Contents
| | | Introductions |
| | | Preface by the Editor |
| | 1. | Beginning of the Wild-Goose Chase |
| | 2. | I First Hear of Mr Andrew Lumley |
| | 3. | Tells of a Midsummer Night |
| | 4. | I Follow the Trail of the Super-Butler |
| | 5. | I Take a Partner |
| | 6. | The Restaurant in Antioch Street |
| | 7. | I Find Sanctuary |
| | 8. | The Power-House |
| | 9. | Return of the Wild Geese |
Introduction
The Power-House is one of the least known of Buchanâs mature works, a tale without a plot, and so full of holes that it calls to mind Samuel Johnsonâs definition of a ânetworkâ â âanything reticulated and desuccated, at equal distances, with interstices between the intersectionsâ. It is pure essence of Buchan â a demonstration of his magical power to weave a tale out of no materials but the threads and colours of his imagination. It does, however, possess a theme â John Bunyanâs idea, in Pilgrimâs Progress, of men of goodwill and courage struggling with an intelligent, evil power at the root of all the worldâs troubles and confusions. The same idea inspired the Richard Hannay stories that quickly followed the appearance of The Power-House in 1913: The Thirty-nine Steps, Greenmantle, Mr Standfast and The Three Hostages. However, in none of Buchanâs books is there a keener sense of place or a clearer victory of sense over unreason than in The Power-House.
The novel was written for Blackwoodâs Magazine at a time when Buchan, working with the Scottish publisher Nelson, was bringing out pocket editions of literature. Already a bestselling novelist â Prester John was published in 1910 â the back of his mind must have been full of scraps of A.E.W. Mason, W.W. Jacobs, H.G. Wells, Conrad and Hilaire Belloc, all republished at sevenpence, as well as ideas from his long-time favourites, Stevenson, Kipling, Conan Doyle, Rider Haggard and possibly even from Edgar Wallace, whose Four Just Men came out in 1906. Strains of all these permeate The Power-House. It needed only the advent of the Great War, together with a powerful injection of Buchanâs own international wartime intelligence experiences and a string of characters drawn from his wide circle of political and military friends, to turn The Power-House formula into that of the Hannay books.
In his autobiography, published in 1940, Buchan confesses he is âfascinated by the notion of hurried journeys . . . a theme common to Homer and the penny reciters, [appealing] to a very ancient instinct in human nature . . . Whether failure or success results, life is sharpened, intensified, idealisedâ. The Power-House embodies this philosophy, as well as Buchanâs conception of the hero as a man of sense, the best of his land and country, a thoroughgoing Etoneducated gentleman. Such a man is intelligent enough not to be âbrainyâ, and is most fully alive when, abandoning comfort, he confronts the wild â conceived of as a moor or mountain inhabited by hostile foreigners.
The hero of The Power-House is Leithen (named after a tributary of the River Tweed in Scotland). Like Buchan, he is a barrister, but also a sportsman. Buchan sets his protagonist the task of solving the problems of a lady troubled with a disappearing husband. However, it is a smoking-room desperado who goes to Uzbekistan to do the actual husbandrescuing rough stuff, while Leithen is subjected to the attentions of the Evil One in the streets of London and the leafy byways of Surrey. The storytelling touch, which never fails with Buchan, is to mirror the cheerful and the humdrum with the deeply sinister and the threatening, producing a kind of nightmare which only steadfast courage and good judgement can restore to sanity and sense.
However, Leithenâs virtues are hardly the point of interest. What really makes this book hum is the first appearance of the Buchan villain, already fully fledged. In this tale he is called Andrew Lumley, but in later books much the same character appears as Graf von Schwabing, Medina or even Hilda von Einem. Lumley, alias Julius Pavia, is English, but with a touch of the Hapsburg about his jaw. Like von Schwabing in The Thirty-nine Steps, Buchan makes him appear first in a library. Medina in The Three Hostages also has a library â âas mysterious as the aisles of a forest', filled with âbooks, books, old books full of forgotten knowledgeâ.
Curiously, all the Buchan villains have sinister eyes, Lumley so much so that he has to wear green spectacles. Von Schwabing can hood his eyes like a hawk and they are, moreover, âcold, malignant, unearthly and horribly cleverâ. Medinaâs are ânot the pale blue . . . [of] our Norse ancestry, but [like] a sapphire, entrancingâ. Von Einemâs eyes pass the paleness test, but are âstrange, potent . . . the cold eyes of the fanaticâ. However, she has compensatory aspects.
Despite their menacing eyes, alien names and jawlines, Buchanâs villains, like his heroes, move in the best circles and attend the most distinguished dinners. They play for the highest stakes. But their sophistication is a masquerade â middle-classness lurks not far beneath the surface. Lumley has mercantile connections, a house in Blackheath, and a very un-Jeeves-like ex-trades-unionist butler. Von Schwabing looks like Mr Pickwick, calls himself âMoxon Ivery', addresses a meeting of the âNew Movementâ in Biggleswick and plays tennis under the pseudonym of Percy Appleton. No gentleman would dream of doing any of that. Even Medina, though indubitably a squire, performs evil deeds in Gospel Oak.
Furthermore, they are all spies and impersonators. Granted, Hannay is not averse to amateur dramatics, but despite passing for a renegade Dutch peasant or a Highland road-mender, he remains ineffably gentlemanly. At no time does Hannay resort to hypnosis to learn the enemyâs secrets, as Medina does, or size them up for seduction like von Einem, or seek, like Lumley, to undermine their morale with tall propositions about the twilight of the world.
It is never clear in Buchanâs tales what really drives all these villains on. What are they actually after? When Leithen ventures to probe this, Lumley answers, âHow should I be able to tell you? . . . I cannot pry into motives . . . I only know of the existence of vast extra-social intelligences; let us say that they distrust the machine.â According to MacGillivray of Scotland Yard, more clues are available âin the sonnet of a poet anarchist who shot himself in the slums of Antwerp, and in the extra-ordinary testimony of a Professor Mâ of Jena who at the age of thirty-seven took his life after writing a strange mystical message to his fellow-citizens.â Tantalising stuff, but we learn no more.
In Buchan, the fate of the villains does not vary â defeated by straight dealing and gentlemanly behaviour, they simply deliquesce. Schwabing does so twice, once during a bombing raid on London and then again when made to fight honestly, at which point he runs and is shot by his own people. Medina, cornered on a crag, unsportingly attempts a murder and falls to his death, but it is left uncertain as to whether this is through suicide or fatigue. Lumley does at least meet the final act like a gentleman. He tries a bargain, recognises defeat, and promptly expires. One thing is clear: vanity and ambition does for all of them. Von Einem is the exception â she fails, of course, because she is a woman. Her sin is pride, not vanity, and she dies like a hero.
Of course, the Buchan villain never operates single-handedly: behind each one can be found armies of underlings. At least three hundred aides, many in disguise, must have been required to track Leithen round London, pushing him into deserted building sites and luring him into taxis. Von Einem seems to command a battalion of German officers, and Schwabing keeps scores of gillies and a monoplane in Galloway on the off-chance that somebody would need to be hunted over the moors. These villains are able to operate as monarchs of crime, seeking to destroy a civilisation that has lost, in Lumleyâs words, âits one great power â the terror of God and his Churchâ. They are a cerebral corporation, ânameless brains, working silently in the background', occasionally producing âsome cataclysmic revelationâ â such as the Great War itself. âSome day there will come the marriage of knowledge and will, and then the world will march', Lumley says. The dark forces are internationalised, or, as we might say nowadays, globalised. To the fore are international unions of workers and meetings of middle-class intellectuals. Worst of all is their âhalf-scientific, halfphilosophic jargon . . . dear . . . to the hearts of the half- bakedâ. Very true, of course, and the thinness of the crust of civilisation, whatever that may nowadays be, is as relevant in our time as it was when Buchan was writing in the early war- torn years of the twentieth century. This bookâs intoxicating blend of madness with scents of home and countryside must have appealed powerfully to fighting men facing the one and longing for the other. It is easy to see why.
Stella Rimington
May 2007
TO MAJOR-GENERAL SIR FRANCIS LLOYD, K.C.B.
My Dear General,
A recent tale of mine has, I am told, found favour in the dug-outs and billets of the British front, as being sufficiently short and sufficiently exciting for men who have little leisure to read. My friends in that uneasy region have asked for more. So I have printed this story, written in the smooth days before the war, in the hope that it may enable an honest man here and there to forget for an hour the too urgent realities. I have put your name on it, because among the many tastes which we share, one is a liking for precipitous yarns.
J.B.
PREFACE BY THE EDITOR
We were at Glenaicill â six of us â for the duck-shooting, when Leithen told us this story. Since five in the morning we had been out on the skerries, and had been blown home by a wind which threatened to root the house and its wind-blown woods from their precarious lodgment on the hill. A vast nondescript meal, luncheon and dinner in one, had occupied us till the last daylight departed, and we settled ourselves in the smoking-room for a sleepy evening of talk and tobacco.
Conversation, I remember, turned on some of Jimâs trophies which grinned at us from the firelit walls, and we began to spin hunting yarns. Then Hoppy Bynge, who was killed next year on the Bramaputra, told us some queer things about his doings in New Guinea, where he tried to climb Carstensz, and lived for six months in mud. Jim said he couldnât abide mud â anything was better than a country where your boots rotted. (He was to get enough of it last winter in the Ypres Salient.) You know how one tale begets another, and soon the whole place hummed with odd recollections, for five of us had been a good deal about the world.
All except Leithen, the man who was afterwards Solicitor-General, and, they say, will get to the Woolsack in time. I donât suppose he had ever been farther from home than Monte Carlo, but he liked hearing about the ends of the earth.
Jim had just finished a fairly steep yarn about his experiences on a Boundary Commission near Lake Chad, and Leithen got up to find a drink.
âLucky devils,â he said. âYouâve had all the fun out of life. Iâve had my nose to the grindstone ever since I left school.â
I said something about his having all the honour and glory.
âAll the same,â he went on, âI once played the chief part in a rather exciting business without ever once budging from London. And the joke of it was that the man who went out to look for adventure only saw a bit of the game, and I who sat in my chambers saw it all and pulled the strings. âThey also serve who only stand and wait,â you know.â
Then he told us this story. The version I give is one he afterwards wrote down, when he had looked up his diary for some of the details.
ONE
Beginning of the Wild-Goose Chase
It all started one afternoon early in May when I came out of the House of Commons with Tommy Deloraine. I had got in by an accident at a by-election, when I was supposed to be fighting a forlorn hope, and as I was just beginning to be busy at the Bar I found my hands pretty full. It was before Tommy succeeded, in the days when he sat for the family seat in Yorkshire, and that afternoon he was in a powerful bad temper. Out of doors it was jolly spring weather; there was greenery in Parliament Square and bits of gay colour, and a light wind was blowing up from the river. Inside a dull debate was winding on, and an advertising member had been trying to get up a row with the Speaker. The contrast between the frowsy place and the cheerful world outside would have impressed even the soul of a Government Whip.
Tommy sniffed the spring breeze like a supercilious stag.
âThis about finishes me,â he groaned. âWhat a juggins I am to be mouldering here! Joggleberry is the celestial limit, what they call in happier lands the pink penultimate. And the frowst on those back benches! Was there ever such a motheaten old museum?â
âIt is the Mother of Parliaments,â I observed.
âDamned monkey-house,â said Tommy. âI must get off for a bit or Iâll bonnet Joggleberry or get up and propose a national monument to Guy Fawkes or something silly.â
I did not see him for a day or two, and then one morning he rang me up and peremptorily summoned me to dine with him. I went, knowing very well what I should find. Tommy was off next day to shoot lions on the Equator, or something equally unconscientious. He was a bad acquaintance for a placid, sedentary soul like me, for though he could work like a Trojan when the fit took him, he was never at the same job very long. In the same week he would harass an Under-Secretary about horses for the Army, write voluminously to the press about a gun he had invented for potting aeroplanes, give a fancy-dress ball which he forgot to attend, and get into the semi-final of the racquets championship. I waited daily to see him start a new religion.
That night, I recollect, he had an odd assortment of guests. A Cabinet Minister was there, a gentle being for whom Tommy professed public scorn and private affection; a sailor; an Indian cavalry fellow; Chapman, the Labour member, whom Tommy called Chipmunk; myself, and old Milson of the Treasury. Our host was in tremendous form, chaffing everybody, and sending Chipmunk into great rolling gusts of merriment. The two lived adjacent in Yorkshire, and on platforms abused each other like pickpockets.
Tommy enlarged on the misfits of civilised life. He maintained that none of us, except perhaps the sailor and the cavalryman, were at our proper jobs. He would have had Wytham â that was the Minister â a cardinal of the Roman Church, and he said that Milson should have been the Warden of a college full of port and prejudice. Me he was kind enough to allocate to some reconstructed Imperial General Staff, merely because I had a craze for military history. Tommyâs perception did not go very deep. He told Chapman he should have been a lumberman in California. âYouâd have made an uncommon good logger, Chipmunk, and you know youâre a dashed bad politician.â
When questioned about himself he became reticent, as the newspapers say. âI doubt if Iâm much good at any job,â he confessed, âexcept to ginger up my friends. Anyhow Iâm getting out of this hole. Paired for the rest of the session with a chap who has lockjaw. Iâm off to stretch my legs and get back my sense of proportion.â
Someone asked him where he was going, and was told âVenezuela, to buy Government bonds and look for birdsâ nests.â
Nobody took Tommy seriously, so his guests did not trouble to bid him the kind of farewell a prolonged journey would demand. But when the others had gone, and we were sitting in the little back smoking-room on the first floor, he became solemn. Portentously solemn, for he wrinkled up his brows and dropped his jaw in the way he had when he fancied he was in earnest.
âIâve taken on a queer job, Leithen,â he said, âand I want you to hear about it. None of my family know, and I would like to leave some one behind me who could get on to my tracks if things got troublesome.â
I braced myself for some preposterous confidence, for I was experienced in Tommyâs vagaries. But I own to being surprised when he asked me if I remembered Pitt-Heron.
I remembered Pitt-Heron very well. He had been at Oxford with me, but he was no great friend of mine, though for about two years Tommy and he had been inseparable. He had had a prodigious reputation for cleverness with everybody but the college authorities, and used to spend his vacations doing mad things in the Alps and the Balkans, and writing about them in the halfpenny press. He was enormously rich â cottonmills and Liverpool ground-rents â and being without a father, did pretty much what his fantastic taste dictated. He was rather a hero for a bit after he came down, for he had made some wild journey in the neighbourhood of Afghanistan, and written an exciting book about it.
Then he married a pretty cousin of Tommyâs, who happened to be the only person that ever captured my stony heart, and settled down in London. I did not go to their house, and soon I found that very few of his friends saw much of him either. His travels...