the Realities of Burmese Muslim Refugee Children in Thailand,ā Mollie Pepper explores the experiences of marginalization and social exclusion among Burmese Muslim children living in refugee camps in Thailand. Challenging the notion that refugee camps are inherently spaces of safety, this chapter demonstrates the ways in which children are deeply affected by discrimination and violence within refugee camps, showing that, in fact, refugee camps can be sites of social exclusion. At the same time, childrenās limited access to resources and services within these sites shapes their unique coping mechanisms and may foster survival strategies for themselves and their families. Pepper ultimately highlights how children navigate multiple vulnerabilities and work to actively mitigate them.
In chapter 4, āA Social Constructionist Approach to Understanding the Experiences of Girls Affected by Armed Conflict in Colombia,ā Maria Camila Ospina-Alvarado, Sara Victoria Alvarado, Jaime Alberto Carmona, and Hector Fabio Ospina present an alternative approach to child development that does not view children affected by armed conflict as mere victims. Drawing on a social constructionist approach and relying on the narratives of Colombian girls affected by armed conflict, the study proposes a shift from deficit-based and individualized views of children to perspectives that are collective in approach and that emphasize the role of boys and girls and their socializing agents in peace building, democracy, and reconciliation.
Chapter 5 addresses the realities of former girl soldiers in postwar northern Uganda. In āArmed with Resilience: Tapping into the Experiences and Survival Skills of Formerly Abducted Girl Child Soldiers in Northern Uganda,ā Jessica Lenz argues that reintegration programs tend to ignore the resilient qualities that children gain from their experiences in armed groups and instead draw on approaches that assume that children are traumatized victims. Lenz demonstrates that, even though they experienced brutality and violence, the girls within the Lordās Resistance Army (LRA) nonetheless gained multiple skills, including nursing, teaching, cartography, and team-building and negotiating skills. Lenz argues that current reintegration programs may weaken a girlās resilience by (1) failing to build on her existing strengths; (2) explicitly or implicitly encouraging her to conform to generalized programs, rather than recognizing her unique potential; (3) encouraging her to forget the past; and (4) promoting traditional gender roles. By challenging existing models of reintegration, Lenz suggests the need not only to broaden theoretical understandings of girls as resilient but also to challenge assumptions surrounding the experiences of girls formerly associated with armed groups.
The theories and concepts that are drawn on in these chapters offer explanatory frameworks and ways of seeing that can help us make sense of the complexity of childrenās lives, behavior, and experiences. Moreover, these theories and concepts can act like a blueprint to guide practice, providing a relatively clear direction and structure for practice, intervention, and action. Although theories and concepts are based on particular worldviews and assumptions, the changing nature of knowledge development requires that they change as new information influences the way we understand things or disproves ideas altogether. The chapters in this section offer theoretical and conceptual explanations that should be seen as fluid, changing, and shifting as new knowledge emerges.
1
āRAISING THE DEADā AND CULTIVATING RESILIENCE
Postcolonial Theory and Childrenās Narratives from Swat, Pakistan
Lubna N. Chaudhry
For decades most academic literature on war-affected children was motivated by a biomedical paradigm (Boyden & de Berry, 2004b); it generally cast children as one-dimensional victims. More recently there have been moves to embrace the psychosocial aspects of childrenās lives and experiences in conflict situations (e.g., Boyden & de Berry, 2004a; Lloyd & Penn, 2010; Shakya, 2011; Williams & Drury, 2011). This burgeoning body of research, while still concerned with childrenās trauma, underscores the importance of also looking at their resilienceāon how children cope in situations of chronic and acute violenceāand of putting childrenās voices at the center of analysis. This focus on resilience and childrenās own representations of their experiences facilitates an understanding of their creative responses to violence (Nordstrom, 1997) and helps locate sites of strategic interventions to augment their mental and social resources in conflict situations by building on existing strengths and spaces (Williams & Drury, 2011).
The objective of this chapter is to explore childrenās constructions of trauma, violence, and resilience in the context of the beautiful Swat Valley in Pakistan, where three entitiesāthe Pakistani Taliban, civilians supporting or resisting the Taliban, and the Pakistani militaryāwere involved in armed conflict. Memories of the past and commentaries of the present are interwoven in narratives collected from 30 children aged 10ā15 (half of them girls), just as personal experiences remain imbricated with collective identities in these accounts. Written in the vein of the new sociology of childhood (see, for example, Christensen & Prout, 2005), this chapter posits Swati children as social actors and reflexive subjects, as human beings who actively negotiate the words and spaces around them to make meaning and take action.
From 2006 onward, the lives of these children have unfolded in a complex sociopolitical scenario in which violence, both direct and physical (e.g., brutality against people and the destruction of property by the Taliban and Pakistani military) and indirect and structural (e.g., the sanctions against āWesternā education by the Taliban and the inability of the state to effectively facilitate the evacuation of families before the invasion in 2009), contributed to the intense suffering of Swati communities.1 Childrenās accounts at times blur the distinction between conflict-generated violence and everyday āpeace-time crimesā (Scheper-Hughes & Bourgois, 2004, p. 19)āforms of violence, mostly structural, generated by oppressive social hierarchies that pre-date the conflict with the Taliban. These forms of violence persist into the so-called postconflict phase, with the addition of new forms related to the militarization of the region. State-sanctioned discourses center on celebrating the victory of the Pakistani military, which restored Swat to its tranquil mountain resort status (Khattak, 2014). However, childrenās narratives undercut both descriptions of the idyllic pre-Taliban society and a triumphalist telling of the encounter with the Taliban. The articulation of trauma itself becomes an assertion of agency, ostensibly even a manifestation of resilience, as children insist on speaking their truths.
Although socioecological approaches to children in war-torn societies that emphasize the need to examine experiences within families, schools, and communities (see, for example, Akesson & Denov, chapter 6; Boothby, Strang, & Wessells, 2006) do inform my analysis, the use of postcolonial theories of trauma and mourning adds another layer to my reading/listening of childrenās narratives. The Swati children I interviewed clearly positioned themselves as historical and political subjects. A postcolonial lens allows for an examination of how larger sociohistorical forces affected the everyday realities of the research participants.
Postcoloniality often does not represent a condition of celebration; around the world, including in Pakistan, nation-building or national security enterprises continue to be characterized by the stateās violence against its own citizens (Chaudhry, 2014). Postcolonial scholars (for example, Durrant, 2004; Holland, 2000) write of how memories of past violence project into the future, making the experiences of the present plight indistinguishable from historical trauma. This body of literature points to the nonlinear, recursive, and incomplete nature of grief, of the āceaseless labor of remembranceā that āallows one to live in memory of both the dead and all those whose living human presence continues to be disavowed by the present world orderā (Durrant, 2004, p. 1). From such a perspective, interviews became spaces to āraise the dead,ā to permit the children āto speak about the unspokenāāthat which has āslipped between the cracks of languageā (Holland, 2000, pp. 3ā5). āRaising the dead becomes a figurative enterprise, as well as an intellectual and therefore concrete endeavor. The task [is] ā¦ not only uncovering silences but transforming inarticulate places into conversational territoriesā (Holland, 2000, pp. 2ā3).
In this chapter, I am especially concerned with the diversity of childrenās experiences and perspectives. Gender is a salient category of differentiation and works with other axes of difference, such as ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and geographical location in Swat, to constrain and enable childrenās agency in circumstances marked by extreme violence (see James, 2009, for my conception of agency). Childrenās agency, or its lack thereof, becomes an indicator of resilience (Williams & Drury, 2011). This chapter addresses childrenās capacity to negotiate the multiple forms of violence impinging on their lives and they ways in which they choose to respond, even if those choices are not always comprehensible to those who do not participate in their life-worlds.
Agency, as Lange and Mierendorff (2009) point out, can be reproductive or resistant, with the latter form having the potential to transform the generational order. In the case of Swati children, agency could also take both forms: Reproducing the generational order as envisaged by one set of adults might be regarded as resistant agency by another set. In addition, resistant agency can be enacted in relation to systems, such as the state apparatus. Integrating a postcolonial orientation into a socioecological framework makes it possible to note this form of agency. From such a perspective, the expression of resilience takes place along a continuum, with survival representing one pole and resistant agency the other one.
The next section provides a brief history of the Swat conflict. It is followed by a description of the research methodology and a discussion of the findings. The concluding section pulls together the different strands of analysis shared in the chapter and presents implications for policy and further research.
CONTEXT
The Swat Valley, located in northwestern Pakistan, is part of the ātribal beltā governed by the province, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa,...