Chapter 1
Introduction
What number systems allow the arithmetic operations of addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division?
In order to count, we need integers. How high can we count? There are finite number systems—and the universe itself may be finite—but let’s assume that we can count to infinity, or, more precisely, that there’s no largest number. In order to subtract, we also need zero, as well as negative numbers. As we said, we need the integers, namely
Integer arithmetic works fine for addition, subtraction, and multiplication, but what about division? Now we need fractions, or, more formally, the rational numbers
Now we can indeed do arithmetic. However, we cannot measure the hypotenuse of a right triangle, or the circumference of a circle. For those operations, we need the real numbers, denoted
, which include rational numbers such as 3 or
, but also irrational numbers such as
or
π.
Are we done yet? No, because there are algebraic equations we still can’t solve. The simplest example is
whose solutions, if any, would be square roots of −1. As you may know, the complex numbers ℂ consist of both real numbers and real multiples of
. Furthermore, all
nth order polynomial equations have exactly
n solutions over ℂ (counting multiplicity). The complex numbers may seem like a mathematical toy; who needs the square root of negative numbers? It turns out that quantum mechanics is an inherently complex theory; complex
numbers are an essential ingredient in our current understanding of the world around us.
Are we done yet? Maybe. What are the rules? Even over the complex numbers, the rules are slightly different, as evidenced by the apparent paradox
which forces us to rethink the rules for manipulating square roots. Can we change the rules in other ways?
Yes, we can. First of all, we can drop the requirement that numbers commute with each other. However counterintuitive this may feel, there is good reason to suspect that such numbers could be useful, since there are many physical operations where the order matters. A mathematical example where order matters is matrix multiplication, where in general AB ≠ BA. As we will see, this choice leads to the quaternions, ℍ.
Can we go further? Yes, by dropping associativity. Why would we do that? Well, matrix multiplication is associative, but the cross product is not. Can you work out
Not without knowing which product to do first! As we will see, this choice leads to the octonions,
.
Can we go further? No; going further requires us to give up division. More precisely, the four algebras ℝ, ℂ, ℍ, and
are the only ones without zero divisors, that is, nonzero elements whose product is nonetheless zero.
The octonions are thus nature’s largest division algebra. This author believes that this largest mathematical structure will ultimately be seen as the key to understanding the basic building blocks of nature, namely the fundamental particles such as electrons and quarks.
The goal of this book is to introduce the reader to the mathematics of the octonions, while offering some hints as to how they might be useful in physics. Let’s begin.
PART I
Number Systems
Chapter 2
The Geometry of the Complex Numbers
2.1Complex Numbers
Begin with the real numbers,
. Add “the” square root of −1; call it
i. You have just constructed the complex numbers, ℂ, in the form
That is, a complex number z is a pair of real numbers(a, b), which is usually written as
and which can be thought of as either a point in the (complex) plane with coordinates (a, b) or as a vector with components a and b.
2.2History
Complex numbers were first used in the 16th century in order to solve cubic equations, as there are some cases with real solutions that nonetheless require the use of complex numbers in order to obtain those solutions. The recognition of the complex numbers as an object worthy of study in their own right is usually attributed to Rafael Bombelli, who in 1572 was the first to formalize the rules of complex arithmetic (and also, at the same time, the first to wri...