Take two Democrats of the same generation with similar political views and similar character issues. One becomes the first man in his party to win reelection in fifty yearsâdespite a sex scandal that later leads to his impeachment trial. The other, after two terms in Congress, canât get elected dogcatcher. Whatever you think of the politics of Bill Clinton and Gary Condit, most people would agree that both behaved inappropriately during crucial moments in their professional lives. Yet Clinton, despite years of jokes and innuendo, managed to walk the fine line between political success and historical infamy (at least while he was in office). By contrast, in the course of one short year, Condit transformed himself before the entire world from a respected congressman to a walking synonym for âunredeemable cad.â As is the case for us all, their presentations made a big difference.
Earlier, Clintonâs defeat of President George H. W. Bush may have been mostly about âthe economy, stupid,â but it also seemed obvious to me at the time that Bush did not present himself or his ideas in a completely effective manner. Remember the âtown hallâ debate of that campaign? Clinton was completely engaged with his audience, hanging on every word, while Bush kept checking his watchâas if he had an appointment that was more important than getting reelected president. Hereâs a hint that you donât need to read a whole book to learn: If you blatantly peek at your watch during your own presentation, you may have instantly jeopardized any rapport you already established with your audience. History shows that Clinton âwonâ that debateâand that single sub-par performance on Bushâs part might well have sealed his own one-term fate.
Clinton might have been more of a natural with people, but you canât tell me that a man who was as capable as Bush was in other respects had to look at his watch or do the many other things he did to alienate his audience. Despite Bushâs excellent qualifications for reelection, if you review that tape youâll see a man who often speaks at his audience, not to them; who looks uncomfortable in their presence; who rarely involves his audience by redirecting attention to them and taking it off himself; who is not âupâ for the moment; and who makes very few adjustments to his approach in order to retain his audienceâs focus. Somebody failed to sharpen this candidateâs presentation skills.
As president, Ronald Reagan became known as the âGreat Communicator.â He earned this reputation by being the first president in modern times to stay relentlessly âon messageâ whenever he spoke, in public or in private. You may or may not have agreed with his political views (or, for that matter, with those of Clinton or Bush), but unlike our experience with most other politicians, we always knew where Reagan stood.
Bill Clinton was something different altogether. To the great frustration of his opponents, Clinton proved to be an excellent presenter, even if at times he quite intentionally was not very communicative. How can that be? Because communication and presentation may frequently overlap, but they are not necessarily the same thing. For the purpose of my work and this book, I define presentation as the act of working to change the content of another personâs mind at a particular time and place. Note that I said âto change the content of another personâs mind,â not âto change another personâs mind.â The latter has the connotation of getting a person or persons to alter their opinion. But a presentation might do the opposite. It might reinforce someoneâs opinion. Or it might have nothing to do with your audienceâs beliefs and simply impart information. Or it might spur your audience to take action. In any case, if successfully executed, presentations fulfill desired outcomes in the presenterâs audienceâby enhancing a skill, changing or reinforcing an attitude, or imparting information.
The upshot of all this is that, on some level, any time we have contact with another individualâon the phone, in person, via e-mail or voice mail, etc.âwe are making a presentation, whether we like it or not. And Bill Clinton, for all his flaws, liked the presentation process and so became very good at it. George H. W. Bush, for all his strengths, clearly didnât enjoy making presentations. And hereâs the most important point to keep in mind: because Bush managed for so many years to succeed in life without achieving Presentation Mastery, he never felt compelled to build those skills. So when the necessity arose for him to step it up a notch, he had neither the time nor the inclination to do so. And the result for him was a less than satisfactory conclusion to his long political career.
Most of us are more like George H.W. Bush than we are like Bill Clinton. We were probably not born with natural charisma or the gift of gab. The very ubiquity of our presentation opportunities often makes us unaware that they exist as opportunities at all. Theyâre just a part of our day that we donât think about, like walking or talking. Our walking has always gotten us to where we want to go, so why bother to work on improving it? We have areas of mastery in our livesâperhaps the kinds of things weâve learned in graduate school or in business trainingâbut when it comes to interpersonal skills we just presume that mere competence is enough. In a very real sense, then, the great opportunities we have to improve our lives through Presentation Mastery continually pass us by.
A lot of the people I know who are Master Presenters have achieved that status either by chance or because at some point they were forced to do so. In many cases they were corporate executives who learnedâbefore it was too lateâthat their lack of presentation skills was holding them back. So they went for training or coaching. In some instances, as with many of my coauthor Kimâs clients, they were requested to refine their presentation skills by a superior or a business partner who needed them to meet an important challenge. But the best story of this kind that I ever heard is about a man who had to learn how to present, literally in order to survive. His name is Bill Porter.
Presentation Is an Art
On a recent plane trip I sat next to a man who happened to be a professional chef. When we exchanged pleasantries and he learned how I make my living, he became excited to remark that a big part of what he does also involves presentation. From the compilation of colors and shapes on a dinerâs plate to the dress of the staff to the lighting and decoration, he noted, the quality of any restaurant patronâs experience depends greatly on how well the chef has mastered the art of presentation. My plane companion had become so conversant in the art of restaurant presentation that he told me he could predict half of an unknown restaurantâs menu simply by looking at the presentation of their parking lot and front entrance.
Art requires both skill and creativity. For the chef, creativity without skill might result in something beautiful to look at but not very appealing to eat. Skill without creativity could result in a well-executed dish that didnât make for a very interesting dining experience. But when he was able to elevate his vocation to an art, it meant that the chefâs skill and creativity had joined forces. Beautiful things resulted.
Like the chef, a man named Bill Porter came to understand early on that the presentations in his life would require equal parts inspiration, skill, and hard work. Andâguess what?âbeautiful things resulted.
When he was still an infant in the early 1930s, Bill Porter was diagnosed with cerebral palsy. Though he later proved to be a man of normal intelligence, the doctor predicted that he would be mentally retarded and urged Billâs mother to have him institutionalized. In a pattern that would be repeated over many decades by Billâs parents and then by Bill himself, they ignored the doctorâs advice and refused to accept defeat.
As related in the book Ten Things I Learned from Bill Porter (written by his longtime friend and employee, Shelly Brady), Porter would go on to graduate from the Grout School for Handicapped Children in Portland, Oregon. More important, he then graduated from the mainstream Lincoln High School, an extremely unusual accomplishment for a physically challenged person of that era. But none of that could change the fact that Porter struggled with a very real and visible disability. At a particularly poignant stage in his life, Porter began looking for a career with the help of a counselor. This effort resulted in little more than a series of humiliations. A job as a pharmacy store clerk lasted less than a day because Porterâs trembling hands would not allow him to stock the shelves neatly. A job as a Goodwill Industries cashier lasted three days because Porterâs palsied fingers kept hitting the wrong keys. His physical limitations also brought a job at the Salvation Army docks to a prompt end. And his slurred speech soon lost him his job answering phones at the Veterans Rehabilitation Center. After five months of this kind of thing the counselor told Porter that the state considered him unemployable. He suggested that Porter stay home and collect disability payments.
Another person in Porterâs position may have taken this advice to heart, but Porter knew deep down inside that he could be a productive member of societyâeven if he couldnât tie his own shoes without difficulty or button his own shirt cuffs. A few years before, Porter had had some success as a door-to-door salesman for United Cerebral Palsy. He quit that job when he realized he couldnât make a living at it, though. The products were too limited and Porter got the impression that repeat customers were buying as much out of charity as for any other reason. He then tried to freelance for a while, purchasing gift items from a catalog and reselling them door-to-door for a marked-up price. In order to do that, Porter realized he had to create a unique presentation that would compensate for his communication disability. So he meticulously built his own catalog by cutting and pasting, then typing descriptions himself. As Shelly Brady notes: âHe wanted to make sure that if verbal communication broke down between himself and his clients due to his speech impediment, the illustrated catalog would do the explaining for him.â In other words, Porterâlike any good presenterâhad put a great deal of stock in preparation. Although that preparation paid off in a degree of success, Porter had begun looking for steadier work with a big employer when he met the string of failures mentioned above. When he realized that his physical limitations were too much to overcome in the field of manual labor, he again set his sights on becoming a salesman.
Having exhausted his patience with state counselors, Porter began combing the want ads himself. Naturally, this met with more rejection. Most times he didnât even get past the initial phone call. Then, one day, Porter landed an interview with a company called Watkins Products. âI know I can do this job,â Porter confidently told the interviewer. âIâve been successfully selling for the past ten years. Itâs in my blood. My father is a successful salesman. It almost doesnât matter what product I sell, customers enjoy buying from me.â
Iâve never met Bill Porter. I can only imagine how difficult it was for him to deliver this speech at the end of a year of rejection and frustration and while trying to do the things that a non-handicapped person might take for granted: sitting still and upright, allowing his muscles to relax, and forming the words with his lips and tongue. All of these things require incredible amounts of effort for a person with cerebral palsy. Yet in this short speech Porter employed several techniques that are the hallmark of the Master Presenter, which weâll explore in later chapters. He put himself in a positive psychological state by opening with a statement that projected self-confidence: âI know I can do this job.â Then he lent authority to that assertion by offering bona fides that the interviewer had to respect: âIâve been successfully selling for the past ten years. Itâs in my blood. My father is a successful salesman.â Finally, he used a technique called Future Pacing, essentially leading his audience to a picture of the outcome Porter intended to generate: âIt almost doesnât matter what product I sell, customers enjoy buying from me.â
Donât forget, weâre talking about an event that happened in 1961, decades before disability laws, when tolerance for people who were âdifferentâ ebbed very low. Porter got his break, but prejudice being what it is, the sales manager assigned Porter to the worst, most hopeless territory in Portland, where people lived in dire poverty and the houses were falling down. And the poor man was working on commission! But more important to Bill Porter, he had himself a job. He packed his briefcase full of color brochures, hit the street at 9 A.M., and hasnât looked back since. Porter didnât sell a single item his first day on the job. But he took time to learn all he could about the Watkins product line and understood human nature enough to use Watkinsâs money-back guarantee as a major selling point. Eventually, he went on to become one of the top salesmen in the history of Watkins Products, and their top salesman ever in the Northwest. None of his colleagues, so far as I know, had to struggle with Porterâs physical challenges. On the other hand, Iâll bet that none of them made presentations as masterfully, either.
A Master Presenter
Bill Porter was an only child. When it became clear that, in the natural order of things, his father and mother would predecease himâand that he was not capable of performing work that required manual dexterityâhe realized that becoming a Master Presenter was the only chance he had to live a dignified and independent life. What makes me so sure that Porter is a Master Presenter? Iâll answer with another question. Tell me, what choice did a man in his position have? Bill Porter never went to college, so he couldnât become a professional. He might, I suppose, have become an office clerk of some kind. But having chosen to be a salesman, how could he possibly succeed if he allowed his presentation ability to cruise along at an average level? People with disabilities usually have to compensate somehow. Like the blind person who listens more attentively, Porter compensated for his weaknesses by building other strengths.
Amazingly, in order to succeed Bill Porter had to overcome one of the most powerful principles that help people connect with one another. As youâll learn in the next chapter, people overwhelmingly like folks who are like themselves and tend to distrust those who are different. Porterâwho walks hunched over, has limited use of his hands, and slurs his wordsâwas like very few people upon whose doors he knocked. To achieve success as a commissioned door-to-door salesman in this position required both monumental effort and complete mastery of presentation techniques.
This assertion is confirmed by some of the other elements of Porterâs story. I...